CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
Customer
Relationship
Success
Latest thinking and practical advice on the way forward
Centre for Corporate Change, Australian Graduate School of Management
1
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
>
Contents
AbouttheAuthors
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iii
iv
iv
ExecutiveSummary
1
1.Introduction
1.1CustomerRelationshipManagement:ADefinition
1.2WhatWasDone?
1.3WhoWasStudied?
1.4DegreeofCRMAdoption
1.5ReportOutline
2.DoesitPaytobeCustomerFocused?
2.1ServiceProfitChain
2.2TheServiceProfitChainUnderAttack
2.3CRMStrategicOrientation
3.WhatCapabilitiesareRequiredforSuccess?
3.1CustomerInformationInfrastructure
3.2SkillsandExperience:ConvertingDatatoKnowledge
3.3SupportingOrganisationalStructures
3.4CRMProgramasaCombinationofCapabilities
4.EnvironmentalPressuresDrivingInvestmentinCRM
4.1CustomerWillingnesstoParticipateinaRelationship
4.2CompetitivePressures
4.3MarketTurbulence
4.4TechnologicalPressures
5.TheImplementationofComplexOrganisationalChange
5.1DirectSystemCostsofImplementation
5.2IndirectCostsofImplementation
5.3BeliefsHeldbyManagers
5.4CulturalChange
6.PositioningforCompetitiveSuccess
6.1ReactiveCustomerOrientation
2
3
4
4
5
6
8
8
10
11
15
15
18
21
23
25
25
27
28
29
32
32
33
34
36
38
38
6.2ProactiveCustomerOrientation
6.3AdditionalMeasuresofCustomerOrientation
7.AFinalWrap
FurtherReadingsForThoseWhoWantMore
39
40
43
46
2
TimColtman
ProfessorTimothyDevinney
ResearchPartners
AboutTheCentreforCorporateChange,Australian
GraduateSchoolofManagement
AboutTheDecisionSystemsLaboratory,
UniversityofWollongong
AboutSAP
AboutMISAustralia
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
Abouttheauthors
AbouttheAuthors
TimColtman
SeniorLecturer,UniversityofWollongong&PhDCandidate,Australian
GraduateSchoolofManagement
Tim’scurrentareaofinterestisthedesignandimplementation
ofe-businesssystems(CRM,ERPandSCM)tosupportimproved
organisationalperformance.Hehasspentthelastfiveyears
investigatingboththedriversandconstraintstosuccess.Beforehis
academiccareer,Timspent10yearsinbusinessasanITproject
managerworkinginmanagementconsultancy,governmentand
highereducationsectors.
TimhaspublishedarticlesinleadingjournalssuchasAdvances
inStrategy,CaliforniaManagementReviewandCommunicationsof
theACM.Hehaspresentedpapersandaddressesatinternationally
recognisedconferencesintheUS,France,Singapore,Australiaand
NewZealand.
ProfessorTimothyDevinney
DirectoroftheCentreforCorporateChange,AustralianGraduate
SchoolofManagement
TimothyisoneofAustralia’sleadingexpertsonstrategic
management.Hehaspreviouslyheldpositionsonthefaculties
ofVanderbiltUniversityandtheUniversityofCalifornia,Los
Angeles.Hehaspublishedfivebooksandmorethan50articles
inleadingjournalsincludingManagementScience,Journal
ofBusiness,AcademyofManagementReview,Organization
ScienceandStrategicManagementJournal.Heisavisiting
professoratbothCopenhagenBusinessSchoolandLondon
BusinessSchoolandamemberoftheAcademyofManagement.
Researchpartners
AboutTheCentreforCorporateChange,AustralianGraduate
SchoolofManagement
www.ccc.agsm.edu.au
ThestrategicpurposeoftheCentreforCorporateChange(CCC)
istochallengetheleadershipstatusquoinAustraliabyproviding
aforumforradicalnewthinkingbasedonsubstantiveexperience
andworld-classresearch.TheCCCexiststopromotethemerger
ofexperiencedcorporateleadershipwithacademicintellectual
rigour,recognisingthatoneisnotantitheticaltotheother.
TheCCC’soperationalgoalistofosteranddisseminateworldclassthinkingintheareaofstrategicchange,whichrequiresa
multi-disciplinaryapproachtoproblemsolvingthat,whilebroad
inscope,alsohastheintellectualdepthintheapplicationof
disciplinaryknow-how.Hence,theCCC’soperationalimperative
istobringdisciplinaryexcellencetotherequirementsofstudying
multifunctionalorganisationalchange,nomatterwhereinthe
worldthatexpertiseresides.
AboutTheDecisionSystemsLaboratory,Universityof
Wollongong
www.dsl.uow.edu.au
TheDecisionSystemsLaboratory(DSL)isaninterdisciplinary
groupofexperiencedacademicsdrawnfromtheFacultyof
Informatics,andtheFacultyofCommerceattheUniversity
ofWollongong.MembersofDSLshareacommoninterestin
providingpracticalsolutionstothechallengeofinformation
systemsdesignandimplementation.Operationally,theaim
ofDSListoprovidecompanieswiththeknow-howrequired
toeffectivelydeployenterprisesystemsthatinclude,butare
notlimitedto,supplychainmanagement,enterpriseresource
planningandcustomerrelationshipmanagement.
3
AboutSAP
www.sap.com
SAPistheworld’sleadingproviderofbusinesssoftwaresolutions*.
Todaymorethan24,450customersinover120countriesrun
morethan84,000installationsofSAP®software–fromdistinct
solutionsaddressingtheneedsofsmallandmidsizebusinesses
toenterprise-scalesuitesolutionsforglobalorganisations.These
solutionsarepoweredbySAPNetWeaver™platformtodrive
innovationandenablepartnercollaborationandcreateefficiencies
acrosstheirsupplychainsandbusinessoperations.SAPindustry
solutionssupporttheuniquebusinessprocessesofmorethan25
industrysegments,includinghightech,retail,publicsectorand
financialservices.Withsubsidiariesinmorethan50countries,the
companyislistedonseveralexchanges,includingtheFrankfurt
stockexchangeandNYSEunderthesymbol“SAP”.
(*)SAPdefinesbusinesssoftwaresolutionsasconsisting
ofenterpriseresourceplanningandrelatedsoftwaresolutions
suchassupplychainmanagement,customerrelationship
management,productlifecyclemanagementandsupplier
relationshipmanagement.
AboutMISAustralia
www.misweb.com/australia
Foundedin1992,MISAustraliawasthefirsttitleinAustralia
tounderstandanddevoteitscontenttothemostseniorIT
executivesandtheirparticularinformationneeds.Thesereaders
areknownbymanytitles–CIOs,ITdirectors,VPsofIT–but
haveoneresponsibility:managingtheentireIToperationtodrive
thebusinessthroughsavvyITstrategyandmanagement.
MISAustralia’squality,reputationandloyaltyarefoundedin
themagazine’sabilitytotapintopeer-topeeradvice,opinion,
newsandfeaturesspecifictotoday’sCIOs
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
ExecutiveSummary
WhatmakescompaniessuchasNationalAustraliaBankin
Australia,OttoVersandinGermany,TescointheUnitedKingdom
andCapitalOneintheUSsomuchbetteratmanagingcustomer
relationshipsthantheircompetitors?Thisquestionwasthe
basisofalargesurveyofseniormanagersinmediumtolarge
Australiancompanies.Thefindingsdemonstratethatrelationship
leadersoutperformtheirrivalsbyproactivelyidentifyingnew
marketdevelopmentsandseekingtomeetlatentorunarticulated
needsoftheircustomers.
Topunchabovetheirweightintoday’scompetitive
environment,companiesneeddatabasesandsoftwaretogain
adeepunderstandingofcustomerneedsandbehaviours.
Yet,technologyaloneisinsufficientforsuccess.Whatsets
relationshipleadersapartfromtherestisanabilitytocreatethe
deeply-seededorganisationalchangerequiredtosupportthe
opensharingofcustomerinformation.
Eightlessonsfollowfromourstudy:
■
Lesson1:CRMprogramsaredeployedfordifferentreasons.
Theoptimalcombinationwas50%customerintimacy,30%
operationalexcellence,10%dataanalyticsand10%tactical
response.
■ Lesson2:SophisticatedITinfrastructuresarenecessarybut
notsufficientforcustomerrelationshipsuccess.
■ Lesson3:Theabilitytoaskpenetratingquestions,glean
usefulinsights,andactdecisivelycomesfromskillsthatarenot
evenlydistributedbetweenorganisations.
■ Lesson4:CRMsystemsareacombinationofactivitiesthat
requiremanagerstoalignandorchestratethedisparatepartsof
theorganisation.
■ Lesson5:Thedepthofrelationshipacustomerwantswitha
suppliercan,initself,beaneffectivewayofsegmentingmarkets
aroundfundamentalcustomerneeds.
■ Lesson6:Intherushtofixthetechnologyandbusiness
alignmentissues,managerstendtooverlookwhatisfeasibleand
focusinsteadonwhatisdesirable.
■ Lesson7:Beingresponsivetocustomerneedsisnolonger
sufficient.Positioningforsuccessrequiresaproactiveapproach
thatiscapableofidentifyinglatentcustomerneedsand
competitivestrategies.
■ Lesson8:Differentstagesofrelationshipdevelopment
representdifferentrevenueandcostprofiles.Thisimpliesthat
differentcustomersmustbemanagedindifferentways.
4
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
01Introduction
“There is a consistency and predictability to the
quality of behaviour in the very best organisations.”
– Margaret J. Wheatley, Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organisation from
an Orderly Universe (1994)
Inmostmarketsoneseesleaderswhooutperformtheir
rivalsthroughtheircloseandconnectedrelationshiptotheir
customers.Anumberofthese‘relationshipleaders’come
tomind:NationalAustraliaBankinAustralia,OttoVersand
inGermany,TescointheUK,CapitalOneandHarrah’s
EntertainmentintheUS.Fororganisationssuchasthese,
customerrelationshipmanagement(CRM)ismorethanatool,
andispartofadeeplyembeddedstrategicdispositionthat
enablesthemtooutperformtheirrivalsinwhatareotherwise
fiercelycompetitivemarkets.
Forthosewantingtolearnfromtheserolemodelsanumber
ofquestionscometomind.Whyaretheysosuccessful?What
marketconditionsexistthatmakeinvestmentintheseprograms
worthwhile?Whatdeeplyembeddedcapabilitiesandcustomerorientedculturesdotheypossess?Howmuchtimeandeffort
havetheyinvestedinCRM?Istheanswertosimplyinvestinthe
latestCRMsoftwaretoleapfrogthecompetition?
Theoptimismgeneratedfromconcentrationon‘relationship
winners’isinstarkcontrasttothenaysayingofmanybusiness
commentators.Forexample,researchandadvisoryfirmthe
GartnerGroupclaimedthatcloseto50percentofallCRM
projectsfailedtomeetexpectations.Additionally,anInfoWorld
surveyfoundthatcloseto30percentofchieftechnologyofficers
saidthatCRMwasoneofthemost‘overhyped’technologies
theyhadseen.Thesecommentarieshighlightthefrustration
manyexecutivesexperienceassoftwareglitches,poorlytrained
staffanddisparatelegacysystemscontinuetohindereffective
deploymentofCRMprograms.Farfromimprovingprofitsand
cementingrelationships,somecompaniesfindthemselvesinthe
worst-casescenariowheretheirCRMsystemswindupalienating
long-termcustomersandemployees.Yetdespitetheseissues,
thetideofCRMgrowthanddevelopmentcontinuestoswell
andrise–theA$426millionspentonsuchsystemsin2003
isexpectedtoincreasetooverA$560millionby2008(The
Australian,29June2004).
Sowhat,ifanything,iswrongwithCRM?Giventhehuge
investmentrequiredtodevelopaCRMsystemitishardlythe
casethatsuchexpendituresaremadewithoutarobustbusiness
case.Norcanthe‘relationshipfailures’simplybelaidatthe
doorstepofan‘overhyped’technology.Indeed,mostpostmortemsofCRMfailuretracetheproblemsbacktofactorsother
thansoftwareandtechnology.Norareoveroptimistic‘bigbang’
approachestoimplementationsolelytoblame.Projectteams
todayareastutelyawarethatthelargerandmoreradicalanIT
projectis,themorelikelyitistofail.
Inourmind,theproblemrestsfairandsquarewithflawed
managerialdecision-making.Putbluntly,seniormanagers
5
underestimatetheCRMimplementationchallengesand
operationalmanagersarenottacticallyallocatingCRMprograms
inwaysthatareresponsibleandappropriatefortheenvironments
inwhichtheyoperate.
