Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition
O R I G I N A L
A R T I C L E
Physical Activity in U.S. Adults With
Diabetes and At Risk for Developing
Diabetes, 2003
ELAINE H. MORRATO, MPH, DRPH1
JAMES O. HILL, PHD2
HOLLY R. WYATT, MD2
VAHRAM GHUSHCHYAN, PHD1
PATRICK W. SULLIVAN, PHD1
OBJECTIVE — Given the risk of obesity and diabetes in the U.S., and clear benefit of exercise
in disease prevention and management, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of physical
activity among adults with and at risk for diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey is a
nationally representative survey of the U.S. population. In the 2003 survey, 23,283 adults
responded when asked about whether they were physically active (moderate or vigorous activity,
ⱖ30 min, three times per week). Information on sociodemographic characteristics and health
conditions were self-reported. Additional type 2 diabetes risk factors examined were age ⱖ45
years, non-Caucasian ethnicity, BMI ⱖ25 kg/m2, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.
RESULTS — A total of 39% of adults with diabetes were physically active versus 58% of adults
without diabetes. The proportion of active adults without diabetes declined as the number of risk
factors increased until dropping to similar rates as people with diabetes. After adjustment for
sociodemographic and clinical factors, the strongest correlates of being physically active were
income level, limitations in physical function, depression, and severe obesity (BMI ⱖ40 kg/m2).
Several traditional predictors of activity (sex, education level, and having received past advice
from a health professional to exercise more) were not evident among respondents with diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS — The majority of patients with diabetes or at highest risk for developing type
2 diabetes do not engage in regular physical activity, with a rate significantly below national norms.
There is a great need for efforts to target interventions to increase physical activity in these individuals.
Diabetes Care 30:203–209, 2007
T
he incidence of diagnosed diabetes
increased 41% between 1997 and
2003, with rising obesity a major
contributing factor (1). Physical activity is
a cornerstone of lifestyle modifications
aimed at preventing and managing type 2
diabetes and its related morbidities (2).
Epidemiological studies have shown that
physical activity reduces the risk of type 2
diabetes by 30% in the general population
(3). Evidence from randomized controlled trials (4,5) has demonstrated that
maintenance of modest weight loss
through physical activity and diet reduces
the incidence of type 2 diabetes in highrisk individuals by as much as 40 – 60%
over 3– 4 years. The risk of mortality
among individuals with diabetes is also
inversely related to fitness level (6,7).
Regular activity is also an important
component in public health efforts addressing the rising obesity epidemic and
is one of the leading Healthy People 2010
indicators in the U.S. (8 –10). The Surgeon
General’s Report on Physical Activity and
Health (11) outlined the health benefits of
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
From the 1School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research Program, University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; and the 2Center for Human Nutrition, University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Patrick W. Sullivan, PhD, University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center, School of Pharmacy, 4200 East Ninth Ave., C238, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail:
[email protected].
Received for publication 1 June 2006 and accepted in revised form 15 November 2006.
Abbreviations: MEPS, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion
factors for many substances.
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1128
© 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby
marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
physical activity, which include not only
achieving weight reduction and reducing
the risk of developing diabetes but also
reducing the risk of developing high
blood pressure and dying from heart disease and enhancing overall psychological
well being. Recent evidence suggests that
aerobic exercise at levels consistent with
public health recommendations is as effective as antidepressant medications in
treating mild to moderate depression
(12), a common comorbidity affecting approximately one-quarter of patients with
diabetes (13) and hindering optimal diabetes self-care (14).
In 2003, an estimated 46% of Americans achieved recommended levels of
daily moderate physical activity (15),
which is nearing the 2010 goal of 50%
(10). However, data on the prevalence of
inactivity in people with diabetes and at
highest risk for developing type 2 diabetes
is limited (14,16 –18). In a large health
maintenance organization, 29% of patients with diabetes engaged in physical
activity (ⱖ30 min) once a week or less
(14). In a survey of adults aged ⱖ55 years
with type 2 diabetes, 55% of respondents
reported no weekly physical activity (17).
Recent data (18) from the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey found
that less than one-third of diabetic adults
who can exercise voluntarily met recommended levels of physical activity. Yet,
the awareness of the need for physical activity appears high among adults with diabetes, as approximately three-quarters
recalled having been told at least once by
a health care professional that they
needed to exercise more (19).
