Home Privacy Fun Fact About Clean Rooms: Data Security Isn’t A Given

Fun Fact About Clean Rooms: Data Security Isn’t A Given

SHARE:
data clean rooms (hero size)

Data clean rooms are magic. All you have to do is put your data inside, press a button, and it comes out matched, privacy safe and secure on the other side.

Just kidding.

Advertisers need to do their due diligence on potential clean room partners before working together, including (and especially) finding out how secure the platform is.

Because once data has been exposed, linked or enriched by another data set, “you can’t walk that back,” said Devon DeBlasio, VP of product marketing at InfoSum, speaking at an IAB Tech Lab Rearc privacy event in New York City last week.

Toothpaste doesn’t go back in the tube.

Somebody call security

Some of the potential security threats in a data clean room environment are the commingling of data, information leakage and “publisher ad observation.”

If, for example, a publisher knows which ads an advertiser is planning to serve, it could observe and log the first-party IDs associated with its own visitors who were also shown the ads. Then the publisher could look up the plaintext PII match keys for those identifiers and – voila! – the data has been exposed.

But not all threats are nefariously motivated, said Bosko Milekic, chief product officer at data collaboration platform Optable.

For example, say a media company owns and operates its own SSP or an advertiser has its own DSP. There’s nothing wrong with that, Milekic said, but even seemingly benign internal data sharing between them can be a form of “collusion” that leads to privacy and security problems, including data transfer through unsecured channels.

In order for data clean rooms to be considered secure, according to the IAB Tech Lab’s new technical standard for data clean room interoperability (which was released for public comment last week), the rooms have to check three important boxes.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

  1. All PII must be encrypted and never shared directly with any party.
  2. No participant should be able to learn anything about the identity of people who aren’t in their own contributed data set.
  3. No one involved should be able to learn anything about anyone in the overlapping audience.

Miss any of these steps, and a clean room can’t really call itself a clean room.

Always ask

But the devil is in those details, and there are a lot of other things for advertisers to consider before partnering with a data clean room.

For example (deep breath):

How does the clean room access data? Can the data stay put, or will it have to be streamed into another platform? Do you have to change the format of your data before sharing it? Are there controls for data governance and encryption? How granular are the controls? Is there a time limit for how long the clean room has access to the data? Will the data flows be audited? What queries can you run on the platform, and is there a specific query language? What type of liability do you have in case of a data breach, and whose responsibility is it? What happens if there’s a breach involving matched data?

“This gets very complicated,” DeBlasio said, “but these are very important questions to ask.”

And we’re not done.

Don’t forget to ask about which privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) the data clean room uses, said Rachel Blum, principal architect and field CTO at Snowflake.

Some PETs are more privacy-enhancing than others, depending on the use case and the advertiser’s own risk tolerance. And PETs aren’t static. The “level” of privacy can be dialed up or down based on qualitative thresholds, and there’s usually a trade-off between privacy and accuracy.

A data breach is a headache no one wants, but implementing a PET that’s so strong you can’t do anything practical is also a problem.

“It’s important to consider what you’re interested in implementing and what risks you’re looking at,” Blum said. “You also need to be able to actually perform the activity.”

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.