Home CTV Roundup Why Temu Spent Tens Of Millions On Its Super Bowl Play

Why Temu Spent Tens Of Millions On Its Super Bowl Play

SHARE:

Brands throw boatloads of cash at Super Bowl ad inventory every year. But this past weekend’s game stood out for a few reasons, including, of course, Taylor Swift.

It was the most-viewed Super Bowl in six years, according to viewing data from Samba TV. An average of 50 million US households tuned in throughout the game, a 10.9% increase from last year, based on data from iSpot.tv. In response to a survey conducted by data collection platform Typeform, 10% of participants said Taylor Swift was the biggest draw.

But, Swift aside, brands also capitalized on other mainstream trends, such as highlighting generative AI or dialing up their investment in celebrity and influencer appearances to capture Gen Z’s attention.

Perhaps most noteworthy this year was Chinese ecommerce company Temu commandeering Super Bowl ad inventory with a grand total of six ads from kickoff through the post-game show.

At $7 million a pop for in-game spots, Temu likely spent tens of millions to advertise during the Super Bowl this year, not to mention the additional $15 million in giveaways and coupons it handed out as part of its Super Bowl Sunday campaign.

Temu tailwinds

Temu’s spending spree might seem like money well spent considering that its top priority is to reach as many prospective customers as possible. But overdoing paid ads at the Super Bowl may actually have had the opposite effect.

Rather than diversify its messaging, Temu blasted viewers six times with the same spot featuring a jingle about “shopping like a billionaire.” That repetition may be why 21% of viewers surveyed by research firm Zappi said they “hated” the ad, ranking it a four or less on a 10-point scale. There were also numerous articles over the weekend about the Chinese ecommerce company that went viral with an annoying jingle.

But, hey, at least Temu achieved its goal of going viral.

Social media chatter, including memes poking fun at how many ads it ran, led to news headlines posing the very question that a challenger brand like Temu wants to answer for US consumers: “What is Temu?”

But despite its lofty goal of competing against Amazon for the ecommerce crown with promises of affordable products delivered quickly, Temu so far captured just 1% of the US ecommerce market as of 2023, according to research firm Bernstein. Compare that to Amazon’s 40% market share.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But still, Temu is an example of the power of paid advertising. It spent nearly $3 billion on digital marketing in the US last year – making it one of the biggest online advertisers in the country.

As a result, Temu now has 70 million monthly active users in the US, up from just 13 million a year ago, based on data from SensorTower.

Behind closed doors

That’s the thing, though – Temu is on a hamster wheel. The only reason it’s still able to grow its MAUs and app downloads despite sales dropping off is thanks to its relentless paid media strategy.

The number of US households that made purchases on Temu’s app was 20% lower in January than in September, according to Morgan Stanley. Sales also fell 12.5% between November and December, Bloomberg reports.

Temu is throwing so much money at its growth problem that analysts and consumers alike are questioning where the heck all this marketing spend is even coming from.

Some Twitter (oops, X) users speculated that spending such a shameless amount of money on Super Bowl ads while shipping products at bargain prices is an indicator that Temu’s real priority may be stealthy mass data collection, which would explain why it has a pile of cash lying around.

Meanwhile, many social media posts over the weekend highlighted recent data leaks on Temu, including anecdotes about scams and hacked credit cards, suggesting that the company’s privacy practices leave something to be desired. Others warned people against using the app in the first place.

These publicized concerns about whether Temu is even safe for consumers to use echo those that spurred intense (and ongoing) regulatory scrutiny of TikTok, which ramped up last year.

But sometimes it takes a Super Bowl ad play to bring questionable business practices to the forefront.

Well, you’ve certainly got our attention now, Temu.

Are you enjoying this newsletter? Let me know what you think. Hit me up at [email protected].

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.