The purpose of this research was to
evaluate the prevalence of physical activity among all adults with diabetes and at
risk for developing diabetes using a recent
nationally representative sample and, importantly, to identify patient characteristics associated with the likelihood of
being physically active.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS — The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) is cosponsored
by the Agency for Healthcare Research
203
Physical activity in adults
Table 1—Physical activity recommendations
Population
Physical activity measures
Source
All adults
Reduce the proportion of adults who engage in no leisuretime physical activity.
Increase the proportion of adults who engage regularly,
preferably daily, in moderate physical activity for at
least 30 min per day.
Increase the proportion of adults who engage in vigorous
physical activity that promotes the development and
maintenance of cardiorespiratory fitness ⱖ3 days per
week for ⱖ20 min per occasion.
Increase the proportion of adults who perform physical
activities that enhance and maintain muscular strength.
Healthy People 2010 Physical
Activity and Fitness Objectives (10)
All adults
Recommended physical activity: moderate-intensity
activities in a usual week (i.e., brisk walking, bicycling,
vacuuming, gardening, or anything else that causes
small increases in breathing or heart rate) for at least 30
min per day, at least 5 days per week; or vigorousintensity activities in a usual week (i.e., running,
aerobics, heavy yard work, or anything else that causes
large increases in breathing or heart rate) for at least 20
min per day, at least 3 days per week or both. This can
be accomplished through lifestyle activities (i.e.,
household, transportation, or leisure-time activities).
Insufficient physical activity: ⬎10 min total per week of
moderate- or vigorous-intensity lifestyle activities but
less than the recommended level of activity.
Inactivity: ⬍10 min total per week of moderate- or
vigorous-intensity lifestyle activities.
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (50)
Prevention/delay of type 2 diabetes
Modest physical activity (30 min daily).
2006 Standards of Medical
Care in Diabetes (2)
Diabetes management
To improve glycemic control, assist with weight
maintenance, and reduce risk of cardiovascular disease,
at least 150 min per week of moderate-intensity aerobic
physical activity (50–70% of maximum heart rate) is
recommended and/or at least 90 min per week of
vigorous aerobic exercise (⬎70% of maximum heart
rate). The physical activity should be distributed over at
least 3 days per week and with no more than 2
consecutive days without physical activity.
In the absence of contraindications, people with type 2
diabetes should be encouraged to perform resistance
exercise three times a week, targeting all major muscle
groups, progressing to three sets of 8–10 repetitions at a
weight that cannot be lifted ⬎8–10 times.
2006 Standards of Medical
Care in Diabetes (2)
and Quality and the National Center for
Health Statistics and is a nationally representative survey of the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population, collecting
detailed information on demographic
characteristics, income and education status, and self-reported health conditions
and use of medical care services (20).
The sampling frame for the MEPS
Household Component is drawn from re204
spondents to the National Health Interview Survey. The MEPS supplements and
validates information on medical care and
pharmacy events at the person level. Medical condition diagnoses are based on
ICD-9-CM codes (21,22). The sample design of the MEPS includes stratification,
clustering, multiple stages of selection,
and disproportionate sampling (23).
MEPS sampling weights incorporate ad-
justment for the complex sample design
and reflect survey nonresponse and population totals from the Current Population Survey (23). Adult respondents to
the year 2003 survey who reported about
their physical activity were eligible for this
study. Of 23,519 adult participants (aged
ⱖ18 years) in 2003, 23,283 (99%) responded when asked about their physical
activity.
