skip to main content
10.5555/3545946.3598925acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Public Access

Effectiveness of Teamwork-Level Interventions through Decision-Theoretic Reasoning in a Minecraft Search-and-Rescue Task

Published: 30 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Autonomous agents offer the promise of improved human teamwork through automated assessment and assistance during task performance [15, 16, 18]. Studies of human teamwork have identified various processes that underlie joint task performance, while abstracting away the specifics of the task [7, 11, 13, 17].We present here an agent that focuses exclusively on teamwork-level variables in deciding what interventions to use in assisting a human team. Our agent does not directly observe or model the environment or the people in it, but instead relies on input from analytic components (ACs) (developed by other research teams) that process environmental information and output only teamwork-relevant measures. Our agent models these teamwork variables and updates its beliefs over them using a Bayesian Theory of Mind [1], applying Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) [9] in a recursive manner to assess the state of the team it is currently observing and to choose interventions to best assist them.

References

[1]
Chris Baker, Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua Tenenbaum. 2011. Bayesian theory of mind: Modeling joint belief-desire attribution. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
[2]
Simon Baron-Cohen, Sally Wheelwright, Jacqueline Hill, Yogini Raste, and Ian Plumb. 2001. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, Vol. 42, 2 (2001), 241--251.
[3]
Rhyse Bendell, Jessica Williams, Stephen M Fiore, and Florian Jentsch. 2021. Towards artificial social intelligence: Inherent features, individual differences, mental models, and theory of mind. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. 20--28.
[4]
Christopher C Corral, Keerthi Shrikar Tatapudi, Verica Buchanan, Lixiao Huang, and Nancy J Cooke. 2021. Building a synthetic task environment to support artificial social intelligence research. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 65, 1 (2021), 660--664.
[5]
Jared T Freeman, Lixiao Huang, Matt Woods, and Stephen J Cauffman. 2021. Evaluating artificial social intelligence in an urban search and rescue task environment. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Computational Theory of Mind for Human-Machine Teams.
[6]
Piotr J Gmytrasiewicz and Prashant Doshi. 2004. Interactive POMDPs: Properties and preliminary results. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 3. 1374--1375.
[7]
J Richard Hackman and Ruth Wageman. 2005. A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, 2 (2005), 269--287.
[8]
Mary Hegarty, Anthony E Richardson, Daniel R Montello, Kristin Lovelace, and Ilavanil Subbiah. 2002. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, Vol. 30, 5 (2002), 425--447.
[9]
Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Anthony R Cassandra. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial intelligence, Vol. 101, 1--2 (1998), 99--134.
[10]
Ellyn Maese, Pablo Diego-Rosell, Les DeBusk-Lane, and Nathan Kress. 2021. Development of emergent leadership measurement: Implications for human-machine teams. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Computational Theory of Mind for Human-Machine Teams.
[11]
Michelle A Marks, John E Mathieu, and Stephen J Zaccaro. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, 3 (2001), 356--376.
[12]
John E Mathieu, Margaret M Luciano, Lauren D'Innocenzo, Elizabeth A Klock, and Jeffery A LePine. 2020. The development and construct validity of a team processes survey measure. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 23, 3 (2020), 399--431.
[13]
Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B MacKenzie, Robert H Moorman, and Richard Fetter. 1990. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 1, 2 (1990), 107--142.
[14]
David V Pynadath and Stacy C Marsella. 2005. PsychSim: Modeling theory of mind with decision-theoretic agents. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1181--1186.
[15]
Sangwon Seo, Lauren R Kennedy-Metz, Marco A Zenati, Julie A Shah, Roger D Dias, and Vaibhav V Unhelkar. 2021. Towards an AI coach to infer team mental model alignment in healthcare. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management. 39--44.
[16]
Gita Sukthankar, Katia Sycara, Joseph A Giampapa, Chris Burnett, and Alun Preece. 2007. Towards a model of agent-assisted team search. In Procceedings of the First Annual Conference of the International Technology Alliance in Network and Information Science.
[17]
Bruce W Tuckman and Mary Ann C Jensen. 1977. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies, Vol. 2, 4 (1977), 419--427.
[18]
Sheila Simsarian Webber, Jodi Detjen, Tammy L MacLean, and Dominic Thomas. 2019. Team challenges: Is artificial intelligence the solution? Business Horizons, Vol. 62, 6 (2019), 741--750.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AAMAS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
May 2023
3131 pages
ISBN:9781450394321
  • General Chairs:
  • Noa Agmon,
  • Bo An,
  • Program Chairs:
  • Alessandro Ricci,
  • William Yeoh

Sponsors

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 30 May 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human-agent teaming
  2. pomdps
  3. theory of mind

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Funding Sources

  • DARPA

Conference

AAMAS '23
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 85
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)64
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media