Inwhatfollowsweattempttoprovidemanagerswithmuch
neededperspective.Weintegratecurrentthinkingandbest
practicewithnewinsightsderivedfromastudyconductedbythe
CentreforCorporateChangeattheAustralianGraduateSchool
ofManagement.Thereportisnotintendedtobeexhaustivebut
toprovideasnapshotofthecapabilitiesrequiredandproblems
encounteredwhendeployingCRM.Mostimportantly,itdraws
togethercomplementarystrandsofthought,experienceand
datainasummaryfashion,topresentapictureofhowdecisionmakingcanbeimproved.Itishopedthatthisdocument
willprovideaspringboardformoreinformeddebatewithin
organisations,whethertheyaredeliveringanewCRMprogram,
terminatingaflounderingprogramortweakingawellfunctioning
program.
1.1CustomerRelationshipManagement:
ADefinition
FromatechnicalperspectiveCRMisgroundedonthe
interrelationshipbetweenhigh-qualitycustomerdataenabledby
informationtechnology(IT).However,fromastrategicperspective
itsaimsandscopeareconsiderablybroader.Accordingto
theGartnerGroup,CRMisdefinedasabusinessstrategy
whoseoutcomesoptimiseprofitability,revenueandcustomer
satisfaction(thewhy?)byorganisingaroundcustomersegments,
fosteringcustomer-satisfyingbehavioursandimplementing
customer-centricprocesses(thehow?).Althoughthisisa
reasonablycompletedefinitionitlackstheoperationaldetailthat
mostmanagersvalue.Forexample,thereareenvironmental
pressuresthatdeterminewhatthemarketwillallowandwhether
itmakessensetoinvestinCRMprograms.Organisationspossess
manyresourcesandcapabilities,butonlyafewwillleadto
positionsofsustainedadvantageandtheseneedtobespelt
outindetail.Last,organisingaroundthecustomeriscostlyand
maynotbefeasibleforeveryone.Therefore,weseekadefinition
ofCRMthatisdeeperandmoreinclusiveofthedriversand
impedimentstoCRMsuccess.Theseaspectsareallillustratedin
Exhibit1belowandexploredindetailthroughoutthisreport.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
CUSTOMERRELATIONSHIPMANAGEMENT:ADEFINITION
Exhibit1–CRMoperationalcomponents
1.2WhatWasDone?
ThisreportwaspreparedundertheauspicesoftheAGSM’sCentre
forCorporateChange(CCC),withfinancialsupportfromtheCCC,
FairfaxBusinessResearchandSAP.Itisoneofthemostdetailed
analysesofthewayAustraliancompaniesaregainingcompetitive
advantagefrominvestmentinCRMprograms.Theresearch
entailedextensivefieldworkthatincludedover50interviews
ofseniormanagersandexecutivesinAustraliancompanies.
Additionally,thedetailedsurveydatacollectedrequiredthe
assistanceofmorethan400Australiancompanies.
Thetargetedindustriesarecharacterisedprimarilybylarge
consumermarketsthatcoveradiverserangeofcustomer
contactpoints.Theycompriseamixtureofmatureandemerging
CRMprograms,andthecompaniesinvolvedinthestudy
arecharacterisedbystrongmarketpressurestodifferentiate
themselvesfromtheircompetition.
Theresultspresentedinthisreportareunlikeanyotherresearch
infiveways.Specificallywe:
■ Measurethebusinessunitratherthanthefirm.Whatone
unitsuchasCorporateandInstitutionalBankingdoesatNAB
tocompeteforcustomerrelationshipsisverydifferentfromthe
actionsofanotherunitsuchasBusinessFinancialServices.
■ Compareeachbusinessunittotheirdirectcompetitors.This
isimportantbecausealthoughabusinesscanberankedhighly
oncertaincapabilities,itmustbesuperiortoitsrivalsinorderto
generatecompetitiveadvantages.
■ Targetawidecrosssectionofpeopleintheseorganisations
chargedwithdevelopingandimplementingCRMprogramsto
ensurethatresponsesarenotsubjecttobiasassociatedwiththe
perceptionsofaparticularfunctionalarea.
■ Provideinsightintotherangeanddepthofcustomer-relating
capabilitiesbeingdevelopedbycompanieswithinsevenbroad
industrysectors–financialservices,insurance,airlines,utilities,
telecommunications,hotelsandlargeretailers.
■ Gainaclearerunderstandingofthenatureandevolutionof
CRMprogramsbyseparatingorganisationalcapabilitiesfrom
6
environmentalpressuresandexaminehow
managersreacttonewstrategicdemandsandtheirown
organisationalimpediments.
1.3WhoWasStudied?
Thetargetsofthisstudywereseniormanagersingeneral
management,marketing,financeandinformationtechnology.
TheindustriesrepresentedincludedFinance(40%ofthose
involved),Insurance(9%),Telecommunications(12%),Airlines
(7%),Hotels/Tourism(6%),Utilities(6%),Retail(10%)and
Other(9%).
Themediancompanystudiedhadapproximately300
employees,withthesmallestfirmhaving50employeesand
thelargest12,000.Themanagersinvolvedworkedinfive
areas:(1)corporateorgeneralmanagement,(2)financial/
operationsmanagement,(3)marketingandsales,(4)technology
management,and(5)customersupport.Allwereverysenior
managersasattestedbytheirtitles.Thewidedistributionof
respondentsbyjobtitleprovidesrigourtothestudyasitensures
thatselectionbiasintheresultsiskepttoaminimum.
1.4DegreeofCRMAdoption
WeseeinthecompaniesstudiedamaturingofCRMexperience
andactivity.Only19percentoftherespondentshavenoCRM
programsinplace,while53percenthaveCRMoperations
inexploratoryorpilotstagesofdevelopment.In28percent
ofcases,CRMprogramshavebeendeployedforadvanced
usage.ThismeansthattheCRMprogramhasbeensuccessfully
integratedintothecoresystemsofthebusiness.Notsurprisingly,
75percentoffirmsbelievethattheywillhaveinplacemature/
fullyintegratedCRMprogramsinthenexttwotothreeyears.
Furthermore,thisstudyindicatesthatwedidnotjustlookat
thosecompaniesthatintendtoimplementadvancedCRM
programs.Severalinsuranceandutilitycompaniesinoursample
havenoplanstodeployadvancedCRMprogramsatall.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
ABROADSECTIONOFAUSTRALIANINDUSTRY
VERYSENIORMANAGERS
Exhibit2–Breakdownofsurveyrespondentsbyindustry
Exhibit3–Surveyrespondentsbyjobtitle
CRMSYSTEMSAREMATURING
Exhibit4–StateofCRMprogramtodayandin2-3years’time
1.5ReportOutline
Aprimaryaimofthisreportistoshowhowrelationshipleaders
areusingCRMprogramstooutperformtheirrivals.However,
wealsonotethatwhathasbeenshowntoworkforleadingCRM
implementersmaypresentadesirablemodelforotherfirmsbut
israrelysufficienttoaccountfortheuniquecustomerdemands,
organisationalcapabilitiesandenvironmentalconstraintsthat
faceacompany.Therearemanyreasonswhythisisthecase,
suchashistoricallydevelopedcapabilities,customerbases,
managerialbeliefsandregulatoryenvironmentsetc.Inthisreport
weseektoexplainboththedriversandimpedimentstocustomer
relationshipsuccess.
■
Chapter4–weillustratetheeffectofpersonalisationand
competitive,marketandtechnologicalpressuresonCRM
success.Thesemarketpressureshelpustounderstandthe
extenttowhicheconomicvaluecanbecreatedandmanaged
throughamoretailoredcustomerrelationshipsystem.
■ Chapter5–theabilityoftheorganisationtoweatherthe
implementationproblemsinherentininstitutingalong-term
strategicchangeprogramiscriticaltoCRMsuccess.Weillustrate
thedifficultythatmanycompaniesexperienceimplementing
CRMprogramsthatalterthebalanceofpowerwithintheir
companyandrequirebotheconomicandbehaviouralchanges
amongstitsemployeesandmanagers.
■ Chapter6–weexaminetheperformanceimplicationsof
positioningforcompetitiveadvantage.Severalmeasuresof
positionaladvantageareusedtoexamineperformancerelativeto
competitors.
■ Chapter7–weconcludewithasectionthatwrapsupthekey
findingsinthisreport.
1.6Acknowledgements
Thisprojectwouldnothavecometofruitionwithoutthesupport
oftheprojectpartners.Projectchampionsdeservingofspecial
mentionareQuentinLong(MIS),MatthewBushby(MIS)and
JenniferRoach(SAP).WealsowishtothankNatashaDubauskas
andNoelParkhillforassistanceinexecutingthesurvey.Fran
PriorprovideddiligentsecretarialassistanceandPaulineOlive
aidedusinhercapacityasthebusinessmanageroftheCentre
forCorporateChange.
Theremainderofthereportisstructuredasfollows:
■
Chapter2–webuildtheplatformforthisstudybyreviewing
theworkthatpurportstoshowthatcustomerrelationship
managementmakesadifference.Wethenplotthewaystrategic
orientationsvarybetweenrespondentsinourstudy.
■ Chapter3–weexplorethecompanyspecificcapabilities
requiredtoachieveanadvantage.Webreakacustomer-relating
capabilityintoitsconstituentpartsandthenshowhowthe
combinationoftheseindividualcapabilitiescanleadto
positionaladvantage.
7
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccess
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
02DoesitPaytobeCustomerFocused?
“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go
from here?” asked Alice.
“That depends a good deal on where you want to
get to,” said the Cat.
“I don’t care where,” said Alice.
“Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,” said the Cat.
– Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
Foryears,managersandmarketershaveemphasisedstrategies
designedtoincreasethesizeoftheircustomerbase,encourage
brandswitchingandboostpurchasefrequency.However,oneof
themostsignificanttrendsinrecentyearshasbeentheshiftin
focusfromengaginginsingletransactionstoestablishinglongtermrelationshipswithcustomers.Consultantsandcompany
directorsechothislineofthinking:
First,youdoeverythingyoucantokeeptheclientsyoualready
haveanddefendyourmarketshare;onlythencanyouthink
aboutlookingfornewcustomers.
Whytheshiftinstrategicfocus?
MarketsindevelopedcountrieslikeAustraliaareoftenmature
oratbestgrowingslowly.Thisimpliesthattherearefewernew
customersoverwhichcompaniescompete.Competitionis
frequentlyintenseandstrategiesbasedoncustomeracquisition
areincreasinglydifficulttomeet.Ithasbeenestimatedthatthe
costofattractingnewcustomerscanbeuptofivetimesasmuch
asthecostofservingexistingonesefficientlytoensurethatthey
staywithyou.Currentthoughtinmarketingtheoryandpractice
pointsoutthatcompetingthroughsuperiorserviceandcustomer
relationshipscanbemoreprofitable.Hence,allocatingresources
tocustomerserviceinitiativescanbeparticularlyeffectivewhen
thecostofgeneratinganewcustomercansubstantiallyexceed
thecostofretainingapresentcustomer.
2.1ServiceProfitChain
Theserviceprofitchainhasproventobeoneofthemostpopular
waystoillustratethelinkbetweencustomer-focusedbehaviour
andprofitability.Thelogicisquitesimple.Whenorganisationsturn
theirattentiontowardsthecustomer,theycreatevalueforthose
customersthatcan,withsomelikelihood,drivecustomersatisfaction
withtheproductandpurchasingexperience.Inturn,theincreased
customersatisfactionwillenhanceloyalty.Finally,highercustomer
loyaltywilldriveincreasedfirmprofitability(seeExhibit5).
Aclassicexampleoftheimplementationoftheservicevalue
chainistherevitalisationofSears,RoebuckandCompany–the
large,establishedAmericancatalogueretaileranddepartment
8
storethatfellonhardtimesinthe1980sastheconsumerretail
marketchangedonanumberofdimensions.Morethan100toplevelSearsexecutivesspentthreeyearsrebuildingthecompany
arounditscustomers.Theydevelopedaholisticbusinessmodel
forthecompany–theemployee-customer-profitmodel–andan
accompanyingmanagementsystemthattrackedactivitiesfrom
managementbehaviourthroughemployeeattitudestocustomer
satisfactionandfinancialperformance.Usingstatisticaltestingthey
establishedthatafivepercentagepointimprovementinemployee
attitudedrovea1.3percentagepointincreaseincustomer
satisfactionthat,inturn,drovea0.5percentagepointincreasein
salesturnover.Althoughthismightappearsmall,onehastokeep
Serviceprofitchain
Exhibit5–Serviceprofitchain(Heskettetal.1994HarvardBusinessReview)
In one of the pioneering studies in this area, Bain
& Company showed that something as small as
a reduction in customer defections by 5 per cent
could lead to an astounding 60 per cent increase
in financial services profits over a five-year period.