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
Morrato and Associates
Table 2—Unadjusted rates of self-reported physical activity among U.S. adults*
Selected characteristics
All adults
Sex
Female
Male
Age-groups (year)
18–29
30–39
40–49
50–59
60–69
70–79
ⱖ80
Race/ethnicity
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Geographic region
Northeast
South
Midwest
West
Education levels
Less than high school
High school
Some college (⬍4 years)
College degree (4 years)
Graduate school (⬎4 years)
Income level
Poor
Near poor
Low income
Middle income
High income
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal (18.5–24.9)
Overweight (25.0–29.9)
Obese, classes 1 and 2 (30.0–39.9)
Obese, class 3 (ⱖ40)
Depression
No
Yes
Physical functioning limitations
No
Yes
Ever advised to exercise more
No
Yes
Unweighted
Physically
active
23,226
56.4 ⫾ 0.6
12,649
10,577
52.8 ⫾ 0.7
60.3 ⫾ 0.7
⬍0.001
5,555
4,566
4,689
3,564
2,265
1,723
864
62.3 ⫾ 1.0
57.7 ⫾ 1.0
55.8 ⫾ 1.0
54.9 ⫾ 1.1
55.9 ⫾ 1.3
52.2 ⫾ 1.7
36.8 ⫾ 2.1
⬍0.001
18,234
3,778
5,940
994
57.5 ⫾ 0.6
50.9 ⫾ 1.2
49.5 ⫾ 1.3
54.5 ⫾ 1.9
⬍0.001
3,434
9,109
4,631
6,052
55.5 ⫾ 1.3
54.5 ⫾ 0.8
57.6 ⫾ 1.4
59.0 ⫾ 1.2
0.01
6,181
11,153
1,440
2,899
1,407
48.3 ⫾ 1.0
56.0 ⫾ 0.7
59.2 ⫾ 1.5
61.7 ⫾ 1.1
64.7 ⫾ 1.4
⬍0.001
3,986
1,351
3,832
6,873
7,184
46.9 ⫾ 1.3
46.9 ⫾ 2.1
52.3 ⫾ 1.3
56.2 ⫾ 0.8
61.4 ⫾ 0.7
⬍0.001
8,079
7,977
5,290
835
63.0 ⫾ 0.8
58.4 ⫾ 0.7
47.3 ⫾ 1.0
34.1 ⫾ 1.9
⬍0.001
21,047
2,179
57.6 ⫾ 0.6
45.1 ⫾ 1.2
⬍0.001
19,076
4,128
60.1 ⫾ 0.7
38.5 ⫾ 1.0
⬍0.001
7,957
14,997
49.0 ⫾ 0.7
60.7 ⫾ 0.7
⬍0.001
P value
Data are % ⫾ SE or n. F tests were conducted to test for variation in rates of physical activity across subgroups.
*All data are based on the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003.
Physical activity
To ascertain physical activity, all adult respondents were asked if they “spend half
an hour or more in moderate or vigorous
physical activity at least three times a
week.” The general context of the questionnaire is “on average.” The MEPS glossary states, “moderate physical activity
causes only light sweating or a slight or
moderate increase in breathing or heart
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
rate and would include activities such as
fast walking, raking leaves, mowing the
lawn, or heavy cleaning. Vigorous physical activity causes heavy sweating or large
increases in breathing or heart rate and
would include activities such as running,
race walking, lap swimming, aerobic
classes, or fast bicycling” (24). The MEPS
criterion for physical activity (level and
duration) was consistent with 2003 recommendations for a “regular physical activity program, adapted to the presence of
complications” (25) but less stringent
than current public health measures (Table 1). Self-reported physical activity has
been shown to have moderate validity in
other national surveys (26).
Ascertainment of diabetes and
diabetes risk factors
Self-reported information from the MEPS
survey was used to determine whether a
respondent had diabetes or risk factors for
developing type 2 diabetes. Respondents
were asked if they had ever been diagnosed with diabetes (excluding gestational diabetes). Adults with type 2
diabetes were not differentiated from type
1 diabetes, although it is estimated that
⬎90% of adults with diabetes have type 2
diabetes (27). For type 2 diabetes risk factors, we selected clinical and demographic variables available in the MEPS
survey, which were included in the American Diabetes Association’s list of risk factors (28). In addition to physical
inactivity, other risk factors included age
ⱖ45 years, non-Caucasian ethnicity, BMI
ⱖ25 kg/m2, diagnosis of hypertension
(diagnosed on two or more different medical visits with high blood pressure), and
history of cardiovascular disease (diagnosed with angina or angina pectoris,
heart attack or myocardial infarction, or
stroke or any other kind of heart disease
or condition).
In the analyses, we defined cardiovascular risk factors as the presence of one or
more of the following clinical conditions:
history of cardiovascular disease, a diagnosis of hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. In the MEPS, 259 mutually
exclusive clinical classification categories
were mapped from ICD-9-CM codes to
create clinically homogenous groupings
(22). The current research used clinical
classification categories 053 “disorders of
lipid metabolism” to identify individuals
with hyperlipidemia.
