skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300865acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Electronic Health Records Are More Than a Work Tool: Conflicting Needs of Direct and Indirect Stakeholders

Published: 02 May 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The involvement of stakeholders is crucial when designing IT in highly complex application domains, such as healthcare. Stakeholder relationships are complex and can include strongly conflicting needs and value tensions. In this case study, we investigate the different perspectives of patients and physicians related to Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records (PAEHR) in Sweden. Generally, the introduction of this service has been heavily criticised by healthcare professionals, but welcomed by patients. The paper presents an innovative study design where themes from interviews with physicians are used as a lens to analyse survey data from patients. The findings highlight the necessity to understand stakeholders' perspectives about other stakeholder groups by contrasting assumptions and expectations of physicians (indirect stakeholders) with experience of use by patients (direct stakeholders), and discusses practical challenges when designing large-scale health information systems.

References

[1]
Phil Adams, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Michael Elfenbein, Elaine Wethington, and Geri Gay. 2017. Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Conditions with Tailored Momentary Self-Assessments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1065--1077.
[2]
Ture Ålander and Isabella Scandurra. 2015. Experiences of Healthcare Professionals to the Introduction in Sweden of a Public eHealth Service: Patients' Online Access to their Electronic Health Records. In MedInfo. 153--157.
[3]
Tariq Andersen, Pernille Bjørn, Finn Kensing, and Jonas Moll. 2011. Designing for collaborative interpretation in telemonitoring: Reintroducing patients as diagnostic agents. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80, 8 (Aug. 2011), e112--e126.
[4]
Tariq Osman Andersen, Jørgen Peter Bansler, Finn Kensing, Jonas Moll, Troels Mønsted, Karen Dam Nielsen, Olav Wendelboe Nielsen, Helen Høgh Petersen, and Jesper Hastrup Svendsen. 2018. Aligning Concerns in Telecare: Three Concepts to Guide the Design of PatientCentred E-Health. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 27, 3--6 (May 2018), 1181--1214.
[5]
Tariq Osman Andersen, Anne Marie Kanstrup, and Signe Louise Yndigegn. 2018. Three living labs in Denmark: Challenges with co-design and implementation of health IT. In Proceedings from The 16th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics 2018, Aalborg, Denmark August 28--29, 2018. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköpings universitet, 1--6.
[6]
Molly Baldry, Carol Cheal, Brian Fisher, Myra Gillett, and Val Huet. 1986. Giving patients their own records in general practice: experience of patients and staff. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.) 292, 6520 (March 1986), 596--598.
[7]
Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard, Thomas Riisgaard Hansen, and Morten Kyng. 2008. Healthcare in Everyday Life: Designing Healthcare Services for Daily Life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1807--1816.
[8]
Andrew B L Berry, Catherine Lim, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, Evette Ludman, Edward H Wagner, and James D Ralston. 2017. "It's good to know you're not a stranger every time" - Communication about Values Between Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions and Healthcare Providers. PACMHCI (2017).
[9]
Keld Bødker, Finn Kensing, and Jesper Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. MIT press.
[10]
Susanne Bødker, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2017. Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 1--2 (Feb. 2017), 245--273.
[11]
Claus Bossen, Lotte Groth Jensen, and Flemming Witt Udsen. 2014. Boundary-object trimming: On the invisibility of medical secretaries' care of records in healthcare infrastructures. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 23, 1 (2014), 75--110.
[12]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage.
[13]
Kelly Caine and Rima Hanania. 2013. Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, 1 (Jan. 2013), 7--15.
[14]
Eefje Cuppen. 2012. Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods. Policy Sciences 45, 1 (01 Mar 2012), 23--46.
[15]
Alexei Czeskis, Ivayla Dermendjieva, Hussein Yapit, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Brian Gill, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2010. Parenting from the pocket: value tensions and technical directions for secure and private parent-teen mobile safety. ACM, New York, New York, USA.
[16]
Janet Davis and Lisa P. Nathan. 2015. Value Sensitive Design: Applications, Adaptations, and Critiques. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 11--40.
[17]
Raisa B. Deber. 1994. Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 151, 2 (July 1994), 171--176.
[18]
Tamara Denning, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Brian T Gill, Tadayoshi Kohno, and William H Maisel. 2010. Patients, pacemakers, and implantable defibrillators: human values and security for wireless implantable medical devices. In CHI '10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Request Permissions, New York, New York, USA, 917.
[19]
Tamara Denning, Daniel B Kramer, Batya Friedman, Matthew R Reynolds, Brian Gill, and Tadayoshi Kohno. 2014. CPS: beyond usability: applying value sensitive design based methods to investigate domain characteristics for security for implantable cardiac devices. ACM, New York, New York, USA.
