Home Ad Exchange News Google Ads Is Fully Ditching Rules-Based Attribution; The Costs Of Targeting

Google Ads Is Fully Ditching Rules-Based Attribution; The Costs Of Targeting

SHARE:
Comic: The power of data-driven attribution compels you."

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Rules Of The Game

In September 2021, Google Ads switched from last-click attribution as its default measurement mode to “data-driven attribution.” The latter is Google’s term for modeled attribution without preset rules, like that a brand’s first ad exposure or the last click should be assigned credit. Other rules include “position-based attribution,” where credit is mostly doled out to the first and last click with a smaller portion for all impressions in between. The “time decay” rule attributes based on the duration between an ad exposure and a conversion. 

But even after Google began defaulting to data-driven attribution, it still supported other attribution models for advertisers with a preference.

That goes away this year, though, Google announced on Thursday in a support page update. Starting in May, new Google Ads accounts will have no option but data-driven attribution. Current advertisers will lose rules-based attribution models by October. 

“Rules-based attribution models assign value to each advertising touchpoint based on predefined rules,” according to the support page. “These models don’t provide the flexibility needed to adapt to evolving consumer journeys.”

Eye On The Target

The targeted advertising value prop is that consumers prefer relevant or personalized ads.

But targeted advertising also exposes consumers to more expensive, lower-quality products, according to a New York Times column by tech and privacy journalist Julia Angwin.

Angwin cites a recent Carnegie Mellon and Virginia Tech study finding targeted ads promote products that are more expensive than similar products found through a web search. The products featured in targeted ads also tend to be sold by lower-quality vendors, according to Better Business Bureau ratings.

For example, Angwin points to a Facebook ad campaign for “anti-woke” razor company Jeremy’s Razors, which targeted fans of hunting, Johnny Cash and the UFC. While its customers liked the political message, its products netted only 2.7 out of 5 stars based on 280 reviews. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Angwin argues that consumer brands could just as easily reach audiences through contextual ads without any of targeted advertising’s privacy concerns.

Angwin also claims the shift from contextual to targeted advertising has had a disastrous effect on newspaper revenue, although she offered little proof for this claim in her column, prompting pushback from ad industry thought leaders.

ID Or I Don’t

For all the talk of testing IDs and building for a post-third-party blah blah blah, the buy side is still just not buying it. 

At least not yet. Although, this has been a hot topic for years, so at what point does “not yet” become “not ever”? 

Part of the issue is that Google’s deadlines turn out to be more like lifelines in that they extend as far as people need. Maybe there was urgency when Google first said it would remove third-party cookies from Chrome, but that was January 2020. There have since been multiple deadline extensions, and third-party cookies are now slated for retirement at the end of 2024. 

“The lion-share of web transactions happen on Chrome and third-party cookies are still there,” Garrett McGrath, Magnite’s SVP of product management, tells Adweek

The whole alternative ID category is in a bind, since the value is having sustainable, post-cookie ad solutions for a world that’s never quite post-cookie. 

“There is usage,” says Mike O’Sullivan, co-founder of Sincera, which monitors online ad tech and RTB data. “But I also agree there isn’t enough usage to really make it obvious the benefits it’s driving.”

But Wait, There’s More!

Apple’s $165 billion cash hoard creates M&A mirages. [Bloomberg]

Disney has named Asad Ayaz as its first-ever chief brand officer. [Ad Age]

Publishers’ Q1 ad revenue was better than forecasts, but not by much. [Digiday]

Google’s senior director of product management for its Privacy Sandboxes, Victor Wong, on Google’s core privacy and business tenets. [blog]

How brands can tailor their audio ads to target “co-listeners.” [Marketing Brew]

You’re Hired!

Sophie Vershbow is promoted to head of social marketing at Eventbrite. [tweet]

Vivvix adds Matt Young as chief commercial officer. [release]

Must Read

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.

A comic depicting people in suits setting money on fire as a reference to incrementality: as in, don't set your money on fire!

How Incrementality Tests Helped Newton Baby Ditch Branded Search

In the past year, Baby product and mattress brand Newton Baby has put all its media channels through a new testing regime for incrementality. It was a revelatory experience.

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to serve as information hubs about its brands and make it easier to collect email addresses and other opted-in user data.

Colgate-Palmolive’s First-Party Data Strategy Is A Study In Quality Over Quantity

Colgate-Palmolive redesigned all of its consumer-facing sites and apps to make it easier to collect opted-in first-party user data.