205
Physical activity in adults
Table 3—Unadjusted rates of self-reported physical activity among U.S. adults diagnosed with
diabetes or at risk for developing type 2 diabetes*
Health condition
Diabetes
No cardiovascular risk factors†
With cardiovascular risk factors†
No diabetes
No diabetes risk factors‡
One diabetes risk factor‡
Two diabetes risk factors‡
Three diabetes risk factors‡
Four diabetes risk factors‡
Unweighted
Physical active
1,825
469
1,355
21,401
4,741
8,743
4,790
2,432
648
38.5 (35.7–41.3)
46.0 (39.9–52.0)
36.1 (32.9–39.4)
57.8 (56.6–58.9)
64.9 (62.7–67.1)
58.9 (57.3–60.4)
54.3 (30.0–32.5)
52.1 (42.4–46.6)
42.0 (37.7–46.2)
P value
⬍0.01
⬍0.001
Data are % (95% CI) or n. *All data are based on the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003. †Cardiovascular risk factors were history of cardiovascular disease, diagnosis of hypertension, and/or diagnosis of
hyperlipidemia. ‡Type 2 diabetes risk factors were age ⱖ45 years, non-Caucasian ethnicity, BMI ⬎25 kg/m2,
diagnosis of hypertension, and history of cardiovascular disease.
Assessment of BMI and other
covariates
We used self-reported information from
the MEPS Household Component survey
for the assessment of BMI, medical advice
to exercise, and other covariates. Respondents were asked to estimate their current
body weight and height; if a “doctor or
other health professional ever advised
you to exercise more?”; if they had “difficulties walking, climbing stairs, grasping
objects, reaching overhead, lifting, bending or stooping, or standing for long periods of time”; and to report on current
smoking status, age, sex, race, ethnicity,
years of schooling, and income level (22).
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention formula was used to calculate
BMI (29), and the National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute classification scheme
was used to define normal, overweight,
and obese categories (30).
Because depression is common
among individuals with diabetes (13) and
is associated with physical inactivity (14),
the relationship of depression with physical activity was also assessed in this
study. A respondent was classified as having depression if they had a medical encounter coded with the three-digit ICD-9
code of 311 (depressive disorder) or 296
(episodic mood disorders, including major depression).
Data analysis
To adjust for the complex sample design,
the current research used the MEPS person-level and variance adjustment
weights using STATA 9.1 in all analyses to
ensure nationally representative estimates. Given the MEPS sample design, F
tests were conducted to test for variation
in unadjusted rates of physical activity
206
across selected subgroups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to
estimate the adjusted odds of being physically active among adults with and without diabetes after controlling for sex, age,
race/ethnicity, education and income levels, region, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, depression, physical limitation
status, and receiving advice to exercise
more.
RESULTS — Overall, 56% of adults reported that they were moderately to vigorously physically active three or more
times a week (Table 2). Regular activity
decreased with increasing BMI and varied
with age. Physical activity was higher
among respondents who were male,
white, had higher education and income
levels, reported previous medical advice
to exercise more, and had no limitations
in physical functioning. Among adults
with diabetes, 39% reported they were
physically active compared with 58% of
those without diabetes (Table 3). The proportion of respondents without diabetes
who reported being physically active decreased as the number of type 2 diabetes
risk factors increased, until approximating the prevalence reported among individuals with diabetes. After adjusting for
demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics, the most notable associations with regular activity, regardless of
diabetes status, were the negative correlations with mental and physical health and
the positive correlation with family income (Table 4).
The association of physical activity
with several demographic and clinical factors varied between adults with versus
without diabetes. For example, the association of sex, race/ethnicity, and educa-
tion status was evident in adults without
diabetes but not in those with diabetes.
Normal-weight individuals with diabetes
were no more likely to be active than
overweight or obese adults; whereas, in
adults without diabetes, the likelihood of
being active incrementally declined with
each increasing BMI category. Lastly,
prior advice from a health professional to
exercise more was positively associated
with current physical activity levels in
nondiabetic individuals but had no association in those with diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS — The most concerning news from this study is that at a
time when the prevalence of the disease is
increasing, ⬍40% of adults with diabetes
reported being regularly engaged in moderate or vigorous physical activity. These
results confirm recent findings from National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey 1999 –2002 (18) and suggest that
no substantial improvement in physical
activity has occurred over the last decade
(16). This is disturbing because there is
clear evidence of the health benefits of
physical activity for the management of
type 2 diabetes (2). Further, despite increased public health attention on the
need for being physically active, the prevalence of physical activity reported by
adults with diabetes in 2003 was no different from rates seen the year before (31).
Moreover, the level of physical activity reported by respondents with diabetes was
significantly lower on average than national norms for adults without diabetes.
