Academia.eduAcademia.edu

A New Bronze Age Mega-fort in Southeastern Europe: Recent Archaeological Investigations at Gradište Iđoš and their Regional Significance

2020, Journal of Field Archaeology

A newly discovered network of later Bronze Age fortified sites of unusually large size are discussed, with a primary focus on results of excavations at the site of Gradište Iđoš. Closely associated with the rivers Mureš, Tisza, and Danube, these sites are located in the southeast of the Carpathian Basin in central Europe. On current evidence, the main period of construction and occupation took place between 1400–1100 b.c., probably constituting successor communities of the tell-centred societies of the Middle Bronze Age. Geophysical survey and excavation results from Gradište Iđoš, the largest site in this network in Serbia, are presented in this paper within their regional context. We discuss preliminary insights into the structural development of the site, alongside a correlation of new 14C dates with relative ceramic chronological markers and the results of faunal analysis. These results provide new perspectives on settlement systems at the dawn of Urnfield cultural traditions in this region.

Journal of Field Archaeology ISSN: 0093-4690 (Print) 2042-4582 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjfa20 A New Bronze Age Mega-fort in Southeastern Europe: Recent Archaeological Investigations at Gradište Iđoš and their Regional Significance Barry Molloy, Dragan Jovanović, Caroline Bruyère, Miroslav Marić, Jelena Bulatović, Patrick Mertl, Christian Horn, Lidija Milašinović & Neda MirkovićMarić To cite this article: Barry Molloy, Dragan Jovanović, Caroline Bruyère, Miroslav Marić, Jelena Bulatović, Patrick Mertl, Christian Horn, Lidija Milašinović & Neda Mirković-Marić (2020): A New Bronze Age Mega-fort in Southeastern Europe: Recent Archaeological Investigations at Gradište Iđoš and their Regional Significance, Journal of Field Archaeology, DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1734899 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1734899 Published online: 19 Mar 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjfa20 Please visit the publisher's website for a complete version of this paper or email [email protected] with queries JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1734899 A New Bronze Age Mega-fort in Southeastern Europe: Recent Archaeological Investigations at Gradište Iđoš and their Regional Significance Barry Molloy a, Dragan Jovanovićb, Caroline Bruyèrea, Miroslav Marić Christian Horn f, Lidija Milašinovićg, and Neda Mirković-Marićh c , Jelena Bulatović d , Patrick Mertle, a University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; bCity Museum, Vršac, Vojvodina, Serbia; cInstitute of Balkan Studies SANU, Belgrade, Serbia; dUniversity of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; eUniversity of the Saarland, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany; fUniversity of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; g National Museum, Kikinda, Vojvodina, Serbia; hInstitute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, Subotica, Vojvodina, Serbia ABSTRACT KEYWORDS A newly discovered network of later Bronze Age fortified sites of unusually large size are discussed, with a primary focus on results of excavations at the site of Gradište Iđoš. Closely associated with the rivers Mureš, Tisza, and Danube, these sites are located in the southeast of the Carpathian Basin in central Europe. On current evidence, the main period of construction and occupation took place between 1400–1100 B.C. , probably constituting successor communities of the tell-centred societies of the Middle Bronze Age. Geophysical survey and excavation results from Gradište Iđoš, the largest site in this network in Serbia, are presented in this paper within their regional context. We discuss preliminary insights into the structural development of the site, alongside a correlation of new 14 C dates with relative ceramic chronological markers and the results of faunal analysis. These results provide new perspectives on settlement systems at the dawn of Urnfield cultural traditions in this region. Urnfield settlement; Bronze Age fortifications; Belegiš; Gava; mega-forts Introduction In and around the Banat region of the Carpathian basin, recent fieldwork has begun to systematically investigate a horizon of massive, enclosed later Bronze Age habitation sites. These mega-sites are truly monumental in scale, incorporating the largest settlements and enclosures in Europe prior to the 1st millennium B.C. This paper presents new data on the site of Gradište Iđoš in northern Serbia. This settlement was identified through its upstanding ramparts in Austro-Hungarian maps and has been subject to periodic, but virtually unpublished, archaeological investigations (Marić et al. 2016). A cemetery ca. 1 km to the east of the ramparts was excavated in the 1960’s, and preliminary details of this were published by Girić (1965, 1968). Since 2014, our renewed fieldwork at the settlement has revealed a much larger and more complex site than previously known, and in this paper we discuss the results of our new investigations at the site in their local and regional context. This latter context includes a series of newly discovered massive enclosed or fortified sites in the Serbian part of Banat that are contemporary to Gradište Iđoš. We present here some preliminary observations on our initial work on the Bronze Age component of the site, including excavated features, geophysical survey, ceramic studies, archaeozoological analysis, and 14C dating. The significance of Gradište Iđoš and the neighboring sites is perhaps emphasized by the dearth of knowledge we have on later Bronze Age settlement throughout this wider region, which has only begun to change in very recent years (Gogâltan and Sava 2010, 2012). The picture emerging from this new research stands in stark contrast to Coles and Harding’s assessment of the state of research 40 years ago, stating that “sites are undistinguished affairs on loess terraces near rivers, CONTACT Barry Molloy [email protected] © Trustees of Boston University 2020 marked only by pits” (Coles and Harding 1979, 443). This changing story is important in light of the well-known, major changes in the settlement, mortuary, and military traditions of Europe associated with the emergence of the later Bronze Age Urnfield cultural tradition, particularly because of the key role played by societies of the Carpathian Basin in these changes. A better understanding of settlements in this region is therefore arguably of European importance (Gogâltan and Sava 2010, 2012; Molloy 2018; Stig Sørensen and Rebay-Salisbury 2008; Szentmiklosi et al. 2011). The region we are focusing on here is bordered by the Tizsa, Mureş, and Danube rivers and the Carpathian Mountains and is generally consistent with the historical province of Banat (southeastern Hungary, western Romania, and northeastern Serbia). The significant number of recently discovered later Bronze Age sites and new excavations at a small number of these is beginning to transform our knowledge of the societies that built these mega-fort structures (Figure 1). The ceramics from these sites indicate initial settlement in the Middle to Late Bronze Age transition. Cruceni-Belegiš I ceramics dominate the north, while Dubovac-Žuto Brdo are relatively more abundant in the south, and, though regionally variable, channel-decorated pottery of the Cruceni-Belegiš IIGava tradition is subsequently found throughout, demonstrating continuity of habitation at many, even most, sites into this phase (Boroffka 2013; Bukvić 2000; Bulatović 2007; Forenbaher 1994; Gogâltan and Sava 2010; Harding 2017; Heeb et al. 2017; Molloy et al. 2017; Szentmiklosi et al. 2011). Though channel-decorated pottery has wide spatial and temporal manifestations, we speak here of this category with respect to interrelated shape, ware, and often (general) fabric groups, and so of a very clear tradition emerging in, and being local to, this region, accepting variances in terminology used. Absolute chronological data, where UCD School of Archaeology, University College Dublin