Home Ad Exchange News Bloomberg Shells Out $10 Million For Anti-Trump Super Bowl Ad; Tivo Enters The Streaming Wars

Bloomberg Shells Out $10 Million For Anti-Trump Super Bowl Ad; Tivo Enters The Streaming Wars

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Bloomberg’s Big Play

Presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg is set to unload a 60-second ad spot critical of President Donald Trump in the upcoming Super Bowl. The New York Times estimates that the former NYC mayor shelled out $10 million for the privilege, also noting Bloomberg’s record-setting spend on political advertising, which is up near $170 million across TV and digital. The Super Bowl is an unconventional ad forum for a presidential candidate. Most White House aspirants focus on the swing states. But, according to University of San Francisco professor Ken Goldstein, it’s a smart move for Bloomberg, who’s running a national campaign. “As expensive as it is, it’s cheaper than buying the ads market by market,” Goldstein told the Times. More.

You Stream, I Stream

TiVo unveiled a “tiny little HDMI puck” at CES that’s designed to provide streaming and live TV content. Dubbed the TiVo Stream 4K, this device makes TiVo the newest entrant into 2020’s streaming wars. Users will get access to a bunch of streaming apps, such as Netflix and HBO, and to content from Tivo Plus, Tivo’s free, ad-supported movie and TV service. The live TV component comes with cloud-based DVR. The TiVo Stream, according to TechCrunch’s Anthony Ha, is also highly personalized in that users can navigate based on shows, instead of having to move between different apps. No word on what this means for advertising, but the puck certainly seems like a device with the potential to capture some pretty powerful insights into the viewing behaviors of TiVo’s audience. More.

FakeBook

Facebook claims it’s cracking down on deep fakes and manipulated media to try and dampen the spread of misinformation during the presidential election – but it’s an uphill battle. In a blog post on Monday, Facebook’s VP of global policy management, Monika Bickert, said that video content will be booted from the platform if it’s been edited in a way that’s likely to mislead the viewer. Videos will also be removed if they’ve been edited or computer generated in ways an average viewer can’t detect. The policy, however, doesn’t cover satire, parodies or videos that were only edited to either cut out or change the order of words. These exceptions to the rule, while necessary, muddy the waters. What, for example, should be considered parody and what is manipulation? Sounds like it’s going to be up to fact-checkers to decide. Facebook was criticized for refusing to take down a video last summer that was altered to make House Speaker Nancy Pelosi look as if she were slurring her speech. Facebook down-ranked the doctored video rather than actually removing it.

SCOTUS Says

Google fired the first salvo in its Supreme Court case involving Oracle over whether Android violated copyright laws by reusing Java code, a popular and partially open-source developer language, for its mobile operating system. “For decades, computer scientists have built on each others’ work, drawing on shared foundations of knowledge and the compatibility of interfaces that allow developers to create applications available on a variety of devices and platforms,” argued Google’s counsel in its first filing to the high court on Monday. (Here’s the full brief.) After all, the original Java slogan, when the code was operated by Sun Microsystems, was “write once, run anywhere.” Oracle will file its response next month, reports Law360. The dispute has bounced through court systems for almost a decade, with Google winning a jury decision but then losing a Federal Court appeal. Once the Supreme Court reaches its decision, the case could have important ramifications for open-source code and IP, as well as how developers operate across major platform APIs.

But Wait, There’s More

You’re Hired

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.