The news is not particularly encouraging even in individuals without diabetes. While more than half of adults
without diabetes reported being physically active, activity levels declined with
increasing BMI and with increasing numbers of cardiovascular disease risk factors.
Since there is a general trend toward increasing BMI and increasing cardiovascular disease risk factors in the U.S.
population, this could suggest that physical activity levels will decrease in the
future.
Because this is a cross-sectional analysis, it is impossible to determine why
adults with diabetes are less active than
their peers without the disease. Less physical activity may reflect the inertia of a
lifetime of habits. These individuals likely
have the same motivational barriers, including lack of interest and not enough
time, as adults without diabetes
(17,32,33). However, those with diabetes
often have physical disabilities (34), per-
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
Morrato and Associates
Table 4—Factors associated with self-reported physical activity among U.S. adults with and
without diabetes*
Physically active†
Selected characteristics
Diabetes
Sex (Ref. ⫽ female)
Age-groups (years)
20–29
30–39
40–49
50–59
60–69
70–79
ⱖ80
Race/ethnicity
White
Black
Asian
Hispanic (Ref. ⫽ no)
Geographic region
Northeast
South
Midwest
West
Education levels
Less than high school
High school
Some college (⬍4 years)
College degree (4 years)
Graduate school (⬎4 years)
Income level
Poor
Near poor
Low income
Middle income
High income
BMI (kg/m2)
Normal (18.5–24.9)
Overweight (25.0–29.9)
Obese, classes 1 and 2 (30.0–39.9)
Obese, class 3 (ⱖ40)
Cardiovascular risk factors (Ref. ⫽ none)‡
Depression (Ref. ⫽ no)
Physical function limitations (Ref. ⫽ none)
Ever advised to exercise more (Ref. ⫽ no)
No diabetes
1.14 (0.89–1.46)
1.29 (1.20–1.37)
1.00 (Ref.)
0.85 (0.39–1.87)
0.92 (0.44–1.91)
0.80 (0.41–1.56)
0.86 (0.42–1.75)
0.85 (0.42–1.70)
0.54 (0.24–1.21)
1.00 (Ref.)
0.84 (0.76–0.94)
0.82 (0.74–0.92)
0.85 (0.74–0.98)
0.96 (0.81–1.12)
0.95 (0.79–1.15)
0.50 (0.40–0.62)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.11 (0.75–1.64)
1.39 (0.42–4.57)
1.43 (0.98–2.07)
1.00 (Ref.)
0.83 (0.73–0.93)
0.95 (0.53–1.70)
0.67 (0.59–0.76)
1.00 (Ref.)
0.98 (0.65–1.48)
1.04 (0.67–1.63)
1.52 (0.99–2.32)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.05 (0.92–1.21)
1.11 (0.94–1.31)
1.25 (1.08–1.46)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.15 (0.87–1.51)
1.22 (0.68–2.20)
1.14 (0.69–1.89)
0.89 (0.45–1.76)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.19 (1.07–1.31)
1.29 (1.10–1.52)
1.32 (1.15–1.51)
1.51 (1.29–1.77)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.54 (0.88–2.70)
1.53 (1.00–2.34)
1.60 (1.05–2.42)
2.03 (1.32–3.14)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.00 (0.81–1.23)
1.17 (1.00–1.36)
1.17 (1.02–1.33)
1.29 (1.11–1.49)
1.00 (Ref.)
1.08 (0.77–1.53)
0.79 (0.54–1.17)
0.39 (0.24–0.64)
0.88 (0.65–1.20)
0.66 (0.46–0.95)
0.47 (0.37–0.61)
0.99 (0.73–1.34)
1.00 (Ref.)
0.83 (0.76–0.90)
0.62 (0.56–0.69)
0.45 (0.37–0.56)
1.04 (0.95–1.14)
0.77 (0.69–0.85)
0.57 (0.50–0.65)
1.35 (1.25–1.47)
Data are odds ratio (95% CI). *All data are based on the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2003. †Odds
ratios were obtained from logistic regression models adjusting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, education and
income levels, region, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors, depression, physical limitation status, and receiving
advice to exercise more. ‡Cardiovascular risk factors were history of cardiovascular disease, diagnosis of
hypertension, and/or diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Ref., reference.
ceive discomfort when exercising (33), or
have decreased exercise capacity (35). In
this study, the likelihood of being active
among individuals with diabetes was reduced by half when physical limitations
were present. Depression is also a barrier.
