Home Commerce It’s Open Season On SaaS As Brands Confront Their Own Subscription Fatigue

It’s Open Season On SaaS As Brands Confront Their Own Subscription Fatigue

SHARE:

Last year, the AdExchanger Commerce Media newsletter covered the reckoning coming for subscription software companies – especially those that serve retail and ecommerce brands.

SaaS vendors heard that message loud and clear, and they’re acting fast to reduce the number of subscription line items that brands have to pay.

SaaS subscription fatigue

It’s no wonder that ecommerce and retail brands are tired of the number of subscriptions they must carry.

An ecommerce merchant might have Shopify, Klaviyo and Yotpo for reviews, maybe a couple of analytics vendors like Triple Whale and Northbeam, plus LiveRamp, perhaps, and many others all wrapped around yet another SaaS platform like Snowflake.

But, the thing is, it can be hard to find fat to trim, because it’s not as if businesses dish out large monthly payments to vendors that don’t provide returns.

One strategy – and it’s what vendors prefer – is to reduce the total number of individual SaaS vendors clients pay directly without actually decreasing the overall budget.

Last week, customer data platform (CDP) BlueConic acquired data company Jebbit, which creates surveys, quizzes and other bits of engaging content that are used to collect data.

Salesforce and Adobe claim to aggregate all the services of a CDP as well as services from other SaaS categories, BlueConic CEO Cory Munchbach told AdExchanger. But those SaaS giants have only “cobbled together” solutions that often require additional services or even consulting contracts before customers can get started.

“Buyers can’t be beholden and slowed down by those kinds of systems,” she said, “so I think it’s going to resonate in market to bring these [tech products together] in different combinations.”

SaaSing back?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

In other words, although brands are on a mission to decrease their SaaS rosters, there is still a huge market opportunity for independent mar tech. That’s because many businesses are still only just starting to shift from traditional IT to cloud computing, a huge potential unlock for SaaS vendors.

And the subscription tech platform giants like Oracle, Salesforce and Adobe aren’t exactly cornering the market, despite their size.

Oracle Advertising is kaput. That means Oracle offerings like Grapeshot, Moat, BlueKai and DataLogix – the one-time top seller of retail audience data for online advertising – are soon to be gone. And $300 million, which was how much revenue Oracle’s ad products generated during the company’s last fiscal year, is up for grabs.

Salesforce’s acquisition of Krux in 2016 is another example, albeit a less dramatic one. The popular early DMP lost its edge and many flagship clients, including Business Insider and Leaf Group, after the Salesforce acquisition. Within Salesforce, web publishers accustomed to blue chip status were hardly a blip on the enterprise radar.

There has also been a general wising-up among brands and regulators about SaaS “stickiness” (the term for how much of a hassle it would be to switch vendors). The FTC announced a case against Adobe last month over alleged deceptive subscription fees and cancellation practices.

“SaaS revenue growth is often just exploiting the burden of switching,” wrote Sean Frank, CEO of Ridge Wallet, in a post last year for his newsletter on DTC marketing. “They are not your friend.”

He says ecommerce brands should add only one more enterprise subscription: for OpenAI. Then use the chatbot prompts to develop software plugins that replace SaaS point solutions.

Head in the clouds

To combat this point of view, independent SaaS vendors can conglomerate together or, you know, simply prove their worth. But another popular tactic is to retreat into cloud infrastructure marketplaces, where what once may have been a dozen different subscription fees can hide under one large Snowflake or AWS bill.

NCSolutions, one of the top shopper marketing data solutions, revamped its go-to-market model last year. The new goal is not to be a separate data source or to ship and export data between platforms. Instead, the plan is to be a native app built on Snowflake, AWS and other clouds, so that advertisers can say their data never leaves the system.

In that same vein, Experian, Neustar and LiveRamp are pilot partners for AWS marketing cloud products, including Data Clean Rooms and Entity Resolution (which is pretty much just ID resolution but in ad tech parlance).

It’s not only easier (but also stickier) for vendors to discreetly bill clients for the bandwidth they consume in cloud computing, rather than hitting them with standalone monthly statements.

CFOs and CEOs might take a look at a list of mar tech vendors with dozens of companies and simply say, “Too many: cut,” one ecommerce marketer told me.

But he said if the AWS bill goes up because LiveRamp, Neustar, a CDP and perhaps other SaaS vendors now charge as native apps through the cloud platform, rather than standalone subscriptions, the business chiefs aren’t going to throttle that spend.

For CFOs and CEOs, we’ve entered a kind of open hunting season on martech SaaS, one large shoe brand marketer told me. “But they’re not cutting out the cloud platform.”

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.