FORMA CIVITATIS
International Journal of Urban and Territorial Morphological Studies
Vol. 2, N. 1, 2022, GREEN OPEN ACCESS: J123-2020-FC; ISSN: 2748-2812 (Print); ISSN: 2748-3134 (Online); ISBN: 9783933713681
Cities in Evolution. Prix de Istanbul
FORMA CIVITATIS
International Journal of Urban and
Territorial Morphological Studies
Vol. 2, N.1 , 2022
Cities in Evolution. Prix de Istanbul
Alessandro Camiz, Giorgio Verdiani, Martin Ebert editors
Grünberg Verlag
Weimar and Rostock, 2022
Cover image: Martin Ebert, The historical landscape of Erzi (Ingushetia, Russia), watercolor, 2022.
FORMA CIVITATIS
International Journal of Urban and Territorial Morphological Studies
[email protected]
http://www.formacivitatis.com/
Editors: Alessandro Camiz, Giorgio Verdiani, Martin Ebert
Editorial assistants: Eleonora Cecconi, Özge Özkuvancı
Sponsors: Dynamic Research on Urban Morphology-DRUM laboratory, Istanbul
With the support of: Özyeğin University, Turkey, University of Florence, Italy, Norvegian
University of Life Sciences, Norway
Cover design: Özge Özkuvancı
Layout and page design: Özge Özkuvancı, Eleonora Cecconi
Publisher: Grünberg Verlag,
Weimar and Rostock
http://www.grunbergverlag.de/
Vol. 2, N. 1, 2022
ISSN 2748-2812 (Print); ISSN 2748-3134 (Online); ISBN: 9783933713681
Green open access
J123-2020-FC
Editorial Board: Orhan Hacıhasanoğlu, Karl Kropf, Todor Stojanovski, Tomasz Bradecki,
Banu Manav, Anna Agata Kantarek, Attilio Petruccioli, Wowo Ding, Olimpia Niglio, Roberta
Spallone, Antonio Pietro Latini, Gjergji Islami, Renato Capozzi, Eva Lovra, Malgorzata
Hanzl, Liisa Seppänen, Alper Ünlü, Giovanni Fusco, Burak Asiliskender, Zoran Djukanovic,
Matthew Hardy, Wolfgang Horst Borner, Wendy McClure, Benjamin N. Vis, Anna Irene
Del Monaco, Raimundo Bambó Naya, Hülya Turgut, Per Elias Cornell, Luca Zavagno, Sofie
Kirt Strandbygaard, Ayse Sema Kubat, Acalya Alpan, Xiao Hu, Ana Nikovic, Uwe Schröder,
Howard Davis, Özlem Altınkaya Genel, Lutz Presser, Erin J. Campbell, Nadia Charalambous,
Eugenio Morello, Valentina Porcheddu, Cosimo Palagiano, Antonio Vito Riondino, Carla
Benocci, Richard A. Etlin, Mosè Ricci, Jana Marikova-Kubkova, Mirjana Roter Blagojevic,
Richard John, Antonella Romano, Tolga Ünlü, Carlos Dias Coelho, Brenda Case Scheer,
Shahin Keynoush, Pierre Gauthier, Vitor Araujo Oliveira, Juhong Park, Remah Y. Gharib,
Maria Carolina Campone, Yasemin Sarıkaya Levent, Lucien Steil, Marco Cadinu, Giorgio
Verdiani, Pier Luigi Tucci, Kostantinos Moraitis, Özlem Köprülü Bağbancı, Pablo RodríguezNavarro, Francescaromana Stasolla, Hossein Sadri, Carmen L. Guerrero, Senem Zeybekoglu
Sadri, Nasser Golzari, Walter Rossa, Jesus Solorzano Telechea, Sophia Psarra, Pietropaolo
Cannistraci, Amedeo Feniello, Susanne Komossa, Massimo Angrilli, Scott Singeisen,
Francesco Spada, Adam Nadolny, Giancarlo Cataldi, Jaime Correa, Matthew J Bell, Thomas
N Howe, Alessandro Guidi, Deni Ruggeri, Rita Occhiuto, Paul Christian Hautecler, Rossano
Pazzagli, Carlo Mario Tosco, Eric Firley, Sergio Pratali, Jean-Francois Lejeune, Fabio Balducci.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vol. 2, N. 1, 2022
EDITORIAL
Prix de Istanbul. Diachronic morphology of the ever changing
urban form
10
Alessandro Camiz
ARTICLES
Requalification of the historical fabric of Alberobello
22
Emma Sabatelli, Antonella Roma, Maria Pia Tridente,
Matteo Ieva
Alvar Aalto and the Florence in the north. Visions, realisations
and utopia in the early 1920s Finland
34
Luca Placci
The actual and its double: Experiential learning and the historical
urban fabric pedagogically considered
48
Frederick C. Biehle
Architecture and landscape of the North Caucasus. Historical
and procedural study of settlement systems and reconstruction of
anthropization of territory
60
Anna Linnik
Adstratum and substratum: The typological process of the patio
house in Caesaraugusta
76
Özge Özkuvancı, Alessandro Camiz
The Castle of Cerretaccio. Studies for the material history and
conservation
Ambra Maramai, Michele Coppola
84
From Roman to Umayyad: The formation process of the great
