skip to main content
10.1145/2037373.2037397acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The effects of walking, feedback and control method on pressure-based interaction

Published: 30 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a study looking into the effects of walking and the use of visual and audio feedback on the application of pressure for linear targeting. Positional and Rate-based control methods are compared in order to determine which allows for more stable and accurate selections, both while sitting and mobile. Results suggest that Rate-based control is superior for both mobile (walking) and static (sitting) linear targeting, and that mobility significantly increases errors, selection time and subjective workload. The use of only audio feedback significantly increased errors and task time for Positional control and static Rate-based control, but not mobile Rate-based control. Despite this, the results still suggest that audio control of pressure interaction while walking is highly accurate and usable.

References

[1]
Brewster, S. Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2002. 6: p. 188--205.
[2]
Brewster, S. and M. Hughes. Pressure-Based Text Entry for Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2009, Bonn, Germany.
[3]
Cechanowicz, J., P. Irani, and S. Subramanian. Augmenting the mouse with pressure sensitive input. In Proceedings of CHI 2007, San Jose, California.
[4]
Crossan, A., M. McGill, S. Brewster, and R. Murray-Smith. Head Tilting for Interaction in Mobile Contexts. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2009, Bonn, Germany.
[5]
Crossan, A., R. Murray-Smith, and S. Brewster. Gait phase effects in mobile interaction. In CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts, Portland, Oregon.
[6]
Kildal, J. 3D-Press: Haptic Illusion of Compliance when Pressing on a Rigid Surface. In ICMI 2010, Beijing, China.
[7]
Marentakis, G. and S. Brewster. Effects of Feedback, Mobility and Index of Difficulty on Deictic Spatial Audio Target Acquisition in the Horizontal Plane. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, Montreal, Quebec.
[8]
McCallum, D., E. Mak, P. Irani, and S. Subramanian. PressureText: pressure input for mobile phone text entry. In Proceedings of CHI 2009, Boston, MA.
[9]
Mizobuchi, S., S. Terasaki, T. Keski-Jaskari, J. Nousiainen, M. Ryynanen, and M. Silfverberg. Making an impression: force-controlled pen input for handheld devices. In Proceedings of CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon.
[10]
Ramos, G. and R. Balakrishnan. Zliding: fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation. In Proceedings of ACM UIST 2005, Seattle, WA.
[11]
Ramos, G., M. Boulos, and R. Balakrishnan. Pressure widgets. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria.
[12]
Shi, K., P. Irani, S. Gustafson, and S. Subramanian. PressureFish: a method to improve control of discrete pressure-based input. In Proceedings of CHI 2008, Florence, Italy.
[13]
Shi, K., S. Subramanian, and P. Irani. PressureMove: Pressure Input with Mouse Movement. IFIP INTERACT 2009.
[14]
Stewart, C., M. Rohs, S. Kratz, and G. Essl. Characteristics of Pressure-Based Input for Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia.
[15]
Tang, H., D. J. Beebe, and A. F. Kramer. A multilevel input system with force-sensitive elements. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2001. 54: p. 495--507.
[16]
Wilson, G., C. Stewart, and S. Brewster. Pressure-Based Menu Selection for Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2010, Lisbon, Portugal.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The effects of walking, feedback and control method on pressure-based interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobileHCI '11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    August 2011
    781 pages
    ISBN:9781450305419
    DOI:10.1145/2037373
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Nokia
    • Swedish Institute of Computer Science: Swedish Institute of Computer Science
    • ERICSSON

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 August 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mobile interaction
    2. non-visual feedback
    3. pressure input

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    MobileHCI '11
    Sponsor:
    • Swedish Institute of Computer Science

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media