skip to main content
10.1145/3356422.3356430acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VIStory: Interactive Storyboard for Exploring Visual Information in Scientific Publications

Published: 20 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Many visual analytics have been developed for examining scientific publications comprising wealthy data such as authors and citations. The studies provide unprecedented insights on a variety of applications, e.g., literature review and collaboration analysis. However, visual information (i.e., figures) that are widely employed for storytelling and methods description are often neglected. We present VIStory, an interactive storyboard for exploring visual information in scientific publications. We harvest the data using an automatic figure extraction method, resulting in a large corpora of figures. Each figure contains various attributes such as dominant color and width/height ratio, together with faceted metadata of the publication including venues, authors, and keywords. To depict these information, we develop an intuitive interface consisting of three components: 1) Faceted View enables efficient query by publication metadata, benefiting from a nested table structure, 2) Storyboard View arranges paper rings -- a well-designed glyph for depicting figure attributes, in a themeriver layout to reveal temporal trends, and 3) Endgame View presents a highlighted figure together with the publication metadata. The system is especially useful for scientific publications containing substantial visual information, such as the visualization publications. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using two case studies conducted on past ten-year IEEE VIS publications in 2009 - 2018.

References

[1]
M. A. Borkin, Z. Bylinskii, N. W. Kim, C. M. Bainbridge, C. S. Yeh, D. Borkin, H. Pfister, and A. Oliva. 2016. Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 519--528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732
[2]
M. A. Borkin, A. A. Vo, Z. Bylinskii, P. Isola, S. Sunkavalli, A. Oliva, and H. Pfister. 2013. What Makes a Visualization Memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2306--2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG. 2013.234
[3]
M. Chen, D. Ebert, H. Hagen, R. S. Laramee, R. van Liere, K. L. Ma, W. Ribarsky, G. Scheuermann, and D. Silver. 2009. Data, Information, and Knowledge in Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 29, 1 (2009), 12--19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2009.6
[4]
J.K. Chou and C. K. Yang. 2011. PaperVis: Literature Review Made Easy. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 3 (2011), 721-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01921.x
[5]
P. van der Corput and J. J. van Wijk. 2016. ICLIC: Interactive categorization of large image collections. In Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 152--159. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465263
[6]
Danilo M. Eler, Marcel Y. Nakazaki, Fernando V. Paulovich, Davi P. Santos, Gabriel F. Andery, Maria Cristina F. Oliveira, João Batista Neto, and Rosane Minghim. 2009. Visual analysis of image collections. The Visual Computer 25, 10 (2009), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-009-0368-7
[7]
P. Federico, F. Heimerl, S. Koch, and S. Miksch. 2017. A Survey on Visual Approaches for Analyzing Scientific Literature and Patents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 9 (2017), 2179--2198. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2610422
[8]
Susan Havre, Beth Hetzler, and Lucy Nowell. 2000. ThemeRiver: Visualizing theme changes over time. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. 115--123. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2000.885098
[9]
I. T. Hawryszkiewycz. 1984. Database analysis and design. Science Research Associates.
[10]
Paul Heckbert. 1982. Color Image Quantization for Frame Buffer Display. SIG GRAPH Comput. Graph. 16, 3 (1982), 297--307. https://doi.org/10.1145/965145.801294
[11]
F. Heimerl, Q. Han, S. Koch, and T. Ertl. 2016. CiteRivers: Visual Analytics of Citation Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 190--199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467621
[12]
P. Isenberg, F. Heimerl, S. Koch, T. Isenberg, P. Xu, C. D. Stolper, M. Sedlmair, J. Chen, T. Möller, and J. Stasko. 2017. Vispubdata.org: A Metadata Collection About IEEE Visualization (VIS) Publications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 9 (2017), 2199--2206. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2615308
[13]
P. Isenberg, T. Isenberg, M. Sedlmair, J. Chen, and T. Möller. 2017. Visualization as Seen through its Research Paper Keywords. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 771--780. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598827
[14]
H. Jänicke and M. Chen. 2010. A Salience-based Quality Metric for Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 3 (2010), 1183-1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01667.x
[15]
P. Joia, D. Coimbra, J. A. Cuminato, F. V. Paulovich, and L. G. Nonato. 2011. Local Affine Multidimensional Projection. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2563--2571. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.220
