Book Reviews
that hinder collaborative working. It also provides evidence of good partnership relationships and thus, the
obstacles detailed in this chapter are counter-balanced
by evidence of positive developments.
Chapters five to seven concentrate on the composition of, and services provided by family centres. Interestingly, the authors draw attention to the pressures
that some family centres are being placed under to
provide late statutory intervention at the expense
of their preventative ethos, suggesting that in some
instances the preventative potential of family centres is
not realized. There is further discussion of how family
centres provide a gateway to other services and can
therefore operate as key holders of information to allow
signposting to other agencies. This part of the book
ends with a discussion of the workforce employed
within family centres and suggests that workforce
development must be supported by adequate resourcing, including support for training and recruitment.
Chapter eight examines the role and impact of family
centres on parents coming into with this particular
service. It highlights that these service users can
provide a valuable resource for the service, for example
as volunteers/workers and that a parent-led approach
can also provide direction for this service. Chapter nine
discusses the changing face of family centres and how
they need to retain the ability to adapt to a changing
local authority landscape to address the requirements
of service users in the future.
In conclusion, the book seeks to convince the reader
that family centres should occupy a pivotal role in the
‘Every Child Matters’ (DfES, 2003) agenda. Detailing
the research and evidence generated around
community-based services, this book makes a valuable
contribution to the knowledge base that seeks to
inform the future development of services for safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. By
providing a balanced view of the ideologies and realities of implementing a seamless approach to service
delivery, this book provides highly relevant reading for
students, social care practitioners, researchers and
policy makers.
Kellie Thompson
PhD research student (ESRC project: Developing
integrated children’s services)
Department of Applied Social Science
Lancaster University
REFERENCES
DfES (2003) Every Child Matters. Stationary Office, London.
Laming, H. (2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry. Department of
Health, London.
117
Child and Family Social Work 2008, 13, pp 113–118
Quinton, D. (2004) Supporting Parents: Messages from Research.
Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
What Works in Residential Child Care: A
Review of Research Evidence and the
Practical Considerations
Roger Clough, Roger Bullock, Adrian Ward
National Children’s Bureau, London, 2006, 134 pp.
ISBN 1 904787 77 0
This book has much to offer to the debate concerning
the planning and use of residential child care services,
summarizing as it does the first stage of a larger review
of residential services for the National Assembly for
Wales. Written by three academics and researchers in
the field of residential childcare, this text can claim to
present an authoritative overview of the residential
childcare research literature. The practical considerations drawn from the review are also well considered
and firmly grounded in the review.
For a text so concerned with research, the authors
make some interesting observations in the introductory chapter, cautioning against total faith in research
as straightforwardly providing all the ‘what works’
answers for residential childcare. However, the rationale behind such a position is clarified, as the authors
then detail some of the difficulties involved with the
measurement, analysis and interpretation of data from
previous residential childcare research. The need for
careful and considered interpretation of research data,
in an attempt to achieve practice based on demonstrable effectiveness, is a theme which runs strong
throughout the book. Following this introduction the
structure of the text is very simple – chapter two deals
with the research literature whilst chapter three takes
the form of a case study and considers the planning of
residential services for children in Wales. The authors
make clear that the material considered in the book,
whilst specific toWales, is relevant for the remainder of
the UK and this is undoubtedly the case.
The review of research literature is detailed and rich
and important points are made with regard to the
strengths and limitations of the existing research
knowledge. In an era punctuated by reviews, the
authors make the important point that whilst this
sector may possess knowledge about what is required
to deliver a purposeful and appropriate service, there
are problems in putting this knowledge into practice.
This important theme is expanded later when
selected residential regimes are questioned for simply
© 2008 The Authors
Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Book Reviews
providing staff with ‘instructions’ about practice,
rather than providing staff with an understanding of
what they are doing. A summation of the conditions
required for effective practice most commonly identified by the research is presented. Issues such as
culture, size of home and the quality of relationships
between children and carers are all raised. Again,
the authors caution against simplistic analysis of the
research findings; achieving effective practice is a
complex matter and focusing on any single or particular aspect of residential care may not ensure success.
Interestingly the chapter concludes with the suggestion that many of the conditions required for effective
residential services often exist beyond the direct remit
of the sector and within the control of children’s services departments.
This theme is developed in the final chapter that
focuses on applying research findings to the planning
of residential services for children in Wales. A key
conclusion is that residential childcare can only fulfil
an effective function if it is planned for and utilized, in
a coherent manner. In particular, services that are
located unfavourably within a hierarchy of services are
in many ways set up to fail. Residential childcare is
frequently a last resort option for children, when other
services have failed and this impacts on how the
service is seen and experienced. Full and proper
assessments of all children and young people are
required and placement decisions should be made on
the basis of these assessments, rather than on the basis
of available resources. The issue of the prevailing ideology around residential childcare should be critically
interrogated, such as the current ‘last resort’ position
of the service. This may, on occasion, lead to some
young people entering residential childcare at an
earlier stage, as opposed to as a last resort after all
other options have been exhausted. For some, such a
position will present a challenge and it is refreshing for
it to be stated here so convincingly.
This book clearly communicates an important
message – residential childcare can provide an important service to some but not all children and young
people requiring services. However, for it to have any
chance of achieving such an aim, it has to be planned
and part of a continuum of services rather than something only to be considered when other services have
failed. The planning of such services involves establishing who will need residential child care, the sort of
services that are required and what can be reasonably
expected of these services. The research evidence
relating to residential.
Childcare and consequent practice implications will
be of significant interest to academics, students and
practitioners alike. However perhaps this text has
most to offer those with the responsibility for planning
and commissioning residential child care services, as
adherence to the issues raised in the book would allow
for a more purposeful and targeted service.
Graham McPheat
Glasgow School of Social Work
Corrigendum
Young, F. 2007, ‘Book Review of Attachment handbook for foster care and adoption by Gillian Schofield and Mary
Beek.’ Child & Family Social Work, 12 (4), 438-439.
The name of the second author Mary Beck was incorrect and should have read Mary Beek throughout the review.
We apologise for this error.
118
Child and Family Social Work 2008, 13, pp 113–118
© 2008 The Authors
Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd