skip to main content
article
Free access

Designing a new foundation for design

Published: 01 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

The book in which Fernando Flores and I introduced our version of the language-action perspective had an ambitious and provocative subtitle: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design [8]. This special section of Communications offers the opportunity to apply the hindsight of nearly two decades to the implicit claim in that phrase, asking how the perspective has been successful as a foundation and promises to be so in the future.

References

[1]
Dumay, M., Dietz, J., and Mulder, H. Evaluation of DEMO and the language/action perspective after 10 years of experience. In Proceedings of LAP2005.
[2]
Kelley, D. and VanPatter, G.K. Design as glue. NextD Journal 7.3 (2005).
[3]
Solomon, R.C. and Flores, F. Building Trust: In Business, Politics, Relationships, and Life. Oxford University Press (2003)
[4]
Spinosa, C., Flores, F., and Dreyfus, H.L. Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. The MIT Press, 1999.
[5]
Suchman, L. Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 2, 3 (1994), 177--190.
[6]
Winograd, T. The design of interaction. In P. Denning and B. Metcalfe, Eds., Beyond Calculation, The Next 50 Years of Computing. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
[7]
Winograd, T., Ed. Bringing Design to Software. Addison-Wesley, 1996.
[8]
Winograd, T. and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood, NJ, 1986.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Reviews

Larry Bernstein

This short muddled exposition clearly does not support the author's claims; he belies his own arguments with his fuzziness. That the language-aspect perspective (LAP) is a foundation for software design is debatable. The author does not support his position with data. The notion that language can express an unambiguous design, without supporting pseudocode or diagrams, is questionable. Unified modeling language (UML) and the rational unified process (RUP) provide one reasonable counterpoint. Natural language is needed in design, but the design must also be expressed with some formal support. For example, Parnas points out that the statement "feet above sea level" was wrongly interpreted by two independent software shops [1]. The reader would do better to read about LAP than to look to this article for foundational support for LAP as a design metaphor. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 49, Issue 5
Two decades of the language-action perspective
May 2006
125 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/1125944
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2006
Published in CACM Volume 49, Issue 5

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media