Home AdExchanger Talks The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off

The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off

SHARE:
Graham Mudd, co-founder, Anonym

It’s a false narrative that personalization and privacy can’t coexist.

Businesses will always need to find a compromise between privacy and utility, but it’s more than possible to strike a healthy balance, says Graham Mudd, president and chief product officer at privacy startup Anonym, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

The challenge is figuring out the most reasonable approach, which is why it’s important to get feedback from lawyers, policymakers and technologists, says Mudd, who co-founded Anonym in early 2022 after more than a decade in executive roles at Meta focusing on measurement, monetization and product marketing for ads.

Mudd’s co-founder is someone many in the ad industry will recognize: Brad Smallwood, who was VP of marketing science at Facebook for more than 12 years.

Anonym’s approach combines privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) with confidential computing in a trusted execution environment – which is a technical way of saying the company uses encrypted data to help advertisers find new customers, connect impressions to conversions and optimize campaigns.

“We don’t create profiles or hold on to that data,” Mudd says. “It flows into our system, we do the compute on it and then we discard it.”

But that’s not the traditional way that ad tech functions. Ad tech relies on data collection.

And one of the main reasons why regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission, have started paying much closer attention to the online advertising industry – which you can see from its recent settlements, enforcement actions and lawsuits – is because it believes data collection is out of control.

“Ad platforms know a lot about what you do on the internet, purely because they want to gather that data for advertising purposes,” Mudd says. “[But in many ways] it doesn’t feel like an even or fair trade-off.”

Also in this episode: How to pronounce “Anonym” (it’s like “anonymous,” but without the “ous”), an insider’s look at how Meta revamped its ads platform after the Cambridge Analytica scandal (and then did it again to manage fallout from Apple’s ATT), the pros and cons of proprietary vs. open source PETs, where ad tech went wrong and Mudd’s firsthand experience testifying before Congress. (Pro tip: Don’t forget to turn on your mic!)

For more articles featuring Graham Mudd, click here.

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.