BRONZE BETWEEN MONEY AND SCRAP
IN LATE ROMAN AND EARLY MEDIEVAL EUROPE
26.–28. OCTOBER 2023 BONN
Bild: Susanne Schenker, Augusta Raurica
COINING VALUES
Information
Teilnehmende sind gebeten, sich spätestens eine Woche vor Beginn über
[email protected] anzumelden. Es gibt nur eine beschränkte
Anzahl Plätze.
Conference attendees have to register at least one week before the opening of the conference at:
[email protected]. There is only a
limited number of seats available.
Tagungsort ist das Bonner Universitätsforum, Heussallee 18, 53113 Bonn.
The conference takes place at Bonner Universitätsforum, Heussallee 18, 53113
Bonn.
2023–10–26 DONNERSTAG / THURSDAY
13:00
Ankunft und Registrierung
Arrival and registration
13:45
Begrüßung und Einführung (Dr. Anna Flückiger, Prof. Dr. Jan Bemmann)
Welcome and Introduction (Dr. Anna Flückiger, Prof. Dr. Jan Bemmann)
14:00
Fleur Kemmers, Money, metal, and the social construction of value
14:30
Ralph W. Mathisen, The role of base metals in Roman law, administration, and
culture
15:00
Anna Flückiger, Hackbronze – coining a term for Late Antiquity
15:30
Kaffeepause
Coffee break
16:00
Philip Smither, Coins, recycling and the end of Roman Britain: A view from the
Saxon Shore
16:30
Ellen Swift, The uses and values of copper alloy artefacts in the late to postRoman transition period in Britain
17:00
Fraser Hunter, „Scrap silver“? Changing approaches to the interpretation of
hacksilver in the late Roman and early Medieval periods
18:00
Abendessen für Vortragende
Dinner - for speakers only
1
2023–10–27 FREITAG / FRIDAY
9:00
Eckhard Wirbelauer, Argentei minuti aus dem elsässischen Niedernai: Überlegungen zur Interpretation einer Fundmünzengruppe
9:30
David Wigg-Wolf, What happened after coins? The collapse of a coin-using
monetary economy in the late-Roman North-West.
10:00
Rahel Otte, Coins without value? Der Schatzfund von Rheindahlen und das
Ende der Monetarisierung im Rheinland
10:30
Kaffeepause
Coffee break
11:00
Markus Peter, Failed fortunes from Late Roman contexts in Switzerland
11:30
Marcus Zagermann, Kings of Metal – Die spätantike Höhensiedlung von
San Martino (Lomaso, Trentino) als sicherer Aufbewahrungsort von Schrott,
Alteisen, Barren und Sonstigem
12:00–13:00 Uhr
Mittagessen
Lunch
2
2023–10–27 FREITAG / FRIDAY
13:30
Alessandro Bona, Traces of complexity. Monetary circulation in Mediolanum in the 5th Century AD: Persistences and Changes
14:00
Giulia Bison, The view from Rome: the social aspects and value of copper
alloy recycling
14:30
Kaffeepause
Coffee break
15:00
Coining Values: Zwischenfazit
Coining Values: interim conclusion
freie Abendgestaltung
Evening to explore the city independently
3
2023–10–28 SAMSTAG / SATURDAY
9:00
Holger Komnick, Römische Bronzemünzen der zweiten Hälfte des 4. Jhs.
im Fundmünzaufkommen von Ostdeutschland – Kein Geld oder Kleingeld?
9:30
Aleksander Bursche/Kirill Myzgin/Anna Zapolska, Roman bronzes and EastCentral Barbaricum
10:00
Anna Zapolska, The finds of bronze coins, their usage, and function in the
West Balts’ societies
10:30
Kaffeepause
Coffee break
11:00
Peter Bray, Chemical eddies. Tracking metal histories and connections in
the mid to late 1st Millennium AD. REMADE (Roman and Early Medieval
Alloys Defined)
11:30
Thomas Schierl, Bronze … makes the world go round? Sozioökonomische Aspekte eines Werk- und Wertstoffes
12:00
Abschluss der Tagung
Farewell
4
Abstracts
Money, metal, and the social construction of value
Fleur Kemmers (Frankfurt a. M.)
