Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
1
AERIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION AND DOCUMENTATION
THE AERIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARCHIVE OF THE INSTITUTE OF
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCES OF THE EÖTVÖS LORÁND
UNIVERSITY OF BUDAPEST
(SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITY IN 1993-2005)
ZOLTÁN CZAJLIK
Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
E-mail:
[email protected]
Abstract
The Aerial Archaeological Archive of the Institute for Archaeological Sciences of the Eötvös Loránd University of
Budapest has been created in 1993. It’s activity is characterised by four important programs:
- 13 years of aerial archaeological research (until 2000 in the cadre of the Hungarian-French archaeological cooperation).
- Exploration and mapping of aerial archaeological sites, which has been done parallel to the other activities.
- Processing of the data obtained from the 768 aerial archaeological sites discovered until 2006. The processing of the
systematised archive has begun in two directions: we make the interpretations for the important sites and we prepare
the geographical transformations of the aerial photos (if possible) and – principally in the case of settlements - we
conduct intensive field surveys to control them.
- Cataloguing of earthwork fortifications, tell settlements and tumuli, which has been greatly supported by
photographical surveys. This surveys can reveal new sites as well as new information about already known sites.
The research activity of 13 years makes it possible to draw some general conclusions concerning the best choice of
geographical areas (Northern and Eastern Transdanubia) and periods (the 2nd and 3rd weeks of June) for the most
fruitful research.
KULCSSZAVAK: LÉGI RÉGÉSZET, TÉRKÉPEZÉS, ÉRTELMEZÉS, TEREPJÁRÁS
KEYWORDS: AERIAL ARCHAEOLOGY, MAPPING, INTERPRETATION, FIELD SURVEY
Introduction
It’s a historical fact, that the common use of the
aeroplane – developed at the turn of the 19th and 20th
centuries – and the photography has been initiated in
the First World War. The analysis of the
archaeological sites observed during war-time
reconnaissance flights has led to a new method in the
1920’s: to the development of the aerial archaeology
(for the history of the international research see:
Leidorf 1996, 33-37).
The situation was similar in Hungary, where the
initiator of the research, Sándor Neogrády has served
in the former Austro-Hungarian army. He took his first
aerial photos in 1917 at the Italian front and from 1920
onwards he had a role in the establishing of the
topographical aerial photography in Hungary. He has
also found archaeological sites during his work and he
managed to attract the attention of the Hungarian
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
researchers. Unfortunately he did not received any
support, and the period of the 2nd World War as well as
Cold War period were not suitable for any kind of
substantive research (for the short summary of the
Hungarian research see: Goguey, Szabó 1995, 18-19).
The political changes in 1989/90 brought a definitive
turn. It became to be possible to conduct aerial
archaeological research – although under the control of
the military censorship until 2000. From that time the
National Office of Cultural Heritage issues the
permissions.
The research has begun at three institutions with the
participation of home and foreign researchers: the
Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of
Sciences, the University of Pécs and at the Institute of
Archaeological Sciences of the Eötvös Loránd
University of Budapest from the beginning of the
1990’s.
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
2
Fig. 1.
Aerial archaeological sites, prospected by R. Goguey (1993-2000), mapping by A. Bödőcs in 2006
The main task of the GIS Laboratory – created in 1993
as a part of the Archaeological Institute of the Eötvös
Loránd University – was to process the GIS
background of the rescue excavations on the M3
motorway in Hajdú-Bihar county (see: Czajlik & Holl
1996, Czajlik et al. 1997, 1999, Raczky et al. 1998,
2002). The creation of the laboratory has made
possible the starting of linked scientific projects. We
could manage the background research in the case of
the aerial archaeological project between 1993 and
2000 in the cadre of a Hungarian-French co-operation.
The initiation of that research comes from Prof. Miklós
Szabó (on the Hungarian side) and from René Goguey
(on the French side) and the main sponsors were the
Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the French Republic,
the Regional Council of Burgundy (France), the
Institute of Archaeological Sciences of the Eötvös
Loránd University of Budapest and the Balaton
Program. Anne Violot-Richeton documentarian and
Zoltán Czajlik archaeologist have been participating in
the project from its very beginning.
