research-article

Introducing Gamettes: A Playful Approach for Capturing Decision-Making for Informing Behavioral Models

Authors:

Omid Mohaddesi,

Rozhin Doroudi,

Jacqueline Griffin,

Stacy Marsella,

Casper HarteveldAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376571

Published: 23 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Agent-based simulations are widely used for modeling human behavior in various contexts. However, such simulations may oversimplify human decision-making. We propose the use of Gamettes to extract rich data on human decision-making and help in improving the human behavioral aspects of models underlying agent-based simulations. We show how Gamettes are designed and provide empirical validation for using Gamettes in an experimental supply chain setting to study human decision-making. Our results show that Gamettes are successful in capturing the expected behaviors and patterns in supply chain decisions, and, thus, we find evidence for the capability of Gamettes to inform behavioral models.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (paper444pv.mp4)

Preview video

Download
3.37 MB

References

[1]

Nilesh Anand, David Meijer, JHR Van Duin, Lóránt Tavasszy, and Sebastiaan Meijer. 2016. Validation of an agent based model using a participatory simulation gaming approach: the case of city logistics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 71 (2016), 489--499.

[2]

Nasrin Asgari, Ehsan Nikbakhsh, Alex Hill, and Reza Zanjirani Farahani. 2016. Supply chain management 1982--2015: a review. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 27, 3 (2016), 353--379.

[3]

William Sims Bainbridge. 2007. The scientifc research potential of virtual worlds. science 317, 5837 (2007), 472--476.

[4]

Olivier Barreteau, Martine Antona, Patrick D'Aquino, Sigrid Aubert, Stanislas Boissau, François Bousquet, William's Daré, Michel Etienne, Christophe Le Page, Raphaël Mathevet, and others. 2003. Our companion modelling approach. (2003).

[5]

Olivier Barreteau, Pieter Bots, Katherine Daniell, Michel Etienne, Pascal Perez, Cécile Barnaud, Didier Bazile, Nicolas Becu, Jean-Christophe Castella, William's Daré, and others. 2017. Participatory approaches. In Simulating Social Complexity. Springer, 253--292.

[6]

Olivier Barreteau, François Bousquet, Michel Étienne, Véronique Souchère, and Patrick d'Aquino. 2014. Companion modelling: a method of adaptive and participatory research. In Companion Modelling. Springer, 13--40.

[7]

Jim Blascovich and Jeremy Bailenson. 2011. Infnite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution. William Morrow & Co.

[8]

Eric Bonabeau. 2002. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 99, suppl 3 (2002), 7280--7287.

[9]

Sally Brailsford, Tillal Eldabi, Martin Kunc, Navonil Mustafee, and Andres F Osorio. 2018. Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review. European Journal of Operational Research (2018).

[10]

Stefano Cacciaguerra and Matteo Rofflli. 2005. Agent-based participatory simulation activities for the emergence of complex social behaviours. Proceedings of Social Inspired Computing'05 (2005).

[11]

Eduardo Calvillo-Gámez, Jeremy Gow, and Paul Cairns. 2011. Introduction to special issue: Video games as research instruments. (2011).

[12]

PC Campo, François Bousquet, and TR Villanueva. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders within a development project. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 11 (2010), 1302--1321.

Digital Library

[13]

David E Cantor and John R Macdonald. 2009. Decision-making in the supply chain: examining problem solving approaches and information availability. Journal of Operations Management 27, 3 (2009), 220--232.

Digital Library

[14]

Seth Cooper, Firas Khatib, Adrien Treuille, Janos Barbero, Jeehyung Lee, Michael Beenen, Andrew Leaver-Fay, David Baker, Zoran Popovi´ c, and others. 2010. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature 466, 7307 (2010), 756.

[15]

Rachel Croson and Karen Donohue. 2006. Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management science 52, 3 (2006), 323--336.

[16]

Rachel Croson, Karen Donohue, Elena Katok, and John Sterman. 2014. Order stability in supply chains: Coordination risk and the role of coordination stock. Production and Operations Management 23, 2 (2014), 176--196.

[17]

Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness: defning gamifcation. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments. ACM, 9--15.

Digital Library

[18]

Ignacio X Domínguez, Rogelio E Cardona-Rivera, James K Vance, and David L Roberts. 2016. The mimesis effect: The effect of roles on player choice in interactive narrative role-playing games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3438--3449.