What is money? Why is metal such a suitable money-medium? How to fix
the value of money-objects? This paper will explore theories from economic
anthropology on money and its social construction, which address these
questions. In a next step, it will focus on the use of uncoined-metal in Iron
Age and early Roman society before the introduction of coinage to see in
how far this could be called ´money´. Finally, it will discuss how this theoretical framework might help to better grasp the use of scrap metal in a
post-coinage society.
The role of base metals in Roman law, administration, and culture
Ralph W. Mathisen (Urbana, Illinois)
Roman written records are replete with references to gold and silver as
items of value. But references to base metals such as bronze, copper, or
lead, do not appear as frequently, and when they do, it often is by metonymy, in words that have lost a direct connection to the metal-qua-metal.
Thus one finds many references to “aes” in the generic sense of „money,”
or to “aerarium” in the sense of a “treasury.” For example, Cod.Theod.
7.4.36 speaks of salaries of military officers in annona units “being received as money [aes]” and of soldiers’ annona units being paid “in the form
of treasury money [aerariarum].” In such cases, however, it is not actual
copper that is being paid but “money” in other forms, probably gold or silver,
metonymically represented by words denoting base metal. In a like manner,
the word “plumbum“ often is applied to forms of punishment.
More to the point for the present purpose are references to actual base
metals themselves in a monetary sense or as items having value. When
such mentions do occur, it sometimes is connected to criminal activity. The
Codex Theodosianus (9.21.6, cf. 11.21.1) also observed, “We have learned
that some metal workers are smelting the maiorina coinage, no less criminally than repeatedly, in order to separate the silver from the copper [aes].”
5
Those apprehended doing this were to suffer capital punishment and have
their property confiscated. In this case, then, the copper coinage had value
as an “ore” from which silver could be smelted. One might wonder whether
some of the surviving copper detritus was a result of this operation.
Copper was assigned a more specific value in 396, when a law (Cod.Theod.
11.21.1) ruled that “a solidus be rendered by the property owner as the
equivalent of twenty-five pounds of copper [coinage],” which works out
to about 1700 copper coins. A law of 424 (Cod.Theod. 11.21.3) speaks
of a centenarius (100 pounds) of copper (coinage) as being the standard
against which an amount of gold was calculated. For the purpose of
government transactions, then, copper coinage still had a standard value,
even if the relative value of copper to gold continued to decline. Still other
legislation regulated how copper coinage was to be received in the currency base.
By applying examples such as these, this contribution will look at issues such as
the meaning, transformation, para-monetary functions, and immaterial values and meanings of base metal coinage or monetized objects from a literary
perspective. One would hope that doing so might help to contextualize the
material base-metal objects in a broader socio-literary context.
Hackbronze – coining a term for Late Antiquity
Anna Flückiger (Basel, Bonn)
What happens if we consider bronze scrap in a similar manner to how
research has lately approached late Roman Hacksilver? With regard to its
exchange power and role in the economy, late Roman and early medieval copper alloy has so far not received the attention that more precious
metals have been given. Fragments from archaeological contexts are still
often treated under the umbrella term “recycling”. Drawing from theoretical
considerations as well as case studies, this paper sets out to change and
broaden this perspective on bronze artefacts and fragments, their possible
shifting roles and values, and the human practices attached to them.
6
Coins, Recycling and the End of Roman Britain: A View from the Saxon
Shore
Philip Smither (Newbury, Berkshire)
In the 4th century AD, on the east and south coasts of Britainnia and the NW
Gallic coast, sat a series of fortified settlements known as the Saxon Shore.
One particular settlement, Richborough, is well known to numismatists in
Britain for breaking the British site coin average with 22,000 coins dating
from AD388-402. It has been postulated that large numbers late nummi
on British sites relate to a spate of continental hoarding in the late 4th-5th
century and/or maintaining maritime links with major centres in Britain and
the Rhineland (Moorhead et. al. 2013).
