Home Ad Exchange News Angry Birds Explodes Its Paid-For Version; Social Subscription Conniptions

Angry Birds Explodes Its Paid-For Version; Social Subscription Conniptions

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

The Ad-Supported Bird Gets The Worm

Free-to-play reigns supreme in the mobile game market. Angry Birds, a mobile gaming OG that found early success using paid downloads, is now putting all its eggs into the ad-supported basket, Ars Technica reports.

Rovio had already shifted to primarily free games and ad revenue. But releasing a pay-to-play remake of the original Angry Birds game put a dent in the earnings of its many ad-supported sequels.

The paid-for Angry Birds version charges players 99 cents for 390 ad-free levels. It’s currently the App Store’s second-best-selling paid download, but it only nets Rovio an estimated $30,000 in monthly revenue. In contrast, the free-to-play Angry Birds 2 garnered 900,000 new downloads last month and over $9 million in revenue, making it the 74th-highest-grossing game on iOS.

Clearly, there’s more money in the ad-supported model than in pay-to-play.

So Rovio is delisting the remake from the Google Play Store. And the game will be renamed to “Red’s First Flight” in the Apple App Store. With the renamed version and metadata likely stripped of branded keywords, the paid-for app won’t interfere with Rovio funneling people who search for “Angry Birds” to its free, ad-supported apps, where the developer makes more money. 

Subscription By Subtraction

For ad-based apps and media companies, subscription revenue looks like green pasture.

But as Rovio shows, subscriptions can create a dangerous undercurrent that drags people away from the core service. 

Social media networks – namely, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and Twitter – take a risk with newly launched subscription packages, Bloomberg reports. Especially since social subscriptions are expensive and provide little value. (Notably, they aren’t even ad-free, though the question shows up in the FAQs.)

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Twitter Blue costs $8 via site or $11 by iOS app. Meta Verified, as its subscription is called, costs $12 or $15 per month. The up-charging for iOS users publicly reinforces the costs of the Apple Services fee on app developers. 

But Zuck and Elon are hardly winning hearts and minds. Twitter made two-factor authentication – basic account security – exclusive to subscribers. Its approach with Blue has been to charge to prevent account degradation, rather than gain coveted new services. 

Meta Verified promises increased exposure, so influencers will pay. But one of its main selling points is basic customer service – the kind of thing users should just have. 

Anything in the name of subscription revenue. But what if that “anything” is your good name? 

Driving Change

Automakers are taking on more and more media and SaaS company capabilities. Or are at least trying to. 

A lot of the effort is to catch up with Tesla on battery charge and driving AI, but they’re also copying Tesla’s software-focused approach and leaning into the car as a machine built around a large screen. 

Mercedes-Benz made $1 billion last year by selling software upgrades to its cars, which come via one-off payments or subscription (everyone’s in on the subscription craze).  

Mercedes also just announced a partnership with Google, which Reuters reports will provide mapping services to route cars. Google has similar deals for onboard services with General Motors, Ford and Nissan.

New Mercedes cars will also come pre-stocked with an “infotainment system” (their words) that includes TikTok to pair with the “superscreens” that will now cover the dashboard, TechCrunch reports.   

But Wait, There’s More!

Warner Media bets against the trend with a profit-first, no-growth streaming strategy. [The Information]

With false advertising lawsuits on the rise, brands risk long-term harm to their image. [Digiday]

A basic iPhone feature (uhh … your passcode) helps criminals steal people’s digital lives and app-based finances. [WSJ

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.