Digital Library

[19]

Rozhin Doroudi, Rana Azghandi, Zlatan Feric, Omid Mohaddesi, Yifan Sun, Jacqueline Griffn, Ozlem Ergun, David Kaeli, Pedro Sequeira, Stacy Marsella, and others. 2018. An integrated simulation framework for examining resiliency in pharmaceutical supply chains considering human behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press, 88--99.

Digital Library

[20]

Magy Seif El-Nasr, Anders Drachen, and Alessandro Canossa. 2016. Game analytics. Springer.

[21]

Michel Étienne. 2013. Companion modelling: a participatory approach to support sustainable development. Springer Science & Business Media.

[22]

Chiara Franzoni and Henry Sauermann. 2014. Crowd science: The organization of scientifc research in open collaborative projects. Research policy 43, 1 (2014), 1--20.

[23]

Paul Guyot and Shinichi Honiden. 2006. Agent-based participatory simulations: Merging multi-agent systems and role-playing games. Journal of Artifcial Societies and Social Simulation 9, 4 (2006).

[24]

Casper Harteveld, Nolan Manning, Farah Abu-Arja, Rick Menasce, Dean Thurston, Gillian Smith, and Steven C Sutherland. 2017. Design of playful authoring tools for social and behavioral science. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion. ACM, 157--160.

Digital Library

[25]

Casper Harteveld, Sam Snodgrass, Omid Mohaddesi, Jack Hart, Tyler Corwin, and Guillermo Romera Rodriguez. 2018. The Development of a Methodology for Gamifying Surveys. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 461--467.

Digital Library

[26]

Casper Harteveld and Steven Sutherland. 2014. Finding the Game in Decision--Making: A Preliminary Investigation. The Shift from Teaching to Learning: Individual, Collective and Organizational Learning Through Gaming Simulation (2014), 199.

[27]

Casper Harteveld and Steven C Sutherland. 2017. Personalized gaming for motivating social and behavioral science participation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Workshop on Theory-Informed User Modeling for Tailoring and Personalizing Interfaces. ACM, 31--38.

Digital Library

[28]

Kristy L Hawley, Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, Mark S Zocchi, Erin R Fox, and Jesse M Pines. 2016. Longitudinal trends in US drug shortages for medications used in emergency departments (2001--2014). Academic Emergency Medicine 23, 1 (2016), 63--69.

[29]

Akhmad Hidayatno, Rachel Giovani Hasibuan, Girindra Chaska Wardana Nimpuno, Arry Rahmawan Destyanto, and others. 2019. Designing a Serious Simulation Game as a Learning Media of Sustainable Supply Chain Management for Biofuel Production. Energy Procedia 156 (2019), 43--47.

[30]

Wander Jager and Gerben van der Vegt. 2015. Management of Complex Systems: Toward Agent-Based Gaming for Policy. In Policy Practice and Digital Science. Springer, 291--303.

[31]

Robert E Kass and Adrian E Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. Journal of the american statistical association 90, 430 (1995), 773--795.

[32]

Jack PC Kleijnen. 2005. Supply chain simulation tools and techniques: a survey. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling 1, 1--2 (2005), 82--89.

[33]

Christophe Le Page and Arthur Perrotton. 2017. KILT: a modelling approach based on participatory agent-based simulation of stylized socio-ecosystems to stimulate social learning with local stakeholders. In International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. Springer, 156--169.

[34]

Michela Le Pira, Edoardo Marcucci, and Valerio Gatta. 2017. Role-playing games as a mean to validate agent-based models: An application to stakeholder-driven urban freight transport policy-making. Transportation Research Procedia 27 (2017), 404--411.

[35]

Hau L Lee, Venkata Padmanabhan, and Seungjin Whang. 1997. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan management review 38 (1997), 93--102.

[36]

Charles M Macal and Michael J North. 2005. Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005. IEEE, 14--pp.

[37]

David Massey, Ola Ahlqvist, Kiril Vatev, and Johnathan Rush. 2019. A Massively Multi-user Online Game Framework for Agent-Based Spatial Simulation. In CyberGIS for Geospatial Discovery and Innovation. Springer, 213--224.

[38]

Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V Tammen. 1989. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confrmatory factor analysis. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 60, 1 (1989), 48--58.

[39]

Sebastiaan Meijer. 2009. The organisation of transactions: Studying supply networks using gaming simulation. Vol. 6. Wageningen Academic Pub.

