Academia.eduAcademia.edu

ANTICIPATING A TRACE

2017, Kunstlicht: Journal for visual art, visual culture, and architecture. Mediated Imaginations: Technologies Touching Upon Art.

Artistic contribution Envisaging drawing as a material and haptic activity, lines emerge ‘in the interplay between human intentions, materials, surfaces, and the tools and bodies that make [them] happen.’ Drawn lines inevitably carry the potential to generate unpredictable pathways that trigger creativity and imagination.

ANTICIPATING A TRACE Sebastian Schneiders The artist and teacher Paul Klee described the line as a point ‘on a walk’.1 He contrasted the freely moving wandering line with the straight line, which rushed single-mindedly towards predetermined points, as if running from one appointment to the next. If the straight line functioned as an instrumental connector, it was contrasted with a wandering line that was free to reflect on its goals and adjust its path as it went along in time. For Klee, as it issued forth, a line was full of indeterminate potential. Beyond seeing, drawing is a material and haptic activity. If a line is the trace of a movement, what can it learn and what stories can it tell, as it moves from point, to line, to defining space while moving through time? A line emerges in the interplay between human intentions, materials, surfaces and the tools and bodies that make it happen. As the trace of a movement, a line might be read as evidence, as an indexical trace of; a hesitant proposition, a routine operation, an impassioned effacement… 1 P, Klee. Pedagogical sketchbook, 1960. Accessed through: Archive.org on 30th September, 2017 If a drawn line is generated by human intentions and anticipations, these can only explain a part of its material manifestation. This is because a line emerges in correspondence with drawing tools, bodies, materials and surfaces that are all thoroughly enmeshed in the currents and flows of a living, ongoing, material world. I want to think of making, instead as a process of growth. This is to place the maker from the outset as a participant in amongst a world of active materials. These materials are what he has to work with, and in the process of making he ‘joins forces’ with them, bringing them together or splitting them apart, synthesising and distilling, in anticipation of what might emerge. 2 More than just a visual articulation of a mental image, a drawing is a vestige of materially mediated actions and reactions. In fact, a drawing emerges from layers of intentions, impulses, habits and distractions, as they manifest in velocities and pressures, in muscles and joints of human arms and hands attempting to negotiate the mediation of mark making tools, materials and surfaces. You never draw alone. 2 Ingold, T. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2013. p. 21. To draw is not to just articulate a preformed mental image with lines on a surface but rather to grow a material graphic thing from cycles of action and reflection. A drawing emerges in time, from layers of marks and gestures, from material actions and reactions. A drawing is a graphic thing to think with, a thing that can be manipulated and reconfigured as it emerges. As John Berger once noted; a photograph stops time, a drawing encompasses it.3 3 J, Berger. ‘Drawn to that moment’, in Berger on Drawing, 2005, pp. 41-44. Accessed through: Spokesmanbooks.com on 30th of September, 2017. To read a line is to identify with the gesture that made it. A line invites us to trace its history and to anticipate its future. A drawing might be constructed routinely from decisive line segments or emerge slowly, in dialogue with the traces accumulating on its surface. While an efficient line connects predefined points without deviation, a wandering line can risk the uncertainty of an open field and, as it feels its way forward, leave a material trace of its becoming. Collectively, wandering lines do not serve the extrinsic connective purpose of the network but generate an intrinsic and unpredictable meshwork of intersecting paths. Unlike the instrumental lines of a network, the lines of a meshwork are paths of becoming.3 These lines are not bound to connect predetermined nodes, but rather, produce them as intersections or knots that occur along the way. The overall shape of a meshwork, as a conglomeration of meandering paths is indeterminate, it emerges over time. While the lines of a network imagine a vast empty space through which to connect its nodes evermore instantly, meshwork lines respond to their terrain and reflect on the value and direction of their paths as they emerge along the way.4 4 5 Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1988) ‘The smooth and the striated’, A thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013, pp, 551 – 581. Ingold, T. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2013.