mosque of Damascus and the surrounding urban tissue
102
Louai Al Hussein, Alessandro Camiz
The formation process of the Regio quartadecima
Constantinopolitana, Istanbul. Relocating Constantine’s walls
120
Alessandro Camiz
Painted landscapes from another age: what the Vasari’s frescoes
in Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, tell about urban fortifications
130
Giulia Emilio, Giorgio Verdiani
BOOK REVIEWS
Cities in Transition
146
Fabio Balducci
Reclaiming a history, Jewish Architects in Imperial Russia and the
USSR, Vol. 1, Late Imperial Russia: 1891-1917
148
Małgorzata Hanzl
Rural Utopia and Water Urbanism, The Modern Village in
Franco’s Spain
152
Martin Ebert
A Morphological Approach to Cities and Regiones
154
Imane Saidi
Morphological Research of the Historical Urban Boundary. The
Inner Fringe of Nanjing
156
Nahal Khorrami
Author Guidelines
158
ARTICLE
2. 2022
PAINTED LANDSCAPES
FROM ANOTHER AGE:
WHAT THE VASARI’S FRESCOES
IN PALAZZO VECCHIO,
FLORENCE, TELL ABOUT URBAN
FORTIFICATIONS
GIULIA EMILIO
UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE
GIORGIO VERDIANI
UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE
ABSTRACT
Palazzo Vecchio is a cultural-historical centre full of elements
from different periods able to offer multiple ideas and reflections.
Inside there are objects, rooms and environments that document
many years of history interacting with many other realities and
contexts. The “Hall of the 500”, the large audience hall restored
by Giorgio Vasari commissioned by the grand duke Cosimo
I, shows in its sumptuous wall paintings the views of cities,
places and landscapes, captured in scenes of war and siege. It
is possible to observe the city walls of Pisa, the Towers of Siena
and Livorno, the military fortifications of Porto Ercole and San
Vincenzo, the Mediterranean coasts and the inland valleys.
Different places, conquered by the Medici family, which branch
off throughout Tuscany and characterise the territory. These
places today appear transformed and modified, in part or not, in
the landscape and urban fabric. In some cases, it is still possible
to find the remains of the sixteenth-century defensive buildings,
while in others there is no longer any trace, or at most only few
remains. Instead, they are legible in the paintings that identify
their elements and characteristics. The opportunity arises for a
comparison between real and painted architecture. From this
point of view, the frescoes in the hall not only have value as
artistic works but also as historical sources and documents
Communication: Giulia Emilio
E-mail:
[email protected]
FORMA CIVITATIS: International journal of urban and territorial morphological studies
(IJUTMS), Vol. 2, N. 1, 2022
130
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
able to tell through painting the conformation of the sites
represented with well-defined details and historical reliability.
Comparing the paintings with today’s urban and landscape
fabric, analogies and discrepancies appear, present, missing and
added objects that allow to reconstruct the analysed structures,
and also to catalogue them according to the level of knowledge
acquired with a good degree of reliability of the source.
With these assumptions it was possible to model the painted
defensive structures in 3D, using not only the frescoes but also
writings, drawings and archive plans and also to catalogue
it. A map was then edited to identify the level of knowledge
achieved with each model. The aim is to increase knowledge
of historical and cultural structures to enhance the city’s
cultural heritage.
Introduction
This report summarises the procedure adopted to analyse and
study the six large frescoes made by Giorgio Vasari (15111574) from 1566 to 1571 in order to broaden the knowledge
of the territories and military structures of the fourteenth,
fifteenth and sixteenth centuries represented in the frescoes.
The views of the Tuscan landscapes in the background of the
paintings characterise the setting of this particular collection
Figure 1. Salone dei cinquecento,
tables, Palazzo Vecchio.