[20]
Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir and Cecilia Lindholm. 2015. When patient empowerment encounters professional autonomy: The conflict and negotiation process of inscribing an eHealth service. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 19, 29 (2015), 27--48.
[21]
Gudbjörg Erlingsdottir, Cecilia Lindholm, and Ture Ålander. 2014. eHealth services, patient empowerment and professional accountability-An empirical study on the changing patient-doctor relationship in the digital world. In International EIASM Public Sector Conference. 1--21.
[22]
Tobias Esch, Roanne Mejilla, Melissa Anselmo, Beatrice Podtschaske, Tom Delbanco, and Jan Walker. 2016. Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods. BMJ open 6, 1 (2016), e010034.
[23]
Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2011. New challenges for health IT--Design fit for life. In Proceedings of the First European Conference on Design, Vol. 4. 121--135.
[24]
Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2013. A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4--6 (2013), 609--665.
[25]
Batya Friedman, David G Hendry, and Alan Borning. 2017. A Survey of Value Sensitive Design Methods. Foundations and Trends® in Human--Computer Interaction 11, 2 (2017), 63--125.
[26]
Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, Jr, and Alan Borning. 2006. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Human--Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, P Zhang and D Galletta (Eds.). ME Sharpe, New York, 348--372.
[27]
Trisha Greenhalgh, Susan Hinder, Katja Stramer, Tanja Bratan, and Jill Russell. 2010. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ 341 (2010).
[28]
Trisha Greenhalgh, Rob Procter, Joe Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, and Sara Shaw. 2012. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ Open 2, 4 (2012).
[29]
Christiane Grünloh and Åsa Cajander. 2017. Using Themes from Qualitative Interviews as Lens to Analyse Survey Data. In Mixing Quantitative with Qualitative Methods. Current Practices in designing experiments, gathering data and analysis with mixed methods reporting. Workshop at the 29th Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (OzCHI'17). https://methodshci.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/ gruenloh-et-al-using-themes-from-qual-interviews.pdf
[30]
Christiane Grünloh, Åsa Cajander, and Gunilla Myreteg. 2016. "The Record is Our Work Tool!" -- Physicians' Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden. J Med Internet Res 18, 6 (27 Jun 2016), e167.
[31]
Christiane Grünloh, Gunilla Myreteg, Åsa Cajander, and Hanife Rexhepi. 2018. "Why Do They Need to Check Me?" Patient Participation Through eHealth and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 20, 1 (15 Jan 2018), e11.
[32]
Jan Gulliksen, Bengt Göransson, Inger Boivie, Stefan Blomkvist, Jenny Persson, and Åsa Cajander. 2003. Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour and Information Technology 22, 6 (2003), 397--409.
[33]
Maria Hägglund and Isabella Scandurra. 2017. Patients' online access to Electronic Health Records--current status and experiences from the implementation in Sweden. Studies in health technology and informatics 245 (2017), 723--727.
[34]
Andrea Hassol, James M Walker, David Kidder, Kim Rokita, David Young, Steven Pierdon, Deborah Deitz, Sarah Kuck, and Eduardo Ortiz. 2004. Patient Experiences and Attitudes about Access to a Patient Electronic Health Care Record and Linked Web Messaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 11, 6 (Nov. 2004), 505-- 513.
[35]
Joris Hulstijn and Brigitte Burgemeestre. 2015. Design for the Values of Accountability and Transparency. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 303--333.
[36]
Isto Huvila, Åsa Cajander, Mats Daniels, and Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt. 2015. Patients' Perceptions of Their Medical Records from Different Subject Positions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 12 (2015), 2456--2470.
[37]
Isto Huvila, Mats Daniels, Åsa Cajander, and Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt. 2016. Patients reading their medical records: differences in experiences and attitudes between regular and inexperienced readers. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal 21, 1 (2016), n1.
[38]
Isto Huvila, Gunilla Myreteg, and Åsa Cajander. 2013. Empowerment or Anxiety? Research on Deployment of Online Medical E-health Services in Sweden. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 39, 5 (2013), 30--33.
[39]
Anne Marie Kanstrup, Jacob Madsen, Christian Nøhr, Ann Bygholm, and Pernille Bertelsen. 2017. Developments in Participatory Design of Health Information Technology -- A Review of PDC Publications from 1990--2016. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (2017), 1--13.