There is some evidence from Richborough to suggest the recycling of copper-alloys in the late 4th century, the metal for which might have come from
the coinage. However, a large number of these late Roman nummi were
found dispersed in stratified contexts and in the topsoil. This could suggest that the coins were distributed across the site for other purposes, not
just hoarding for recycling. A make-do-and-mend attitude is also evident
in many late Roman artefacts, suggesting there was a need to mend and
recycle objects with little new material arriving from the continent.
This research looks at the context for the vast number of late Roman coins
from Richborough and to what extent they, and other objects, were the raw
materials or products of recycling.
The uses and values of copper alloy artefacts in the late to post-Roman
transition period in Britain
Ellen Swift (Kent)
Abstract to follow. The paper incorporates both an overview of some previously
published work, and some new research on the topic.
7
„Scrap silver“? Changing approaches to the interpretation of hacksilver in
the late Roman and early Medieval periods
Fraser Hunter (Edinburgh)
Hacksilver in the late Roman and early Medieval periods has seen more
extended scholarly treatment than hacked bronze, mostly because such
treatment of „precious metal“ objects has been seen as curious or „barbarian“. Metal-detecting has produced a wealth of new evidence, while recent
scholarship has considered it from a range of different angles, from the
economic to the diplomatic and ritual, with a strong concern around life
cycles of this material. This may be of some value in considering the ways
in which bronze could have been used and reused at this time. A particular focus will be on the different forms in which silver was circulating in
the fourth and fifth centuries, considering how hacksilver fitted into wider
patterns of silver use.
Argentei minuti aus dem elsässischen Niedernai: Überlegungen zur Interpretation einer Fundmünzengruppe
Eckhard Wirbelauer (Strasbourg)
In einem 1995 aufgedeckten Gräberfeld bei Niedernai (Dép. Bas Rhin) wurden in zwei Gräbern Fragmente von insgesamt sieben sogenannten argentei minuti geborgen, die im Rahmen eines ANR-DFG-Programms (NiedArc5
2014–2018, Leitung: Susanne Brather-Walter, Freiburg und Eckhard Wirbelauer, Straßburg) näher untersucht werden konnten. In dem vorgeschlagenen Beitrag sollen diese für das Oberrheintal außergewöhnlichen Funde
typologisch und historisch eingeordnet werden. Dabei wird die im beginnenden 20. Jahrhundert entstandene Bezeichnung dieser Fundmünzengruppe
einer Kritik unterzogen und gefragt, ob der aus einer Schriftquelle gewonnene Begriff wirklich zu den Fundmünzen passt, die durch die Forschungen
Lafauries und Fischers inzwischen recht gut bekannt ist.
8
What happened after coins? The collapse of a coin-using monetary economy in the late-Roman North-West.
David Wigg-Wolf (Frankfurt a. M.)
As David Schaps puts it: “Occasionally an invention succeeds so thoroughly
that it changes permanently the terms in which society thinks. It becomes
an essential part of the world; life without it is hardly conceivable.” (Schaps
2004, 1). Coinage is one of those inventions. But whereas Schaps was
interested in what preceded the invention of coinage and the establishment
of a monetary economy as we might recognise it today, less work has been
done on what happened in situations where the monetary economy had
collapsed. What happened after coins?
One such case is the end of Roman rule in the north-western provinces
when the supply of coinage, in particular bronze, abruptly ceased. There is
often an assumption that somehow a kind of coin-using monetary economy must have continued, either with existing coins remaining in use with
the same or a similar function for considerable periods, or with objects
such as bronze scrap supplementing or replacing coins. It is, as Schaps
points out, hard for us to conceive of life without coins once they are there.
However, the question of the extent to which the economy of the north-western provinces was monetised in Late Antiquity needs to be addressed, and
therefore the extent to which coins were actually needed. Indeed, imperial
rescripts indicate that coins were perhaps not as widespread as the picture
we have from coin finds might suggest. How did people with insufficient
access to coins cope?
This paper will consider the extent of monetisation in the 3rd and 4th centuries,
in particular the role of markets in sustaining a coin-using monetary economy,
and the evidence of episodes of mass imitation of official coins as an indicator of
monetisation.
