Home Data-Driven Thinking It’s 10:00 PM: Do You Know Where Your Pixels Are?

It’s 10:00 PM: Do You Know Where Your Pixels Are?

SHARE:
Richy Glassberg, Co-Founder and CEO, SafeGuard Privacy

Now that the new California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) has long been in effect, it’s time to clean up your pixel game. CPRA requires any business that markets to California consumers to enter into comprehensive contracts with other companies with whom they’ll share consumer data. 

More so, this law has added complexity to your vendor agreements with three different agreement types – service provider, contractor or third party – one of which must be in place prior to sharing consumer data.

But do you know what your pixels are doing? Pixels are manifestations of the business relationships you have or have had with various third parties. CPRA is asking: Do these relationships continue to make sense for your businesses and your customers? Which should you keep and which should you cull? 

Those pesky pixels

Since the beginning of digital marketing, website owners have placed a plethora of pixels on their sites – tiny snippets of code that websites and the ad tech ecosystem use to gather information about visitors. It could be in the form of a 1×1 transparent image or the Twitter logo. 

It’s just one line of javascript, but if you’ve been in the business as long as I have, you’ll recall a ton of stories about data leakage that are a direct result of those pesky pixels.

Basically, a marketer would enter into an advertising or marketing agreement with a partner and implement the pixels of their partners to collect data. That data could be used for retargeting, attribution, measurement, fraud or other purposes.

Pixels are incredibly difficult and time-consuming to implement and can be even harder to remove. When the contract ends, those pixels are supposed to stop collecting data, but that isn’t always the case. Consequently, all sites have at least some zombie pixels that are capable of transferring consumer data.

With the introduction of CPRA, this represents danger and risk. You now have a legal obligation to perform due diligence and assess your vendors, as well as have a comprehensive contract in place with the owners of those pixels. 

I’ll give you a current example: When Elon Musk took over Twitter and flouted the brand safety norms of the industry, the headlines were about brand managers who paused advertising on Twitter. But there’s a difference between pausing advertising and disabling a pixel.

The responsible marketer must now ask basic questions, such as: Is there a server at Twitter that is still on? Is it still receiving my users’ personal data? If you can’t answer these questions with any kind of certainty, assume the worst: Twitter is still receiving my data and using it to build audiences.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Clean up your website

With CPRA and other emerging privacy laws, those pixels, whether they’re active or zombies, could be a liability you haven’t considered before. Your privacy policy won’t protect you if you don’t know what the third-party pixels on your site are doing. That’s why it’s imperative every business answer some hard questions, such as:

  • Do you have a complete list of the pixels on your site, regardless of their status?
  • Do you know where the data those pixels are collecting is going? Do you know how they are using it? Do you have the right contract with that vendor?
  • Have you analyzed all of the pixels in your stack? Do you need them all? Do you still use them all? What can you get rid of?
  • Do you have an agreement with your counterparties, as CPRA now requires of all companies that do business with California residents?

You need to take action based on your answers to these questions. If you opt to sever a relationship, take the time to remove that party’s pixel from your site. If you opt to continue a relationship, ensure you have a comprehensive contract in place, as required by law. 

Pixel cleaning may seem like a drag, but it’s actually a blessing in disguise. It’s smart business to know who is on your site and has access to your consumer data. Your customers expect you to keep their data safe. Sweeping your site of zombie or unneeded pixels is an important part of ensuring your data safety and mitigating brand risk.

So I repeat my question. It’s 10:00 pm: Do you know where your pixels are?

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow SafeGuard Privacy and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Richy Glassberg, click here.

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.