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
Hungarian-French aerial archaeological
research (fig. 1)
The main task of the aerial archaeological project
starting in 1993, were the support of the HungarianFrench Iron Age research as well as the support of the
regional research on the Northern part of the Great
Hungarian Plain by the Institute of Archaeological
Sciences of the Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
According to the personal devotion of the French pilot
René Goguey, the other main objective was the
research of the Roman Danube frontier and Pannonia.
The practical experience – based on the very good
weather and soil conditions during the aerial
archaeological research - has made it clear, that the
most important objective of the aerial research (of 3040 hours a year) is the preliminary exploration of the
whole surface of Hungary. That’s why we have
decided in the first five years to explore separate
regions in order to avoid long aerial trips. This method
has been proven very efficient as we have always
changed the base airports.
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
3
The county museums offered us their aid and we cooperated during the airport use with the Jósa András
Museum of Nyíregyháza in 1994, the Rippl-Rónai
Museum of Kaposvár in 1995 and the Déri Museum of
Debrecen in 1996. We had to get used to the
circumstance, that the one-week-long aerial
archaeological actions had to be scheduled, because of
technical reasons. This means, we have done our
research in regions, where the growth of the cereals on
the fields has been appropriate.
During the primary identification, we have found 432
aerial archaeological sites (Fig. 2). The term „aerial
archaeological site” means we have identified 432
places on the 1:10,000 maps altogether using the GPS
co-ordinates (rather inaccurate before 2001 because of
political and technical reasons) where René Goguey
has taken his photos. This number of 432 does not
equal with the number of the new sites discovered
since the structures seen on the photos could also
reveal the following phenomena:
Between 1993 and 1997, we could use the aeroplane of
the Regional Council of Burgundy, a special plane of
the type Robin 3000 (registry sign F-GKRB) adapted
to the needs of aerial archaeology (board-GPS by
Garmin, camera windows built into the door and into
the rear fuselage). From 1998, we have used the
Cessna 172 aeroplane (registry sign HA-SLG) of the
Őcsény Aviation Club, piloted by Péter Cziráki. That
plane had a more precise Garmin board-GPS and a
camera window in the door. The photos have been
taken almost exclusively by René Goguey on
conventional films (mainly Kodak Ektachrome) using
professional Nikon and Leica cameras. In 1997-1998
and in 2000 Zoltán Czajlik has made photos too, he has
taken principally panoramic views to help the
identification of the sites.
•
non-archaeological phenomena (like traces of
modern and 19th century farms esp. on the Great
Hungarian Plain)
•
drains filled in, trenches from the war periods,
traces of soil amelioration
•
archaeological sites already known (tumuli,
earthwork fortifications, etc.)
The processing of the photos has been managed to
keep pace with the exploratory research. The basic
processing was the preliminary identification (with
interpretation sketches in many cases) of the sites,
based on the slide copies and digitalised photos handed
over by the French partner and on the GPS coordinates. The main task of the Hungarian participants
was to get the appropriate topographical maps and to
identify the sites on the photos. The most of this task
has been done in the cadre of the Hungarian Scientific
Research Fund Program (nr. T043762) using the
benefits of the Balaton program (French-Hungarian
bilateral governmental co-operation), too. The
identification process has been finished early in 2006.
The brief evaluation of the more than 4000 photos
taken at 432 aerial archaeological sites during 8 years
leads to the following experience:
Fig. 2.
Aerial archaeological prospections (R. Goguey, 19932000)
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
Despite of the inaccuracies mentioned above the
majority of the photos taken show new archaeological
sites, thanks to the working method of René Goguey
who has filtered the information before he has taken
any photos and he has drawn sketches in the aeroplane
just over the site after he has completed an action. This
method has proven very efficient during the research.
•
the best time interval for aerial archaeological
operations in Hungary is linked to the seeding of
the cereals planted at autumn, which means
usually the 2nd and 3rd week of June. A slight
discolouration of the cereals planted in autumn can
be observed under circumstances in the 1st week
of June and the discolouration is still visible in the
1st week of July – just before harvest. This
discolouration is visible even in the spring growth
just after plantation.