Schaps 2004: D.M. Schaps, The invention of coinage and the monetization
of ancient Greece (Ann Arbor 2004)
9
Coins without value? Der Schatzfund von Rheindahlen und das Ende der
Monetarisierung im Rheinland
Rahel Otte (Bonn)
Die regelmäßige Belieferung des Rheinlands mit Münzgeld endete um 400
n. Chr. Die letzten Münzen, die die Provinz Germania secunda noch in größerer Zahl erreichten, waren Halbcentenionales aus der Zeit von 388 bis 403
n. Chr. Die innere Zusammensetzung von theodosianischen Schatzfunden
zeigt, dass diese Münzen auch nach dem Ende der Münzversorgung von
der Bevölkerung noch eine Zeitlang weiterverwendet wurden. Zu diesen
Schatzfunden gehört auch der 2017 entdeckte Hort von MönchengladbachRheindahlen. Er beweist, dass Münzen dort noch bis etwa 410/420 n. Chr.
benutzt wurden. Doch welchem Zweck dienten die Münzen? Stellten sie nur
noch Altmetall für Recyclingzwecke dar oder wurden sie weiterhin in ihrer
Geldfunktion verwendet? Und lassen sich die Ergebnisse auch auf die übrige Germania secunda übertragen? Diesen Fragen geht der Vortrag auf der
Basis einer bislang noch unpublizierten Datensammlung zu Münzfunden
aus dem ländlichen Raum nach.
Failed fortunes from Late Roman contexts in Switzerland
Markus Peter (Bern/Augusta Raurica)
Anhand mehrerer Fundkomplexe und -kontexte des späten 3. und 4. Jahrhunderts werden mögliche Entstehungsmuster von archäologischen Befunden mit bedeutenden Mengen von Münzen vorgestellt.
Kings of Metal – Die spätantike Höhensiedlung von San Martino (Lomaso,
Trentino) als sicherer Aufbewahrungsort von Schrott, Alteisen, Barren und
Sonstigem
Marcus Zagermann (München)
Befestigte Höhensiedlungen sind ein zentrales Element der spätantiken
Besiedlung im alpinen Italien. Auf dem Monte San Martino bei Lomaso,
nördlich des Gardasees, bestand von ca. 480/520 bis mindestens ins 8.
10
Jahrhundert eine solche Höhensiedlung. Diese war allerdings kein wehrhaftes Dorf, sondern vielmehr ein strategischer Punkt, in dem unter anderem
verschiedene Werte sicher aufbewahrt wurden, vor allem Lebensmittel,
aber auch Metallschrott unterschiedlicher Art. Das Spektrum reicht dabei
beispielhaft von Altmünzen (Republik bis erste Hälfte 4. Jahrhundert), über
seit Jahrhunderten aus der Mode gekommene Fibeln bis hin zu nicht näher
klassifizierbaren Blechfragmenten. Klar ist, dass in gewissem Rahmen eine
Weiterverarbeitung vor Ort erfolgte, vieles wurde aber offensichtlich lediglich hier verwahrt, um in einem nicht näher zu konkretisierenden Szenario
unmittelbar Zugriff darauf zu haben. Das kann bei der Auswertung problematisch sein: Darf ein fragmentierter Waagbalken als Nachweis einer
Schnellwaage gewertet werden, der damit auch Hinweise auf die Tätigkeiten innerhalb eines Gebäudes gibt? Oder handelt es sich um ein Objekt,
das bereits fragmentiert auf den Berg kam und zum „Schrottensemble“ zu
zählen ist? Gerade wenn klar ist, dass Altmaterial in großem Stil zur Weiterverarbeitung aufbewahrt wurde, muss für jedes Einzelstück gefragt werden,
ob es eben dazu auf den Berg kam oder dort oben in seinem ursprünglichen
Kontext und Verwendungszweck genutzt wurde. Gibt es Kriterien, die bei
einer Entscheidung helfen?
Der Vortrag gibt einen Überblick über das vorhandene Spektrum und beleuchtet die daran anschließenden Fragestellungen an ausgewählten Beispielen.