[40]
Jay Katz. 2002. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient (revised ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
[41]
Finn Kensing. 2017. Computer-supported patient involvement in heart rehabilitation. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on ComputerSupported Cooperative Work-Exploratory Papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
[42]
Finn Kensing, Stine Lomborg, and Camilla Moring. 2017. Evolving relations between the practices of nurses and patients and a new patient portal. In Infrahealth 2017-Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Infrastructure in Healthcare 2017.
[43]
Predrag Klasnja, Andrea Civan Hartzler, Kent T. Unruh, and Wanda Pratt. 2010. Blowing in the Wind: Unanchored Patient Information Work During Cancer Care. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 193--202.
[44]
Lisl Klein. 2014. What do we actually mean by 'sociotechnical'? On values, boundaries and the problems of language. Applied Ergonomics 45, 2 (March 2014), 137--142.
[45]
Catherine Lim, Andrew B.L. Berry, Tad Hirsch, Andrea L. Hartzler, Edward H. Wagner, Evette Ludman, and James D. Ralston. 2016. "It Just Seems Outside My Health": How Patients with Chronic Conditions Perceive Communication Boundaries with Providers. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1172--1184.
[46]
Yves Longtin, Hugo Sax, Lucian L Leape, Susan E Sheridan, Liam Donaldson, and Didier Pittet. 2010. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 85. Elsevier, 53--62.
[47]
Graham G Macdonald, Anne F Townsend, Paul Adam, Linda C Li, Sheila Kerr, Michael McDonald, and Catherine L Backman. 2018. eHealth Technologies, Multimorbidity, and the Office Visit: Qualitative Interview Study on the Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, 1 (Jan. 2018), e31.
[48]
Jessica K. Miller, Batya Friedman, Gavin Jancke, and Brian Gill. 2007. Value Tensions in Design: The Value Sensitive Design, Development, and Appropriation of a Corporation's Groupware System. In Proceedings of the 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 281--290.
[49]
Jonas Moll, Hanife Rexhepi, Åsa Cajander, Christiane Grünloh, Isto Huvila, Maria Hägglund, Gunilla Myreteg, Isabella Scandurra, and Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt. 2018. Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden. J Med Internet Res 20, 11 (01 Nov 2018), e278.
[50]
Christian Nøhr, Liisa Parv, Pille Kink, Elizabeth Cummings, Helen Almond, Jens Rahbek Nørgaard, and Paul Turner. 2017. Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia. BMC Health Services Research 17, 1 (Aug. 2017), e141.
[51]
Francisco Nunes and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2015. Self-Care Technologies and Collaboration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 12 (Nov. 2015), 869--881.
[52]
Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 22, 6 (Dec. 2015), 1--45.
[53]
Sun Young Park and Yunan Chen. 2017. Patient Strategies As Active Adaptation: Understanding Patient Behaviors During an Emergency Visit. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 880--892.
[54]
Lena Petersson and Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir. 2018. Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 2): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals. JMIR Ment Health 5, 2 (21 Jun 2018), e10521.
[55]
Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Charles Perin, Jo Vermeulen, Haley MacLeod, Diane Gromala, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2017. Differences that matter: in-clinic communication challenges. ACM, New York, New York, USA.
[56]
Hanife Rexhepi, Rose-Mharie Åhlfeldt, Åsa Cajander, and Isto Huvila. 2016. Cancer patients' attitudes and experiences of online access to their electronic medical records: A qualitative study. Health Informatics Journal (2016), 1--10.
[57]
Isabella Scandurra, Anette Jansson, Marie-Louise Forsberg-Fransson, and Ture Ålander. 2015. Is 'Patient's Online Access to Health Records' a Good Reform? -- Opinions from Swedish healthcare professionals differ. Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015), 964--968.
[58]
Isabella Scandurra, Anette Jansson, Marie-Louise Forsberg-Fransson, and Ture Ålander. 2017. Patient Accessible EHR is Controversial: Lack of Knowledge and Diverse Perceptions Among Professions. International Journal of Reliable and Quality E-Healthcare (IJRQEH) 6, 1 (2017), 29--45.
[59]
Peter H Schwartz, Kelly Caine, Sheri A Alpert, Eric M Meslin, Aaron E Carroll, and William M Tierney. 2014. Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: a Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care. Journal of General Internal Medicine 30, 1 (2014), 25--30.
[60]
Dean F Sittig, Adam Wright, Joan Ash, and Hardeep Singh. 2016. New Unintended Adverse Consequences of Electronic Health Records. Yearbook of medical informatics 25, 1 (2016), 7--12.
[61]
Dean F Sittig, Adam Wright, Enrico Coiera, Farah Magrabi, Raj Ratwani, David W. Bates, and Hardeep Singh. 2018. Current challenges in health information technology--related patient safety. Health Informatics Journal 10, 1 (Dec. 2018), 146045821881489.