The implication of these studies is that companies
should allocate resources to build more cooperative
and long-lasting relationships with their customers.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
inmindthatSears’salesin2003wereUS$41.1billion(A$54.3b).
Theserviceprofitchainhasbeenusedinahostofindustries,
providingfurtherevidenceofarelationshipbetweencustomer
satisfaction,loyaltyandcompanyperformance.
■ Banking.Customersatisfactioninretailbankingcanbe
correlatedhighlywithbranchprofitability.Highlysatisfied
customershadbalances20percenthigherthansatisfied
customersand,assatisfactionlevelswentupovertime,sodid
accountbalances.Thereversewasalsotrue.Assatisfaction
levelsfell,sodidaccountbalances(Carr1999).
■ Telecommunications.A10percentincreaseinacustomer
satisfactionindexledtoa2percentincreaseincustomer
retentionanda3percentincreaseinrevenues.Inaddition,
customersatisfactionwasaleadingindicatorofcustomer
retention,revenueandrevenuegrowth(IttnerandLarcker1998).
■ Airlines.Asonemightexpect,themaindriversof
dissatisfactionintheairlineindustryarehighloadfactors
(crowding),mishandledbaggageandpoorpunctuality.Thestudy
concludedthatasdissatisfactionrose,operatingrevenuefelland
consequentlyoperatingexpensesroseandoperatingincomefell
(BehnandRiley1999).
However,thesestudiesdonotclaimtoestablishacause-effect
relationship.Theysimplyfindevidenceofastrongcorrelation
betweencustomersatisfaction,loyaltyandperformance.Overall,
theseresultsindicatethatthestrongestindicatorofsuccessis
loyalty.Butwhatisloyaltyanddoallcustomersreallywanttobe
loyal?Asindividualsweexhibitloyalbehaviourtothethingsthat
reallymattertous:
■ Toourspouseorpartner
■ Toourrugbyleague,soccer,Aussierulesorrugbyunionteam
■ Toourpoliticalparty
Butdowereallywanttobeloyaltoabank,airline,hotelorretailstore?
2.2TheServiceProfitChainUnderAttack
Contrarytothepopularviewthatlong-lifecustomersaremore
profitable,otherssuchasAGSMProfessorGrahameDowling,
cautionthatloyalcustomerscanoftenbelessprofitable.One
reasonforthisisthattheyexpectarewardfortheirloyalty;such
asapricediscountorextrafreeservice.Inthecaseoffast
movingconsumergoods,service,retailandlifestylemarkets,
thereisnologicalreasonwhycustomersshouldstayloyaltoa
singlebrand.Therearemanygoodreasonsforthis:
■ Differentbrandsareusedduringdifferentusageoccasions
(eg.FrenchChampagneforcelebrations,CheninBlancor
Rieslingwithfish).
■ Brandsarecomplementarynotsubstitutes(eg.TheSydney
MorningHeraldfordailynewsandTheAustralianFinancial
Reviewforin-depthcompanyanalysis).
■ Itisnecessarytocombinevariousbrandsinordertocreatea
completeproduct(eg.withclothing,cosmetics,cooking,travel)
andcustomersareunwillingtohavesuchchoiceconstrainedby
thesupplier.
■ Consumersarevarietyseekers(eg.Italian,French,Mexican,
ChineseandIndianrestaurants)andareunlikelytowantto
remainwiththesamesupplierforever.
■ Thedesirefornovelty(let’sexperimentandtrysomethingnew).
Additionally,theleversthatmanagersneedtopulltodrive
customersatisfactioncanbequitedifferentfromwhat
determinesdissatisfaction.Weseeevidenceofthisoncustomer
retentionwhenaone-pointincreaseincustomersatisfaction(say
9
from‘2’to‘3’onafive-pointscaleformeasuring‘satisfaction’)
doesnotcompareequallywithaone-pointdownwardshift
(sayfrom‘4’to‘3’onthesamefive-pointscale).Diminishing
returnsmayalsosetinifcustomerexpectationsarealreadymet.
Furtherinvestmentaimedatincreasingcustomersatisfaction
fromhightoveryhighlevelsmaynothavethesameimpact
onperformanceasinvestmentsaimedatmovingcustomer
satisfactionfromlowlevelstoparity.
Whatthismeansforamanageristhatcustomerorientationdoes
notalwaysleadtogreatercustomersatisfaction,nordoescustomer
satisfactionalwaysincreaseperformance.Hencetheequation
“marketorientation=performance”isfartoosimplisticanddoes
notholdinmostcircumstances.Therefore,theimpactofCRM
programsonfirmperformancemaybeeitherpositiveornegative,
dependinguponthemeasureused,theindustryanalysedandthe
typeofITsystemconsidered.Whatwecantakefromthisisthatmore
relationshipbuildingisnotnecessarilybetter,butratherbuildingthe
righttypeofrelationshipisthekeytoperformancesuccess.
2.4CRMStrategicOrientation
WeknowthatCRMmeansdifferentthingstodifferent
organisations.Insomecasesitisdesignedtosupportcooperation
andcreateacustomer-centricbusinessculture.Thisorientation
treatscustomersastruepartnersandreflectsagenuine
willingnesstocatertoindividualservicerequirements.Others
aremorefocusedontheimplementationofbestpracticeto
capturecostsavingsthroughbusinessprocessautomation.Some
focusedproactivelyonthegenerationofcustomerintelligence
toenhancecustomerandcompanyvalue.Andsomeengagein
CRMforpurelytacticalreasonstoblocktheimpactofloyaltyand
otherrelationship-basedprogramsinitiatedbycompetitors.Each
ofthesefourstrategicorientationsissummarisedinExhibit6.
Strategic
Orientation
DominantCharacteristic
Customeras
Partner
Atop-downperspectivethatviewsCRMasacore
customercentricbusinessstrategy.Thisorientation
treatscustomersastruepartnersandreflectsa
genuinewillingnesstocatertoindividualservice
requirements.
Operational
Efficiency
ThisperspectiveonCRMisfocusedonthe
implementationofbestpracticetocapturecost
efficienciesthroughmajorautomationprojectssuch
asservice,salesforceandmarketingautomation.
AnalyticMining
Abottom-upperspectiveonCRMconcentratingon
theintelligentminingofcustomerdataforstrategic
andtacticalpurposes.
TacticalResponse
Atacticalperspectivethatseekstodenyan
advantagetocompetitorsbyimitatingcompetitive
initiativessuchasloyaltyprogramstoretain
existingcustomers.
Exhibit6–Fourlevelsofstrategicorientation
We live and breathe the service-profit chain,
understanding our customers is fundamental to
our success – satisfied customers make satisfied
clients, make happy shareholders.
– AC Nielsen (www.acnielsen.com.au)
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
BREAKDOWNBYSTRATEGICORIENTATION
CustomerasPartner
OperationalExcellence
DataAnalytic
TacticalResponse
Exhibit7–Relevantstrategicorientationthatbestdescribesyourorganisation’sCRMemphasis
Theresultsofourstudyshowthatin96percentofcases,CRM
programsincorporateelementsofallfourstrategicorientations.
Managerswereaskedtoallocatethedegreetowhichthey
werepursuingeachofthesefourstrategicorientations.Two
orientationsinparticulardisplaystatisticallysignificantvariation.
First,themedianallocationtoa“customeraspartner”orientation
is40percent.Onethirdofcompaniesinoursampleallocate
“21-40%”andanother28percentallocate“40-60%”tothis
strategicorientation.TheothersignificantareainwhichCRMis
deployedisoperationalefficiency.Themedianallocationis30
percent,with43percentofcompaniesallocating“1-20%”and
33percentallocating“21-40%”tooperationalexcellenceinan
efforttoreducecosts.Althoughtheremainingorientationsare
notstatisticallysignificanttheyarestillimportant.Inthecaseof
analyticminingthemedianorientationis10percent,with73per
centallocatingbetween“1-20%”oftheirCRMstrategytowards
dataintelligenceandotheranalyticactivities.Inthecaseof
tacticalresponseprograms,suchasloyaltyschemes,82percent
ofrespondentsallocatedlessthan20percenttothisorientation.
10
Thesefindingsimplythatcustomerrelationshipand
operationalexcellencestrategiesareprimarystrategic
orientationsinoursample.Dataanalyticandtacticalresponse
orientationsappeartorepresentsecondarystrategicpostures.
Itisinterestingtonotethatinmostcases(96percent)
organisationsemployabalancedapproachthatincludes
elementsofallfourstrategicorientations.Whymightthisbe
thecase?First,mostorganisationsarerationalwhenitcomes
tochoosingtheportfolioofmarketsinwhichtheywilloperate.
Theychooseabalanceofmaturemarketswheretheycanexploit
existingcapabilitiesandgrowthmarketswheretheyexplore
andseeknewopportunities.Forexample,only25percentof
thecompaniessurveyedindicatethattheydealrepeatedlywith
samecustomerbase.Theimplicationofthisisthatcompanies
mustworkwithcustomersthatareatdifferentrelationship
stagesandthesestagesarechangingdynamically.Second,this
portfolioofmarketsisassociatedwithdifferentialratesofreturn
andcommensuratelevelsofrisk.Forexample,54percentof
companiesindicatethatlessthan21percentoftheircustomers
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
FINDINGTHEOPTIMALCRMCOMBINATION
accountformorethan80percentofprofitsand/orlifetimevalue
–anamazingvalidationofthe80:20rule!Hence,thegoalofany
organisation’smarketingstrategyisnotsoclearandsimple.
Whatweseeinthedataisthatabalancedapproachmakes
sense.Thestartingpointistodeployacustomeraspartner
orientationtochangethewaymanagersthinkabouttheir
customersandtheirbusiness.Closelycomplementarytothisis
thedevelopmentofsystemsforthecollectionofcustomerdata
thatreducecoststhroughoperationalexcellence.Ifusedwell,
dataanalyticswillalsochangethewaycustomersthinkabout
yourcompany.Butwhatistheoptimalallocation?
ToillustratehowcompaniesperformwhenCRMprogramsare
deployedfordifferentreasons,welookedatthebest,average
andworstperformingsegmentsinourdata.Thedifferent
orientationsarebestillustratedonatwo-by-twomatrix(see
Exhibit8)wherethearrowsindicatethemeanscoreforeachof
thefourcategories.
Medianscoresarealsousefulfordescriptivepurposesand
aremoreeffectiveatcapturingthesymmetrythatcharacterises
11
AttentiontoOffensiveMarketing
AttentiontoOffensiveMarketing
Exhibit8–MeanallocationofCRMactivity
ourdata.Ifwelookattheorganisationsthatareperforming
betterorfarbetterthanthecompetition,the‘best’combination
is:customeraspartner(50percent),operationalexcellence
(30percent),dataanalytics(10percent)andtacticalresponse
(12.5percent).Thecompaniesthatareaverageperformers
intheirindustrytendtoplacelessemphasisondeploying
CRMtobecomecustomerfocusedandmoreondataanalytic
activities.Themediandistributionforthissegmentis:customer
aspartner(40percent),operationalexcellence(30percent),
analyticmining(15percent)andtacticalresponse(10percent).
Finally,thegroupofcompaniesthatperformedworseormuch
worsethanthecompetitionarelesssureaboutexactlywhat
theyshouldbedoingwiththeirmarketingprograms.Theyuse
CRMtoachieveefficiencythroughoperationalexcellenceandto
defendtheircurrentmarketposition.Thesecompaniesallocate
thehighestscorestooperationalexcellence(35percent)and
tacticalresponse(15percent)orientations.Consequentlythey
scorelowestoncustomeraspartner(35percent)andanalytic
mining(10percent).
Lesson 1
CRM programs are strategically deployed for
different reasons. The optimal combination
is 50 per cent customer intimacy, 30 per cent
operational excellence, 10 per cent data analytics
and 12.5 per cent tactical response.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
03WhatCapabilitiesareRequiredforSuccess?
Today, when people say “implement” CRM, they
often think about technology; the reality is that
you can only enable CRM with technology. There
is a pattern in the marketplace where some big
technology is introduced and everyone gets excited
about tracking customer information with it. But
CRM is more than that. You need three things: a
means to track the information, the ability to evaluate
customer performance with metrics, and the means
to make change happen.
