skip to main content
10.1145/3202185.3202730acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Overcoming socio-technical challenges for cross-cultural collaborative applications

Published: 19 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Our research focuses on facilitating access to cross-cultural collaborative applications for schoolchildren. In this paper, we present two user studies with students from an underprivileged region in Delhi. In the first study, we found that Indian students were hesitant when using the application as compared with Finnish students in a similar study, for example. We purport these challenges were social - related to face-saving and power-distance - and technical - related to lack of access to and experience with computers. In the second study, we presented a dramatized scenario before the task to address the socio-technical challenges. Our findings suggest that adding a dramatized scenario facilitated meaningful collaboration by (a) overcoming the lack of previous computer and gaming experience and (b) reducing social and cultural barriers towards communication. We believe these findings extend to cross-cultural collaboration between students with varying computer experience.

References

[1]
Abhijit Banerjee, Shawn Cole, Esther Duflo, and Leigh Linden. 2005. Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. National Bureau of Economic Research, Paper No. 11904
[2]
Michael Harris Bond and Peter Lee. 1978. Face saving in Chinese culture: A discussion and experimental study of Hong Kong students. Social Research Center, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Chinese University Press.
[3]
John M Carroll. 2000. Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with computers 13, no. 1: 43--60.
[4]
Apala L. Chavan. 2005. Another culture, another method. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 21(2).
[5]
Apala L. Chavan, Douglas Gorney, Beena Prabhu, and Sarit Arora. 2009. COVER STORY The washing machine that ate my sari---mistakes in cross-cultural design. Interactions, 16(1), 26--31.
[6]
Torkil Clemmensen, Morten Hertzum, Kasper Hornbæk, Qingzin Shi, and Pradeep Yammiyavar. 2008. Cultural cognition in the thinking-aloud method for usability evaluation. ICIS 2008 Proceedings: 189.
[7]
Betsy DiSalvo, Mark Guzdial, Amy Bruckman & Tom McKlin. 2014. Saving Face While Geeking Out: Video Game Testing as a Justification for Learning Computer Science, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23:3, 272--315.
[8]
Paul Dolan, David Leat, Laura Mazzoli Smith, Sugata Mitra, Liz Todd, and Kate Wall. 2013. Self-organised learning environments (SOLEs) in an English school: an example of transformative pedagogy?. Online Education Research Journal, 3(11).
[9]
Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, no. 1: 1--25.
[10]
David Faust and Richa Nagar. 2001. Politics of Development in Postcolonial India: English-Medium Education and Social Fracturing. Economic and Political Weekly, India, 2878--2883.
[11]
Leah Findlater, Ravin Balakrishnan and Kentaro Toyama. 2009. Comparing semiliterate and illiterate users' ability to transition from audio+text to text-only interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). 1751--1760.
[12]
Thomas L. Friedman. 2005. The world is flat. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[13]
Susan M. Gass and Evangeline Marlos Varonis. 1994. Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in second language acquisition 16, 3. 283--302.
[14]
Frank van Gils. 2005. Potential applications of digital storytelling in education. In 3rd twente student conference on IT, vol. 7. University of Twente, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Enschede.
[15]
Greet Hofstede. 1983. National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 46--74.
[16]
Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded 3rd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
[17]
Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1311--1320.
[18]
Pekka Kallioniemi, Laura-Pihkala Posti, Jaakko Hakulinen, Markku Turunen, Tuuli Keskinen, and Roope Raisamo. 2015. Berlin Kompass: Multimodal Gameful Empowerment for Foreign Language Learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 43:3, 429--450.
[19]
Pekka Kallioniemi, Tomi Heimonen, Markku Turunen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tuuli Keskinen, Laura Pihkala-Posti, Jussi Okkonen, and Roope Raisamo. 2015. Collaborative navigation in virtual worlds: how gender and game experience influence user behavior. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST '15), 173--182.
[20]
Mathew Kam, Divya Ramachandran, Varun Devanathan, Anuj Tewari, and John Canny. 2007. Localized iterative design for language learning in underdeveloped regions: the PACE framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). 1097--1106.
[21]
Mathew Kam, Vijay Rudraraju, Anuj Tewari, and John Canny. 2007. Mobile gaming with children in rural India: Contextual factors in the use of game design patterns. In Proceedings of 3rd Digital Games Research Association International Conference.
[22]
Mathew Kam, Akhil Mathur, Anuj Kumar, and John Canny. 2009. Designing digital games for rural children: a study of traditional village games in India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). 31--40.
[23]
Mathew Kam, Aishvarya Agarwal, Anuj Kumar, Siddhartha Lal, Akhil Mathur, Anuj Tewari, and John Canny. 2008. Designing e-learning games for rural children in India: a format for balancing learning with fun. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '08). 58--67.
[24]
Anu Kankainen, Kirsikka Vaajakallio, Vesa Kantola, and Tuuli Mattelmäki. 2012. Storytelling Group-a co-design method for service design. Behaviour & Information Technology 31, no. 3:221-230.
