Gaps in allergen immunotherapy administration and subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy dose adjustment schedules

Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125 (2020) 505e506 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Perspective Gaps in allergen immunotherapy administration and subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy dose adjustment schedules Need for prospective data Désirée Erlinda Larenas-Linnemann, MD *; Tolly Epstein, MD y, z; Punita Ponda, MD x; David Bernstein, MD y; Paul Williams, MD k, {; Peter Creticos, MD #, ** * Research department, Medica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, Mexico city, Mexico Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio z Allergy Partners of Central Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana x Department of Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York k Division of Allergy/Inflammation, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington { Northwest Asthma and Allergy Center, Everett, Washington # Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland ** Creticos Research Group, LLC, Crownsville, Maryland y A R T I C L E I N F O Article history: Received for publication June 28, 2020. Received in revised form July 11, 2020. Accepted for publication July 15, 2020. Introduction Many abrupt adjustments in the delivery of medical care became necessary owing to the unexpected emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in early 2020. To ensure social distancing and the concomitant requirements for personal protective equipment, practitioners have had to make a myriad of adjustments to continue providing subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT). In many practices, SCIT was stopped or administration intervals have been increased, whereas other practices have transitioned some patients to the sublingual administration route.1 Although many locations have recently eased lockdown requirements, this led to a rise in cases in several states, resulting in further lockdowns. Thus, it might very well still take months before our daily routine shall come close to normal again. Learning from historical lessons, the H1N1 influenza “Spanish flu” pandemic lasted 15 months and killed 50 million people. It comprised the following 3 waves: the first (milder) one was in winter-spring 1918; Reprints: Désirée Erlinda Larenas-Linnemann, MD, Medica Sur Clinical Foundation and Hospital, Torre 2, cons.602, Puente de Piedra 150, Col. Toriello Guerra, Del. Tlalpan, Mexico City, 14050, Mexico; E-mail: [email protected]. Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. Funding: The authors have no funding sources to report. the second wave, in September 1918, was disastrous and deadly, because it coincided with the massive troop gathering and transport of soldiers for World War I and an apparent aggressive mutation of the virus; and the last wave, beginning in 1919, had less severity. Finally, the virus resolved on the development of herd immunity, the ending of the war, and possibly a favorable mutation. Although prevention of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical, it is also important that other health concerns are addressed to limit preventable emergencies. Maintaining good health appears to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 disease. In the context of allergic diseases, SCIT has been reported to reduce symptoms and medication requirements in allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis, and in patients with immunoglobulin Eedependent asthma, improving the quality of life. Moreover, a case could be made that patients with an allergy might experience some ancillary immunologic benefit in battling an infectious pathogen by being on an effective SCIT dose. Immunotherapy restores the function of dendritic cells and augments the number of active TH1 cells, both enhance innate immunity, which could be important at the start of a SARS-COV-2 infection whose initial mechanism is innate immune suppression, a theory that might be interesting to explore.2 For SCIT to be effective, an optimal target monthly maintenance dose has to be administered. The extended spacing interval of injections, although acceptable from a safety point of view, may result in a diminution of therapeutic efficacy. Thus, as soon as the risk for https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.015 1081-1206/Ó 2020 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 506 D.E. Larenas-Linnemann et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125 (2020) 505e506 SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infection can be reduced to levels considered safe by health authorities, it behooves the allergist to return to a maintenance immunotherapy schedule known to be effective. At this moment, there are no data from controlled trials on dose adjustment after gaps in administration. The intention of this article is to review the limited data available and discuss what is needed to answer pressing questions related to resuming SCIT after gaps in therapy. life-threatening systemic reactions. Patients with higher risk may include those with the following5: (1) history of anaphylaxis or mast cell disorder; (2) moderate to severe asthma; (3) high sensitization pattern or systemic reaction during skin prick testing; (4) systemic reactions to previous SCIT administration; and (5) patients receiving SCIT during peak pollen season for an allergen to which they are highly sensitized. Thus, the personal background of the patient should be taken into consideration when choosing a dose adjustment schedule after a gap in therapy; pediatric age could need extra caution. Published Data Related to Gaps in Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy Administration Dose Adjustment Schedules Future In an online supplement to the Practice