– Heidi Wisbach, manager CRM analytics, Capgemini Ernst & Young Marketing News,
7 May, 2001
Manyorganisationsarecomingtotherealisationthatsustained
competitiveadvantageisbasedlargelyonpossessionoftheright
resourcesandcapabilities.Conceivably,anorganisationcanpossess
manyresourcesandcapabilities,butonlyafewofthesehavethepotential
toleadtopositionsofsustainedadvantage.Itisrarethatinvestmentin
simplecustomerrelationshipsolutionssuchasnetworktechnology,CRM
software,goodintentionsandskilledstaffwillproducesuperioroutcomes.
Instead,organisationsrequireadeep-seededcommitmentthat
underscoresaninvestmentinanoverarchingcustomer-relatingcapability.
customer-relatingcapability
Butwhatisacustomer-relatingcapability?Weneedto
appreciatethatbroadgeneralisationswillnotsuffice.Defining
thenecessarycapabilityaspossessionofcustomermarketing
skillsforexample,canbemisleadingifthevalueliesina
particularchannelrelationshipaswellasotheringredients
suchastechnology,pricingorpromotionthataremerely
average.Additionally,thereneedstobesomesenseofhowan
organisationcomparestoothersintheirindustrytoappreciate
theimpactthateachcapabilityhasoncompetitiveadvantage.
Tofullyunderstandthescopeofacustomer-relatingcapabilitywe
breakitdownintothreeconstituentparts:
12
(1)Informationtechnologyinfrastructure
nformationtechnologyinfrastructure–thebedrockof
aformalCRMsystemisdata.IfCRMisgoingtohave
apositiveimpactonperformance,reliabledataand
informationareprerequisites.
(2)Skillconvertingmarketdataintocustomerknowledge
Skillconvertingmarketdataintocustomerknowledge–
dataandinformationaloneareinsufficient.Organisations
mustbecapableofinterpretingdatacorrectlytoensure
thedecisionsthatneedtobemadeareintheright
businesscontext.Know-howmustleadtonewknowledge
aboutcustomersthatcanbeusedtoinformmanagerial
andemployeedecision-making.
(3)Supportingorganisationalstructures
upportingorganisationalstructures–simplygathering
informationandgainingnewcustomerinsightwillhaveno
impactonbusinessperformanceunlessactionscanbe
takenappropriatelyandefficiently.TheoutputsofCRM
systemshavetobeacteduponandthisrequiresappropriate
organisationalstructures,controlsystemsandincentives.
3.1CustomerInformationInfrastructure
Overthelast15yearsstrongempiricalevidencesupported
bymanagerialsuppositionhasaccumulatedsuggestingthat
informationtechnologies,wheneffectivelydeployed,can
contributetosuperiorperformance.Theseadvantagesarise
becausethetypeofITarchitecturerequiredtosupportCRM
isnoteffortlesstodeployandrequiresskillsthatarerare
andcannotbeduplicatedeasily.Hence,thecompaniesthat
candevelopthisarchitecturerevealtheirsuperiorinternal
capabilities.
AprimeobjectiveofmanyCRMsystemsistogainamore
completepictureofthecustomerbyintegratingdatacollection
acrossallcustomertouch-points.Thedatainourstudyindicates
thatapproximatelyonethird(35percent)haveachievedthis
goalwhileanotherthird(37percent)areclearlystruggling.
Theseresultsconfirmthatdeliveryofawell-integratedpictureof
thecustomeriscomplexanddifficulttoachieve(seeExhibit9).
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
PROVIDINGAFULLPICTUREOFTHECUSTOMERISDIFFICULT
Exhibit9–StateofCRMprogramtodayandin2-3years’time
AsanyonewhohastriedtodeployaCRMprogramwill
appreciate,thewrongtechnologybasecanturnintegration
initiativesintoamassivetechnologicalandorganisational
nightmare.Integratinglegacysystemsandunfamiliarsoftware
requirescustomintegrationthatiscostly,timeconsumingand
risky.Therefore,thequalityofacompany’sITinfrastructure
canactasahedgeagainstfutureuncertainty.Itcanfacilitate
theorganisation’sfutureabilitytocosteffectivelyrespondto
customerdemandsandprovidethebasisonwhichnewservice
improvementscanbedevelopedandimplemented.
Weaskedthemanagersinourstudytoindicatewhether
theirinformationsystemswereextremelydifficult,orverygood
atadaptingandrespondingtounplannedcustomerneeds.One
third(33percent)indicatethattheyfinditdifficulttoadopttheir
ITsystemstochangingcustomerneeds.Whileanotherthird(34
percent)indicatethattheyaregoodatadaptingtheirITsystems.
TheinflexibilityofITarchitecturealsohasimplicationsforthe
easewithwhichCRMsoftwarecandifferentiateamongcustomer
segments(seeExhibit10).
Considerforamomenttherangeoftechnologiesthatneedto
beinterlinked.Thislistmightincludeacombinationofnetwork
infrastructure,frontofficeapplicationssuchassalesforce
automation,callcentresandtelesales,campaignmanagement
andfieldservicesupport,backendenterpriseresourceplanning
andotherlegacysystems.Tosimplifythewide-rangingscopeof
ITinfrastructurewecreatedanaggregatemeasurethatcombined
measuresof:ITflexibility,systemintegration,real-timedata
provision,andtheabilitytodifferentiateamongcustomers.
Lesson 2
Sophisticated IT infrastructures are a necessary but
not sufficient condition for customer relationship
success.
IMPACTOFITFLEXIBILITYONCUSTOMERDIFFERENTIATION
Towhatextentisthefollowingtrueoftheinformationsystemsinyourorganisation?
CRMallowsustodifferentiate
amongcustomersastotheir
lifetimevalue
Itisextremelydifficulttoadapt
ourIT&respondtounplanned
customerneeds
Average
Weareverygoodatadaptingour
IT&respondingtounplanned
customerneeds
Total
Stronglydisagree
21%
19%
8%
29
Neitheragreenordisagree
2%
5%
15%
22
Stronglyagree
6%
7%
11%
24
29
31
34
Total
Exhibit10–TowhatextentisthefollowingtrueoftheinformationsystemsinyourorganisationandCRMallowsustodifferentiateamongcustomers
astotheirlifetimevalue
ITINFRASTRUCTURERELATIVETOCOMPETITORS
Overall,howdoesyourbusinesscomparetothethreemostprofitablecompaniesatmanaging
customerrelationships
ITInfrastructure
AmongtheLowest
Average
AmongtheBest
Total
Poor
16%
13%
11%
40
Average
6%
8%
8%
22
High
5%
6%
27%
38
27
27
46
Total
Exhibit11–ITinfrastructureandcompetitiveposition
13
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
IT’SNOTEASYTODEVELOPTHEFORMALISEDDOCUMENTATIONREQUIRED
SOPHISTICATEDDATAMODELLINGTELLSATALE
Exhibit12–Toassiststaffinextracting,manipulating,analysingand
presentingdatainourorganisationwehaveinplacelittleorextensive
formaliseddocumentationandprocedures
Exhibit13–Sophisticatedmodelsarefrequentlyusedtoanalysedata
Whenwecomparethisaggregatemeasureof‘IT
Infrastructure’withthecompetitivepositionineachindustrythe
correlationisstatisticallysignificant.Twenty-sevenpercentof
companieswithhighlevelsofITinfrastructurearealsoamong
thebestperformersintheirindustry.Likewise,16percentof
companieswithpoorITinfrastructurearealsoamongthelowest
performersintheirindustry.
Theseresultsprovidestrongevidenceofthegrowing
importanceofsophisticatedITarchitecturestosupport
customerinformationflows.However,futureperformanceand
companysurvivalisnotbasedonthesophisticationofdata
collection,storageanddeliverydevices.Customerdataneeds
tobeinterpretedcorrectlyinthecontextofthebusinessand
newinsightsgainedthatinformthedecision-makingprocess.
Additionally,simplygatheringinformationandgaininginsightwill
havenoimpactonbusinessperformanceunlesstheoutputsof
theCRMsystemareacteduponinthewiderbusiness.
3.2SkillsandExperience:Converting
DatatoKnowledge
Oneoftheprimaryreasonsmanyorganisationsfailin
implementingnewformsofCRMtechnologyisbecausethey
simplydon’thavetherequisiteskillsandexperiencenecessary
tousethedataeffectively.Forexample,asnewformsofdataare
madeavailable,humaninsight,skillandexperienceisrequired
totransformstaticdataintoknowledge.Thisknowledgeisthen
usedtosupportdecision-makingsuchas:whetheracustomer
ismoreorlessimportant,whetheranideaforanewproductis
attractiveormarginal,andsoon.
Developmentoftheseskillsrequiresdeliberateinvestmentin
acycleoflearningthroughknowledgearticulationandknowledge
codification.Formaliseddocumentationandproceduresarea
firststeptowardsthearticulationandcodificationofcustomer
knowledge.Manyorganisationsindicatethatthereareproblems
inthisarea,with37percentindicatingthatlittleformalised
documentationandfewproceduresareinplace.Amongthe
betterperformersinthisareaare28percentoforganisations
thatsaytheyhaveinplaceextensivedocumentationand
14
proceduresthatcanbesharedandusedbyothersinthe
organisation(seeExhibit12).Noindustryspecifictrendswere
visibleinthedata.
Additionalquestionsinourstudyidentifiedseveralcommontraits
amongthebetterperformingorganisations(ie.thosewithabove
averageskillsandexperience):
■ Theyhaveinplaceextensivedocumentationandprocedures
toassiststaffextract,manipulate,analyseandpresent
customerdata,
■ Theyutilisesophisticatedmodelstoanalysedata,
■ Thereisacommonunderstandingbetweenmanagersin
customerserviceandITunitsregardinghowdatacanbeusedto
improvecustomerservice,and
■ WhenextractingdatafromCRMsystemsanddatabasesmost
ofthestaffinvolvedhaveextensiveknowledgeofthebusiness
issuesfacingthecompany.
Whenwecomparethesemeasureswiththecompetition,
thecorrelationbetweenskillsandcompetitivepositionineach
industryisstatisticallysignificant.Thirty-fivepercentofthese
companieswithstrongskillsandexperienceareamongthetop
performersintheirindustry;whileonly5percentofcompanies
withhighskillsareamongthelowestperformersintheirindustry
(seeExhibit14).
Lesson 3
Although market data is readily available from
innumerable sources, the ability to ask penetrating
questions, glean useful insights, and act decisively
comes from a skill set that is not evenly distributed
between organisations.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
SKILLS&KNOW-HOWRELATIVETOCOMPETITORS
Overall,howdoesyourbusinesscomparetothethreemostprofitablecompaniesatmanaging
customerrelationships?
Skills&know-how
AmongtheLowest
Average
AmongtheBest
Total
Poor
11%
11%
11%
33
Average
3%
8%
8%
19
High
5%
8%
35%
88
19
27
54
Total
Exhibit14–Skillandknow-howcomparedtocompetition
DIVERGENTINCENTIVES
WIDESPREADACCOUNTABILITY
Exhibit15–Towhatextentareemployee/managementincentivesusedin
yourorganisationtosupportcustomerrelationshipbuilding?