[16]
Daniel Keim, Gennady Andrienko, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Carsten Görg, Jörn Kohlhammer, and Guy Melançon. 2008. Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4950. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 154--175.
[17]
K. Kucher and A. Kerren. 2015. Text visualization techniques: Taxonomy, visual survey, and community insights. In Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 117--121. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2015.7156366
[18]
S. Latif and F. Beck. 2018. VIS Author Profiles: Interactive Descriptions of Publication Records Combining Text and Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865022
[19]
Y. Liang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, S. Hu, and S. Liu. 2018. PhotoRecomposer: Interactive Photo Recomposition by Cropping. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 10 (2018), 2728--2742. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2764895
[20]
J. Marino and A. Kaufman. 2016. Planar Visualization of Treelike Structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 906--915. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467413
[21]
L. E. Matzen, M. J. Haass, K. M. Divis, Z. Wang, and A. T. Wilson. 2018. Data Visualization Saliency Model: A Tool for Evaluating Abstract Data Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 563--573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743939
[22]
William Plant and Gerald Schaefer. 2011. Visualisation and Browsing of Image Databases. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19551-8_1
[23]
J. F. Rodrigues, A. J. M. Traina, M. C. F. de Oliveira, and C. Traina. 2006. Reviewing Data Visualization: an Analytical Taxonomical Study. In Proceedings of Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation. 713--720. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2006.94
[24]
H.J. Schulz. 2011. Treevis.net: A Tree Visualization Reference. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 31, 6 (2011), 11--15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2011.103
[25]
Qiaomu Shen, Wei Zeng, Yu Ye, Stefan Mueller Arisona, Simon Schubiger, Remo Burkhard, and Huamin Qu. 2018. StreetVizor: Visual Exploration of Human-Scale Urban Forms Based on Street Views. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 1004 - 1013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744159
[26]
B Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. IEEE, 336 - 343. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307
[27]
H. Strobelt, D. Oelke, C. Rohrdantz, A. Stoffel, D. A. Keim, and O. Deussen. 2009. Document Cards: A Top Trumps Visualization for Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1145--1152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.139
[28]
L. Tan, Y. Song, S. Liu, and L. Xie. 2012. ImageHive: Interactive Content-Aware Image Summarization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 32, 1 (2012), 46--55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2011.89
[29]
Paul van der Corput and Jarke J. van Wijk. 2017. Comparing Personal Image Collections with PICTuReVis. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 295--304. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13188
[30]
Yanhong Wu, Naveen Pitipornvivat, Jian Zhao, Sixiao Yang, Guowei Huang, and Huamin Qu. 2015. egoSlider: Visual Analysis of Egocentric Network Evolution. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2015), 260 - 269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2468151
[31]
X. Xie, X. Cai, J. Zhou, N. Cao, and Y. Wu. 2018. A Semantic-based Method for Visualizing Large Image Collections. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2835485
[32]
J. Yang, J. Fan, D. Hubball, Y. Gao, H. Luo, W. Ribarsky, and M. Ward. 2006. Semantic Image Browser: Bridging Information Visualization with Automated Intelligent Image Analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology. 191--198. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2006.261425
[33]
Ka-Ping Yee, Kirsten Swearingen, Kevin Li, and Marti Hearst. 2003. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 642681, 401--408. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642681

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. VIStory: Interactive Storyboard for Exploring Visual Information in Scientific Publications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    VINCI '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
    September 2019
    201 pages
    ISBN:9781450376266
    DOI:10.1145/3356422
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • East China Normal University

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 September 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. document visualization
    2. faceted metadata
    3. image browser
    4. visualization survey

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    VINCI'2019

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 193 submissions, 37%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media