Traces of complexity. Monetary Circulation in Mediolanum in the 5th Century AD: Persistences and Changes
Alessandro Bona (Milano)
The paper aims to discuss and presents in detail a large number of coin
finds brought to light during archaeological excavations in contexts datable
to the 5th century AD in Milan (Northern Italy), some unpublished or never
analysed from a contextual point of view so far. The deep contextual analysis I have dedicated to the coin finds from the archaeological digs carried
out in the city allowed me to reconstruct the dynamics of the coin circu-
11
lation in Mediolanum between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages.
The diachronic results of my studies were recently analysed in my doctoral
thesis (Coins from Recent Excavations in Milan. New data from archaeological contexts for the recomposition of the monetary circulation in the light of
the history of the ancient city) discussed in June 2022 (Università Cattolica/
University of Warwick). The database examined (more than 3.500 coins)
appears to be rather consistent. The model, however, differs considerably
from what is known in the territory north of the Alps.
My paper, therefore, aims to highlight the great differences existing between the territories south and north of the Alpine watershed, trying to
enrich the picture presented at the conference with an example from a
different geographical area. In Mediolanum, coins continued to circulate
at least until the middle of the 6th century A.D. and metal fragments do
not appear in the local market pool as para-monetary objects (so far?). An
element of similarity, however, is the phenomenon of coin cutting, which
was intensively practised in this period. It is therefore plausible that in a
city like Mediolanum, until the very first years of the 5th century AD one of
the ‚capitals‘ of the Empire (402 AD) and located in northern Italy, so still
reached by monetary flows from central Italy, the monetarization of society
experienced a greater and more profound persistence than in the areas of
the Rhine limes.
The view from Rome: the social aspects and value of copper alloy recycling
Giulia Bison (Leicester)
In spite of the very special status it still enjoyed in Late Antiquity - no longer
the capital of the empire, but still a revered imperial seat and privileged
residence of the senatorial aristocracy - in this period the city of Rome went
through a series of transformations that had more than something in common with rather distant territories. In particular, the perception of public
spaces and the values associated with them changed radically, as did that
of the materials that formed part of these complexes; besides, even certain
objects of everyday life were now seen in a different light.
12
The practice of recycling played a fundamental role in this new conception
and is the instrument through which it was expressed at various levels.
Recent archaeological investigations have brought to light phenomena
inherent, in particular, to the reuse and recycling of small coins in metalworking structures, which not only make us think about the different value
that was attributed to them, but also raise a series of questions concerning
the way in which they were collected, as part of an operational chain that
involved various agents, and must certainly have had not only economic,
but also social repercussions.
Hence, what can we speculate about the people involved in these mechanisms, and the value they must have attached to this practice? How could
these coins have been procured, and were they all out of circulation at the
time of their remelting? Which hypotheses can be made, on the basis of
what we know about the collection and recycling systems of other kinds of
materials (for example, glass)?
On a different side of the question, the discovery of a dump of copper-alloy
objects in one of the city‘s oldest sacred sites, located in the heart of the
city centre - the Sanctuary of the Curiae Veteres, at the foot of the Palatine Hill - raises some similar questions: were these objects discarded and
stored, waiting to be re-melted, or were they the products of a workshop? If
so, what kind of workshop? And above all, what value - economic, but not
only - was attached to these artefacts, and why did they end up as waste
products along with other materials?
The two case studies that will be presented raise multiple questions about the
dynamics of the use, reuse and recycling of copper alloy items, and whether
these practices should simply be dismissed as signs of a general decadence, or
whether they should be interpreted as evidence of deeper and wider transformations that still need to be questioned.
13
Römische Bronzemünzen der zweiten Hälfte des 4. Jhs. im Fundmünzaufkommen von Ostdeutschland – Kein Geld oder Kleingeld?