Exhibit16–Accountabilityforcustomerrelationships
3.3SupportingOrganisationalStructures
skillscombinetoensurethatinformationandknowledgeflowsare
embedded,activatedandgivenmeaning.Forexample,aresatisfaction
Competitiveadvantageliesnotonlyinpeopleandtechnology,but
levelsashighasanticipated?Isthissegmentgrowingasfastas
alsointhearchitecturalalignmentthatprovidescomplementarity
expected?Andsoon.Withouttheinformationfromthesesystems,there
betweencompanyincentivesandcontrols,decisionmakingprocesses, isnobasisforlearning,correctingmistakes,andadjustingassumptions
technologies,skillsandroutines.Differentcompaniesmaypossessthe
tobetteralignwhatthefirmisdoingwithwhatitshouldbedoing.Akey
samebasicphysicaltechnologyandsimilarskills,butonlyoneofthese
aimofaneffectivecustomerrelationshipcontrolsystemistoensurethat
companiesmaypossessorganisationalcultureandsocialrelationsto
accountabilityfortheoverallqualityoftherelationshipiswelldefined
fullyexploitthistechnology.Whenwespeakofsupportingorganisational andunderstood.Asaccountabilitybecomesmorewidelydispersed
structureswerefertotheorganisationalheirarchy,incentivesand
acrossorganisationalstakeholdersthistaskbecomesincreasingly
controls,revealedcompetitivestrategyandtheeasewithwhich
difficult.Theresultsindicatethat34percentagreeorstronglyagree
technologiescanbeadjustedtomeetnewcustomerdemands.
thataccountabilityforcustomerrelationshipsiswidelydispersedand42
Forexample,managerialexpectationsarecommunicatedto
percentofcompaniesdisagreeorstronglydisagree.
employeesthroughvariousperformancemeasures,incentives
Theabilitytoalignorganisationalstructureswithmarketing
andothercoordinatingmechanismsthatemphasisewhether
objectivesisakeyaspectofthiscapability.Theimplicationis
customersareviewedasvaluableassetstoberetainedor
thatwheneveralignmentishigh,thecompanyismorelikely
anonymoustransactionaltargets.Thesesignalsactasalitmus
tobesuccessful.Severalquestionsinoursurveywereused
testtotheeffectivenessofcompanybehaviourbothbefore,
todeterminetheextenttowhichanorganisation’sstrategy
duringandaftereachexchange.Ourdataindicatesthat35
emphasisestheimportanceofcustomerrelationships.We
percentoforgansiationshaveinplaceconsiderableincentives
createdascaletomeasureorganisationalarchitecturethat
schemes(payrise,promotionetc.)basedoncustomersatisfaction includedtheimportanceof:(1)customerretention,(2)
andretention.However,incentivesarenotwelldevelopedina
importanceofcustomerknowledgetofuturesuccess,and(3)
numberofcompaniesthatrespondedtooursurvey;44percent
whetherthefirmtakesalong-termorshort-termviewtocustomer
claimthattheyhavenoincentiveschemesbasedonmeasuresof relationships.Thirty-eightpercentofcompanieswithhighly
productsalesandprofitability(seeExhibit15).
alignedorganisationalarchitecturesarealsoamongthebest
Controlsystemsareusedtotellorganisationswhichresourcesand
performersintheirindustry(seeExhibit17).
15
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
ORGANISATIONALARCHITECTURERELATIVETOCOMPETITORS
Overall,howdoesyourbusinesscomparetothethreemostprofitablecompaniesatmanaging
customerrelationships?
OrganisationalArchitecture
AmongtheLowest
Average
AmongtheBest
Total
Poor
8%
2%
3%
13
Average
3%
11%
11%
25
High
5%
18%
38%
61
16
31
52
Total
Exhibit17–Organisationalarchitecturecomparedtocompetition
ORGANISATIONALARCHITECTURERELATIVETOCOMPETITORS
Exhibit18–Dimensionsofacustomer-relatingcapability
Thetrendthatemergesfromeachofthetableexhibitsinthis
chapteristhatstrongorganisationalcapabilitiesarevaluable.
ThoseorganisationswithsophisticatedITinfrastructure,strong
skillsandcustomer-focusedarchitecturesarehighlylikelyto
beamongthebestperformers.Beingnotsogoodoneachof
thesecapabilitiesmeansaverageorparityperformance.The
interpretationofthisimpliesthatstrategicthemesarerequired
toprioritise,orchestrateanddirectthecollectionofcustomer
relationshipresources.
3.4 CRMProgramasaCombinationofCapabilities
Whetherweakorstrong,CRMcapabilitiescannotbetaken
inisolation.Thereasonforthisisthateachdimensionis
nestedwithinanintricateorganisationalsystemofinterrelated
andinterdependentresources.Thereforeitisimportantto
conceptualiseaCRMprogramasacombinationofactivities
requiringmanagerstoconcentratenotononeortwocapabilities
independentlybuttooptimisetheoverarchingCRMprogram.
Failuretodosomayconceivablyleadtoworsecustomer
responseandsatisfactionthanthelesssophisticatedsystems
theyaremeanttoreplace.
Insummary,wesuggestthatalone,eachoftheindividual
capabilitiesdiscussedinthischapterisnecessarybutnot
sufficientforCRMsuccess.Onlywhencombineddotheycapture
thetruenatureofinterdependencecontainedinacustomerrelatingcapabilityatanenterpriselevel(seeExhibit18).
Sometimesthevaluableresourceisanadroitcombinationof
capabilities,noneofwhichissuperioralone,butwhencombined,
makesabetterpackage.Thencompetitivesuperiorityisdue
16
toaweightedaverageeffect–thebusinessdoesrankfirston
anyassetorcapabilitybutisbetteronaveragethananyofthe
rivals.WesawevidenceofthiseffectinExhibits11,14and17,
whereasmallpercentageofcompaniesscorelowonindividual
capabilities,yetarestillamongthebetterperformersintheir
industry.Thisweightedaverageeffectisalsoinfluencedby:
(1)Theenvironmentalturbulenceandficklenessofcustomers
inthosemarketswherethecompanycompetes,
(2)Thesuperiorclarityandstrategicfocusthatmanagers
bringtothechangeinitiative.Thisisimportanttoprovide
thestrategicthrustnecessarytomobiliseresourcesand
createthetypeoforganisationalchangerequired,and
(3)Thefeasibilityofimplementingcomplexsystemintegration
andmutuallyreinforcingcapabilities.
Eachofthesepointsisdiscussedinthechaptersthatfollow.
Lesson 4
CRM systems are a combination of activities that
require managers to align and orchestrate the
disparate parts of the organisation.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
04EnvironmentalPressuresDrivingInvestment
inCRM
Over time researchers have increasingly come to see
business strategies as systems of related choices.
These choices are influenced by the multiplicity of
connections or interactions that take place within an
industry’s performance landscape.
– Daniel Levinthal,. “Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes.” Management Science 43(7), 1997
Customerrelationshipsuccessisnotsimplyamatterofinvestment
insuperiortechnologyanddatamodellingcapabilities.Successis
alsodependentuponthemarketandnon-marketconditionsfacing
theorganisation.Theseindustrylevelfactorsdeterminethe‘rulesof
engagement’thatinturn,directlyaffectcustomercapabilitiesand
problemsolving,suppliercapabilitiesandresourceallocation.New
opportunitiesforeconomicvaluemayariseformanyreasonssuchas
customerco-production,customisationopportunities,reductionoflinksin
thevaluechain,andsoon.However,anecessaryconditionforsuccessful
customerrelationshipinvestmentistheremustbesomeeconomicvalue
addedfromthenewarrangement.Whatpriorresearchshowsisthatthe
firstmistakemadebycompaniesistheassumptionthatthiseconomic
valueexistswhennosuchcaseexists.
4.1CustomerWillingnesstoParticipatein
aRelationship
Thedevelopmentofameaningfulexchangerelationshipdependsdirectly
ontheabilityandmotivationofboththecustomerandthesupplierto
participate.Forexample,acompany’ssuccessatmovingacustomer
fromanarm’slengtharrangementtoadeeperlevelofcommitmentis
contingentuponthecustomer’stime,energyormotivationtoforma
relationship.Therefore,anyunderstandingofexchangerelationships
requiresthatbothsidesbeunderstoodsimultaneously.
Ourstudycapturedeachmanager’sassessmentoftheircustomer
baseaccordingtofourdifferenttypesofrelationships.Eachsegment
typecapturesadifferentstageofrelationshipdevelopment–from
totalstrangersononeend,thatdonotrequirepersonalisation,totrue
partnersattheotherendthatarewillingtocontributeactivelytothe
relationship.Wecalculatedmedianscoresforeachsegmenttypebased
onthenumberofcustomersandtheirrevenuecontribution.Themean
proportionofcustomersthatdonotrequirepersonalisationis34with
ameanrevenuecontributionforthissegmentof16percent.Theyet
tobeconvincedgrouphasameanof14andrevenuecontributionof
11percent.Thesegmentthatacceptssomepersonalisationhasa
meanof20andrevenuecontributionof19percent.Alternatively,the
meanproportionofcustomersthataretruepartnersis30.Althoughthis
segmentisquitesmall,itmakesanimpressivecontributionof57percent
tocompanyrevenues.SeeExhibit17.
PROPORTIONOFCUSTOMERSTHATREQUIREPERSONALISATION
ProportionofCustomers
(meanscore)
ProportionofRevenueContribution
(meanscore)
Strangers
CustomersthatdoNOTrequirepersonalisation
34
16
Acquaintances
Customersthatareyettobeconvincedthatenteringa‘relationship’
withyourfirmisbeneficialtothem
14
11
Friends
Customersthatacceptsomepersonalisedcontactbutdon’treallywant
arelationship
20
19
30
57
TruePartners
Customerswhobelievetheywillbenefitfromacloserassociationwith
yourorganisation
Exhibit19–Provideyourbestestimateofthepercentagedistributionofcustomersandrevenueforeachsegment
17
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
PREDICTABLESTRATEGIESBYCOMPETITORSISDRIVINGCRMINVESTMENT
Strategiesofkeycompetitorsinourindustryareextremelypredictable
Investmentdrivenby
competitiveinitiatives
Stronglydisagree
Unsure
Stronglyagree
Total
Veryweak
5%
9%
12%
26
Some
8%
9%
22%
39
Verystrongly
2%
8%
25%
35
15
26
59
Total
Exhibit20–Customerrequirementsfortheproductsand/orservicessoldinourindustryarechangingcontinually
Thedataclearlyshowsthatcustomercircumstancesand
preferencesdifferwidely.Thesedifferencesareindependentof
industrytypeorfirmsize.Mostimportantly,thedatashowsthat
revenuecontributionincreasesmarkedlyascustomersmovefrom:
■ Strangersthatdonotrequirepersonalisation,to
■ Acquaintancesthathaveyettobeconvincedthatenteringa
‘relationship’isbeneficial,to
■ Friendsthatacceptsomepersonalisedcontact,to
■ Truepartnersthatbelievetheywillbenefitfromacloser
associationwithyourorganisation.
Thisunderscorestheneedtodifferentiatemarketingprograms
onthebasisofhowvalueiscreatedandtolinkvaluecreation
withineachrelationshipsegmenttooverallvaluecreationfor
thecompany.Inotherwords,organisationsneedtobeselective
aboutwhentoandwhennottogrowarelationship.Forexample,
insurancecompanies,utilitiesandcasinoscategorisedmanyof
theircustomersasstrangersthatdonotwantarelationship.
4.2CompetitivePressures
Competitivepressurescanarisebecauseofthewidespread
adoptionofCRMwithinsectorslikebanking,telecommunications
andairlines–requiringlateradopterstorespondinkind.
Alternatively,adoptionofsuchsystemscanoccurinrelated
andcomplementaryenvironmentssuchascasinos,carrental
agencies,hotelsandtouroperators.Intheseindustries,CRMcan
potentiallychangethenatureofinter-firminteraction,requiring
integrationofsystemsandthinking.
Ourresultsindicatethatorganisationsfacestrongcompetitive
pressures.In45percentofcasesmanagersagreeorstronglyagree
thatonefrequentlyhearsaboutnewcompetitiveproducts,models
andotherstrategicinitiatives.Theimplicationisthatwheneverhighly
competitivepressurescharacteriseyourmarket,customersare
morelikelytoswitchbecauseofanabundanceofsubstitutes.CRM
systemsarealsolikelytobeusedheavilytomanageorganisational
operationscreatingpositionaladvantagesthattendtobestronger
andenduring.Inthecasewherecompetitivepressuresarelow,
executivesmaybeledtobelievethattheycangetawaywithminimal
amountsofcustomerservice.Inthesemarkets,CRMisunlikelyto
addvaluebeyondtraditionalmarketingactivities.
Whenwelookatthereasonswhyorganisationshave
investedinCRM,itisclearthatrespondentsbelievethatas
competitivepressuresincrease,theincentivestomatchand
neutraliseanothercompetitor’srelationshipadvantageincreases.
Additionally,manymanagers(59percent)stronglyagreethatthe
strategiesofkeycompetitorsareextremelypredictable.In25per
centofcasesthispredictabilityiscorrelatedwithaverystrong
beliefthatcompetitiveinitiativesarealsodrivingCRMinvestment.
Bankingandinsurancecompaniesfacestrongercompetitive
pressuresthanmostoftheothersectors.Fiftypercentofbanks
18
FICKLECUSTOMERSCREATEMANYCHALLENGES
Exhibit21–Customerrequirementsfortheproductsand/orservicessold
inourindustryarechangingcontinually
and40percentofinsurancecompaniesindicatethattheyare
understrongtoverystrongcompetitivepressuretoinvestin
customerrelationships.Respondentsfromretailandairlinesare
surprisinglylessconcernedwithcompetitivepressures.When
comparedtocompanysize,ourdatadoesnotindicateany
significantdifferencebetweensmallfirmsandlargeorganisations.