In this study, adults with diabetes were
one-third less likely to be active if diagnosed with depression. The American Diabetes Association’s standards of medical
care recognize the need to individualize a
patient’s activity plan to accommodate
macro- and microvascular complications
and to address psychosocial problems
(2).
Physical activity was also correlated
with sociodemographic characteristics.
For example, inactivity is more common
among women, people with lower incomes and less education, African Amer-
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
icans and Hispanics, and adults residing
in northeastern and southern states (10).
Results from this study were consistent
with these established correlates among
adults without diabetes; however, the association of sex and education status was
not observed among adults with diabetes.
In addition, the data also suggest that
rates of physical activity were not lower
among Hispanic compared with nonHispanic adults with diabetes. It is not
clear why correlates of physical activity
would be different in those with diabetes,
but these differences may be important in
developing strategies to increase physical
activity in this population.
In this study, the rate of physical activity among adults without diabetes,
while disappointing, is consistent with
other national surveys (15). The highest
rates reported were among the youngest,
most educated, and most economically
advantaged adults, but even then over a
third was inactive. Reinforcing the value
of life-long physical activity for young,
sedentary adults can help curb the rising
obesity and diabetes epidemics as young
adults gain, on average, an estimated 2 lb
per year (36), with a long-term risk of
becoming overweight exceeding 50%
(37).
The results of this research are subject
to limitations. All variables relied on selfreports, including disease status and the
diagnosis of diabetes. While diabetes and
risk factor estimates presented here are
consistent with other U.S. survey-based
national estimates (38 – 40), it may be that
the self-reported rates of diabetes and diabetes risk factors in this study are underestimated, leading to a bias toward the
null when assessing differences in physical activity by disease status. Self-reported
health conditions can be underreported
in general (41), and blacks, whites, and
Hispanics differ in reporting of diseases
and levels of illness and disability (42,43).
Previous studies (44) have also shown
that overweight respondents tend to underestimate their weight and overestimate
their height so BMI scores are underestimated. However, excellent concordance
between medical records and patient selfreport has been observed for several medical diagnoses, including history of
diabetes, obesity, and history of acute
myocardial infarction (45).
MEPS also does not contain information on undiagnosed diabetes. Recent estimates suggest that one-third of
individuals with diabetes are undiagnosed (27). Respondents in this study
207
Physical activity in adults
with multiple risk factors for developing
type 2 diabetes may have undiagnosed diabetes, which may explain why their rates
of physical activity were similar to those
patients with diabetes. Finally, several
known environmental factors associated
with physical activity were also unavailable for study using the MEPS data so that
environmental barriers to physical activity could not be assessed.
Self-report was also used to ascertain
physical activity in the MEPS due to the
challenges of measuring cardiorespiratory
fitness on a large national scale. Selfreported physical activity has moderate
validity with individuals tending to overreport activity (26). On the other hand,
while the MEPS definition of moderate
and vigorous physical activity included
domestic household and leisure-time activity, it did not specifically query other
sources of physical exertion undertaken
by adults, such as through employment
(24), and therefore may underestimate total physical activity. For example, the
International Physical Activity Questionnaire measures more contributors toward
total physical activity and has been shown
to lead to higher physical activity prevalence estimates compared with the Behavior Risk Factor Survey Surveillance (46).
Also, the extent of sedentary behavior,
such as longer television viewing, was not
assessed in the MEPS. Recent epidemiological evidence (47) suggests that increased sedentary behavior is a predictor
of diabetes risk independent of leisuretime physical activity. Nevertheless,
physical activity estimates from national
public health surveys, such as the MEPS,
can provide valuable information to guide
national policy and program decisions
(48).
Caution should also be taken in directly comparing results from this study
with other studies as part of the apparent
differences in the prevalence of physical
activity may be attributable to differences
in how physical activity was defined (49)
and changing public health recommendations (Table 1). In the MEPS, physical activity was defined as “moderate/vigorous
activity, ⱖ30 min, three or more days per
week.” The American Diabetes Association’s recommendations have become
more specific as scientific understanding
has evolved, i.e., from “regular physical
activity” in 2003 (25) to “150 min per
week of moderate-intensity (50 –70% of
maximum heart rate)” in 2006 (2). The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention similarly defines recommended
208
physical activity as “moderate-intensity
activities in a usual week of 30 min per
day for at least 5 days per week.” (50)
Therefore, values reported in the 2003
MEPS data may be an overestimation of
the proportion of adults achieving “therapeutic levels ” of exercise based on current public health guidelines.