Holger Komnick (Bonn)
Mit dem 1996 in Kamenz-Jesau in Sachsen gefundenen Münzschatz, der
478 Münzen umfasst, lässt sich der größte mit Bronzemünzen des 4. Jhs.
gebildete Münzschatz benennen, der im Osten Deutschlands gefunden
wurde. Er setzt sich aus 475 Bronzemünzen des 4. Jhs. sowie aus drei
Silbermünzen; die zu Beginn des dritten Drittel des 3. Jhs. einzuordnen sind,
zusammen. Unter den Bronzemünzen befinden sich dabei 244 Exemplare,
die in die zweite Hälfte des 4. Jhs. datieren, wobei die jüngsten aus der Zeit
der valentinianischen Dynastie stammen. Ebenso lassen sich unter den
Einzelfunden in Sachsen, denen des sich nördlich anschließenden Bundeslands Brandenburg sowie des Stadtstaats Berlin spätantike römische Bronzemünzen dieser Zeit fassen. Um etwaige Hinweise auf die Funktion dieser
Münzen erhalten zu können, ist zunächst einmal die Zusammenschau der
Münzen sowie der überlieferten Befunde erforderlich, aus denen die in der
zweiten Hälfte des 4. Jhs. n. Chr. geprägten Stücke stammen. Ebenso ist
auf sekundäre Veränderungen an den Münzen zu achten, die Hinweise auf
ihren Gebrauch geben können.
Roman bronzes and East-Central Barbaricum
Aleksander Bursche/Kirill Myzgin/Anna Zapolska (Warsaw)
In the Germanic areas of East-Central Barbaricum, bronze, along with precious metals, was imported in the form of wares, primarily from the Roman
Empire. The use of bronze Roman coins to be melted down to produce local
items is evidenced i.e., by the deposit of a goldsmith found in Frombork and
by finds of fragments of deliberately cut specimens recovered from settlements. Their relatively modest number is a result of the poor state of settlement research on the Continent and the insufficient flow of information in
this regard from the prospecting community (i.e. amateur users of metal
detectors). There is no evidence to indicate the use of cut bronze coins as a
14
measure of value or means of exchange.
Apart from coins, another source of bronze in the Barbaricum areas in
question was imports, especially bronze vessels, often found in fragments.
Finally, as indicated by the content of pouches from sacrificial deposits,
bronze scrap was an important element. The common practice was to use
worn or damaged objects made of this alloy, possibly coming from spoils
of war and robbed graves. During the Migration Period, when trade routes
collapsed, grave robbing for raw material became a massive phenomenon.
This is evidenced by the hoard of Łubiana, in Pomerania and traces of plundering of the graves of the Roman Period cemeteries.
The tradition of bronze use ceased in the majority of the discussed areas in the
7th century with the arrival of the Slavs.
The finds of bronze coins, their usage, and function in the West Balts’
societies
Anna Zapolska (Warsaw)
The West Balts societies, occupying the area of amber-reach, South-Eastern
Baltic coast, are known for accepting of Roman bronze coins in exchange
for amber. The bronzes, for the most part, sestertii made of orichalcum,
played a crucial role in their everyday existence. Bronzes were treated in
various ways by the West Balts – some of them were put in the graves probably as an obolus of the dead, some coins were adapted for suspension
and a great deal of them were gathered in the form of bigger and smaller
hoards. There is a common consensus, though, that most of them were
treated as a source of precious metal, and were melted down and reused
to make jewelry adjusted to the local taste and other parts of the dress. In
my paper, I will present an overview of the functions of the Roman coins in
the West Balts’ societies, which varied slightly from culture to culture and
address the problem of the social structure of these societies, which can
be established based on the finds of Roman bronze coins and other bronze
objects.
15
Chemical eddies. Tracking metal histories and connections in the mid to
late 1st Millennium AD. REMADE (Roman and Early Medieval Alloys Defined)
Peter Bray (Reading)
The chemical analysis of copper-alloy reveals the last composition of that
material. Through combining large published analytical projects and targeted new work, we can begin to see deeper patterns that carry over from
earlier patterns of production, use, and reuse. This paper introduces the REMADE project (Roman and Early Medieval Alloys Defined), which is a major
new analytical project supported by UKRI (UK Research and Innovation)
and hosted by the University of Reading, which studies the copper-alloys of
the 1st Millennium AD across the UK. Alongside new chemical models and
interpretative techniques to explore metallic histories, it will also discuss
the importance of collaboration across all heritage disciplines. REMADE is
working with major national museums, large independent archaeological
units, smaller regional archives, trusts, and private collectors. Chemical
case studies can demonstrate the close links between different object
classes, for example coins, brooches, militaria and toilet sets. It also raises
important possibilities of shared knowledge across materials that are too
often studies separately today: glass, metals, and ceramics. Longer term,
through working with small find specialists, theorists, and geographers we
aim to support the core aims of this conference; using metal as a lens for
understanding identity, value and shifting connections across Europe.
