skip to main content
10.1145/1134285.1134396acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Teaching framework for software development methods

Published: 28 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we suggest a framework for teaching software development methods (SDMs). Specifically, based on our accumulative research and in-practice experience of teaching SDMs, a set of principles, that guides our teaching of SDMs in different settings and teaching experiences, has been formulated. The teaching framework consists of 14 principles that their actual implementation is varied and adjusted in different teaching environments. This paper outlines the principles and addresses their contribution to learners' understanding of the said software development method.

References

[1]
Beck, K. (2000). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley.
[2]
Beck, K. (with Andres, C., 2005, second edition). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley.
[3]
Davis, R. B., Maher, C. A. and Noddings, N. (1990, eds.). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 4, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
[4]
Dubinsky, Y. and Hazzan, O. (2004). Roles in Agile Software Development Teams, Fifth International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, pp. 157--165.
[5]
Dubinsky, Y. and Hazzan, O. (2005). A Framework for teaching software development methods, Computer Science Education 15(4), pp. 275--296.
[6]
Fowler, M. and Beck, K. (2002). Planning Extreme Programming, Boston, MA.
[7]
Hazzan, O. (2002). The reflective practitioner perspective in software engineering education, The Journal of Systems and Software 63(3), pp. 161--171.
[8]
Hazzan, O. and Dubinsky, Y. (2003A). Teaching a Software Development Methodology: The Case of Extreme Programming, The proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, Spain, pp. 176--184.
[9]
Hazzan, O. and Dubinsky, Y. (2003B). Bridging cognitive and social chasms in software development using Extreme Programming, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Genova, Italy, pp. 47--53.
[10]
Hazzan, O. and Tomayko, J. (2003). The reflective practitioner perspective in eXtreme Programming, Proceedings of the XP Agile Universe 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 51--61.
[11]
Kerth, N. (2001). Project Retrospective, Dorest House Publishisng.
[12]
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
[13]
Lawler, J.M. (1999). Metaphors we compute by, In Figures of Thought: For College Writers by D.J. Hickey, Mayfield Publishing.
[14]
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner, BasicBooks,
[15]
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in The Profession, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[16]
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A. and Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3, pp. 115--163.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICSE '06: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering
May 2006
1110 pages
ISBN:1595933751
DOI:10.1145/1134285
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 May 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active learning
  2. constructivism
  3. learning
  4. software development methods
  5. software engineering
  6. software engineering education
  7. teaching

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ICSE06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media