Parameters on Allergen Immunotherapy (third update), the authors propose a schedule on how to dose-adjust after a gap in SCIT administration. The schedule is based on the time elapsed since the missed dose. Tangentially, the focused practice parameter update on sublingual immunotherapy recommends restarting the tablet for sublingual immunotherapy in-office after interruptions of more than 7 days. This is recommendable given anaphylaxis has been reported after the first tablet, be it rarely.3 The largest amount of data available comes from the collective experience of more than a thousand allergy specialists. An online survey of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) membership was conducted and reported in 2012.4 Shortly afterward, almost 80% of responders reported dose-adjusting based on the date of the last administered dose. Most reduced the dose a certain number of steps back, others reduced a percentage, and a few reduced a certain volume. In the online supplement, we present dose adjustment schedules with one (Table e1) based on the most frequently used solutions according to the survey and others either used by large allergy practices (Table e2-e5) or proposed by the guidelines (Table e6 and e7). There is no consensus or firm evidence suggesting which dose adjustment strategy is superior after a gap in therapy. In addition, it is unclear whether some patients may tolerate longer gaps in therapy than previously allowed, both in terms of efficacy and safety. Understanding the consequences and developing optimal strategies for dose adjustment after gaps in therapy has become paramount during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, the AAAAI Immunotherapy, Allergen Standardization, and Allergy Diagnostics Committee are evaluating outcomes related to various dose adjustment strategies for gaps in therapy. A prospective, randomized single-center trial evaluating outcomes for 2 different dose adjustment schedules is underway. In addition, we are gathering data using the immunotherapy surveillance study. We would like to invite colleagues to join us and submit their data regarding gaps in therapy to the surveillance study (https://tinyurl.com/AITAnnualSurvey). Supplementary Data Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.015. Safety Reports Related to Gaps The AAAAI and the American College of Allergy Asthma and Immunology Immunotherapy surveillance study started in 2008. Members submit data annually regarding SCIT-related systemic reactions and their severity. In the last update, the investigators gave a detailed description of a total of 7 fatal reactions since 2008 (1:9.1 million injection visits). Although not specifically queried for nonfatal reactions, there were no reports of fatal reactions occurring owing to a gap in therapy.5 As discussed below, the issue of gaps in therapy will be more extensively queried in this year's upcoming surveillance survey. Special Considerations Allergen immunotherapy is still an art, and it might require extra precautions in patients who could be at higher risk for References 1. Rubin R. COVID-19’s Crushing Effects on Medical Practices, Some of Which Might Not Survive. JAMA. 2020;324:321e323. 2. Larenas-Linnemann D, Rodriguez-Perez N, Ortega-Martell JA, Vijil VB, Luna-Pech JA. Mexican Immunotherapy Working Group. COVID-19 and allergen immunotherapy: theoretical benefits invite to adjustments in practice recommendations [e-pub ahead of print]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2020. 06.009, accessed August 11, 2020. 3. Janssens NS, van Ouwerkerk L, Gerth van Wijk R, Karim AF. Acute systemic reactions to sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite [e-pub ahead of print]. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14417, accessed August 11, 2020. 4. Larenas-Linnemann DE, Gupta P, Mithani S, Ponda P. Survey on immunotherapy practice patterns: dose, dose adjustments, and duration. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(5):373e378.e3. 5. Epstein TG, Liss GM, Berendts KM, Bernstein DI. AAAAI/ACAAI subcutaneous immunotherapy surveillance study (2013-2017): fatalities, infections, delayed reactions, and use of epinephrine autoinjectors. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(6):1996e2003.e1. D.E. Larenas-Linnemann et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125 (2020) 505e506 Supplementary Data The below tables are some examples of different schedules for dose adjustment after gaps in subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy administration, developed by academia, large practices, and guidelines in an attempt to minimize the possibility of a systemic reaction. However, avoidance of a reaction cannot be guaranteed. The physician is further guided in the exact dose adjustment decision by clinical data such as the concentration of allergen being given, previous reaction history, and seasonality. 506.e1 eTable 2 Johns Hopkins Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Dose Adjustment Scenarios for Standard SCIT Dose Modifications Owing to Missed Injections Scenario A: missed build-up visit. Based on time elapsed since the last dose. 1-2 wk since the last dose Continue schedule 2-3 wk (15-21 d) Repeat the previous dose 3-5 wk (22-35 d) Decrease by 1 dose 5-6 wk (36-42 d) Decrease by 2 doses >9 wk Notify allergist for instructions Scenario B: build-up schedule completed (Once final dose has been reached) Repeat last dose in 2 wk then, Repeat last dose in 3 wk then, Repeat last dose in 4 wk then, Continue maintenance dose every 4 wk Scenario C: missed maintenance visit 4-6 wk (42 d) since the last dose Continue schedule 6-7 wk (43-56 d) Decrease by 1 dose 5-6 wk (57-63 d) Decrease by 2 doses >9 wk Notify allergist for instructions Abbreviation: SCIT, subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. eTable 1 Empirical Dose Adjustment Schedule after Gaps