It is difficult to be optimistic about
addressing the twin epidemics of obesity
and diabetes without success in increasing physical activity in the population.
The results of this study provide very pessimistic data about achieving this goal.
Physical activity is least likely to be present
in those who already have diabetes and in
those most at risk for developing diabetes.
There is a great need for intensive efforts
to target interventions to increase physical activity in these individuals.
References
1. Geiss L, Pan L, Cadwell B, Gregg EW,
Benjamin SM, Engelgau MM: Changes in
incidence of diabetes in U.S. adults,
1997–2003. Am J Prev Med 30:371–377,
2006
2. American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes, 2006.
Diabetes Care 29 (Suppl. 1):S4 –S42, 2006
3. Bassuk SS, Manson JE: Epidemiological
evidence for the role of physical activity in
reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J Appl Physiol 99:
1193–1204, 2005
4. Diabetes Prevention Program Research
Group: Reduction in the incidence of type
2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or
metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393– 403,
2002
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Primary Prevention Working Group:
Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes
mellitus by lifestyle intervention: implications for health policy. Ann Intern Med
140:951–957, 2004
6. Church TS, Cheng YJ, Earnest CP, Barlow
CE, Gibbons LW, Priest EL, Blair SN: Exercise capacity and body composition as
predictors of mortality among men with
diabetes. Diabetes Care 27:83– 88, 2004
7. Hu FB, Willett WC, Li T, Stampfer MJ,
Colditz GA, Manson JE: Adiposity as
compared with physical activity in predicting mortality among women. N Engl
J Med 351:2694 –2703, 2004
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services: The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight and
Obesity. Rockville, MD, U.S. Government
Printing Office, 2001
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans
2005. Rockville, MD, 2005
10. U.S. Department of Health and Human
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Services: Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC, U.S. Govt. Printing Office,
2000
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Surgeon General’s Report on Physical
Activity and Health. Springfield, VA, National Technical Information Service,
1996
Dunn AL, Trivedi MH, Kampert JB, Clark
CG, Chambliss HO: Exercise treatment
for depression: efficacy and dose response. Am J Prev Med 28:1– 8, 2005
Anderson R, Freedland K, Clouse R, Lustman P: The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a metaanalysis. Diabetes Care 24:1069 –1078,
2001
Lin EH, Katon W, Von Korff M, Rutter C,
Simon GE, Oliver M, Ciechanowski P,
Ludman EJ, Bush T, Young B: Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care,
medication adherence, and preventive
care. Diabetes Care 27:2154 –2160, 2004
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: U.S. physical activity statistics: 2003
state summary data [article online], 2006.
Available from http://www.cdc.gov/
nccdphp/dnpa/physical/stats/index.htm.
Accessed 26 April 2006
Nelson KM, Reiber G, Boyko EJ: Diet and
exercise among adults with type 2 diabetes: findings from the Third National
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES III). Diabetes Care 25:1722–
1728, 2002
Hays L, Clark D: Correlates of physical
activity in a sample of older adults with
type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:706 –
712, 1999
Resnick HE, Foster GL, Bardsley J, Ratner
RE: Achievement of American Diabetes
Association clinical practice recommendations among U.S. adults with diabetes,
1999 –2002: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care
29:531–537, 2006
Morrato EH, Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Ghushchyan V, Sullivan PW: Are health care
professionals advising patients with diabetes or at risk for developing diabetes to
exercise more? Diabetes Care 29:543–
548, 2006
Introduction to the MEPS household component [article online], 2005. Available
from http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/data_pub
/questionnaires/questhc5/readr1-5.htm.
Accessed 14 September 2005
U.S. Health Care Financing Administration: The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification:
ICD-9-CM. 2nd ed. Washington, DC, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service for sale by the
Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Printing Office,
1980
MEPS HC-078: 2003 medical conditions,
November 2005 [article online]. Avail-
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
Morrato and Associates
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
able from http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/
mepsweb/data_stats/download_data/pufs/
h79/h79doc.shtml. Accessed 21
December 2006
Machlin S, Yu W, Zodet MW: Computing
standard errors for MEPS estimates [article online], 2005. Available from http://
www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_
comp/standard_errors.jsp. Accessed 21
December 2006
Medical expenditure panel survey household component: main study glossary,
2002 [article online]. Available from http://
www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_
comp/hc_ques_glossary.pdf. Accessed 21
December 2006
American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26 (Suppl.