131
FORMA CIVITATIS
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
of memorable and heroic (that is, those which had seen
the Florentines prevail) battles, conducted by the Medici
family and the city of Florence. They were commissioned by
Cosimo I (1519-1574) in the context of a large and ambitious
renovation program of the Sala Grande, now called the Salone
dei Cinquecento, in Palazzo Vecchio. The history of the Palace
dates back to the 13th century, since then many extensions
and renovations already took place, always linked to political
and cultural events of the city of Florence. With the death
of Lorenzo “the Magnificent” Dei Medici in 1492, Florence
was governed severely by the Dominican friar Girolamo
Savonarola. The renovation of the government building was
functional to the friar's reform program. It was necessary to
build a hall capable of accommodating the members of the
new city council, which was richly increased: the Salone dei
Cinquecento, characterised by its austere nature, in line with the
political vision of Savonarola. When Cosimo I became Lord of
Florence, he felt the necessity to radically restructure this hall,
to be the place to represent republican liberties. Going back
to his family's tradition of patronage, Cosimo supported the
arts as a means of strengthening his image as an absolute Lord
and surrounded himself with refined artists. In this climate of
centralization of power, Vasari becomes the main interpreter
of the will of the duke, who places him in charge of the works.
The extensive renovation program included many parts of the
hall such as the paintings. The ultimate goal of the architect
was to praise and glorify the Medici family, Cosimo I, and the
greatness of the city of Florence.
Three pitched battles relating to the Pisa war were reproduced
on the west wall and three battles concerning the Siena war
on the east wall. The historiographic character of Vasari's
paintings allows us to consider these frescoes not only as
important artistic works, but also as historical documents,
reliable sources that accurately report the architectural and
environmental past of Medici Tuscany. In the preparatory
phase of the frescoes, the defensive structures and the
topography of the places are studied with extreme accuracy
through the execution of sketches and drafts of the landscape
and architectures, by Vasari's collaborators, who were sent to
collect information directly on the site.
Of the six frescoes, three were selected: "Maximilian removes
the siege of Livorno", "Defeat of the Pisans at the tower of San
Vincenzo" and "Presa di Porto Ercole". These three subjects
developed the basis for a practical and technologically
advanced approach to the documentation, interpretation and
communication of the contents, represented as an artistic
form. The central location of this study is, therefore, the Salone
132
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
Cycle
Title
Date of
realization
Date of
the event
Position
Authors
in the Hall
War with Pisa
Assault to Pisa
1568
1499
North-West
G. Vasari and collaborators
War with Pisa
Maximilian I ends the siege in
Livorno
1567
1496
Centre-West
G. Vasari and collaborators
War with Pisa
Defeat of the Pisan army at the St.
Vincent Tower
1569
1505
SouthWest
G. Vasari and collaborators
War with Siena
Assault to the Siena fortress near the
Camollia’s gate
1570
1554
NorthEast
G. Vasari and collaborators
War with Siena
The fall of Porto Ercole
1570
1555
Centre-East
G. Vasari and collaborators
War with Siena
Pietro Strozzi defeated in the Scanna- 1571
gallo battle, Valdichiana
1554
SouthEast
G. Vasari and collaborators
dei Cinquecento, to then expand to the places represented on Table 1. Classification of the
its walls. The project was born, in fact, during the digital survey frescoes in the “Salone dei
of Palazzo Vecchio, commissioned by the City Municipality to Cinquecento” Hall.
the Dipartimento di Architettura of the University of Florence.
The survey has been essential for all types of analyses that
were subsequently made, providing a reliable, accurate metric
model capable of offering certain insights into the proportions
among the parts present in each work.
Survey Methodology
For the complete survey of Palazzo Vecchio, six 3D laser
scanners units were used. These collected a considerable
amount of data (5500 scanning stations carried out in about
21 days of detection). Two in particular were used for the
hall, the 3DLS CAM/2 FARO with 330 metred range and 2
millimetres accuracy at 10 m distance, and the 3DLS CAM/2
FARO Focus-3D 70s with 70 metres of range and one
millimetre accuracy at 10 metres distance. From this survey it
is possible to obtain the 2D reproduction of the orthographic
and perspective drawings, typed down in Autodesk. Within
the perspective drawings, the three photographic images
of the examined frescoes were repositioned, which entered
as a reference in the CAD tracking operations. For the
photographic survey of the Salone, a NIKON D800E was
used, a DSLR camera with a resolution of 36.3 Megapixels,
with two different lenses: a Nikkor zoom 24-120mm F4
and a Nikkor zoom 70-300mm F4.5. The former lens made
it possible to obtain high-resolution shots of the individual
paintings and of the overall space of the hall; with the latter,
photogrammetric details of the architectures shown in the
background and of the main details of each pictorial work
were acquired. All the shots were subsequently processed to
correct the distortions of the lenses in use and therefore the
perspective distortions based on the LS3D survey.
