19951
BOOK REVIEWS
The textual comments include the name of the
species, author(s), and a selection of synonyms.
Recently published views and facts are given under the headings " T a x o n o m y " and "Nomenclature," differing from or completing the treatment
in Flora Europaea. Data on the ploidy are included and chromosome n u m b e r listed by each
country. When the distributional information
given by Flora Europaea is not particularly detailed, as tends to be the case at the level of
subspecies, all the pertinent territories are listed
for the taxa mapped. "Total range" completes
the information about European endemics; or
when the total range exceeds the European
boundaries, original total range maps are cited.
The fact that distribution maps are based on
every reliable record and the most up-to-date
material and the fact that the literature is cited
contribute to its veracity and usefulness. The series is recommended for anyone interested in
European vascular plants.--BEAT FISCHER, The
New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N Y 104585126, U.S.A.
Guide to Flowering Plant Families. By Wendy B. Z o m l e f e r . U n i v e r s i t y o f N o r t h C a r o l i n a Press, P.O. Box 2 2 8 8 , C h a p e l Hill,
North Carolina 27515-2288.
ISBN
0 - 8 0 7 8 - 2 1 6 0 - 8 (cloth), 0 - 8 0 7 8 - 4 7 7 0 - 5
(paper). 1994. 4 3 0 pp. $ 5 5 . 0 0 (cloth).
$ 2 7 . 5 0 (paper).
This beautifully produced book is the culmin a t i o n of the work of many years and incorporates the author's previously published guides.
N o w with 130 families, 23 comparative charts,
a n d 158 plates of botanical illustrations, it will
serve as a course in plant systematics on its own.
The emphasis is on families represented in the
U n i t e d States and Canada, but since m a n y of
these are of cultivated exotic taxa, this text will
have a relevancy over a much wider area.
Each family has a reasonably complete description along with a shorter "family characterization" giving the most immediately relevant
characters botanists use to recognize a family;
the n u m b e r of genera and species, both worldwide and in the U.S./Canada; general distribution; major genera; the economic species and their
products; an often highly original commentary
on the family; and a short but relevant list of
references.
341
The eye-catching plates of illustrations for each
family will prove useful for both the experienced
botanist and the beginning student. The author
realized the need for well-illustrated textbooks
during her student years, when she found the
existing texts either poorly illustrated or out of
date. The illustrations have been drawn from
living plants and are with little exception clear,
scientifically accurate, and aesthetically pleasing.
There is a well-illustrated glossary, and a family
s u m m a r y chart presents family characters in an
abbreviated form.
The author generally follows Thorne in the
delineation of families, and a few of these circumscriptions will not be familiar to most botanists. The temperate families Aceraceae and
Hippocastanaceae are logically united with the
large, diverse, and mainly tropical Sapindaceae,
with which they would undoubtedly have been
originally placed if there were more sapindaceous
genera than Acer and Hippocastanum in the north
temperate forests where most botanists have lived
and worked.
In m a n y cases, the author enthusiastically follows the results of cladistic analyses and insists
that taxa be monophyletic and not be paraphyletic; the concepts and terminology involved are
dearly explained, as is the application in particular cases. Thus, Apiaceae and Araliaceae must
be united, even though the two families can be
fairly logically and practically defined without
undue injustice to phylogeny, and the nature of
their relationship has been quite well appreciated
long before cladistics are invented. Uncritical and
strict reliance on avoiding paraphyly may lead
to frivolous results. The Caprifoliaceae (sans
Sambucus and Viburnum) may need to be expanded to include the Valerianaceae and Dipsacaceae in order to avoid paraphyly. Would the
author also add the Calyceraceae (a small and
poorly known family) if it were shown to bear
the same relationship? A n d then must the Asteraceae also be brought into the Caprifoliaceae
to avoid paraphyly? This monster family would
then be so cumbersome as to be meaningless.
Incongruously, the Lemnaceae are said to be derived from the Araceae, but both families are
allowed to stand; perhaps after a cladistic analysis, these, too, will have to be united. Some
arguments of cladists (and not just those of this
author) often seem to lack perspective, both biological and historical.
342
BRITTONIA
All in all, this is a marvelous b o o k - - c e r t a i n l y ,
i f not the finest, one o f the finest college-level
introductory text books to the flowering plant
families. M y s~udents have found the previous
WOL. 47
versions o f the Guide to be very satisfactory, a n d
I continue to consult m y copies.--MICHAEL NEE,
The N e w Y o r k Botanical Garden, Bronx, N e w
Y o r k 10458-5126, U.S.A.