[62]
Cristiano Storni and Liam J Bannon. 2012. Towards the design of truly patient-centred infrastructures: A socio-technical approach to self-care.
[63]
Kenton T Unruh and Wanda Pratt. 2008. The Invisible Work of Being a Patient and Implications for Health Care: {the doctor is} my business partner in the most important business in my life, staying alive.". Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2008, 1 (Nov. 2008), 40--50.
[64]
Kenton T. Unruh, Meredith Skeels, Andrea Civan-Hartzler, and Wanda Pratt. 2010. Transforming Clinic Environments into Information Workspaces for Patients. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--192.
[65]
Jan Walker, Suzanne G Leveille, Long Ngo, Elisabeth Vodicka, Jonathan D Darer, Shireesha Dhanireddy, Joann G Elmore, Henry J Feldman, Marc J Lichtenfeld, Natalia Oster, James D Ralston, Stephen E Ross, and Tom Delbanco. 2011. Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: Patients and Doctors Look Ahead: Patient and Physician Surveys. Annals of Internal Medicine 155, 12 (Dec. 2011), 811--819.
[66]
Jan Walker, Michael Meltsner, and Tom Delbanco. 2015. US experience with doctors and patients sharing clinical notes. BMJ 350 (2015). arXiv:http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.g7785.full.pdf
[67]
Lauren Wilcox, Dan Morris, Desney Tan, and Justin Gatewood. 2010. Designing Patient-centric Information Displays for Hospitals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2123--2132.
[68]
Susan S Woods, Erin Schwartz, Anais Tuepker, Nancy A Press, Kim M Nazi, Carolyn L Turvey, and W Paul Nichol. 2013. Patient Experiences With Full Electronic Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, 3 (2013), e65.
[69]
Daisy Yoo. 2018. Stakeholder Tokens: a constructive method for value sensitive design stakeholder analysis. Ethics and Information Technology 22, 4 (Aug. 2018), 1--5.
[70]
Daisy Yoo, Alina Huldtgren, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, David G Hendry, and Batya Friedman. 2013. A value sensitive action-reflection model: evolving a co-design space with stakeholder and designer prompts. In CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Request Permissions.
[71]
Donna M Zulman, Kim M Nazi, Carolyn L Turvey, Todd H Wagner, Susan S Woods, and Larry C An. 2011. Patient Interest in Sharing Personal Health Record Information: A Web-Based Survey. Annals of Internal Medicine 155, 12 (Dec. 2011), 805--810.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021DIGITAL HEALTH10.1177/2055207624122802410Online publication date: 28-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Providing Context to the "Unknown": Patient and Provider Reflections on Connecting Personal Tracking, Patient-Reported Insights, and EHR Data within a Post-COVID ClinicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869888:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Impact of healthcare education on preferences for electronic health records: Results from national survey of patient users in SwedenProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685412(1-10)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2019
9077 pages
ISBN:9781450359702
DOI:10.1145/3290605
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. direct and indirect stakeholders
  2. ehealth
  3. healthcare
  4. patient accessible electronic health records
  5. patient portal
  6. user experience
  7. value sensitive design
  8. value tensions

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 703 of 2,958 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)What is public trust in national electronic health record systems? A scoping review of qualitative research studies from 1995 to 2021DIGITAL HEALTH10.1177/2055207624122802410Online publication date: 28-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Providing Context to the "Unknown": Patient and Provider Reflections on Connecting Personal Tracking, Patient-Reported Insights, and EHR Data within a Post-COVID ClinicProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869888:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Impact of healthcare education on preferences for electronic health records: Results from national survey of patient users in SwedenProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685412(1-10)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Charting the COVID Long Haul Experience - A Longitudinal Exploration of Symptoms, Activity, and Clinical AdherenceProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642827(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Recordkeeping in Voice-based Remote Community EngagementProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642779(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Technological development roles and needs in pre-hospital emergency care from the advanced level paramedics’ perspectiveInternational Emergency Nursing10.1016/j.ienj.2024.10140673(101406)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2023)Data Work of Frontline Care Workers: Practices, Problems, and Opportunities in the Context of Data-Driven Long-Term CareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794757:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A sociotechnical framework to assess patient-facing eHealth tools: results of a modified Delphi processnpj Digital Medicine10.1038/s41746-023-00982-w6:1Online publication date: 15-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional SurveyJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/3743824:6(e37438)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2022
  • (2022)The Limitations of User-and Human-Centered Design in an eHealth Context and How to Move Beyond ThemJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/3734124:10(e37341)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media