133
FORMA CIVITATIS
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
Outside the palace, three other photographic surveys, in the
historical sites of the battles (Livorno, San Vincenzo, Porto
Ercole), were carried out. The tools used are the same as
those used for the Salone. In this way, material relating to
the territory, to the conformation of places, villages and cities
was collected to be analysed and compared with the Tuscan
landscape views painted in the hall.
3D reconstruction and analysis
For all paintings the same methodology of analysis and 3D
reconstruction was used, both to keep the common thread
of the whole research clear, and to better highlight the
differences between the three locations: Porto Ercole, San
Vincenzo and Livorno. The work phases were carried out in
the following order: compositional analysis, analysis of the
battle, study of the landscape, study of the architecture and
fortifications and 3D reconstruction, final reading of the
results. The compositional analysis of the paintings proved
to be of primary importance. Vasari chooses, for the six
large wall frescoes, muted colours and light chiaroscuro in
such a way as to mitigate the force of the gigantic figures
represented in the foreground. Vasari creates the paintings
using imaginary diagonals and reference lines, a wide range
of variation is allowed between the effective perspective
of the places, and the crushing and alteration needed to
compose scenarios and figures. Each painting is studied on
three different levels. In the foreground stand the gigantic
figures of captains, lords and emperors who took part in the
battles. Many of them are dressed in old-fashioned clothes
and accompanied by symbolic objects, to highlight the value
and power they owned. Further the battle scenes, the clashes
between the militias, the cavalry and the infantry fighting.
And furthermore the banners, the coats of arms and the flags
flying between the heads of the soldiers, armed advancing
accompanied by drums and trumpets. In the end, beyond
the battle, appear: coasts, forests, valleys, perched citadels,
watchtowers, entire cities defended by walls. These structures
too are caught in the heat of battle, during sieges and assaults.
The defensive structures appear, therefore, invaded, destroyed
or still intact in the midst of the defence action.
The next step: historical research.
The capture of Porto Ercole is part of the more general scenario
of the war with Siena and takes place between May and June
1555. The story in the fresco concerns one of the last phases
of the war. Following the fall of Siena on April 17, 1555, the
few surviving, who escaped the capture of the city, decided to
continue the resistance under the command of Piero Strozzi.
134
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
The only help from the outside could have come only to Porto
Ercole. There Strozzi gathers the Franco-Sienese troops and
fortifies the place waiting for the Turkish fleet of Dragut Rais.
On the opposite front the imperial troops of Charles V are
deployed. The frescoes entitled "Maximilian removes the siege
of Livorno" and "The defeat of the Pisans at the tower of San
Vincenzo" regard two battles linked to the Pisa War. In 1406,
following the fall of Pisa, the city passed under the Florentine
dominion. However the Pisan independence forces have
not subsided. When Charles VIII, King of France, goes to
Italy directed to the Kingdom of Naples, to claim the rights
of the Angevins, Pisa creates an alliance to recover the old
territories. In this context, in 1496 the emperor Maximilian,
an ally of Pisa, attacked Livorno, which however strenuously
defended itself and forced Maximilian to retreat. Between
1494 and 1509 Pisa rebelled several times against Florence so
as to be garrisoned by Florentine troops. It is in this climate of
revenge that the "Battle of San Vincenzo" takes place between
Florentines and Pisans on 17 August 1505. The captain
Bartolomeo d’Alviano, together with about a thousand men
from the Sienese Maremma, rushes to the aid of the Pisans.
The Florentines tried to stop him, sending an expedition of
Figure 2. The fall of Porto
Ercole, photo, Palazzo Vecchio.
135
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
about 1200 armigers commanded by Ercole Bentivoglio. He
has the intention of attacking near the Tower of S. Vincenzo,
a strategic point that makes the place easily defensible. The
clash ends with the victory of the Florentine army.