4.3MarketTurbulence
Anaturalconsequenceofmarketgrowth–andthediffusionof
innovationwithinaproductlifecycle–isthatcustomerdemand
becomesmoreheterogeneousovertime.Inresponsetothis
heterogeneity,companiesconstantlyinnovate,puttingforward
alternativesystems,servicesprocessesandproductstocreate
valueforandtoattractnewcustomers.Turbulent,fastchanging
marketsappeartodominateourstudywith40percentof
managersindicatingtheyagreeorstronglyagreethatcustomer
requirementsarechangingcontinually.Only25percentdisagree
orstronglydisagreethatproductsandservicesareconstantly
changingintheirmarkets.SeeExhibit21.
Lesson 5
The type of relationship a customer wants with a
supplier can in itself be an effective way of segmenting
markets around fundamental customer needs.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
MAINDRIVERISCUSTOMERSERVICE
NEWTECHNOLOGY=NEWOPPORTUNITIES
Exhibit22–Industrypressurestodeliverhighlevelsofcustomerservice
Returnstocustomerrelationshipbuildingactivitiesarelikely
whenfastchangingmarketsdemanddifferentassetsand
capabilitiesthanthoserequiredinmorestableenvironments.
Advantagesareshortlivedascompetitivepressuresquickly
underminethevaluederivedfromproductdifferentiation.The
abilitytostayontopofcustomertrendsandtorespondquickly
tochangingmarketsiscriticalforsuperiorperformanceinsuch
environments.
Thispointisvisibleinourstudyasmarketpressuresquite
clearlyprovidethestrongestdriversofCRMadoption.Seventyeightpercentoforganisationsconsiderthemselvesunder
considerablepressuretodeliverhighlevelsofcustomerservice.
ThesecompaniesindicatethattheirdecisiontoinvestinCRM
programsisadirectreflectionofindustryforcesthatdemand
highlevelsofcustomerservice.SeeExhibit22.
The22percentofcompaniessuggestingthatmarket
pressureisaweaktoveryweakreflectionoftheirdecisionto
investinCRMappeartooperateinstableenvironments.This
suggeststhatorganisationsfacingrelativelystableenvironments
prefertoexploitexistingknowledgeandcapabilitiesratherthan
explorenewpossibilities.Whenthelevelsofcustomerservice
demandedbythemarketarelowwealsoseemoreinvolvement
byprivacyactivistsand,notsurprisingly,lessdemandforhighly
integratedproductsthatspandifferentbusinessunits.
Exhibit23–TheInternetandrelatedtechnologieswillmakeitveryeasyto
personalise/tailorproductorserviceofferingsinourindustry
CONCERNSWITHCONSUMERPRIVACY
Exhibit24–Privacyactivistsareextremelyactiveinourindustry
Technologicalpressureshavebeenfeltmostinbanking,
insurance,telecommunicationsandutilitysectors.Thispoint
4.4TechnologicalPressures
isalsoevidencedinshareholderpressurewhere36per
TechnologicaladvancessuchastheInternet,relationaldatabases centofmanagersstronglyagreethatinvestmentinCRMis
andCRMsoftwarecreateenormousopportunitiesforfirmsand
adirectreflectionofshareholderbeliefsthattechnologically
theircustomers.Asizable83percentofmanagersstronglyagree sophisticatedcompaniesaremorefavourableincomparisonwith
thattechnologicalchangesprovidebigopportunitiestodeliver
technologicallynaïveorganisations.
newlevelsofservicetocustomersintheirindustry.Thesesame
executivesalsohavehighhopesindicatingthattheInternetand
4.5CustomerPrivacy
relatedtechnologieswillmakeitveryeasytopersonalise/tailor
theirproductorserviceofferingstocustomers(seeExhibit23).
Inmarketswherethecustomerhaslittleinformationonthe
Forty-fivepercentofmanagersstronglydisagreethatadvancesin companyand/orthecompanyhasinsufficientinformationand
theuseofdatabasetechnologiesbycompetitorsisakeyreason
understandingaboutthecustomer,transactionmarketingis
forinvestmentincustomerrelationshipprograms.Fortypercent
likelytodominate.Thisisbecauseconsumerswilloftenuse
believethatadvancesintheInternetandnetworkingtechnologies theirpowertohinderinformationexchange.Thisenvironment
stronglyreflecttheirdecisiontoinvestinCRMprograms.This
willencourageactivistswithaviewthatcompaniesarenottobe
suggeststhatthedriversfornewcustomerrelationshipprograms trusted.Underthesecircumstancesindividualswillbereluctant
arenewopportunitiesforlowcostinterconnectionbetweenthe
tobecomevoluntarymembersofCRMprograms,andwillonly
customerandthevarioustouchpointsinthefirm.
wanttransactionalexchanges.Thiswillleadtohighercosts
19
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
andlowerlevelsofcommunicationbetweenthecustomerand
company,reducingtheefficiencyofCRM.Theseactivistswilluse
legalregulationtoprotectthemselvesandexploitthenewdata
protectionsoftwareandtechnologytotheirownadvantage.
Some50percentofcompaniesstronglyagreewiththe
statementthatprivacyactivistsareextremelyactiveintheir
industry.Arelativelysmall24percentindicatethatprivacy
activistsarenotveryactiveintheirindustry.
Inthebankingsector56percentofmanagersstronglyagree
thatprivacyactivistsareextremelyactive.Thiscompareswith
retailwhere55percentofmanagersstronglydisagreethat
privacyactivistsareextremelyactiveintheirindustry.
Understandingthedynamiccompetitiveenvironmentisa
necessarysteptoeffectivelyallocatetherighttypeofmarketing
programtotherighttypeofcustomer.Thischapterhasshown
thatthetypeofrelationshipacustomerwantswithasupplierand
thestrengthofcompetitiveandmarketpressuresfacingthefirm
arestrongindicatorsofCRMprogramsuccess.
20
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
05TheImplementationofComplex
OrganisationalChange
Change sticks when it becomes “the way we do
things around here.” Until new behaviours are rooted
in social norms and shared values, they are only
temporary and a waste of time and energy.
– John Kotter, “Leading Change: Why Transformational Efforts Fail” Harvard Business Review,
73(2), 1995
InordertoexecuteaCRMstrategysuccessfully,especiallyin
uncertainenvironmentssuchasCRM,firmsneedtomanage
changeinpeople,systemsandstructures.Thisrequires
anappreciationoftheforcesthatinfluencetheprocessof
strategyimplementation.Thisismadeallthemoredifficult
bythefactthatCRMisunlikeotherre-engineeringchange
programsthathaveprecededit.Thecomplexityinvolvedina
CRMprogramcreatesenormouschallengesforstaffexpected
tointegratedisparatecustomerdatabasesandqualitativeand
quantitativeapproachestomanagingcustomers.Additionally,
thediversityinaCRMprogramcreatesaccountabilityissuesand
complicatesthechallengeofpersuadingemployeestoembrace
thebehaviouralchangerequired.Considerforamomentthe
stakeholdersaffectedbyaCRMinitiative.Theyincludefrontline
salesandserviceproviders,callcentrerepresentatives,business
analysts,ITprofessionalsandabroadarrayofmanagerslocated
indiversepositionsthroughouttheorganisation(justtonamea
few).AnyofthesestakeholderscanbreakaCRMprogram,but
noneindividuallycanmakeitsuccessful.Whentheresponsibility
fordifferentaspectsofasolutionrestsindifferentplaces,it’s
oftenhardtomustertheorganisationalresolvetopullintheright
people,unclogthebottlenecksandmakeeffectivedecisions.
Companiesthatlackexperienceworkingwiththeseperennial
organisationalchallengesalltoofrequentlyfailtoappreciatethe
challengestheyimpose.Intherushtofixthetechnologyand
businessalignmentissues,managerstendtooverlookwhatis
feasibleandfocusinsteadonwhatisdesirable.Theimpactof
thishasbeenplayedoutinseveralabandonedITprojectssuch
as:Westpac’sCS90projectthatlostA$150m,andtheLondon
StockExchangeTaurusprojectthatwasdumpedafteran£80m
investment(Drummond1999).
5.1DirectSystemCostsofImplementation
CRMsystemsaretypicallyquiteexpensive,withsomereports
suggestingthatthemedianpriceforaCRMprojectexceeds
US$1million(Yu,2001).Manyorganisationsinourstudywere
rightlyspookedbythesecosts:
Mistakes are going to happen, and you can bank on it.
– 02 May 10998, Australian Financial Review
TAURUS – JOBS HIT BY RIPPLE EFFECT
– 18 March 1993, Computer weekly
CRMPROGRAMSARENOTCHEAP
Thecostofhardware,softwareandnetworkinfrastructure
Stronglydisagree
Unsure
Stronglyagree
Banking
8%
33%
58%
Insurance
0%
50%
50%
Telecommunications
25%
62%
12%
Airlines
40%
60%
0%
Hotels/Tourism
0%
33%
66%
Utilities
50%
0%
50%
Retail
66%
22%
12%
Other
0%
92%
8%
Exhibit25–Inyourbusinessunit,towhatextentdoesthefollowingconstrainyourorganisation’sabilitytodeployCRM
21
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
■
55percentindicatethatthecostofnetworkinfrastructure
andhardwareisalargeconstraint.
■ 49percentindicatethatthecostofCRMandsalesforce
automationsoftwareisalargeconstraint.
Theimpactofdirectcostsofimplementationisclearlya
significantfactorbutCRMprogramsalsoincuradditionalcosts
associatedwithcallcentreinfrastructureandITstaffrequiredto
maintainthesesystems.Wecombinethesecostsintoanoverall
measurethatincludescostsofhardware,software,infrastructure
andmaintenance(seeExhibit25).Lessthan10percentof
respondentsbelievethatwhencombined,thesecostsarea
smalldeterrenttoimplementation.Fortypercentofcompanies
seethesecostsasalargeorverylargefactorinhibitingCRM
deployment.
Whenweexaminetheimpactofcostconstraintsoneach
industrysectortheresultsarenotsurprising.Managersinthe
hotelandbankingsectorsaremorelikelytobeconcernedwith
thedirectcostsofIT.Sixty-sixpercentofhotelsandcasinosview
directcostsasalargeorverylargeconstraint,while58percent
ofthoseinbankingexpressthesamelevelofconcern.Managers
fromtheretailsectorarelessconcernedwithdirectcosts,with
66percentindicatingthatcostsareasmallconstraint.
WHATDOMANAGERSBELIEVE?
Exhibit26–CRMisamajorbreakthroughthatwillhavearevolutionary
strategicimpactonourindustryinthenexttwoyears
beliefsinfluenceoutcomes.Atoneextremeisthetendency
tocatertoriskaversion.Ifcomplexre-engineeringprograms
5.2IndirectCostsofImplementation
suchasCRMaretosucceedtheyrequiremanagerswhohold
strongbeliefsregardingthevalueofCRM.Weseeevidenceof
Thefullimpactofcostconstraintsisafunctionofnotonlydirect
thiscommitmentinourmanagerswhere67percentstrongly
costs,butindirectcostsaswell.Therearethreeareaswhere
agreethatCRMprogramswillcreatenewvaluefortheirmajor
theseindirectcostsarise,thedifficultyofacquiringskilled
workers,thetimeneededtoeffectivelycodifycustomerdataand customers.Asmaller,althoughstillsignificant35percent
stronglybelievethatCRMisamajorbreakthroughthatwillhave
theimpactthatsystemfailuremayhaveonbrandequity.
arevolutionarystrategicimpactontheirindustryinthenexttwo
(1)Diffi
Difficultyacquiringskilledstaff
cultyacquiringskilledstaff–thecostandavailability
years(seeExhibit26).
ofskilledstafftomanagecomplexITrelatedprojects
Thevarianceinthisdataisstronglyrelatedtotheimpactthat
hasfrequentlybeenthecauseofconcernformany
technologicaldevelopmentssuchastheInternetande-business
organisations.However,thecompaniessurveyedhere
havehadontheindustriesofthecompaniesconsidered.Many
appearlessconcerned,with60percentbelievingthat
managersareunwillingto‘betthefirm’andespousemore
theshortageinacquiringskilledmanagerstostrategically
modestambitionswith31percentstronglydisagreeingthat
manageinternalCRMdevelopmentsisasmallconstraint.
CRMisamajorbreakthroughfortheirindustry.Thisdivision
(2)Effortrequiredtocodifycustomerdata
Effortrequiredtocodifycustomerdata–thetimeneeded
isparticularlyvisibleinbankingwhere39percentstrongly
torecodecustomerdataisanothermatter.Relational
agreewiththestatementand34percentstronglydisagree.
databasesarenotdesignedtodealwithunstructured
Suchuncertaintyleadstofragmentedandcontradictorysignals
dataand58percentofrespondentsbelievethatthe
andincentives.Theinvestmentendsupbeinginsufficientfor
timeneededtoeffectivelycodecustomerdataisabig
realsuccessandthecommitmenttochangingorganisational
consideration.Thisiscompletelyindependentofindustry
processes,trainingandrewardsystemsthatCRMdemandscan
orfirmsize.
beerratic.