•
Most of the aerial archaeological sites are located
in the eastern part of Transdanubia (Figs. 3-4) as
well as between the Danube and the Tisza and in
the Kisalföld (the latest applies for certain years
only). Despite of the base airports at Nyíregyháza
and Debrecen we have identified only a relative
small number of new sites on the Great Hungarian
Plain and the same happened when the base
airport has been set to Sármellék and Kaposújlak:
the number of the sites in Zala and Somogy county
is relatively small.
•
We believe that the scheduling of the operations
has significantly influenced the effectivity of the
research, but the results show that the years 1997
and 2000 were very efficient, in contrast to the
year 1994 of no avail. In certain years the greenery
appeared on the whole surface of Hungary (1993)
but sometimes we could observe a mosaic-like
pattern (1998, 2000).
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
Fig. 3 a-b.
Beloiannisz – Nagy Vadas: Traces of a medieval
farm(?) and the field usage (photo: R. Goguey, 12
June, 1993; interpretation: A. Violot-Richeton in 1995;
field survey: Z Czajlik and K. Tankó, 11 April, 2006)
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
4
When we would like to have an overview of the results
of the Hungarian-French co-operative research activity
we can not leave the publications and exhibitions of
this 8 years period unmentioned.
The first introduction of the research program was at
the RCHMS conference in Oxford in September of
1995 (published only later: Goguey & Czajlik 2003)
and, at the end of the same month at the conference of
the Brandenburgisches Landesmuseum (Goguey
1995). In October of the same year the results were
displayed for the professionals and the public at the
international conference organised by the French
Institute in Hungary and the Eötvös Loránd University
of Budapest as well as at the joint exhibition
„L’histoire vue du ciel” - The history from bird’s eye
view (Goguey & Szabó 1995). The novelty of the
exhibition has been confirmed at a series of representations at Debrecen, Székesfehérvár, Dijon,
Bibracte and Châtillon-sur-Seine. In December of 1996
he held a presentation at an international aerial
archaeological conference in Prague (Goguey 1997)
and the results we have displayed at a series of
international exhibitions in 1997, participating 6
Central-European nations. The conference in honour of
the 10th anniversary of the French-Hungarian cooperation was held just before the flight actions in
1998 with the first comparison of the prehistoric sites
in Eastern France and Hungary by René Goguey
(Goguey 2000a) and at the same time was published a
short report on the technical background of the
researches (Goguey 2000b).
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
5
Fig. 4 a-b.
Ercsi – Sinatelep: Traces of a Late Roman military tower, the limes-road and a fortification? (photo: R. Goguey, 28
June, 2000; interpretation and field survey: A. Bödőcs, 2003)
Since we had outstanding results in the year 2000 there
has been published a preliminary evaluation
incorporating the analysis of the possibilities of the
GIS processing, too (Goguey et al. 2003). The
exhibition in 2002 displayed in Lyon - Saint-RomainHU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
en-Gal – Vienne has shown the summarisation of the
results of the 8-years-long research period (Goguey
2002a). There has been also released an article for the
public (Goguey 2002b).
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
6
Fig. 5.
Aerial archaeological sites, prospected by Z. Czajlik (2001-2005), mapping by A. Bödőcs in 2006
Aerial archaeological prospection since
2001 (fig. 5)
In 2000 and 2001 the financial background is
supported by different projects, from 2003 by the
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund Program (as
mentioned above) and from 2004 onwards we can
benefit the increasing support of the private sector, too.
An important support is the assignment from the
territorial museum organisations as order as well as a
co-operation (Somogy, Bács-Kiskun and BorsodAbaúj-Zemplén counties).
An important change since the period between 1993
and 2000, that we manage to select the best days for
aerial actions considering the weather of the
spring/early summer period. It means a significant
difference that we have got the flight data from the
previous actions (they are processed in an increasing
number) which allows us to plan and schedule the
aerial photography actions. The technical development
– the evolution of the digital photography and the use
of video cameras – can be considered as an advantage
compared to the past (faster processing), despite of the
fact that the digital technology does not allow the same
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
image quality as the conventional photography
technology at the same price level.