The research continues with the inspection of the three battle
sites. The aim is to better study the place and the remains, carry
out the photographic survey, find the prevalent point of view
chosen by Vasari to represent the scenes of the painting, and
to relocate its on the territory. Vasari sends his collaborators
to the territories of the battles with the task of drawing
sketches of the landscape and thus being able to evaluate the
appropriate points of view to set the events. The composition
of the painting exceeds the geometric construction rules
and resorting to various "licences" in order to obtain a more
impressive and dynamic result.
During the survey in Porto Ercole, the search for the point of
view required a significant exploration of the area. Looking
at the painting, in the background, the coast between the sea
and the land appears. Galeries, troops and encampments
settle around eight military forts. The place today appears
invaded by nature, the dense Mediterranean scrub and the
vegetation extend up to the rocky coast. On the heights of the
woods and in the basin on which Porto Ercole rests the more
Figure 3. Maximilian I ends the
siege in Livorno, photo, Palazzo
Vecchio.
136
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
rigorous and geometric profile of the port unfolds, flanked by
the houses of the village. Even today it is possible to see the
traces of the mediaeval walls of the Rocca and the Spanish
stratifications built later. Clearly visible along the road leading
to Porto Ercole appears the Isolotto, a very small island, a
characteristic natural element of the place. Two fortifications
are visible on the crests of the nearby mountains: Forte
Stella and Forte Filippo, built after the battle. From the Forte
Stella, the point of view adopted by Vasari can be identified.
The comparison between the real territory and the painted
territory shows correspondences among the promontories,
the coast and the vegetation, but also some discrepancies,
for example, the elongated strip of land of the Isolotto is
eliminated in the fresco. It can be seen that Vasari adapts the
painted area to his scenographic and celebratory needs, for
instance, by raising the horizon line to give more space to the
clash and better show the forts. Of the eight defensive forts
built, almost nothing remains.
The survey in San Vincenzo shows how today the tower and
the landscape are very different. The strong presence of woods
and nature are prevalent in the fresco. The only architectural
feature present in the area is the tower itself, which overlooks
the surroundings and the main road. The road reveals the
identity of the place: a junction to nearby cities and a point
of communication with the other coastal towers. The same
view of this area today appears built and strongly altered.
Non-homogeneous urbanisation is dominant, not always a Figure 4. Defeat of the Pisan
good example of contemporary architecture. The tower is army at the St. Vincent Tower,
still present, but modified. A long series of interventions and photo, Palazzo Vecchio.
137
FORMA CIVITATIS
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
restorations transformed its appearance. On one side of the buildings
are linked to the walls of the tower themselves, on the other side a
public square and the coast open up. The pitched roof was replaced
by the battlements, the lack of the entrance door, the absence of
overhanging elements present in the painting, as well as the opening
of a new door at the roadway level. We can trust the original shape
of the tower as it appears in the fresco, on the contrary the landscape
is not entirely realistic: there are several discrepancies between what
is painted and what is present in the area. Probably, the architectpainter choosed to mix more points of view to represent the beauty
of the coast and also to tell the salient episodes of the battle. The
forest, for example, could have been inserted to represent the arrival
of the Medici troops. At the same time, this setting of the fresco
serves the artist to enrich the scenography with inserts typical of
the territory and tuscany architecture, as in the case of the fortified
village present in the setting. The village could represent the fortress
of Populonia which, however, has some significant differences.
As for Livorno, the point of view chosen by Vasari and his
collaborators appears today to be largely altered by the urban
expansion and development of the port. The residential settlement
grew between the fortification system of the fifteenth century. The
landscape around the walls, that surrounded the city and the coast,
appears to have changed greatly. Of the five towers present in the
painting, only some are still present and in good condition (such as
the Marzocco tower and the lighthouse), the others no longer exist.
To search more precisely the point of view of the painting, it was
decided to look at the area using Google Earth, which, thanks to the
aerial view, allows one to travel around the city without losing sight
of the main objects of study. Once the main possible points were
identified, these were also verified on the territory, and the most
probable was therefore chosen on the basis of the greatest visual
correspondence with what Vasari painted. The chosen position
allows one to see the Marzocco tower and the landscape behind it.
Unfortunately, due to the actual port and constructions, the other
towers, the old fortress and the walled village are completely blocked
from view.
The reconstruction of the defensive system of the three scenes
represented was possible thanks to the careful analysis and research
carried out up to this point. The following paragraphs recount
the steps of the work from the historical-artistic study of the
representation of the battle, to the 3D drawings of the fortifications.
The defensive system of Porto Ercole
The defensive system of Porto Ercole, built for the battle against
the Medici and their allies, consisted of eight fortifications.
