Currently unavailable.
We don't know when or if this item will be back in stock.
Select delivery location
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

How I Lost By Hillary Clinton Paperback – 1 Jan. 2017

4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars 12 ratings

Judging by the stance of the leadership of the Democratic Party and much of the media, Hillary Clinton’s devastating loss in the presidential election of November 2016 was all the fault of pernicious Russian leaks, unwarranted FBI investigations and a skewed electoral college. Rarely blamed was the party’s decision to run a deeply unpopular candidate on an uninspiring platform. At a time of widespread dissatisfaction with business-as-usual politics, the Democrats chose to field a quintessential insider. Her campaign dwelt little on policies, focusing overwhelmingly on the personality of her opponent. That this strategy was a failure is an understatement. Losing an election to someone with as little competence or support from his own party as Donald Trump marked an extraordinary fiasco. The refusal of the Democratic leadership to identify the real reasons for their defeat is not just a problem of history. If Democrats persevere with a politics that prioritizes well-off professionals rather than ordinary Americans, they will leave the field open to right wing populism for many years to come. Drawing on the WikiLeaks releases of Clinton’s talks at Goldman Sachs and the e mails of her campaign chief John Podesta, as well as key passages from her public speeches, How I Lost By Hillary Clinton also includes extensive commentary by award-winning journalist Joe Lauria, and a foreword by Julian Assange, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks. It provides, in the words of the Democratic candidate and her close associates, a riveting, unsparing picture of the disastrous campaign that delivered America to President Trump, and a stark warning of a mistake that must not be repeated.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ OR Books (1 Jan. 2017)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1682190854
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1682190852
  • Customer reviews:
    4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars 12 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Joe Lauria
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
12 global ratings

Top review from United Kingdom

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 26 December 2017
So don’t get angry with me for saying this, but toward the end of the book I was starting to think along the lines of “you know, she may be totally corrupt, but she bloody knows the issues!” Like, if you compare the first paragraph of any of the answers she gives to Lloyd Blankfein’s questions (for example, regarding China) to the longest statement Trump has made about anything, it’s night and day how much more she knows, even if she actually does not care.

And the narrator is bloody annoying too. I totally come from his side. My voting record is Dukakis ’88, Obama ’08, OK? But the guy keeps carping on how awful and phony she is and, you know what? He’s applying ideology to a subject where there is room for none. A corrupt insider who’s “on the take” is not any more vulnerable to somebody with an ideology that to an assistant district attorney with no such leanings.

It is the evidence that carries the book, and that only.

But the evidence is devastating. The three pages that list what she’s charged for her speeches and to whom is all you need to know. Like, she starts with USD 225k for everybody, but toward the end she goes totally a la carte, charging “what the market will bear.” They could have published that alone and the book would be worth buying.

But they’ve published more. My total favorite is the bit where Chelsea suddenly discovers how awful the Clinton Global Initiative is and starts spamming about this major epiphany of hers and in particular about how it makes her saintly daddy look like Tony Blair. So the main man there first fires off an email saying “somebody contain her please,” but she carries on. And then he goes “can somebody please remind her we paid for her wedding?”

It’s awesome awesome stuff. I haven’t seen the whole list, so I can’t tell whether the person who did the anthology was some type of God or if all the material was this revealing.

But if you want to have a feel for the depths to which the polis has sunk, you simply must read these emails.

And if it was the KGB who released them (which I very much doubt) they’ve done the West a service. This is a major wake-up call!
One person found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Great view from from a left leaning author on why ...
Reviewed in the United States on 8 July 2017
Great view from from a left leaning author on why Hilary's elitism, policy's, and untrustworthiness cost her the election. Best argument I've seen.
49 people found this helpful
Report
Preston Zimmerman
4.0 out of 5 stars Politics. Yuck learned so much I had never known. Sadly we don’t learn this stuff until it’s too late
Reviewed in the United States on 5 January 2019
Learned so much I had never known Sadly we do not learn this stuff until it is too late. Media coverage was deficient
3 people found this helpful
Report
Thomas P. Byrne
3.0 out of 5 stars I was a little disappointed. Written from a progressive viewpoint
Reviewed in the United States on 4 October 2017
I was a little disappointed. Written from a progressive viewpoint, the book examines the flaws in Hillary's campaign in an adequate manner. But this approach may not satisfy the average reader. For example, the writer says that Bernie Sanders exposed Clinton's phony progressivism which presumably cost her votes from the far left. OK, I can accept that. But the author misses the point that it was a "drain-the-swamp" mentality which was the key factor in my opinion. It was Clinton's inability to speak to the average American voter and her personality that cost her the election and not the fact that she failed fully embrace the hard left's positions. That said, would Sanders have beaten Trump? Very possibly.
6 people found this helpful
Report