Compared to the period between 1993 and 2000 we
could explore a bit less number of sites during less or
equal time spent with flight between 2001 and 2005
(Fig. 6). The region between the Danube and the Tisza
rivers as well as the Eastern-Transdanubia proved to be
fruitful for the research and in certain years we had
outstanding results.
Fig. 6.
Aerial archaeological prospections (Z. Czajlik, 20012005)
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
We have found a great number of new sites in the
Kisalföld region in 2003 and in the Jászság region
(where the research has been not very effective before)
in 2003 and 2004.
In many cases we could observe very light
discolouration in the vegetation, which was seen only
once before (in 2000) thanks to the precise schedule of
the flight actions and the dry springtime weather in
those years. In 2003 and 2004 we could identify even
cemeteries of serial type and ditch-framed burials as
well as the traces of long houses and houses with
foundation trenches.
The results of the archaeological exploration are
published in the periodical ’Archaeological
Investigations in Hungary’ from 2001 onwards. We are
also displaying our results on exhibitions: the most
remarkable ones were at the Hungarian University of
Fine Arts (January 2005), Denkmalexpo Leipzig
(October 2006) and the overview of our research has
been displayed at the ’Örökség Galéria’ (Heritage
Gallery, September, 2007).
Inventory programs
The infrastructural background built up in the GIS
Laboratory of the Archaeological Institute of the
Eötvös Loránd University of Budapest and the
experience in archaeological GIS have made it possible
to start the different inventory programs. The inventory
program for tumuli, earthwork fortifications and tell
settlements has been initiated by the Ministry of
Environment in 1996 according to the law 1996/LIII.
The database has been finished (with the exception of
the Roman Age tumuli and the Medieval earthworks),
but in the case of the prehistoric earthwork
fortifications and the tell settlement on the Great
Hungarian Plain we have also finished the
topographical identification. The database of kurgans
and the tumuli has been developed by Zoltán Czajlik
and Balázs Holl, based mainly on the data collection of
István Ecsedy and Dénes Virágh (Ecsedy 1979) and
the Archaeological Topography of Hungary (MRT
1966 - 1998). The inventory of the prehistoric
earthwork fortifications has been made by Gyula
Nováki, Zoltán Czajlik and Balázs Holl using the data
collection of József Dénes and Zsuzsa Miklós
(presented in Linz, at the ÖGUF-conference in 1999,
Nováki et al. 2006) and the inventory of the tell
settlements has been created by a workgroup led by Pál
Raczky and Nándor Kalicz (participants: Alexandra
Anders, Marietta Csányi, Judit Tárnoki, Emese
Gyöngyvér Nagy, Zoltán Czajlik). The most important
result of the inventory work is not the publishing of the
sites – known since the 19th century in many cases but their precise coordinate definitions. Without that,
there would have never been any chance to do the
aerial archaeological status control, which is the base
of our aerial photo research program.
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
7
Aerial archaeological status control of
earthwork fortifications (fig. 7)
After the previous work, we have started the aerial
archaeological status control of the earthwork
fortifications. The program was funded by the Ministry
of Education (program Nr. 0198/2000) between 2000
and 2002, from 2003 it is supported by the Hungarian
Research Found Program (Nr. T043762).
The inventory finished in 1999 includes the status of
200 earthwork fortifications. During the survey it was
a very important factor to take pictures from as many
fortifications as possible at one flight action. This
resulted in exploration of 5-10 fortifications per flight.
An important factor in the taking of photos, was to
make the flight possibly, when the plants were
defoliated. In the vegetation period we managed to
take photos from the earthworks covered by trees and
bushes. It became evident that the spring reveals more
opportunity for the flight actions since the trees of the
oak genus do not drop their leaves in the late autumn
and the early sunset is very unpractical for taking
pictures. The snow-covered surface is very good for
both types of the fortified settlements: the ones in
openings and the ones covered with vegetation.
Regarding our experience detailed above we could
finish the documentation of 160 earthwork
fortifications, which means 80% of the total. In
addition, we have taken photos of 32 Medieval
earthwork fortifications and 20 new other ones have
been identified (Fig. 5). In many cases we could obtain
more information about already know fortifications.