Unfortunately, it is not known who the creator of these
buildings is. From the documents of the time, it is clear that
138
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
more people actually contributed to the strategic decisions.
Piero and Leone Strozzi were certainly involved in the
transition between the design and executive phases. Paul de
la Barthe, a French military engineer who was involved in the
fortification works in Maremma, was also involved. We have
received various descriptions of individual forts, collected
from the writings of the Florentine military, who, when they
conquered a position, reported the territory taken on paper.
From the information obtained it is possible to make some
observations. The eight forts had to be for the most part
small, had to perform specific functions and were equipped
with buildings and service facilities, such as warehouses or
remittances, some of which were close to waterways. The
largest building was the Rocca, while the smaller ones were
Fort Guasparino, Ercoletto and Sant’Ippolito. Archival
plans have only been found for some of the forts, and
graphical scales are indicated only for some of them. The
plant of Fort Sant’Ermo, for example, is shown in the
Braccia Florentine measure.
The defensive system of San Vincenzo
Historical research on defensive structures shows how the 15th
century towers built on the coast shared the same typological
pattern of shapes and composition. The San Vincenzo tower
is no exception. These structures had different functions, all
inextricably linked to the position and the surrounding area.
They served as watchtowers against possible pirate or enemy
incursions, for sighting so as to get in touch with other towers
thanks to luminous or acoustic signals, or as control points
for health and customs surveillance reasons. The tower of San
Vincenzo had a square plan and is characterised by having
a base part with very thick shoe walls on which three floors
were inserted. The top consisted of a terrace that could be
covered by a pitched roof. On this level, shooting platforms
were built to place the Battery. The top floor was intended
for the guardhouse, while the rooms below were used as
housing for the garrison. Usually the first floor was occupied
by the castellan. The space obtained from the base nut was
often used as a water tank and was without direct entry to the
outside. For safety reasons, the access to the tower was placed
on the first floor and was reached via a stone staircase and a
small retractable wooden element, if necessary. This could be
a ladder or a small bridge. The internal vertical connection
between floors, which normally consisted of a single room,
was characterised by retractable wooden stairs. The rooms
were lit by small windows that allowed the surrounding area
to be kept under control. The tower was also flanked by small
139
FORMA CIVITATIS
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
buildings, used as ovens, stables or sheds; it was probably also
flanked by a small vegetable garden.
Defensive system of Livorno
From the fresco it was possible to identify the coastal towers,
the lighthouse, the walled village and the Old Fortress. These
structures as a whole characterise the defensive structure of the
village. From the painting it is possible to clearly identify the
general appearance, the geometric, volumetric and spatial shape
and the position in the territory, in which they are inserted. The
Farone or Fanale (1302), the Torre del Marzocco (1439), the
Torre del Magnale, the Torre della Rocchetta and the Torre del
Palazzotto. The Fanale and Torre del Marzocco are the largest in
size. The Torre del Marzocco is the highest (54 m), the other three
towers have heights around 30 metres.
The interventions made by Giambacorti in 1392 are evident from
the reconstruction, such as the walls that surrounded the entire
settlement. These walls had to have no embankment, isolated and
equipped in the corners of some towers. The enclosure measured
one thousand and six hundred fathoms (approximately 933.76
metres). If the walls defending the port were also considered, it
is then to arrive at two thousand and two hundred braccia. They
started west, where the Porta a Mare was and continued north
towards the Porta a Terra, then turned in a semicircle. Via Maestra
(now San Giovanni still existing) connects the two gates.
3D reconstruction methodology
To model the fortifications defensive system depicted by Vasari,
the information obtained during the analyses and surveys were
processed and compared with each other. The reconstruction
took place in three phases. First of all, the plan of the individual
structures was drawn. For the fortifications and towers, in
which the plans with their respective dimensions were found, it
was possible to convert the Braccia Florentine into metres and
then scale the plan according to the measurements obtained.