Bronze … makes the world go round? Sozioökonomische Aspekte eines
Werk- und Wertstoffes
Thomas Schierl (Marburg)
Gerade das geographische Herz Deutschlands ist spätestens seit den
Arbeiten von H.J. Eggers bekannt für seine zahlreichen hochwertigen
provinzialrömischen Bronzefunde, die im 19. und 20. Jh. vor allem in den
kaiserzeitlichen Körpergräbern der einheimischen Elite zutage traten. Eine
16
seit dem systematischen Einsatz von Metalldetektoren stark ansteigende
Zahl an Metallfunden von Siedlungsplätzen bereichert das Formenspektrum an nachzuweisenden Bronzefunden entscheidend, und lässt uns die
ehemals vorhandene verhältnismäßig hohe Zahl solcher Objekte, aber
auch ihre Präsenz in zahlreichen Lebensbereichen antiker Realität deutlich vor Augen treten. Unter diesen finden sich regelmäßig, nicht seltenen
zahlreiche – teils verschmolzene, teils beschnittene – Metallfragmente,
die an eine Verwendung als Werkstoff für die Herstellung eigener Erzeugnisse denken lassen. Andererseits sind es vor allem ungewöhnliche, in
den entsprechenden Kontexten kaum zu deutende Buntmetallobjekte aus
germanischen Beisetzungen, die auf einen symbolischen Charakter solcher
Gegenstände verweisen. Zwar kann eine temporäre oder regional begrenzte Münzwirtschaft basierend auf römischen Münzen wenigstens im 3. Jh.
nicht ausgeschlossen werden, doch lassen einige Indizien ebenso an die
Verwendung von Münzersatz denken. Alle Hinweise lassen an eine vielschichtige Bedeutung bzw. an unterschiedliche kontextgebunden betonte
Funktionen auch des Wertstoffes Bronze denken.
Zweifelsohne bietet sich Mitteldeutschland als Ausgangspunkt für eine
eingehende Betrachtung von Bronze und Messing als Werk- und Wertstoff
an, gelangten doch im 1. und vor allem im 3. Jh. große Mengen an Buntmetallobjekten – wohl vor allem im Kontext der Limesstürme – aus dem
Römischen Reich in diese zentrale Landschaft des germanischen Siedlungsraumes und lassen sich dort in unterschiedlichsten Zusammenhängen nachweisen. Vor allem diese bieten die Möglichkeit das Verhältnis der
einheimischen Gruppen zum Metall am „Vorabend“ der Spätantike genauer
ins Auge zu fassen. Zwar scheinen die wenigen Metallfunde des 4./5.
Jahrhunderts allgemein auch auf einen nachlassenden Zustrom aus dem
Imperium denken, doch belegen Keramikfunde eine fortgesetzte Anbindung
wenigstens der westlichen Gebiete an den imperialen Wirtschaftsraum an
Rhein und Donau, so dass gerade in dieser Periode auch ein ähnlicher Umgang mit Metall als monetäre Einheit denkbar erscheint.
Anhand von ausgewählten mitteldeutscher Fundkomplexen werden zu-
17
nächst wichtige Aspekt eines gemeinschaftlichen und individuellen Umganges mit Bronze und Messing im 1.–3. Jh. beispielhaft beleuchtet. Erst in
einer Gegenüberstellung mit Fundkomplexen aus anderen gut erforschten
Regionen, wie bspw. Westfalen und Mainfranken, gelingt es, die schütteren
zentraldeutschen Zeugnisse des 4. und 5. Jh. für eine wertebasierte Metallwirtschaft sozioökonomisch und historisch einordnen zu können.
18
Notes
19
20
21