1):S33–S50, 2003
Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J, Stanwyck C, Mack KA: Reliability and validity of
measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soz Praventivmed 46 (Suppl. 1):S3–S42, 2001
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Diabetes Fact Sheet: United
States, 2005. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006
American Diabetes Association: Screening for type 2 diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 27 (Suppl. 1):S11–
S14, 2004
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: BMI-body mass index: formula for
adults [article online], 2005. Available
from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/
bmi/bmi-adult-formula.htm. Accessed 14
September 2005
Expert Panel on the Identification Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and
Obesity in Adults: Executive summary of
the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Arch Intern
Med 158:1855–1867, 1998
Morrato EH, Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan
V, Wyatt HR, Hill JO: Physical activity
and diabetes in U.S. adults: the Medical
Expenditure Panel Survey, 2000 –2002
(Abstract). Diabetes 54 (Suppl. 1):A254,
2005
32. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA,
Brennan LK, Bacak SJ: Environmental and
policy determinants of physical activity in
the United States. Am J Public Health 91:
1995–2003, 2001
33. Thomas N, Alder E, Leese G: Barriers to
physical activity in patients with diabetes.
Postgrad Med J 80:287–291, 2004
34. Gregg EW, Beckles GL, Williamson DF,
Leveille SG, Langlois JA, Engelgau MM,
Narayan KM: Diabetes and physical disability among older U.S. adults. Diabetes
Care 23:1272–1277, 2000
35. LeBrasseur NK, Ruderman NB: Why
might thiazolidinediones increase exercise capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes? Diabetes Care 28:2975–2976, 2005
36. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC:
Obesity and the environment: where do
we go from here? Science 299:853– 855,
2003
37. Ramachandran SV, Pencina MJ, Cobain
M, Freiberg MS, D’Agostino RB: Estimated risks for developing obesity in the
Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med
143:473– 480, 2005
38. Sullivan PW, Morrato EH, Ghushchyan
V, Wyatt HR, Hill JO: Obesity, inactivity
and the prevalence of diabetes and diabetes-related cardiovascular comorbidities
in the U.S., 2000 –2002. Diabetes Care 28:
1599 –1603, 2005
39. Shih M, Hootman JM, Kruger J, Helmick
CG: Physical activity in men and women
with arthritis: National Health Interview
Survey, 2002. Am J Prev Med 30:385–393,
2006
40. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the
United States, 1999 –2004. JAMA 295:
1549 –1555, 2006
41. Edwards DS, Winn DM, Kuriantzik V:
Evaluation of the National Health Interview
Survey Diagnostic Reporting. Hyattsville,
MD, National Center for Health Statistics,
1994
42. Berkanovic E, Telesky C: Mexican-American, black-American and white-American differences in reporting illnesses,
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 2, FEBRUARY 2007
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
disability and physician visits for illnesses. Soc Sci Med 20:567–577, 1985
Johnson TP, O’Rourke D, Chavez N, Sudman S: Cultural variations in the interpretation of health survey questions. In
Health Survey Research Methods. Warnecke RB, Ed. Hyattsville, MD, National
Center for Health Statistics, 1996, p.
57– 62
Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P:
Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol
115:223–230, 1982
Tisnado DM, Adams JL, Liu H, Damberg
CL, Chen WP, Hu FA, Carlisle DM, Mangione CM, Kahn KL: What is the concordance between the medical record and
patient self-report as data sources for ambulatory care? Med Care 44:132–140,
2006
Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Jones DA, Reis
JP, Addy CL, Bowles HR, Kohl HW 3rd:
Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the
IPAQ physical activity questionnaires.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:1584 –1592, 2006
Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, Armstrong T, Zimmet PZ, Welborn TA, Cameron AJ, Dwyer T, Jolley D, Shaw JE, the
AusDiab Steering Committee: Associations of TV viewing and physical activity
with the metabolic syndrome in Australian adults. Diabetologia 48:2254 –2261,
2005
Nelson DE, Powell-Griner E, Town M,
Kovar MG: A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview
Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System. Am J Public Health
93:1335–1341, 2003
Sarkin J, Nichols J, Sallis J, Calfas K: Selfreport measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence estimates of meeting
physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 32:149 –156, 2000
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: U.S. physical activity statistics: definitions [article online], 2006. Available
from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/
physical/stats/definitions.htm. Accessed
21 December 2006
209