For the architectures, the original plants have not been found,
other sources of information have been used: the frescoes by
Vasari and other artists, the reports and descriptions written by
the captains of the Medici, the comparison with the territory
and the morphology of the site. Secondly, the heights were
reported, extruded and the main curtain wall of the fort was
modelled. Later the details, the overhangs and openings and the
characteristic elements of the sixteenth-century fortifications
were added such as the ramparts, the battlements, the walkways
on the walls and the service structures present in the fresco
(accommodation, remittances and storage areas). The military
constructions have gradually taken a more concrete form and
140
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
have been reconstructed in their main features. This procedure
was followed for all the three battle locations analysed. For
San Vincenzo it was possible to model not only the external
structure, but also the internal rooms of the tower. This is thanks
to an ad hoc analysis carried out on the defensive coastal towers
of the area dating back to 1400-1500. For the sizing of each
reconstruction, the resulting shapes were compared using the
two graphic scales used: Braccia Florentine and metres. The
Braccia Fiorentine, used in Tuscany of 1400-1500, obviously
found a greater confirmation than the measures in metres in the Figure 5. Giulia Emilio,
definition of the compositional matrices. They are clearer and knowledge level map, 3D
more precise as they are original units in use in the design phase. reconstruction, Porto Ercole.
141
FORMA CIVITATIS
Figure 6. Giulia Emilio,
knowledge level map, 3D
reconstruction, St.Vincent.
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
Conclusions
The final result of the 3D reconstruction of the defence
systems is linked to several factors. For Porto Ercole the
reconstruction of the eight fortifications is more geometrical
and spatial, closely connected to the conformation of the village
and Monte Argentario. For San Vincenzo a typological and
architectural reconstruction of the coastal tower is obtained.
While for Livorno, the five towers, the old fortress and the walled
city, appear to be deeply linked to the urban aspects, such as the
development of neighbourhoods, roads and the seaport. The
model reports a realistic as detailed as possible reconstruction
142
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
of the defensive system examined. The trace left by Vasari's
representation, beyond the great artistic value, becomes a
fundamental historical clue, which allows the best understanding
of a territory that is now transfigured. The difference in available
information and the different transformation undergone in
places and architectures led to a significant variation in the results
obtained for the individual structures, leading to a heterogeneous
final outcome. Hence the need to prepare a map able to facilitate
the reading and understanding of the 3D models, showing how and Figure 7. Giulia Emilio,
which elements were reconstructed and the degree of assurance. knowledge level map, 3D
From the analysis carried out and the sources acquired, the data reconstruction, Livorno.
143
FORMA CIVITATIS
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
obtained were synthesised through an original solution, prepared
and based on a score that defines the degree of approximation of the
results according to a scale of values from zero to one hundred. The
sources considered are: consistency of the representation in Vasari's
painting, confirmation by other paintings, the remains on the site,
archival plans, historical research. If the data is missing, the score
obtained is zero, if it is certain the score is one hundred, intermediate
values indicate the degree of detail and the certain correspondence
between the testimony and its confirmation with the other tests.
The reading of the 3D models obtained is easier and more direct,
not distorted in interpretation by the simple fact of appearing
"resolved". Plus, it clarifies for each reconstructed element which
sources have been taken into consideration, and what percentage
these have influenced the choices. This is because it has not always
been possible to find all the sources of the information necessary
for the 3D reconstruction. For San Vincenzo an optimal source was
historical research, for Livorno two other Vasari paintings, preserved
in Palazzo Vecchio, concerning the battle were of great help. Finally,
it can be concluded that the frescoes in the hall have always been
considered in the 3D reconstruction as the main sources for the
graphic and architectural choices.
The intention is to correctly classify the level of knowledge achieved,
relating to all the structures and, at the same time, underline the
transformation of the urban / natural landscape and the level of
enhancement (as a state of fact or as a potential) of the built heritage
arrived at present day from the late Renaissance scenario.
Acknowledgments
The Digital Survey of Palazzo Vecchio was conducted inside the
research “Vulnerabilità sismica di edifici strategici e rilevanti,
storici e monumentali posti nel Comune di Firenze - Rilievo 3D
Laser Scanner di Palazzo Vecchio”, on the base of an agreement
between the Florentine Municipality, coordinator: Paolo Ferrara
and the Dipartimento di Architettura, University of Florence,
agreement coordinator: Mario De Stefano, survey coordinator:
Giorgio Verdiani, sampling and data integration coordinator:
Marco Tanganelli; operative survey team: Mattia Faiulo, Alexia
Charalambous, Giulia Emilio, Andrea Guazzoni, Federico Nannini,
Gaia Vannucci, Francesca Meli, Ilaria Bencini, Yelenia Ricci, Andrea
Pasquali, with the collaboration of Paolo Capraro. The survey and
data post processing were supported by the DIDALABS System
of the Dipartimento di Architettura, University of Florence. The
historical-artistic research, the on-site investigation, the recovery
of materials, and the photographic survey were conducted with the
support of Professor Giorgio Verdiani and the historian Gualtiero
Della Monaca, president of the “Centro studi Don Pietro Fanciulli,
Monte Argentario”.
