skip to main content
10.1145/2038476.2038523acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Google news: how user-friendly is it for the blind?

Published: 03 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Being able to read text, find out information and know about the latest news has always been a challenge for those who cannot access the printed version, such as the visually-impaired. The advent of the Web has been a big step in the right direction for blind people to obtain up-to-date information on the internet. Many portals and Web sites offer online services for up-to-date news. In this paper our aim is to evaluate how easy and rewarding it is for blind people to access this. For this purpose, we are focusing on the well-known online service provided by Google, i.e. Google News as a case study. In order to truly benefit from access to the information available on the Web, the page interface must be simple and easy to use by everyone, including people who have to use assistive technologies. In this work we analyze not only the accessibility of the service offered by Google for its News, but also in particular the usability when interacting via screen reader.

References

[1]
Borodin, Y. P., Bigham, J., Dausch, G. and Ramakrishnan, I. V. 2010. More than Meets the Eye: A Survey of Screen-Reader Browsing Strategies. In Proc. of the 2010 international workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), Raleigh, NC (USA), April 26--27, 2010.
[2]
Craig, J. and Cooper, M. 2011. Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation, 18 January 2011 at http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/.
[3]
Donker, H., Klante, P. and Gorny, P. 2002. The design of auditory user interfaces for blind users. In Proc. of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
[4]
Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., and Malarkey, C. 2007. What Frustrates Screen Reader Users on the Web: A Study of 100 Blind Users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 22(3), 2007, pp. 247--269.
[5]
Leporini, B., Andronico, P., Buzzi, M. and Castillo, C. 2008. Evaluating a modified Google user interface via screen reader. In the Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS), Vol. 7(3), 2008, pp. 155--175.
[6]
Leporini, B. and Paternò, F. 2008. Applying web usability criteria for vision-impaired users: does it really improve task performance? In "International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction" (IJHCI), Vol. 24, issue 1, January 2008, pp. 17--47.
[7]
Mankoff, J., Fait, H. and Tran, T. 2005. Is your web page accessible? a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human factors in Computing Systems, CHI '05.
[8]
Petrie, H., Hamilton, F. and King, N. 2004. Tension, what tension?: Website accessibility and visual design. In the 2004 international workshop W4A, pp. 13--18.
[9]
Tatcher, J. 2006. Assistive technology: screen readers and browsers. Chapter in the book "Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance", Rutter et al. (ED), Springer, 2006. pp. 103--124.
[10]
Theofanos, M. F. and Redish, J. 2003. Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability, ACM Interactions magazine, ACM Press, Nov. - Dec. 2003 issue, pp.36--51.
[11]
Trewin, S., John, B. E., Richards, J., Swart, C., Brezin, J. Bellamy, R. and Thomas, J. 2010. Towards a tool for keystroke level modeling of skilled screen reading. In Proc. of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10), Orlando, Florida (USA), October 25--27, 2010.
[12]
W3C. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/.
[13]
Watanabe, T. 2007. Experimental evaluation of usability and accessibility of heading elements. In Proc. of the 2007 international-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A), Banff. New York, May 7-8, 2007. ACM Press; 2007 pp. 157--164.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGDOC '11: Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on Design of communication
October 2011
308 pages
ISBN:9781450309363
DOI:10.1145/2038476
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 October 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. accessibility
  2. blind users
  3. news service
  4. screen reader
  5. usability
  6. user interfaces

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGDOC'11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGDOC '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 75 submissions, 48%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media