skip to main content
10.1145/1101149.1101191acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

SensEye: a multi-tier camera sensor network

Published: 06 November 2005 Publication History

Abstract

This paper argues that a camera sensor network containing heterogeneous elements provides numerous benefits over traditional homogeneous sensor networks. We present the design and implementation of senseye---a multi-tier network of heterogeneous wireless nodes and cameras. To demonstrate its benefits, we implement a surveillance application using senseye comprising three tasks: object detection, recognition and tracking. We propose novel mechanisms for low-power low-latency detection, low-latency wakeups, efficient recognition and tracking. Our techniques show that a multi-tier sensor network can reconcile the traditionally conflicting systems goals of latency and energy-efficiency. An experimental evaluation of our prototype shows that, when compared to a single-tier prototype, our multi-tier senseye can achieve an order of magnitude reduction in energy usage while providing comparable surveillance accuracy.

References

[1]
J. M. Kahn and R. H. Katz and K. S. J. Pister. Mobile Networking for "Smart Dust". In Proc. of ACM MOBICOM, pages 271--278, 1999.]]
[2]
A. Gamal and L. J. Guibas. Collaborative visual sensor networks. http://mediax.stanford.edu/projects/cvsn.html]]
[3]
Sony SNC-RZ30N Camera Driver. http://cvs.nesl.ucla.edu/cvs/viewcvs.cgi/CoordinatedActuation/Actuate/]]
[4]
The CMUcam2. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/ cmucam/cmucam2/index.html]]
[5]
D A. Forsyth and J Ponce. Computer Vision: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, 2002.]]
[6]
E. Shih and P. Bahl and M. Sinclair. Wake on Wireless: An Event Driven Energy Saving Strategy for Battery Operated Devices. In Proc. of ACM MOBICOM, pages 160--171, 2002.]]
[7]
J. Elson, L. Girod, and D. Estrin. Fine-Grained Network Time Synchronization using Reference Broadcasts. In Proc. of OSDI, pages 147--163, 2002.]]
[8]
F. Zhao and M. Chu and J. E. Reich. Distributed Video Sensor Network. In Proc. of Intelligent Distributed Surveillance Systems, 2004.]]
[9]
J. Hill and R. Szewczyk and A. Woo and S. Hollar and D. Culler and Kr. Pister. System Architecture Directions for Networked Sensors. In Proc. of ASPLOS, pages 93--104, 2000.]]
[10]
P. Kulkarni, D. Ganesan, and P. Shenoy. The Case for Multi-tier Camera Sensor Networks. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV, pages 141--146, 2005.]]
[11]
X. Liu, P. Kulkarni, and P. Shenoy. Snapshot: A Self-Calibration Protocol for Camera Sensor Networks. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, 2005.]]
[12]
L.Jiao and Y. Wu and G. Wu and E. Y. Chang and Y. Wang. The Anatomy of a Multi-camera Security Surveillance System. ACM Multimedia System Journal Special Issue, pages 144--163, October 2004.]]
[13]
M. Gerla and K. Xu. Multimedia Streaming in Large-Scale Sensor Networks with Mobile Swarms. In Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, pages 72--76, 2003.]]
[14]
T. Mitchell. Machine Learning. Mc"Graw Hill, 1997.]]
[15]
Crossbow wireless sensor platform. http://www.xbow.com/Products/Wireless Sensor Networks.htm]]
[16]
N B. Priyantha and A. Chakraborty and H. Balakrishnan. The Cricket Location-Support System. In Proc. of MOBICOM, pages 32--43, 2000.]]
[17]
R. Collins and A Lipton and T. Kanade. A System for Video Surveillance and Monitoring. In Proc. of American Nuclear Society (ANS) Eighth International Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems, 1999.]]
[18]
M. Rahimi, R. Baer, J. Warrior, D. Estrin, and M. Srivastava. Cyclops: In Situ Image Sensing and Interpretation in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of ACM SENSYS, 2005.]]
[19]
A. Rosenfeld and J. L. Pfaltz. Sequential Operations in Digital Picture Processing. Journal of the ACM, 13(4):471--494, 1966.]]
[20]
J. Sorber, N. Banerjee, M. D. Corner, and S. Rollins. Turducken: Hierarchical Power Management for Mobile Devices. In Proc. of MOBISYS, pages 261--274, 2005.]]
[21]
Stargate platform. http://www.xbow.com/Products/XScale.htm]]
[22]
U.M. Erdem and S. Sclaroff. Optimal Placement of Cameras in Floorplans to Satisfy Task Requirements and Cost Constraints. In Proc. of OMNIVIS Workshop, 2004.]]
[23]
V.C. Raykar, I. Kozintsev and R. Lienhart. Position Calibration of Audio Sensors and Actuators in a Distributed Computing Platform. In Proc. of ACM Multimedia, pages 572--581, 2003.]]
[24]
W. Feng and B. Code and E. Kaiser and M. Shea and W. Feng and L. Bavoil. Panoptes: A Scalable Architecture for Video Sensor Networking Applications. In Proc. of ACM Multimedia, pages 151--167, 2003.]]
[25]
F. Zhao, J. Liu, J. Liu, L. Guibas, and J. Reich. Collaborative Signal and Information Processing: An Information Directed Approach. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(8):1199--1209, 2003.]]

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MULTIMEDIA '05: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia
November 2005
1110 pages
ISBN:1595930442
DOI:10.1145/1101149
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 November 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. camera sensors
  2. hierarchical sensor networks

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

MM05

Acceptance Rates

MULTIMEDIA '05 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 312 submissions, 16%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media