144
GIULIA EMILIO, GIORGIO VERDIANI
FORMA CIVITATIS
References
Allegri E., Cecchi A. (1980), Palazzo Vecchio e i Medici guida
storica, S.P.E.S, Florence, Italy.
Argan G.C. (1988), Storia dell’Arte Italiana 3, Sansoni editore,
Florence, Italy.
Benigno Á., Avilés, G. (editors)(2017), Defensive Architecture
of the Mediterranean XV to XVIII centuries, Volume 5,
Publicacions Universitat D’alacant, Alicante, Spain.
Beni, E. (2009), Populonia: dalle origini alla fondazione
di Piombino, La Bancarella, Piombino, Italy. Carbone C.
Coppellotti A.,Cuccaro S.(2004), I luoghi delle battaglie in
Toscana, Regione Toscana, Florence, Italy.
Cecchi A. (2011), Giorgio Vasari, L’uomo e l’artista in Giorgio
Vasari disegnatore e pittore, Skira editore, Milan, Italy.
Crova C. (2018) Torri costiere di Terra di Lavoro. Storia e
conservazione, Volturnia Edizioni, Italy.
Della Monaca G. (2010), la presa di Porto Ercole, C&P Adver
Effigi, Italy.
Echarri Iribarren, V. (editor)(2017), Defensive Architecture
of the Mediterranean XV to XVIII centuries, Volume 6.
Publicacions Universitat D’alacant, Alicante, Spain.
Fiore F.P. (2018) Architettura e arte militare. Mura e bastioni nella
cultura del Rinascimento, Campisano Editore, Firenze, Italy.
Guarducci, A., Piccardi M., Rombai L. (2012), Atlante della
Toscana tirrenica: cartografia, storia, paesaggi, architetture,
Debatte, Italy.
Kula W. (1987), Le misure e gli uomini dall'antichità a oggi, translated
by Salmon Vivanti A., Storia e società, Laterza, Bari, Italy.
Muccini U. (1990), Il salone dei cinquecento in Palazzo Vecchio,
Le lettere, Italy.
Nudi G.(1959), Storia urbanistica di Livorno. Dalle origini
al secolo XVI, Neri Pozza editore, Venezia, Italy. Verdiani,
G. Camiz, A. (2016). Modern Age Fortifications of the
Mediterranean Coast: exhibition catalogue, Didapress,
Firenze, Italy.
Verdiani, G. (2016), Reading the project and “reverse design”:
An architectural approach to digital reconstruction, in:
20th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New
Technologies 2015, vol. 1, pp. 1-15, Museen der Stadt Wien –
Stadtarchäologie, Vienna, Austria.
Verdiani G. (2017), Fortifications and documentation: the
case of Fortezza Vecchia in Livorno. State of the digital survey
2017, in Defensive Architecture of the Mediterranean XV to
XVIII centuries, , vol. 6, pp. 311-318, Editorial Publicacions
Universitat D’alacant, Alicante, Spain.
Tito Sante Centi, (1993) Girolamo Savonarola: il frate che
sconvolse Firenze, Roma, Italy.
145
Printed on November the 1st 2022 in Weimar and Rostock.
161
Vol. 2, N. 1, 2022, Grünberg Verlag, Weimar and Rostock, GREEN OPEN ACCESS: J123-2020-FC; ISSN 2748-2812 (Print); ISSN 2748-3134 (Online); ISBN: 9783933713681
FORMA CIVITATIS, International Journal of Urban
and Territorial Morphological Studies, Vol. 2, N. 1,
2022, Grünberg Verlag, Weimar and Rostock, GREEN
OPEN ACCESS: J123-2020-FC; ISSN 2748-2812 (Print);
ISSN 2748-3134 (Online); ISBN: 9783933713681
FORMA CIVITATIS
Forma Civitatis, International journal of urban
and territorial morphological studies aims to
publish yearly scientific researches in English,
characterized by the application of innovative
and experimental methods. The covered
themes range from urban morphology to the
history of architecture, to the theory of form, to
survey, to architectural design and restoration,
without excluding on the other hand, the studies
in the discipline of archaeology. The journal
adheres to the Open Access philosophy, as
part of a general policy of reducing the cultural
divide of the contemporary world, it will be
freely accessible online, and available in print
on demand technology thanks to the publishing
house’s kind efforts in Weimar and Rostock.