in SCIT Administration Based on Mean Replies From the AAAAI Members' Survey (Aqueous Extracts) All patients Intuitively, highly sensitive patientsa might need special caution and more drastic dose reduction after gaps Dose increase phase Dose adjustment actions to be taken <2 wk since the last dose Increase normally 2-3 wk Repeat the last dose 3-4 wk Reduce 1 dose 4-5 wk Reduce 2 doses 90 d Restart SCIT: from bottle 1, first dose Maintenance phase <5 wk since the last dose Apply normally 5-7 wk Reduce by 25% 7-11 wk Reduce 1 dose/Reduce by 45% 8-15 wk Reduce 2 doses/Reduce by 55% 3-4 mo Restart SCIT: from bottle 1, first dose Abbreviations: AAAAI, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; SCIT, subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. a Special caution might be needed for the following: (1) history of anaphylaxis or mast cell disorder; (2) moderate to severe asthma; (3) high sensitization pattern or systemic reaction during skin prick testing; (4) systemic reactions to previous SCIT administration; (5) patients receiving SCIT during peak pollen season for an allergen to which they are highly sensitized; and (6) pediatric patients. eTable 3 Schedule Used by Allergy Partners Schedule for missed injections for the build-up Time elapsed since the last dose 2-14 d Continue increasing per schedule 15-21 d Repeat the last dose, then increase per schedule More than 21 d Reduce the dose by 1 step for each week over 3 wk, then increase per schedule More than 63 d Ask physician Schedule for missed injections for maintenance Time elapsed since the last dose 0-35 d Continue the maintenance dose More than 35 d Reduce the dose by 1 step for each wk over 5 wk, then increase per schedule More than 91 d Ask physician Schedule for refills First dose from refill Reduce to 1/3 of the maintenance dose Second dose from refill Reduce to 2/3 of the maintenance dose Third dose from refill Back to usual dose, reset phase to maintenance 506.e2 D.E. Larenas-Linnemann et al. / Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 125 (2020) 505e506 eTable 4 Dose Adjustment Schedule for Gaps in SCIT Administration, University of Cincinnati For lapses in therapy in the 1:10,000, 1:1000, and 1:100 vials, adjust the dose as follows: Weeks overdue 1 wk overdue Repeat the last dose 2 wk overdue Decrease by 1 dose 3 wk overdue Decrease by 2 doses 4 wk overdue Ask MD For lapses in therapy in the 1:10 vial, adjust the dose as follows: Wk overdue 2 wk overdue Reduce by 50% 3 wk overdue Start at the beginning of vial 4 wk overdue Ask MD For lapses in therapy in the 1:1 vial, adjust the dose as follows: Weeks overdue 1-2 wk overdue Repeat the last dose 3-4 wk overdue Decrease by 1 dose 4-6 wk overdue Decrease by 2 doses >6 wk overdue Ask MD eTable 6 Practice Parameters (Third Update) of Online Repository Proposed Schedule (eTable 5) Build-up phase for weekly or biweekly injections Modify dosage accordingly to time interval since missed injection Continue as scheduled Up to 7 da 8-13 d after missed scheduled injection Repeat the previous doseb 14-21 d after missed scheduled Reduce the dose by 25%b injection 21-28 d after missed scheduled Reduce the previous dose by 50%b injection A similar dose reduction protocol should be developed for gaps in maintenance immunotherapy. a If on weekly build-up, then it would be up to 14 days after administered injection or 7 days after the missed scheduled injection. Then increase dose each injection visit as directed on the immunotherapy schedule until the therapeutic maintenance dose is reached. b Abbreviation: MD, doctor of medicine. NOTE: Normal dosing of vials 1:10,000 and 1:1000 is with 0.10 mL increments, 1:100 and 1:10 with 0.05 increments, and 1:1 with 0.03 increments. eTable 7 Dose Adjustment Schedule, Mexican Guidelines on Immunotherapy 2019 eTable 5 Dose Adjustment Schedule for Gaps in SCIT Administration, Northwestern University Immunotherapy dose adjustments for lapses in SCIT during the build-up phase Review IT chart for past reactions 10 d overdue No adjustment 2 wk overdue If no history of reaction: repeat dose If the history of reaction: decrease by 0.05 mL 3 wk overdue Decrease by 0.10 mL 4 wk overdue Decrease by 0.15 mL For lapses in allergen immunotherapy during the maintenance phase: Weeks overdue 2 wk overdue Repeat dose 3 wk overdue Decrease by 0.05 mL 4 wk overdue Decrease by 0.10 mL 2 months overdue Decrease by 0.05 for each week missed after 2 wk 3 months overdue Will need to discuss compliance with the patient and attending before stopping IT or restart at 1:1000 of 0.05 mL Abbreviation: IT, immunotherapy; SCIT, subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Prolonged interval between doses (aqueous extracts)a Up-dosing phase. Time since last SCIT injection. B < 2 wk Increase normally B 2-3 wk Repeat the last dose B 3-4 wk Decrease by 1 dose B 4-5 wk Decrease by 2 doses B 6-8 wk Reboot from vial 1 Maintenance phase. Time since last SCIT injection. B < 5 wk Administer normally B 5-6 wk Decrease by 1 dose B 6-8 wk Decrease by 2 doses or 50% B 2-3 mo Start vial from 0.05 mL B 3-4 mo Start from previous vial 0.05 mL B > 4 mo Reboot from vial 1 Prolonged interval between doses (allergoid or adsorbed extracts)b B Maintenance <8 wk Maintain normal dose (For details, see manufacturer recommendations) Abbreviations: AIT, allergen immunotherapy; SCIT, subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Based on the experience of approximately 1000 allergist members of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. Adapted from Larenas-Linnemann DE, Gupta P, Mithani S, Ponda P. Survey on immunotherapy practice patterns: dose, dose adjustments, and duration. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(5): 373-378.e3. b Preferably continue normally or suspend. It is debatable whether reducing the AIT dose of European extracts results in loss of efficacy. a