We have to point out that the photos taken by René
Goguey between 1993 and 2000 helped us to identify
many fortifications not known before – an addition to
the number of earthworks in our database. The results
we presented at the international (Czajlik 1999) and
national (Czajlik & Holl 2003) conferences, in reports
(Czajlik 2004a, 2004b, 2005, Czajlik & Bödőcs 2006,
Vicze et al. 2005) and in an overview (Czajlik 2006).
Evaluation of the data
After 13 years of research, we can state that the aerial
archaeological research has to be continued in
Hungary, because of the very good natural conditions.
The best regions for the research are the region
between the Danube and the Tisza rivers as well as the
Eastern and Northern Transdanubia. Thanks to the
good possibilities and the advantage of the airports
near to Budapest (Tököl and Budaörs), we could find
many new aerial archaeological sites to the South from
Budapest along the riversides of the Danube down to
Paks in the last 5 years. Going to the East from the
Danube we could explore many sites in the zone of
Dunaharaszti-Dabas-Dunavecse, even in the years of
rainy or disadvantageous weather.
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
8
Fig. 7.
Etyek – Pince-dűlő: traces of a Bronze age earthen fort (photo: Z. Czajlik, April 1, 2005; field survey: Z. Czajlik,
March 12, 2007)
This can be caused by the soil structure, since there is a
field of gravel from the Late Pleistocene Age under
this zone (Goguey et al. 2003, 80.).
The density and complexity of the aerial
archaeological sites in the region to the South from
Budapest
(Adony-Iváncsa,
ZichyújfaluSzabadegyháza, Szalkszentmárton, Bugyi, Dabas) is
the reason for a full-scale photo interpretation work.
This work results in the merging of the rectified photos
with the maps and the processing of photo-maps.
Fig. 8
Ráckeresztúr – Malontai út mellett: Traces of a rural
settlement from the Celtic period (photo: Z. Czajlik, 11
June, 2003, field survey: Z. Czajlik and A. Bödőcs,
March 28, 2006)
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
Since the decision between archaeological sites and the
other phenomena can be done only after field survey of
the aerial archaeological sites, we have begun the field
surveying in the spring of 2006 and our first
impressions are very positive about the results. The
first task of the field survey done on the fields of
Ráckeresztúr (Fig. 8), Adony, Beloiannisz, Ercsi,
Perkáta, Szabadegyháza and Gárdony is to determine
whether they are settlements or not. As a preliminary
evaluation, we can report that the majority of the aerial
sites proved to be an archaeological site of the Bronze,
Celtic or Roman Ages.
Translated by Lőrinc Tímár
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
Bibliography
CZAJLIK, Z. (1999): Archaeological Aerial
Prospection in Hungary: a Landscape Vanishes... in:
FASSBINDER, J. & IRLINGER, W. E.:
Archaeological Prospection. Third International
Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Munich 9.11. September 1999. Arbeitshefte des Bayerischen
Landesamtes für Denkmalpflege, 108, 24-25.
CZAJLIK, Z. (2003): Rövid jelentések - Short reports
(Békés – Viharsarok TSZ, Cegléd – Hódula-dűlő,
Hajdúszovát – Cenzus-föld, Hunya – Baják L. tanya,
Konyár – Nagy Hangás-dűlő, Polgár – Ferenci-hát 2,
Szeghalom – Cigányéri-dűlő, Tiszakeszi – Rigós),
Régészeti
Kutatások
Magyarországon
–
Archaeological Investigations in Hungary 2001, KÖH,
Budapest, 142., 156., 171., 173., 180., 204., 218., 229.
CZAJLIK, Z. (2004a): Légirégészeti kutatások
Magyarországon 2002-ben (Rövid beszámoló az ELTE
Régészettudományi
Intézetének
Térinformatikai
Kutatólaboratóriumában végzett munkáról) - Aerial
archaeological investigations in Hungary in 2002 (A
short report on the work done in the GIS Research
Laboratory of the Institute of Archaeological Sciences,
Eötvös Loránd University), Régészeti Kutatások
Magyarországon – Archaeological Investigations in
Hungary 2002, KÖH-MNM, Budapest, 161-169.