(3)RiskofSystemFailure
RiskofSystemFailure–theimportanceofsystemfailure
Attheotherextremeismanagerialover-optimism.Managers
onbrandreputationandequitydoesnotappeartocreatea
can,attimes,succumbtoover-optimismwhenitcomestotheir
barriertoadoptionwith54percentclaimingthisisasmall
company’sabilitytomanagechangesuccessfully.Althoughthis
impedimenttoimplementation.
over-optimismcanbetracedtomanysources,oneofthemost
5.3BeliefsHeldbyManagers
Whennew,infanttechnologicalopportunitiessuchasCRMarise,
evenmanagersincompetingcompaniesinthesamemarket
ormanagerswithinthesamecompanycanholdverydifferent
beliefsabouttheopportunitiesthetechnologywillcreateandits
likelyimpactonperformance.Forexample,somemanagersmay
believeCRMwillenhancetheeffectivenessoftheorganisation
oritslegitimacyinthemarketandstillotherswillbelieveitwill
havelittleornoeffectoncurrentperformance.Thehallmark
ofallideasisthatsomeonemustseetheopportunitytheidea
presents;CRMisnodifferent.
Characterisingthebeliefsofmanagersisadifficultexercise.
However,wecantalkabouttwoextremesthathighlighthow
22
“Nothing is ever smooth. The biggest problem we
have in the bank is implementing, you know, just
getting the people to develop the systems is basically
a pain in the backside. It just takes so long and we
have been trying to get a new net system going for
this financial services type offering. We have gone
around in circles in the last two months, we still
haven’t got there and I think we are pretty frustrated
by it all.”
Director, Financial Services
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
percentstronglyagreethattheircompaniesareproficientinthis
area,andonly26percentstronglydisagreewiththestatement.
MostexecutivesknowthatnewCRMapplicationschange
howpeoplework.Thegreatertheorganisationalandcultural
changethelesslikelythecompanyistoachieveitsreturnon
investmentgoalsforCRMprojects.Successinsuchaclimate
demandstheneedforexecutivesupport,userbuy-in,ongoing
communicationwithusersandextensivetraining.Thereisaneed
toinvolvebusinessusersearlyandletthemdrivethefunctional
requirementsthatincludeon-screendesignandnavigation.
Gettingthesystemsrightsothesalespeoplewillbeeagerto
useitappearstobeachallengeformanyofthecompanies
studied.Only26percentbelievethattheyarewellpreparedfor
implementationchallengeand38percentstronglydisagreethat
theyarepreparedforCRM(seeExhibit29).
DANGERSOFOVER-OPTIMISM
Exhibit27–Over-optimismcomparedtocompetitors
powerfulisthetendencybyindividualstoexaggeratetheirown
talent;tobelievethattheyareaboveaverage.Considertheresultsof
asurveyconductedbytheUSCollegeBoardinthe1970sinvolving
onemillionstudents,whichhasrecentlybeenrepublishedina
2003editionoftheHarvardBusinessReview.Whenstudentswere
askedtoratethemselvesincomparisontotheirpeers,70percent
ofstudentssaidtheywereaboveaverageinleadershipability.For
athleticprowess,60percentsawthemselvesabovethemedian,6
percentbelow.Whenassessingtheirabilitytogetalongwithothers,
25percentconsideredthemselvestobeinthetop1percent.
Inasimilarmanner,therespondentsinthisstudydisplay
evidenceofover-optimism.Thirty-fourpercentofmanagers
indicatethattheyareeithermorepositiveorfarmorepositive
thantheircompetitors,while42percentbelievethattheyhold
similarbeliefstotheircompetitors(seeExhibit27).
Althoughsuchoptimismisnotnecessarilybad,particularly
whenradicalchangeisrequired,thetrickistobalanceoptimism
withanabilitytogeneraterealisticassessmentsofwhetherthis
typeofchangeisfeasible.
“Probably the biggest impediment to e-intelligence so
far has been serious doubts by the managing director
in particular and other senior managers about the
value of e-business. Some of them think this is really
a flash in the pan, they spend a lot of money then find
out it’s just a passing phase and then why did we
bother to spend all that money and waste all that time
with it?”
Managing Director, Retail Sector
HOWWELLPREPAREDAREYOUFORCRM?
5.4CulturalChange
Inmostcases,introducingCRMrequiresamajorculturalchange
tothesales,serviceormarketingfunctionsofcompanies.
Integratinglegacysystemswithnewcustomerrelationshipneeds
isatrickyactivity.Surprisingly,manyexecutivesindicatethattheir
organisationsarehighlyproficientatintegratinglegacysystems.Fifty
Exhibit29–MyorganisationiswellpreparedtoimplementafullyintegratedCRMsystem
ABILITYTOINTEGRATEISAPREREQUISITEFORCRM
Weareveryproficientatintegratinglegacysystemswithnewcustomerneeds
Myorganisationiswell
preparedtoimplementCRM
Stronglydisagree
Neither
Stronglyagree
Total
Stronglydisagree
19%
11%
8%
38
Neither
20%
15%
1%
36
Strongagree
5%
8%
15%
28
44
34
24
Total
Exhibit28–MyorganisationiswellpreparedtoimplementCRMandweareveryproficientatintegratinglegacysystemswithnewcustomer/partner
relationshipneeds
23
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
Themaininsightemergingfromthediscussionaboveisthat
beforeanynewCRMprogramscanbedevelopeditmustfirst
be‘do-able’.Do-ablemeanseitherthatitisnotinconflictwith
theoperationalorstrategicconstraintsorthatsufficientstrategic
resourcesareinplacetoovercometheoperationalconstraints.
Directandindirectcostswerefoundtobestrongoperational
constraintsandthesenodoubtcombinetoforminertial
tendenciesthatrestrictnewinitiativesinmanyorganisations.
Addtothistherealitythatoldskillsandknowledgeembedded
inorganisationalroutinesandproceduresarenoteasily
changedandweseemanyimplementationdifficultiesarisingfor
companiesintheirattemptstoexploitCRM.
“The end-users of CRM tend to be special animals.
The big thing is that since marketing, sales and
customer-service personnel work on commission,
time lost adjusting to a hard-to-use system is
money lost”
Barton Goldenberg, president of ISM Inc., a CRM
advisory firm in Bethesda, Md, US.
Lesson 6
In the rush to fix the technology and business
alignment issues, managers tend to overlook what
is feasible and focus instead on what is desirable.
24
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
06PositioningforCompetitiveSuccess
The essence of competitive advantage is a
positioning theme that sets a business apart from
its rivals in ways that are meaningful to the target
customer.
– George S. Day, “Market Driven Strategy: Processes For Creating Value” The Free Press (1994)
Aswehaveshowninpreviouschapters,CRMprojectscan
easilycostseveralmilliondollars,notcountingthetime,human
resourcesandorganisational‘angst’involvedintheprocess
itself.Anyproposalforfundinganinitiativetobuildcustomer
relationshipsmustclearlydemonstratehowtheinitiative
willaffectkeymeasuresthatareimportanttothecompany
financially.Quantifyingtherightperformancemeasureswillnot
onlyincreasethechancesofgettingaprojectapprovedbutalso
pavethewaytoimproveorganisationalperformance.Determining
theappropriatemeasurementstobeused,however,isa
particularlyelusivetask.
Traditionalmeasuresofsuccess,suchasquarterlyproduct
sales,costofgoodssold,thenumberofnewcustomersacquired,
andearningsbeforeinterest,taxesordepreciationaretriedand
true,butarealsoproblematicforavarietyofreasons.First,they
don’tmeasurethosefactorsthatcreatefuturevaluesuchas
customerresponsiveness,qualityserviceandspeedofresponse.
Second,theymisstheimportanceofinnovationandtheability
tolearn.Last,theydon’tmotivatelong-termbehaviour.Overthe
pasttwodecadesagreatdealofattentionhasbeendevotedtothe
developmentofamorebalancedsetofmeasures.Oneapproach
suggestedintheacademicliteratureistomeasurecustomer
orientationonthebasisofreactiveandproactivemeasures.
RESPONSIVETOINDIVIDUALCUSTOMERNEEDS
6.1ReactiveCustomerOrientation
Asthetitlesuggestsareactiveorientationisfocusedonthe
expressedneedsofcustomers.Theassumptionisthatthebetter
thecompanyisatreactingtotheseexpressedneedsthemore
likelyitistoretaincustomersandoutperformitscompetitors.
Comparedtotheircompetition61percentofcompanies
investigatedindicatethattheircompanyisamongthemost
responsiveatmeetingindividualneeds(seeExhibit30).Clearly
thesecompaniestreatcustomerinteractionveryseriouslyas
indicatedbyanumberofotherperformancemeasures:
■ 53percentbelievetheyaretheeasiestforcustomerstodo
businesswith,
■ 39percentbelievetheyarethebestatsharingcustomer
experiencesacrossthebusiness,
■ 77percentconsiderthemselvesamongthemosttrustedof
companies,and
■ 47percentfeeltheyareamongthebestatdeveloping
systemsthatallowcustomerstohelpthemselves.
6.2ProactiveCustomerOrientation
Beingreactivetothecustomerisonething,butitisalso
importantthatcompaniesareproactiveintheirdesiretosatisfya
customer’slatentneeds.Thisapproachisbasedonintelligence
gatheringandisthereforefocusedonacquiringinformationabout
customerbehaviourinanattempttoidentifylatentcustomer
needsandcompetitorcapabilitiesandstrategies.Inourstudy,
40percentofcompaniesbelievethattheyareamongthebest
atdiscoveringunarticulated(latent)customerneeds(seeExhibit
31).Thisproactiveorientationwasconfirmedbyanumberof
additionalmeasures:
■ 45percentconsiderthemselvesamongthebestatpredicting
newmarketdevelopments,
■ 47percentthinktheyareamongthebestatbrainstorming
howcustomersusenewproductsandservices,
■ 48percentviewthemselvesasamongthebestatworking
closelywithleadusers,and
■ 52percentbelievetheyareamongthebestatdriving
businessobjectivesbycustomersatisfaction.
Exhibit30–Takingtheperspectiveofyourmostprofitable
customersegment,howwouldtheycompareyourbusinessto
yourthreenearestcompetitors?
25
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
PROACTIVEATTEMPTSTODISCOVERLATENTCUSTOMERNEEDS
CUSTOMERDEFECTIONRATES
Exhibit31–Takingtheperspectiveofyourmostprofitable
Exhibit32–Whatistheannualrateofcustomerdefectionsto
customersegment,howwouldtheycompareyourbusinessto
yourthreenearestcompetitors?
yourcompetitors?
Thereisastrongargumenttomakethatareactiveor
proactivepositionaladvantagewillleadtoimprovedreturnon
investment,increasedsales,etc.Whenwecomparedthesetwo
measuresonlyproactiveorientationswerestatisticallyrelatedto
performance.Reactivemeasuresdidnothaveasignificanteffect
onperformance.
Despitethesepromisingresults,thereisstillroomforcaution
regardingtheaccuracyofthesefindings.While30percentof
respondentsindicatethattheyareextremelyconfidentthattheir
answersarecorrect,approximately68percentindicatethatthey
areonlymildlyconfident,withaverysmall1percentindicating
thattheyarenotconfidentatall.Thereasonsforthisarethat
manycompaniesdonotmeasuretheseaspectsofperformance
formally.
6.3AdditionalMeasuresofCustomer
Orientation
Otherpopularmarketingperformancemetricsseektocapture
thedurationofacustomer’srelationshipwiththecompanyby
measuringcustomerretentionrateandannualrateofcustomer
defections.Ingeneral,thecompaniesinourstudyexperience
quitelowlevelsofcustomerdefection.In39percentofcases,
defectionratesarebetween0percentto4percent,in17per
centofcasestheyarebetween5percentto9percent,and19
percentat10percentto14percent.Mosttelecommunications
companiesreportdefectionratesofbetween5and15percent.
Only3percentofcompaniesexperienceadefectionratehigher
than30percent.Notsurprisinglythesearelargely
hotelandretailcompaniesthatfacestrongtoverystrong
competitivepressures.
Lesson 7
Being responsive to customer needs is no longer
sufficient. Positioning for success requires a
proactive approach that is capable of identifying
latent customer needs and competitive strategies.
