Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Lidar and complex sites: Poštela hillfort

2013

Lidar and complex sites: Poštela hillfort Dimitrij Mlekuž, University of Ljubljana and Institute for the protection of cultural heritage of Slovenia What makes complex sites complex? Sites, like landscapes, are not static. They change, they move, they are constantly under construction, never finished. There is no time to clear the mess and start from scratch. People patch the new from the old, build over, change and modify thing that are already there. Complex sites are thus full of traces of past practices that combine in a complex ways. Time is inscribed in its very constitution at multiple levels and scales. Complex sites are thus just sites; they are not just large assemblage of features and they are not just palimpsests, result of simple layering. Instead, they are part of a landscape a continuum of features combined together a complex, messy ways. This complexity requires different sensibilities in interpreting remote sensing data. Ploughed out barrows Central barrow with ring ditch New rampart Old rampart De bri sfl ow Barrow group Sometimes, new traces can completely erase, destroy or rework older traces. There is absolutely no relation to past activities. Mundane activities such as ploughing, grazing, clearance… might have a minimum impact on the surface but can combine in a long term to form a distinctive textures that abrade older traces. All these processes combine the products of different temporalities in different ways; destroy, blur or sharpen their apparent boundaries. These effects are important, for they determine where we see traces of past human practices and what these look like. Some traces of human activities get worked into, or get buried into the earth. They became part of the earth itself and disappear as scrapes on the surface. But they can be retrieved by other ways of mapping, like geophysics. Here, a well preserved group of barrows in the forest is contrasted with the few ploughed out barrows in the surrounding fields. Sites are part of a lifeworld of people who inhabit it. People are not simply situated on the site; there is mutual relation, where, on the one hand, the features constrain and enable some social practices, and, on the other hand, it is modified and rearranged by its inhabitants. The actions of people refer to these features, and features structure the way people act. People inhabit the world shaped by their predecessors. Large barrow here is surrounded by broad ring-ditch. Its position as a prominent marker in the cemetery is reinforced by the erection of at least five later barrows in its ditch or at its edge. There are agencies other than human, that leave traces. The agencies of the Earth accumulate and erode layers, subside, lift, grind, slide apart and collide them. These processes are slow, moving in the rhythms of tectonic and geologic time. Human activities are nested in this temporality. Hillfort was erected on a stable ridge between two ancient debris flows. However, after hillfort was built, new debris flow eroded part of the ramparts, forcing people to rebuild it and adapt it to new topography. Things which are apparently immobile and static, merely a stage for our human drama, are also players on the stage. Holloways connect sites with a wider landscape. They were never constructed, but eroded by the flow of people, animals, carts and water. Water erosion speeded the hollowing-out process and made some lanes muddy and impassable. When this happened alternative routes were taken by people traveling along them, leading in some place to formation of river like braided channels, branching and converging. Simulated surface runoff shows how holloways are diverting the flow of water over the landscape. They are rivers, gullies and tracks at the same time, rendering the nature/culture dichotomy meaningless. Hillfort Ancient debris flow Ancient debris flow Barrow group and urn field cemetery Holloways Holloways Barrow group Ploughed out barrows Large barrow reused as a moated site The Iron Age hillfort Poštela was erected on eastern slopes of Pohorje hill-range on a dominant position overlooking the whole eastern part of the Drava plain. The complex consists of the hillfort and several urn field and barrow cemeteries and dense meshwork of holloways, connecting the hillfort with the the plain below. The past is included in the present in a variety of ways. Traces from different times exist simultaneously and are part of a site where people and other creatures are creating new traces. All this processes combine to create a complex sites. Complex sites are therefore messy; messy not only because they are full of different scrapes, traces and scars, but because these scars, traces and scrapes combine in complex, often messy ways. On a complex sites, past is incorporated and reworked into the present in different ways. The idea of palimpsest, of historical layering, of continuous erasing and creating anew is overly simplistic to capture the creation of complex sites. This messy entanglement of temporalities on complex sites require more reflexive approach to their study.