[40]

Fabien Michel, Jacques Ferber, and Alexis Drogoul. 2018. Multi-Agent Systems and Simulation: A Survey from the Agent Commu-nity's Perspective. In Multi-Agent Systems. CRC Press, 17--66.

[41]

Arunachalam Narayanan and Brent B Moritz. 2015. Decision making and cognition in multi-echelon supply chains: an experimental study. Production and Operations Management 24, 8 (2015), 1216--1234.

[42]

Joerg Nienhaus, Arne Ziegenbein, and Paul Schönsleben. 2006. How human behaviour amplifes the bullwhip effect. A study based on the beer distribution game online. Production Planning & Control 17, 6 (2006), 547--557.

[43]

Afshin Oroojlooyjadid, MohammadReza Nazari, Lawrence Snyder, and Martin Takác. 2017. A Deep Q-Network for the Beer Game: A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm to Solve Inventory Optimization Problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.05924 (2017).

[44]

Nathan Partlan, Elin Carstensdottir, Sam Snodgrass, Erica Kleinman, Gillian Smith, Casper Harteveld, and Magy Seif El-Nasr. 2018. Exploratory Automated Analysis of Structural Features of Interactive Narrative. In Fourteenth Artifcial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference.

[45]

Vincent Peters, Geert Vissers, and Gerton Heijne. 1998. The validity of games. Simulation & Gaming 29, 1 (1998), 20--30.

[46]

David V Pynadath and Stacy C Marsella. 2005. PsychSim: Modeling theory of mind with decision-theoretic agents. In IJCAI, Vol. 5. 1181--1186.

[47]

John R Raser. 1969. Simulation and society: An exploration of scientifc gaming. (1969).

[48]

Christopher A Rates, Bridget K Mulvey, and David F Feldon. 2016. Promoting conceptual change for complex systems understanding: Outcomes of an agent-based participatory simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 4 (2016), 610--627.

[49]

Stéphane Ross, Joelle Pineau, Sébastien Paquet, and Brahim Chaib-Draa. 2008. Online planning algorithms for POMDPs. Journal of Artifcial Intelligence Research 32 (2008), 663--704.

Digital Library

[50]

Richard M Ryan. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of personality and social psychology 43, 3 (1982), 450.

[51]

Sidney Siegel. 1956. Nonparametric methods for the behavioral sciences. New York (1956).

[52]

Christophe Simon and M Etienne. 2010. A companion modelling approach applied to forest management planning. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 11 (2010), 1371--1384.

Digital Library

[53]

Lawrence V Snyder and Zuo-Jun Max Shen. 2011. Fundamentals of supply chain theory. Wiley Online Library.

[54]

Véronique Souchère, Laurent Millair, Javier Echeverria, François Bousquet, Christophe Le Page, and Michel Etienne. 2010. Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 11 (2010), 1359--1370.

Digital Library

[55]

John D Sterman. 1989. Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management science 35, 3 (1989), 321--339.

[56]

John D Sterman. 2006. Learning from evidence in a complex world. American journal of public health 96, 3 (2006), 505--514.

[57]

John D Sterman and Gokhan Dogan. 2015. "I'm not hoarding, I'm just stocking up before the hoarders get here.": Behavioral causes of phantom ordering in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 39 (2015), 6--22.

Digital Library

[58]

K Thomas. 2017. A vital drug runs low, though its base ingredient is in many kitchens. New York Times (2017).

[59]

Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science 185, 4157 (1974), 1124--1131.

[60]

Sean D Vermillion, Richard J Malak, Rachel Smallman, Brittney Becker, Michale Sferra, and Sherecce Fields. 2017. An investigation on using serious gaming to study human decision-making in engineering contexts. Design Science 3 (2017).

[61]

Alexey Voinov and Francois Bousquet. 2010. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 11 (2010), 1268--1281.

Digital Library

[62]

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers. 2007. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values. Psychonomic bulletin & review 14, 5 (2007), 779--804.

[63]

Günter Wallner. 2019. Data Analytics Applications in Gaming and Entertainment. CRC Press.

[64]

Kobchai Worrapimphong, Nantana Gajaseni, Christophe Le Page, and François Bousquet. 2010. A companion modeling approach applied to fshery management. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 11 (2010), 1334--1344.

