skip to main content
10.1145/2463728.2463810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

E-government portals in central America: a preliminary evaluation and ranking (2011--2012)

Published: 22 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Developing e-government strategies and particularly Internet portals could be considered an important trend for public administrations worldwide. These government-wide websites could potentially provide useful information and services and, at the same time, become the gateways for citizen participation and collaboration with government. However, the development of these tools and their potential impacts are not the same for developed and developing countries and there is not enough research about less developed nations. This paper applies a multi-dimensional evaluation model to the national portals of Central American countries (2011-2012) and starts providing some of the necessary knowledge about this particular reality. The model was first used in 2005 for evaluating Mexican state portals and has been systematically refined during the last 7 years. The results clearly identify important gaps and opportunities for improvement in most Central American countries.

References

[1]
Bannister, F. 2007. The Curse of the Benchmark: An Assessment of the Validity and Value of E-Government Comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 73, 2 (Jun. 2007), 171--188.
[2]
Bannister, F. and Connolly, R. 2011. Trust and transformational government: A proposed framework for research. Government Information Quarterly. 28, 2 (2011), 137--147.
[3]
Gasco, M. 2005. Exploring the E-Government Gap in South America. International Journal of Public Administration. 28, 7, 8 (2005), 683--701.
[4]
Gil-Garcia, J. R. and Martinez-Moyano, I. J. 2007. Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly. 24, 2 (2007), 266--290.
[5]
Goldkuhl, G. and Persson, A. 2006. From e-ladder to e-diamond -- re--conceptualising models for public e-services. ECIS 2006 Proceedings (Göteborg, Sweden, Jan. 2006).
[6]
Gottschalk, P. 2009. Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly. 26, 1 (2009), 75--81.
[7]
Grullon, M. and Tavarez, D. 2009. Progress and challenges for e-government in the Dominican Republic. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance ICEGOV 09. 328 (2009), 411.
[8]
Gutierrez, M. A. 2004. Latin America and the digital economy challenge. foresight. 6, 3 (2004), 163--172.
[9]
Kunstelj, M. and Vintar, M. 2004. Evaluating the progress of e-government development: A critical analysis. Info. Pol. 9, 3, 4 (Diciembre. 2004), 131--148.
[10]
Lau, T. Y. et al. 2008. Adoption of e-government in three Latin American Countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommunications Policy. 32, 2 (2008), 88--100.
[11]
Layne, K. and Lee, J. W. 2001. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly. 18, 2 (2001), 122--136.
[12]
Luna-Reyes, L. F. et al. 2009. Ranking Estatal 2009 de Portales. gob. Politica Digital. 51 (Agosto. 2009), 10--12.
[13]
Luna-Reyes, L. F. et al. 2008. The Impact of Institutions on Interorganizational IT Projects in the Mexican Federal Government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research. 4, 2 (2008), 27--42.
[14]
Ngwenyama, O. and Morawczynski, O. 2009. Factors affecting ICT expansion in emerging economies: An analysis of ICT infrastructure expansion in five Latin American countries. Information Technology for Development. 15, 4 (2009), 237--258.
[15]
Rorissa, A. et al. 2011. Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly. 28, 3 (Jul. 2011), 354--362.
[16]
Rubino-Hallman, S. and Hanna, N. K. 2006. New technologies for public sector transformation: A critical analysis of e-government initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of EGovernment. 3, 3 (2006), 3--39.
[17]
Sandoval, R. and Gil-García, J. R. 2008. Limitations of Evolutionary Approaches to E-government. Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology. D. Garson and M. Khosrow-Pour, eds. IGI-Group. 22--30.
[18]
Sandoval-Almazan, R. 2010. Ranking de Portales de Transparencia: La medición 2010. Política Digital.
[19]
Sandoval-Almazán, R. et al. 2007. Ranking de portales estatales, la medición 2007. Política Digital. 38 (2007), 30--32.
[20]
Sandoval-Almazán, R. et al. 2008. Ranking estatal 2008 de portales. gob. Política Digital. 7, 45 (2008), 50--58.
[21]
Sandoval-Almazan, R. and García, J. R. G. 2006. A examen, los portales. gob estatales. Política Digital. 29 (May. 2006), 30--32.
[22]
Sandoval-Almazan, R. and Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2011. Gobierno Electrónico, Apertura y Transparencia en Centro América. Dialogo Regional sobre la Sociedad de la Información.
[23]
Silvana, Rubino-Hallman 2002. E-Government In Latin America And The Caribbean. Reinventing Governance In The Information Age. Information Age (Caracas, Venezuela, 2002), 1--19.
[24]
Su, S. 2005. Transnational Information Sharing, Event Notification, Rule Enforcement and Process Coordination. International Journal of Electronic Government Research. 1, 2 (2005), 1--26.
[25]
Yildiz, M. 2007. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly,. 24, 3 (2007), 646--665.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
October 2012
547 pages
ISBN:9781450312004
DOI:10.1145/2463728
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Govt: Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Government
  • University at Albany - State University of New York: University at Albany - State University of New York

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Central America
  2. assessment
  3. e-government
  4. e-government portals
  5. metrics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Dialogo Regional sobre la Sociedad de la Informacion (DIRSI), Lima, Peru

Conference

ICEGOV '12
Sponsor:
  • Macao Foundation, Macao SAR Govt
  • University at Albany - State University of New York

Acceptance Rates

ICEGOV '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 98 submissions, 23%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media