affirm that the author advances the discussion of Matthew’s sources or Litteraturgeschichte. What we are left with, however, is a hodgepodge of verbal similarities (Part 2) coupled together with an inconclusive reconstruction of the Didache’s compositional history (Part 1). One can only look forward to further analysis of these and other “gospel” materials in early Christianity. James A. Kelhoffer, Saint Louis University
clayton jefford hasn't uploaded this paper.
Let clayton know you want this paper to be uploaded.
