Home Digital TV and Video DG Still Preaching Convergence After Selling TV Ad Distribution Unit

DG Still Preaching Convergence After Selling TV Ad Distribution Unit

SHARE:

DG CEO Neil NguyenThe $525 million sale of digital ad management provider DG’s TV ad distribution business to rival Extreme Reach is not just about freeing the Irvine, TX-based company from heavy debt incurred by acquisitions designed to build its online capabilities. It’s also about taking better advantage of TV-digital convergence by staking out a position solely on the interactive side.

DG CEO Neil Nguyen repeatedly said as much on an analyst call this morning, following the sale announcement. But DG has major challenges ahead as it waits for its sprawling array of digital businesses to pick up lost revenue from TV ad operations in the interim. Plus, with a wide range of clear online video players already much better positioned in the area of video convergence and online ad workflow, DG has its work cut out as it migrates to being a “New Online Company” after the deal closes in the first quarter of 2014.

“I’m confident this is the best way forward for both the online and TV businesses to reach their full potential, though clearly, this was a difficult decision,” Nguyen said.

To be sure, TV operations comprise half of DG’s revenues and that loss could be devastating, at least in the short run. While online has grown to 50% of DG’s revenues from just 8% three years ago, it was debt-fueled acquisitions that got it to that point.

In particular, while DG did possess some strength in the digital marketplace, it wasn’t until the July 2011 $414 million acquisition of ad tech firm MediaMind, which added a number of sales offices and expanded its global reach, that boosted its online presence. That deal, along with the purchase of Enliven Marketing Technologies five years ago, has also contributed heavily to DG’s heavy debt load. It’s not clear that DG, hamstrung by those debts, has advanced those businesses, or that of other digital holdings such as EyeWonder, Unicast and Peer39.

Nguyen cited those three businesses in particular as the foundation of the new company DG will become.

“It’s important to recognize that with this announcement, we are not abandoning this belief and the role we expect to play within the convergence of media and emerging TV-related video channels,” Nguyen said. “We are even more committed to video distribution across all media channels and believe that ultimately, linear programming content will be delivered over IP. This coming change will allow us to continue to leverage our remaining assets in much the same way we work with clients in online display today.”

Of course, it can’t escape notice that DG could have done a slightly better deal with video ad services rival Extreme Reach last year, but it decided to reject it at the time. Extreme Reach was started by executives of DG’s earlier incarnation and has strictly focused on the TV market. And Extreme Reach CEO John Roland has a different view of how convergence ad dollars will flow between TV and online from DG’s Nguyen.

As Roland told us a few months ago, he doesn’t expect TV ad budgets to move online in any significant way. If he’s right, the addition of DG’s TV assets will make Extreme Reach stronger and could weaken DG as it competes against a multitude of others also waiting for the great migration of TV ad budgets to shift to digital.

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.