CZAJLIK, Z. (2004b): Légirégészeti kutatások
Magyarországon 2003-ban (Rövid beszámoló az ELTE
Régészettudományi
Intézetének
Térinformatikai
Kutatólaboratóriumában végzett munkáról) - Aerial
archaeological investigations in Hungary in 2003 (A
short report of the activity of the 3D Research
Laboratory of the ELTE Archaeological Institute),
Régészeti
Kutatások
Magyarországon
–
Archaeological Investigations in Hungary 2003, KÖH,
Budapest, 111-125.
CZAJLIK, Z. (2005): Légirégészeti kutatások
Magyarországon 2004-ben (Rövid beszámoló az ELTE
Régészettudományi
Intézetének
Térinformatikai
Kutatólaboratóriumában végzett munkáról) - Aerial
archaeological investigations in Hungary in 2004 (A
short report of the activity of the 3D Research
Laboratory of the ELTE Archaeological Institute)
Régészeti
Kutatások
Magyarországon
–
Archaeological Investigations in Hungary 2004, KÖH,
Budapest, 121-142.
9
Hungary in 2005 (A short report of the activity of the
3D Research Laboratory of the ELTE Archaeological
Institute). Régészeti Kutatások Magyarországon –
Archaeological Investigations in Hungary 2005, KÖH,
Budapest, 149-159.
CZAJLIK, Z. & HOLL, B. (1996): The Archaeological
Chronology and the Excavation Data Bases. In:
MARTON, E. ed.,: The Future of Our Past '93-'95,
MNM, Budapest, 144-150.
CZAJLIK, Z. & HOLL, B. (2003): Die
Luftbildprospektion der urzeitlichen Erdburgen
Ungarns. In: VISY, Zs., ed.,: Mandulavirágzási
tudományos napok, Régészeti műemlékek kutatása és
gondozása a 3. évezred küszöbén Pécs-Szekszárd,
2002. március 4-8., Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Ókortörténeti és Régészeti Tanszék Régészeti
Szemináriuma, Pécs, 67-82.
CZAJLIK, Z., MARTON, Á. & HOLL, B. (1997): Az
M3-as
autópálya
régészeti
leletmentéseinek
térinformatikai feldolgozása Hajdú-Bihar megyében The GIS Processing of the Rescue Excavations
Associated with the M3 Motorway in Hajdú-Bihar
County. In: KOVÁCS, T., ANDERS, A. & RACZKY, P.:
Utak a Múltba - Paths into the Past - Az M3-as
autópálya régészeti leletmentései - Rescue Excavations
on the M3 Motorways, Budapest 1997, 153-155.
CZAJLIK, Z., MARTON, Á. & HOLL, B. (1999): Az
M3-as
autópálya
régészeti
leletmentéseinek
térinformatikai feldolgozása Hajdú-Bihar megyében.
DÉM 1997-1998 73 193-197.
ECSEDY, I. (1979): The people of the pit-grave
kurgans in Eastern Hungary, Fontes Archaeologici
Hungariae, Akadémiai kiadó, Budapest
GOGUEY, R. (1995): Archéologie aérienne de la
Seine au Danube : quelques aspects des récentes
recherches sur la Bourgogne et la Hongrie. In:
„Luftbildarchäologie in Mittel- und Osteuropa”. Actes
du Colloque de Berlin, 26-30 sept. 1994. Potsdam,
Brandenburgisches Landesmuseum für Ur- und
Frühgeschichte, 227-235.
GOGUEY, R. (1997): Coopération franco-hongroise
en archéologie aérienne: Cinq campagnes de
recherches de 1993 à 1997. In: OEXLE, J.: Aus der
Luft – Bilder unserer Geschichte, Dresden, Landesamt
für Archäologie, 82-89.
CZAJLIK, Z. (2006): Őskori erődítések kutatása légi
régészeti módszerekkel. In: KOVÁCS, Gy. & MIKLÓS,
Zs.: „Gondolják, látják az várnak nagy voltát…”
Tanulmányok a 80 éves Nováki Gyula tiszteletére,
Castrum Bene Egyesület – Históriaantik Könyvesház,
Budapest, 71-80.