[25]
Tuuli Keskinen. 2015. Evaluating the user experience of interactive systems in challenging circumstances. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere, Finland.
[26]
Anuj Kumar, Anuj Tewari, Geeta Shroff, Deepti Chittamuru, Matthew Kam, and John Canny. 2010. An exploratory study of unsupervised mobile learning in rural India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). 743--752.
[27]
Martha Larson, Nitendra Rajput, Abhigyan Singh, and Saurabh Srivastava. 2013. I want to be Sachin Tendulkar!: a spoken English cricket game for rural students. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. (CSCW '13). 1353--1364.
[28]
Sonia Livingstone and Ellen Helsper. 2007. Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New media & society, 9, no. 4:671-696.
[29]
Indrani Medhi, Aman Sagar, and Kentaro Toyama. 2006. Text-free user interfaces for illiterate and semi-literate users. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development, (ICTD'06). 72--82.
[30]
Indrani Medhi. 2007. User-centered design for development. Interactions, 14(4), 12--14.
[31]
Indrani Medhi, S.N. Gautama, and Kentaro Toyama. 2009. A comparison of mobile money-transfer UIs for non-literate and semi-literate users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). 1741--1750.
[32]
Sugata Mitra and Vivek Rana. 2001. Children and the Internet: experiments with minimally invasive education in India. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(2), 221--232
[33]
Sugata Mitra, James Tooley, Parimala Inamdar, and Pauline Dixon. 2003. Improving English pronunciation: an automated instructional approach. Information Technologies & International Development 1: 75.
[34]
Sugata Mitra, Ritu Dangwal, Shiffon Chatterjee, Swati Jha, Ravinder S. Bisht, and Preeti Kapur. 2005. Acquisition of computer literacy on shared public computers: Children and the "Hole in the wall". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21(3), 407--426.
[35]
Sugata Mitra. 2009. Remote Presence: Technologies for 'Beaming' Teachers Where They Cannot Go. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 1(1), 55--59.
[36]
Michael J. Muller, I. Thank Andrew Cohen, Kathy Curley, Irene Greif, Dan Gruen, Larry Hawes, Barbara Kivowitz, Paul Moody, Margi Olson, and John Patterson. 1999. Catalogue of scenario-based methods and methodologies. Lotus Research.
[37]
Michael J. Muller. 2003. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Human-computer interaction: Development process 4235:165--185.
[38]
Joyojeet Pal, Meera Lakshmanan, and Kentaro Toyama. 2009. "My child will be respected": Parental perspectives on computers and education in Rural India. Information Systems Frontiers 11, 2, 129--144.
[39]
Janet C. Read, S. J. MacFarlane, and Chris Casey. 2002. Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children's fun. Interaction design and children, vol. 2,1--23. Shaker Publishing Eindhoven.
[40]
Alla Sadik. 2008. Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational technology research and development 56, no. 4: 487--506.
[41]
Sumanjeet Singh. 2012. Digital divide in India: Measurement, determinants and policy for addressing the challenges in bridging the digital divide. Digital Economy Innovations and Impacts on Society 11, no. 20.1 (2012): 106.
[42]
Pia Sundqvist and Peter Wikström. 2015. Out-of-school digital gameplay and in-school L2 English vocabulary outcomes. System, 51, 65--76.
[43]
Stella Ting-Toomey and Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International journal of intercultural relations 22,2. 187--225.
[44]
Bernie Trilling, and Charles Fadel. 2009. 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
[45]
Markku Turunen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Aleksi Melto, Tomi Heimonen, Tuuli Laivo, and Juho Hella. 2009. SUXES - user experience evaluation method for spoken and multimodal interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), 2567--2570.
[46]
Ravi Vatrapu and Dan Suthers, D. 2007. Culture and computers: a review of the concept of culture and implications for intercultural collaborative online learning. In Intercultural Collaboration 260--275. Springer Berlin Heidelberg
[47]
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[48]
Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta. 2003. English in Finland: globalisation, language awareness and questions of identity. English Today 19, 04:3--15.
[49]
Mark Warschauer. 1997. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 4. 470--481.
[50]
Mark Warschauer. 2003. Digital divide. Scientific American (Aug,2003).
[51]
Junfeng Yang, Kinshuk, Huiju Yu, Sue-Jen Chen, and Ronghuai Huang. 2014. Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 17(3), 208--221.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Overcoming socio-technical challenges for cross-cultural collaborative applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children
      June 2018
      789 pages
      ISBN:9781450351522
      DOI:10.1145/3202185
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 19 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. collaborative online applications
      2. cross-culture collaboration
      3. interaction design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      IDC '18
      Sponsor:
      IDC '18: Interaction Design and Children
      June 19 - 22, 2018
      Trondheim, Norway

      Acceptance Rates

      IDC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 96 submissions, 29%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

      Upcoming Conference

      IDC '25
      Interaction Design and Children
      June 23 - 26, 2025
      Reykjavik , Iceland

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media