Home Data Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

Cloud-Based Collaboration Is Ad Tech’s Post-Cookie Lifeline – But Will It Last?

SHARE:

Cloud infrastructure vendors are insinuating themselves into data-driven advertising.

Third-party ad tech vendors are becoming service providers that build their solutions using cloud infrastructure – namely Amazon Web Services (AWS), the Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Snowflake and Microsoft Azure.

This trend has given rise to technologies such as data clean rooms and CDPs, and for many major advertisers and ad buyers, the cloud is their post-cookie plan.

If you ask the cloud operators themselves, they might call it the Daft Punk revolution – better, faster, stronger. But the real reason why marketing tech companies are building their businesses on the backs of cloud platforms is privacy.

Still, the question remains: Can this cross-cloud collaboration system function in the real world? As in, to be useful for marketers while also passing muster with regulators and privacy advocates.

Privacy laws and platform data policies have focused on restricting the number of businesses that can access data, rather than prohibiting specific actions like ad targeting or attribution. That’s why Apple’s ATT update derailed Facebook’s ad platform, whereas Amazon Ads kept trucking along despite the post-pandemic ecommerce slowdown. Facebook needed other businesses to share data, whereas Amazon already has the data in one place.

If the new rules of the road call for data to be kept in one place, then the only logical outcome is for vendors to set up shop there.

How cross-cloud collaboration is actually used

One challenge is that ad tech and data vendors have a nuanced understanding of the technology, but clients often don’t.

Last year, a marketer at a large beverage brand told me she had begun running parallel campaigns on The Trade Desk and the Walmart Connect DSP, which is built on The Trade Desk. By reconciling the IDs, she said, the brand can attribute certain media channels to Walmart sales and retarget customers as they moved between Walmart and other stores or publishers.

Wait!

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Isn’t that exactly what the Walmart Connect DSP is built to prevent?

Yes, it is.

Cloud-based targeting and attribution generally can’t be audited and don’t enhance the brand’s own customer data. But from the marketer’s point of view, they’re still using familiar dashboards to employ common tactics.

For instance, a walled garden like the Walmart Connect DSP might generate an audience segment that can be retargeted on TikTok, Roku or Snapchat, and then later attributed to purchases. The data might also be put into a clean room where the IDs can be retargeted elsewhere without exposing individuals.

For another example of how cross-cloud collaboration works in practice, consider LiveRamp and the Amazon Marketing Cloud (AMC), which is the data clean room operated by Amazon Ads.

In February, LiveRamp announced a partnership with Amazon so that RampID, LiveRamp’s ID solution, can be used “as a key to join first and third-party insights with Amazon Ads in Amazon Marketing Cloud for measurement and to activate brand-specific RampID-based audiences directly on RampID within Amazon DSP.”

You’re forgiven for not following that jargonese – and if you’re a marketer, this complexity has relatively little impact on your day-to-day work.

Brand marketers don’t need to know the modular arithmetic to explain how two parties can multiply two numbers to reveal a sum without revealing the numbers in the formula.

For LiveRamp and AMC, it’s complicated. They aren’t just matching and enhancing profiles, like during the former days of data onboarding.

Encrypted audiences within Amazon Ads are matched to an encrypted instance of the RampID graph. The Amazon DSP doesn’t know who it’s retargeting or attributing on behalf of the advertiser – all it has is an encrypted RampID. And LiveRamp doesn’t find out who made a purchase, only the aggregate number of conversions. Meanwhile, the advertiser doesn’t know who it retargeted, and no data is added to its first-party CRM system.

But user-level retargeting and purchase attribution did happen.

Ad tech is like a fancy restaurant that, for now at least, is able to maintain normal service in the dining room while chaos and grease fires upend the kitchen.

Potential pitfalls

But back to the main question – will cross-cloud collaboration work?

Well, the fact is, it does work. Billions of marketing dollars are channeling through this system as we speak.

There are caveats, however.

Just last week, a report co-authored by privacy researchers Wolfie Christl and Alan Toner found LiveRamp has a fairly secure system of encryption and one-way data processing, but that “some of these measures are at least questionable” under GDPR.

For instance, LiveRamp customers have their own instance of pseudonymous RampIDs. That means a DSP or identity vendor that uses RampIDs for Hershey’s and Mondelez, say, can’t compare data across its clients. Google puts a similar barrier in place when an agency or ad tech company uses Ads Data Hub, its cloud-based data clean room, on behalf of many brands.

However, Christl and Toner allege that some RampID customers are themselves data brokers, DSPs or SSPs that maintain their own identity systems. They incorporate a pseudonymous RampID into their results and pass those results – even sometimes specific audiences – onto other clients.

LiveRamp’s privacy measures are built to prohibit individuals from being re-identified by advertisers, ad tech or publishers. And the report does acknowledge that LiveRamp does this well.

But what if the law is interpreted to prohibit personal data from being joined across different databases and companies?

There’s nothing stopping a European data protection authority from pursuing that interpretation.

According to some brand marketers (and boastful press releases), brands can track and attribute consumer IDs across cloud infrastructure services and digital media platforms that are each, ostensibly, walled gardens unto themselves.

Which means collaboration software companies should speedily educate clients about how their privacy frameworks work. And they should refrain from over-selling their capabilities.

Because cloud-based ad tech is an advertiser’s best hope for a post-cookie solution. But if data collaboration tech vendors aren’t careful, they’ll be the next problem that needs to be solved.

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.