GOGUEY, R. (2000a): Nécropoles et habitats
protohistoriques : aperçu des recherches d’archéologie
aérienne menées sur le quart nord-est de la France et
sur la Hongrie. In: GUILLAUMET, J.-P.: Dix ans de
coopération franco-hongroise en archéologie 19881998, Collegium Budapest, Budapest, 77-96.
CZAJLIK, Z. & BÖDŐCS, A. (2006): Légirégészeti
kutatások
Magyarországon
2005-ben
(Rövid
beszámoló az ELTE Régészettudományi Intézetének
Térinformatikai
Kutatólaboratóriumában
végzett
munkáról) - Aerial archaeological investigations in
GOGUEY, R (2000b): Sur la route de Dijon … au
limes romain de Pannonie. Bulletin de Centre
interdisciplinaire de Recherche Aériennes 23 30-31.
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
Archeometriai Műhely 2007/3.
GOGUEY, R. (2002a): Traces dans la Grande
Plaine… Photographies aériennes de Hongrie.
Exposition du 18 avril au 2 juin 2002. Musée et site
archéologiques de Saint-Romain-en-Gal – Vienne.
GOGUEY, R. (2002b): L’histoire vu du ciel,
Archéologia 395 32-43.
GOGUEY, R. & CZAJLIK, Z. (2003): Un aspect de la
coopération Bourgogne-Hongrie dans la recherche et la
protection sites : le GPS, vecteur entre l'archéologue, le
chercheur aérien et la carte informatisée.
CommArchHung 23 5-14.
GOGUEY, R. & SZABÓ, M. (1995): L’histoire vue du
ciel. Photographie aérienne et archéologie en France
et en Hongrie – A történelem madártávlatból. Légi
fényképezés és régészet Franciaországban és
Magyarországon. Institut Français en Hongrie –
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem Budapest.
GOGUEY, R., CZAJLIK, Z. & BÖDŐCS, A. (2003):
Magyar-francia
légi
régészeti
kutatások
Magyarországon - Recherches franco-hongroises
d'archéologie aérienne en Hongrie en 2000. Régészeti
kutatások
Magyarországon
Archaeological
Investigations in Hungary, 2000., KÖH - Magyar
Nemzeti Múzeum, Budapest, 75-86.
LEIDORF, K. (1996): Luftbildarchäologie –
Geschichte und Methode. in: BECKER, H. (Zgst.) :
Archäologische Prospektion. Luftbildarchäologie und
Geophysik. Arbeitshefte des Bayerischen Landesamtes
für Denkmalpflege, 59 München.
HU ISSN 1786-271X; urn:nbn:hu-4106 © by the author(s)
10
MRT 1966 -1998:
Topográfiája, volumes
Budapest.
Magyarország Régészeti
1-10, Akadémiai kiadó,
NOVÁKI, Gy., CZAJLIK, Z. & HOLL, B. (2006):
Kataster der prähistorischen Erdburgen Ungarns –
Versuch einer umfassenden Datenerfassung zum
Schutz des kulturellen, archäologischen und
naturräumlichen Erbes In: Alexandra Krenn-Leeb
(Hrsg.):
Wirtschaft,
Macht
und
Strategie.
Höhensiedlungen und ihre Funktionen in der Ur- und
Frühgeschichte. Archäologie Österreichs Spezial 1
125-139.
RACZKY, P., CZAJLIK, Z., HOLL, B. & MARTON,
Á. (1998): GIS and the evaluation of rescue
excavations along the M3 Motorway in Hungary,
Poročilo 24 157-170.
RACZKY, P., PUSZTA, S., CZAJLIK, Z., HOLL, B.
& MARTON, Á. (2002): Investigation of
archaeological sites with the integrated application of
aerial photography, magnetometer surveys and
archaeological excavation. In: JEREM, E., T. BIRÓ,
K. & RUDNER, E.: Archaeometry 98. Proceedings of
the 31st Symposium Budapest, April 26 - May 3 1998,
Volume I, BAR International Series 1043 (I), 135-143.
VICZE, M., CZAJLIK, Z. & TÍMÁR, L. (2005): The
archaeological topography of the Northern part of the
Benta-valley. In Százhalombatta Archaeological
Expedition (SAX), 2, Matrica Museum, 251-254.