Digital Library

Cited By

Harteveld CJavvaji NMohaddesi OKleinman EDaniels KJackson DTroiano G(2024)RePresent: Enabling Access to Justice for Pro Se Litigants via Co-Authored Serious GamesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661632(3225-3242)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661632
Yongsatianchot NChicoine NGriffin JErgun OMarsella SAgmon NAn BRicci AYeoh W(2023)Agent-Based Modeling of Human Decision-makers Under Uncertain Information During Supply Chain ShortagesProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598855(1886-1894)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3598855
Mohaddesi OChicoine NGong MErgun OGriffin JKaeli DMarsella SHarteveld C(2023)Thought Bubbles: A Proxy into Players’ Mental Model DevelopmentProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581570(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581570
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Introducing Gamettes: A Playful Approach for Capturing Decision-Making for Informing Behavioral Models
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. HCI design and evaluation methods
      1. User studies

Recommendations

Learning from Gamettes: Imitating Human Behavior in Supply Chain Decisions
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Gamettes are playful tools for agent-based participatory simulation and have shown to be valid for collecting rich behavioral data from human decision-makers. However, there is still a question that how such data can be used to create or update agent-...
Human factors in supply chain management
HCI'13: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information: information and interaction for learning, culture, collaboration and business - Volume Part III

Human behavior in supply chains is insufficiently explored. Wrong decisions by decision makers leads to insufficient behavior and lower performance not only for the decision maker, but also for other stakeholders along the supply chain. In order to ...
Partners Portfolio Decision-Making Model Based on the Fuzzy Evaluation and Polychromatic Sets
ISISE '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Symposium on Information Science and Engineering

In order to design an enterprise's own supply chain, the portfolio decision-making model for supply chain partners is proposed based on polychromatic sets and fuzzy evaluation. First, the evaluation value of the supply chain members is given, Then, to ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

10688 pages

ISBN:9781450367080

DOI:10.1145/3313831

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Honorable Mention

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NSF

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

12
Total Citations
View Citations
819
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)46
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Harteveld CJavvaji NMohaddesi OKleinman EDaniels KJackson DTroiano G(2024)RePresent: Enabling Access to Justice for Pro Se Litigants via Co-Authored Serious GamesProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661632(3225-3242)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661632
Yongsatianchot NChicoine NGriffin JErgun OMarsella SAgmon NAn BRicci AYeoh W(2023)Agent-Based Modeling of Human Decision-makers Under Uncertain Information During Supply Chain ShortagesProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598855(1886-1894)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3545946.3598855
Mohaddesi OChicoine NGong MErgun OGriffin JKaeli DMarsella SHarteveld C(2023)Thought Bubbles: A Proxy into Players’ Mental Model DevelopmentProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581570(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581570
Caldwell SSweetser PO’Donnell NKnight MAitchison MGedeon TJohnson DBrereton MGallagher MConroy D(2022)An Agile New Research Framework for Hybrid Human-AI Teaming: Trust, Transparency, and TransferabilityACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/351425712:3(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3514257
Tochilnikova EPatnaik AAlsebayel GNarayan UCoeytaux ARamdin VKim MHarteveld C(2022)“Guilty of Talking Too Much”: How Psychotherapists Gamify TherapyProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517437(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3517437
Mohaddesi OGriffin JErgun OKaeli DMarsella SHarteveld C(2022)To Trust or to Stockpile: Modeling Human-Simulation Interaction in Supply Chain ShortagesProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502089(1-18)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491102.3502089
Ulusan ANarayan USnodgrass SErgun OHarteveld C(2022)“Rather Solve the Problem from Scratch”: Gamesploring Human-Machine Collaboration for Optimizing the Debris Collection ProblemProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3490099.3511163(604-619)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3490099.3511163
Tariq ZMannino MLe Xuan Anh MBagge WAbouzied AShasha D(2021)Planning Epidemic Interventions with EpiPolicyThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474794(894-909)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472749.3474794
Troiano GWood MSonbudak MPadte RHarteveld C(2021)“Are We Now Post-COVID?”: Exploring Post-COVID Futures Through a Gamified Story Completion MethodProceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3461778.3462069(48-63)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3461778.3462069
Troiano GSchouten DCassidy MTucker-Raymond EPuttick GHarteveld CMirza-Babaei PMcArthur VVanden Abeele VBirk M(2020)Ice Paddles, CO2 Invaders, and Exploding Planets: How Young Students Transform Climate Science Into Serious GamesProceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play10.1145/3410404.3414256(534-548)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3410404.3414256
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents