Home On TV & Video The Death Of Linear TV Is Being Greatly Exaggerated

The Death Of Linear TV Is Being Greatly Exaggerated

SHARE:

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Today’s column is written by Michele Madaris, media director at Boathouse

TV is not dead, nor is it dying. It is in an evolutionary state. Gone are the days of the family gathering in the living room, huddled around the one TV in the household, to watch NBC’s primetime lineup. What we have now is a fragmented viewing experience across multiple devices (TV, desktop, mobile, tablet) and services (linear TV, OTT, CTV) – and they’re all fighting for the viewer’s attention.

The pandemic was a watershed moment. Stay-at-home orders changed media consumption behaviors across all channels. Nielsen reported that video viewership increased by 60% thanks to CTV. And 44% of households have cut the cord or have never had traditional cable or satellite services.  

Choice in programming has grown, too. There are more than 817,000 unique program titles across US linear TV and streaming services, up from 646,000 in December 2019. 

For this reason, there is no one-size-fits-all solution for advertisers to reach their target audience. Rather, it comes down to who your target viewers are, what content they crave and how they consume it. But between distrust in Nielsen’s approach to TV metrics and continued fragmentation in digital measurement on the CTV side, advertisers don’t have clear answers.

An audience-first approach to measurement

Despite the shifts and acceleration toward streaming platforms, linear television remains the best way to reach a mass audience. Late last year, Nielsen reported that 32% of total TV time was spent with TV connected devices, compared to 68% with traditional TV. While there has been an overall ratings decline in traditional TV viewing, consumers continue to gravitate toward it for news and sports programming. Streaming, meanwhile, is the go-to for original and episodic content. Clearly, there’s a hunger for both. 

For CTV and linear to co-exist, there needs to be an evolution in measurement.  

We are in the age of focusing on the audience first for developing marketing strategies. We’re figuring out how they are behaving, the desired outcome, then determining the right time, right place and right message for intercepting our audiences. 

Shouldn’t we apply the same audience-first approach to measuring impact across linear and CTV?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Advertisers deserve a consistent measurement approach across platforms with one, equivalized currency for both. As these worlds coexist and move into the future, we need to lean into one currency that is consistent across both platforms so we can effectively measure and optimize for the consumer advertisers. 

We want and expect granularity, immediacy, transparency and flexibility in the current climate. For linear and CTV to remain relevant and coexist, measurement needs to evolve, just like the TV product.  

So is TV’s death exaggerated? Yes. Can TV and CTV coexist? Most definitely. My hope is that an audience-first measurement approach and common currency will be the solution for reinforcing that the two can, in fact, live happily ever after.

Follow Boathouse (@boathouseinc) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.