26
CHANGEINCUSTOMERDEFECTIONRATES
Exhibit33–Howhastherateofdefectionschangedinthepast
threeyears
Itisimportanttoknownotonlytherateofdefectionbutalso
howthisratehaschangedoverthepastthreeyears.Thedata
indicatesthatsomeAustraliancompaniesfaceconsiderable
pressureswith5percentindicatingthattheyhaveexperienceda
considerableincreaseintherateofdefections,33percentreport
amodestincreaseand35percentindicatenochangeatall(see
Exhibit33).
Whatisimportantinthisclimateisnotonlytherateof
defections,ascompaniesintelecommunications,hotelsand
retailshouldexpectthatmanyoftheircustomerswouldswitch
betweencompetitors.Instead,whatisrelevantistheshare
ofwalletordegreeofacustomer’stotalproductusagethatis
controlledbyyourcompany.Hereweseethat8percentof
companiesreportaconsiderableincreaseand55percentreport
amodestincrease.
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
SHAREOFWALLET
Exhibit34–Withregardstoyourmostvaluablecustomers,state
howyour‘shareofwallet’(degreeofacustomer’stotalproduct
usagethatiscontrolledbyyourorganisation)haschangedin
thepastthreeyears
Whatthisstudyindicatesisthatitistheamountofmoney
thatacustomerspendswithacompanythatdriveslifetime
valuetothecompany–regardlessofhowlongtheyhavebeen
orarelikelytobeacustomerofthecompany.Forexample,
50percentofcompaniesthatreportamodestorconsiderable
increaseareeitheraverageorbetterthanaverageperformers
intheirindustry.Theimplicationsfordecision-makingarethat
managersshouldfocusonrevenueenhancementasopposed
tocustomerretention.Onewaytocrosscheckthisistolookat
thosefirmsinoursurveythathavedevotedaverylargepartof
theirstrategicorientationtocustomerloyaltyprograms.Although
theseprogramskeeptheircustomers‘onthebooks’foran
extendedperiodoftime,thereisnoevidencetosuggestthatthey
areenhancingprofitabilityrelativetocompetitors.Infactourdata
indicatesanevenperformancesplitforthosecompanieswitha
heavyemphasisonloyaltyprograms.
Lesson 8
Different stages of relationship development
represent different revenue and cost profiles. This
implies that different customers are managed in
different ways.
27
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
07AFinalWrap
OurstudyrevealsthatCRMprogramsarebecoming
commonplaceinmediumtolargesizedAustraliancompanies.
Withinthenexttwoyearsthreequartersofthecompaniesin
oursurveybelievethattheywillhaveinplaceadvancedCRM
programs.Theresultspresentedareverymuch‘warts-and-all’
showingboththepositiveandnegativeaspectsoforganisational
attemptstomanagecustomerrelationships.Withoutunderemphasisingthecomplexityoftheproblemwecansummarise
ourresultssuccinctlyasfollows:
WhilemanyCRMstrategiesarebasedonthetheoryofincreasing
customerretentionthroughimprovedsatisfaction,itisamyth
thatallcustomershavethetime,motivationandenergytoform
information-intensive‘personal’relationships.
■Segmentingmarketsaroundfundamentalcustomerneeds,
caninitself,beaneffectivestartingpointforperformance
improvement,
■Thisisnoteasyasmostorganisationsworkwithcustomers
thatareatdifferentrelationshipstagesandthesestages
aredynamicallychanging,and
■Todealwiththisproblem,thebestorganisationsemploy
abalancedapproachwheretheytrade-offthebenefits
andcostsassociatedwithcustomerintimacy,operational
excellence,dataanalyticsandloyaltyprograms.
oensureCRMprogramsuccess,organisationsneedtodevelop
T
ahighlevelcustomer-relatingcapability.Thethreeconstituent
partsofacustomerrelatingcapabilityare:
■AflexibleITinfrastructurethatprovidesafullpictureofthe
customerhistories,purchasingactivityandproblems,
■Theskilltoconvertmarketdataintoknowledgeof
thecustomer(managementofinformationcollection,
organisationanduse),and
■Supportingorganisationalstructures(thedegreetowhich
thebehavioursandvaluesofstaffarealignedwiththenew
customerorientation)
•ALONE,eachofthesecapabilitiesisinsufficientfor
success.Therefore,managersshouldbewaryof
concentratingononeortwoaspectsindependentlyinan
efforttogaincontroloverwhatcanbealarge-scaleproject.
ThemainconstraintslimitingCRMprogramsareorganisational
first,financialsecondandtechnologicalthird:
■Organisationalconstraintsarenotjustpoliticalandcultural
issues,butalsothewayCRMprogramscandisturbthe
delicatelybalancedchainofcustomerknowledgerelated
activities.Theimplicationsofthisarethatmanagersneed
tosellCRMprogramsearlyandsellthemoftentoensure
participationbythenecessarystakeholders,
■Financialconstraintsloomlargeandasystematic
analysisofhowyoudothingsnowandtheorganisational
transformationrequiredtosupportrelationshipprogramsis
required,and
■Technologicalconstraintsarenotaboutwhatsoftware
solutionsareavailablebutrevolvearoundtheabilitytoget
systemstotalktooneanotherandintegratingdisparateand
legacysystemsinanorganisationallyfriendlymanner.
28
Exhibit35–Evolvingrelationshiptypes
FirmsoperateCRMprogramswithvaryingdegreesofsuccess
withmanyexperiencingoutstandingsuccessstoriesandfailures.
Someexamplesoftheseinclude:
“Directcustomerfeedbackhasproventobeanexcellentprogram
thatwasnotoriginallyrequested”(CFO–FinancialServices)
“Theimplementationofanewfrequentflyerproposition
tomarketthatisfullysupportedbyourCRMsystemhas
strengthenedourinternalprocessesandimprovedour
competitivepositionconsiderably”(AirlineSalesDirector)
“Successhasbeentheuseofanewdatawarehousefor
developingcustomerretentionstrategies,failurehasbeenthe
continualfailuretousetheCRMsystembyAccountManagers”
(CIO–FinancialServices)
“Wehaveexperiencedtoomanyfailurestolist.Availabilityof
skilledresourcesinAustraliaisamajorproblem”(CRMDirector
–Telecommunications)
“Failureisduetotheuseofthetechnology,notthetechnology
perse”(CEO–FinancialServices)
ThefinalinsightweofferisthatCRMisaboutmanagingdifferent
typesofcustomerrelationships.Inthisstudywelookedatfour
differenttypesofrelationship:strangers,acquaintances,friends
andtruepartners.Astheserelationshiptypesevolveovertime
theycreateverydifferentdemandsonCRMprogramsand
subsequentcompanyvalueandprofitability(seeExhibit35).
■Strangerstoacquaintances–strangersarecustomers
thathavenotyetenteredthemarketorarecustomers
ofcompetingsuppliersandhencedonotrequire
personalisation.Assoonasthereisabusinesstransaction,
acustomermovestoanewlevelofawareness.Atthis
pointthesupplierandcustomerbecomeacquaintances.In
manycases,thesecustomersarestillyettobeconvinced
thatenteringintoa‘relationship’willbebeneficial.Inthis
case,suppliersneedonlyprovideavalueproposition
toacustomerthatisonparwithcompetitors,orparity
value.Bylisteningtotheircustomersanddeliveringon
thebasics,companieswillgainexperienceandlearnto
improveproductionefficiencies.Asyoubecomebetterat
providingtheroutinebenefitsthatcustomersexpecttoget
whentheymakeapurchaseyoubegintogainapositional
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
advantageoverthosewithlessexperienceandvolume.
■Acquaintancestofriends–bydirectingresourcestowards
ensuringthatallcommunicationbetweenyourcompany
andyourcustomersisrelevant.Youshowcustomersthat
yourememberthemandthattheirbusinessmatterstoyou.
Asthecustomerrelationshipevolvesfromacquaintance
tofriend,suppliersareincreasinglyrequiredtomovefrom
deliveringvalueonparwiththecompetitiontocreating
differentialvalue.Thisrequiresdevelopmentoftrustinthe
relationshipthroughprovisionofdiversifiedproductsand
services.Anaturalconsequenceisthatcustomersrequire
moreinformation,therebyplacinggreaterdemandson
thecompany’stechnologyandthestaffresponsiblefor
modellingcustomerdata.
■Friendstotruepartners–ultimatelytrustbreedsgreater
commitmentthatresultsinashiftfromshort-term
exchangestolong-termrelationships.Customised
informationandproductsarerequiredfortruepartners.
Thisimpliesthatappropriateorganisationalstructuresare
inplacetoensurethatyoutreatyourbestcustomerswell.
Thisimpliesthatstaffbehavioursandvaluesaretightly
alignedwithcustomerneeds.
Fromaresourceallocationperspective,organisationsneedto
ensurethatthedeliveryofparityvalue,differentialvalue,and
customisedvalueistightlyalignedwithcustomermotivationto
remainasstrangers,acquaintances,friendsortruepartners.
Carteblancheapproachesthatseektoestablishrelationships
withallyourcustomersareunlikelytobeprofitable.Inour
study,thecompaniesthataremostcomfortablewithcustomer
relationshipprogramsarecompaniesthatknowwhattheywant
togetfromtheirdatasystemsandhavearealisticappreciation
fortheorganisationalconstraintsthatexist.Inotherwords,
thesecompanieshaveaclear,unconstrainedstrategyaimed
atidentifyingcustomersegmentsandextractingthemost
valuefromtheireconomicinteractionswithdifferenttypesof
customers.Itisinthisarea,asmanyorganisationswouldagree,
thatconsiderableroomforimprovementexists.Inournextreport,
weaimtoprovidecompanieswithmoredetailedmeasurement
instrumentsandclassificationsschemesthatenablethemto
identifyandsortdifferentcustomersaccordingtotheirvalue.For
thosewantingmoredetailonthisalistofselectedreadingshas
beenincluded.Shouldyouwishtobeinvolvedinfurtherresearch
inthisarea,thenpleasecontacttheauthorsofthisreport.
29
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004
CustomerRelationshipSuccessReport2004
FurtherReadingsForThoseWhoWantMore
Behn,B.K.andR.A.Riley(1999).“UsingNon-Financial
InformationtoPredictFinancialPerformance:TheCaseofThe
USAirlineIndustry.”JournalofAccounting,AuditingandFinance
JournalofAccounting,AuditingandFinance
41(1):29-56.
Carr,N.G.(1999).“Marketing:TheEconomicsofCustomer
Satisfaction.”HarvardBusinessReview77(2):15-16.
Coltman,T.,T.M.Devinney,etal.(2001).“E-Business:
Revolution,EvolutionofHype?”CaliforniaManagementReview
CaliforniaManagementReview
44(1):57-85.
Coltman,T.,T.M.Devinney,etal.(2002).“Keepinge-Business
inPerspective.”CommunicationsoftheACM45(8):69-74.
Day,G.S.(1994).“TheCapabilitiesofMarket-Driven
Organizations.”JournalofMarketing
JournalofMarketing58(4):37-52.
Day,G.S.(2003).“CreatingaSuperiorCustomer-Relating
Capability.”MITSloanManagementReview
MITSloanManagementReview(Spring):77-82.
Dowling,G.R.(2002)“CustomerRelationshipManagement
inB2CMarkets,OftenLessisMore”CaliforniaManagement
CaliforniaManagement
Review,44(3):87-103.
Review,
Drummond,H.(1999).“AreWeAnyClosertotheEnd?
EscalationandtheCaseofTaurus.”InternationalJournalof
ProjectManagement17(1):11-17.
ProjectManagement
Fletcher,K.(2003).“CustomerPowerandPrivacy:theChanging
NatureofCRM.”InternationalJournalofAdvertising
InternationalJournalofAdvertising22:249-272.
Ittner,C.D.andD.F.Larcker(1998).“AreNon-Financial
IndicatorsofFinancialPerformance:AnAnalysisof
CustomerSatisfaction.”JournalofAccountingResearch
JournalofAccountingResearch
36(Supplementary):1-16.
Heskett,J.L.,L.James,etal.(1994).“Puttingtheservice-profit
chaintowork.”HarvardBusinessReview72(2):164-175.
Johnson,M.D.andF.Selnes(2004).“CustomerPortfolio
Management:TowardaDynamicTheoryofExchange
Relationships.”JournalofMarketing
JournalofMarketing68(4):1-17.
Langerak,F.(2003).AnAppraisalofResearchonthePredictive
PowerofMarketOrientation.EuropeanManagementJournal.
EuropeanManagementJournal.21:
447-464.
Reichheld,F.F.(1993).“Loyalty-basedManagement.”Harvard
BusinessReview(March-April):64-73.
30
AustralianGraduateSchoolofManagementReport2004