skip to main content
10.1145/2070562.2070586acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bandwidth on demand for inter-data center communication

Published: 14 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Cloud service providers use replication across geographically distributed data centers to improve end-to-end performance as well as to offer high reliability under failures. Content replication often involves the transfer of huge data sets over the wide area network and demands high backbone transport capacity. In this paper, we discuss how a Globally Reconfigurable Intelligent Photonic Network (GRIPhoN) between data centers could improve operational flexibility for cloud service providers. The proposed GRIPhoN architecture is an extension of earlier work [34] and can provide a bandwidth-on-demand service ranging from low data rates (e.g., 1 Gbps) to high data rates (e.g., 10-40 Gbps). The inter-data center communication network which is currently statically provisioned could be dynamically configured based on demand. Today's backbone optical networks can take several weeks to provision a customer's private line connection. GRIPhoN would enable cloud operators to dynamically set up and tear down their connections (sub-wavelength or wavelength rates) within a few minutes. GRIPhoN also offers cost-effective restoration capabilities at wavelength rates and automated bridge-and-roll of private line connections to minimize the impact of planned maintenance activities.

References

[1]
S. Agarwal, J. Dunagan, N. Jain, S. Saroiu, A. Wolman, and H. Bhogan. Volley: automated data placement for geo-distributed cloud services. In NSDI, 2010.
[2]
Apple icloud. http://www.apple.com/icloud/.
[3]
B. S. Arnaud, J. Wu, and B. Kalali. Customer-controlled and -managed optical networks. In Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2003.
[4]
Amazon Simple Storage Service, aws.amazon.com/s3/.
[5]
Windows azure. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/.
[6]
Y. Chen, S. Jain, V. K. Adhikari, Z.-L. Zhang, and K. Xu. A first look at inter-data center traffic characteristics via yahoo! datasets. In IEEE INFOCOM. 2011.
[7]
A. L. Chiu, G. Choudhury, G. Clapp, R. Doverspike, J. W. Gannett, J. G. Klincewicz, G. Li, R. A. Skoog, J. Strand, A. von Lehmen, and D. Xu. Network design and architectures for highly dynamic next-generation ip-over-optical long distance networks. In Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2009.
[8]
M. Chowdhury, M. Zaharia, J. Ma, M. I. Jordan, and I. Stoica. Managing data transfers in computer clusters with Orchestra. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2011.
[9]
R. Doverspike. Practical aspects of bandwidth-on-demand in optical networks. In Panel on Emerging Networks, Service Provider Summit, OFC, 2007.
[10]
Facebook Statistics. www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics.
[11]
N. Farrington, G. Porter, S. Radhakrishnan, H. H. Bazzaz, V. Subramanya, Y. Fainman, G. Papen, and A. Vahdat. Helios: a hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2010.
[12]
M. D. Feuer, D. C. Kilper, and S. L. Woodward, ROADMS and their system applications. In Optical Fiber Telecommunications VB. New York: Academic Press, 2008.
[13]
S. Figueira, S. Naiksata, H. Cohen, D. Cutrell, P. Daspit, D. Gutierrez, and D. B. Hoang. DWDM-RAM: Enabling grid services with dynamic optical networks. In IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2004.
[14]
Forrester research. http://info.infineta.com/1/5622/2011-01-27/Y26.
[15]
Google, http://www.google.com/corporate/datacenter/index.html.
[16]
A. Greenberg, J. Hamilton, D. A. Maltz, and P. Patel. The cost of a cloud: research problems in data center networks. In ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 2009.
[17]
A. Greenberg, J. R. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim, P. Lahiri, D. A. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. VL2: a scalable and tlexible data center network. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009.
[18]
C. Guo, G. Lu, D. Li, H. Wu, X. Zhang, Y. Shi, C. Tian, Y. Zhang, and S. Lu. BCube: a high performance, server-centric network architecture for modular data centers. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009.
[19]
C. Guo, H. Wu, K. Tan, L. Shi, Y. Zhang, and S. Lu, DCell: a scalable and fault-tolerant network structure for data centers. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2008.
[20]
Perspectives - James Hamilton's Blog, Inter-Datacenter replication & geo-redundancy. http://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2010/05/10/InterDatacenterReplicationGeoRedundancy.aspx.
[21]
Ibm smart cloud. http://www.ibm.com/cloud-computing/us/en/.
[22]
N. Laoutaris, M. Sirivianos, X. Yang, and P. Rodriguez, Inter-datacenter bulk transfers with NetStitcher. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2011.
[23]
N. Laoutaris, G. Smaragdakis, P. Rodriguez, and R. Sundaraam. Delay tolerant bulk data transfers on the internet. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2009.
[24]
T. Lehman, J. Sobieski, and B. Jabbari. DRAGON: a framework for service provisioning in heterogeneous grid networks. In IEEE Communications Magazine, 2006.
[25]
R. Niranjan Mysore, A. Pamboris, N. Farrington, N. Huang, P. Miri, S. Radhakrishnan, V. Subramanya, and A. Vahdat. Portland: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009.
[26]
K. Oikonomou and R. Sinha. Network design and cost analysis of optical vpns. In OFC, 2006.
[27]
Optical mesh service (OMS). http://http://www.business.att.com/wholesale/Service/data-networking-wholesale/long-haul-access-wholesale/optical-mesh-service-wholesale/.
[28]
A. Singla, A. Singh, K. Ramachandran, L. Xu, and Y. Zhang. Proteus: A topology malleable data center network. In ACM HotNets, 2010.
[29]
G. Wang, D. G. Andersen, M. Kaminsky, M. Kozuch, T. S. E. Ng, K. Papagiannaki, and M. Ryan. c-Through: Part-time optics in data centers. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2010.
[30]
S. L. Woodward, M. D. Feuer, J. L. Jackel, and A. Agarwal. Massively-scaleable highly-dynamic optical node design. In OFC/NFOEC, 2010.
[31]
H. Wu, G. Lu, D. Li, C. Guo, and Y. Zhang. MDCube: a high performance network structure for modular data center interconnection. In ACM CoNEXT, 2009.
[32]
Yahoo! http://www.yahoo.com/.
[33]
O. Yu, A. Li, Y. Cao, L. Yin, M. Liao, and H. Xu. Multi-domain lambda grid data portal for collaborative grid applications. Future Gener. Comput, Syst., 2006.
[34]
X. J. Zhang, M. Birk, A. Chiu, R. Doverspike, M. D. Feuer, P. Magill, E. Mavrogiorgis, J. Pastor, S. L. Woodward, and J. Yates. Bridge-and-roll demonstration in griphon (globally reconfigurable intelligent photonic network). In OFC, 2010.
[35]
X. Zheng, M. Veeraraghavan, N. S. V. Rao, Q. Wu, and M. Zhu, CHEETAH: Circuit-switched high-speed end-to-end transport architecture testbed. In IEEE Communications Magazine, 2005.
[36]
D. Ziegler. Distributed peta-scale data transfer. http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~dhay/IND2011.html.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Bandwidth on demand for inter-data center communication

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HotNets-X: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
    November 2011
    148 pages
    ISBN:9781450310598
    DOI:10.1145/2070562
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 November 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. OTN
    2. ROADM
    3. inter-data center communication
    4. reliability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HOTNETS-X
    Sponsor:
    HOTNETS-X: Tenth ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
    November 14 - 15, 2011
    Massachusetts, Cambridge

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 460 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media