skip to main content
10.1145/3038912.3052605acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Temporal Effects on Hashtag Reuse in Twitter: A Cognitive-Inspired Hashtag Recommendation Approach

Published: 03 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Hashtags have become a powerful tool in social platforms such as Twitter to categorize and search for content, and to spread short messages across members of the social network. In this paper, we study temporal hashtag usage practices in Twitter with the aim of designing a cognitive-inspired hashtag recommendation algorithm we call BLLi,s. Our main idea is to incorporate the effect of time on (i) individual hashtag reuse (i.e., reusing own hashtags), and (ii) social hashtag reuse (i.e., reusing hashtags, which has been previously used by a followee) into a predictive model. For this, we turn to the Base-Level Learning (BLL) equation from the cognitive architecture ACT-R, which accounts for the time-dependent decay of item exposure in human memory. We validate BLLI,S using two crawled Twitter datasets in two evaluation scenarios. Firstly, only temporal usage patterns of past hashtag assignments are utilized and secondly, these patterns are combined with a content-based analysis of the current tweet. In both evaluation scenarios, we find not only that temporal effects play an important role for both individual and social hashtag reuse but also that our BLLI,S approach provides significantly better prediction accuracy and ranking results than current state-of-the-art hashtag recommendation methods.

References

[1]
J. Alstott, E. Bullmore, and D. Plenz. powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavy-tailed distributions. PloS one, 9(1):e85777, 2014.
[2]
J. R. Anderson, D. Bothell, M. D. Byrne, S. Douglass, C. Lebiere, and Y. Qin. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological review, 111(4):1036, 2004.
[3]
J. R. Anderson and L. J. Schooler. Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2(6):396--408, 1991.
[4]
P. G. Campos, F. Díez, and I. Cantador. Time-aware recommender systems: a comprehensive survey and analysis of existing evaluation protocols. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 24(1--2):67--119, 2014.
[5]
A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. Newman. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM review (SIREV), 51(4):661--703, 2009.
[6]
U. Cress, C. Held, and J. Kimmerle. The collective knowledge of social tags: Direct and indirect influences on navigation, learning, and information processing. Computers & Education, 60(1):59--73, 2013.
[7]
M. Efron. Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. In Proc. of SIGIR'10, pages 787--788. ACM, 2010.
[8]
J. Gemmell, T. Schimoler, M. Ramezani, L. Christiansen, and B. Mobasher. Improving folkrank with item-based collaborative filtering. Recommender Systems & the Social Web, 2009.
[9]
F. Godin, V. Slavkovikj, W. De Neve, B. Schrauwen, and R. Van de Walle. Using topic models for twitter hashtag recommendation. In Proc. of WWW '13 companion, pages 593--596. ACM, 2013.
[10]
A. T. Hadgu and R. Jäschke. Identifying and analyzing researchers on twitter. In Proc. of WebSci '14, pages 23--30, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[11]
M. Harvey and F. Crestani. Long time, no tweets! time-aware personalised hashtag suggestion. In Proc. of ECIR'15, pages 581--592. Springer, 2015.
[12]
J. Huang, K. M. Thornton, and E. N. Efthimiadis. Conversational tagging in twitter. In Proc. of HT '10. ACM, 2010.
[13]
K. Jrveälin and J. Kekäläinen. Ir evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In Proc. of SIGIR'00, pages 41--48, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.
[14]
R. Jäschke, L. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in folksonomies. In Proc. of PKDD'07, pages 506--514. Springer, 2007.
[15]
R. Jäschke, L. Marinho, A. Hotho, L. Schmidt-Thieme, and G. Stumme. Tag recommendations in social bookmarking systems. AI Communications, 21(4):231--247, 2008.
[16]
M. Jeon, S. Jun, and E. Hwang. Hashtag recommendation based on user tweet and hashtag classification on twitter. In Proc. of Web-Age Information Management (WAIM'14), pages 325--336. Springer, 2014.
[17]
C. Körner, D. Benz, A. Hotho, M. Strohmaier, and G. Stumme. Stop thinking, start tagging: Tag semantics emerge from collaborative verbosity. In Proc. of WWW '10, pages 521--530, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[18]
D. Kowald and E. Lex. Evaluating tag recommender algorithms in real-world folksonomies: A comparative study. In Proc. of RecSys'15, pages 265--268, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[19]
D. Kowald and E. Lex. The influence of frequency, recency and semantic context on the reuse of tags in social tagging systems. In Proc. of HT'16, pages 237--242. ACM, 2016.
[20]
D. Kowald, P. Seitlinger, C. Trattner, and T. Ley. Long time no see: The probability of reusing tags as a function of frequency and recency. In Proc. of WWW'14 companion, pages 463--468. ACM, 2014.
[21]
R. Krestel and P. Fankhauser. Personalized topic-based tag recommendation. Neurocomputing, 76(1):61--70, 2012.
[22]
R. Krestel, P. Fankhauser, and W. Nejdl. Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation. In Proc. of RecSys'09, pages 61--68. ACM, 2009.
[23]
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proc. of WWW '10, pages 591--600, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[24]
S. M. Kywe, T.-A. Hoang, E.-P. Lim, and F. Zhu. On recommending hashtags in twitter networks. In Social Informatics, pages 337--350. Springer, 2012.
[25]
J. Lehmann, B. Gonçalves, J. J. Ramasco, and C. Cattuto. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In Proc. of WWW'12, pages 251--260. ACM, 2012.
[26]
J. Lin and G. Mishne. A study of "churn" in tweets and real-time search queries. In Proc. of ICWSM'12, 2012.
[27]
H.-M. Lu and C.-H. Lee. A twitter hashtag recommendation model that accommodates for temporal clustering effects. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 30(3):18--25, 2015.
[28]
Z. Ma, A. Sun, and G. Cong. Will this# hashtag be popular tomorrow? In Proc. of SIGIR'12, pages 1173--1174. ACM, 2012.
[29]
L. B. Marinho and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Collaborative tag recommendations. In Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications, pages 533--540. Springer, 2008.
[30]
J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In Proc. of RecSys'13, pages 165--172. ACM, 2013.
[31]
S. A. Myers and J. Leskovec. The bursty dynamics of the twitter information network. In Proc. of WWW'14, pages 913--924, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[32]
S. Rendle, L. Balby Marinho, A. Nanopoulos, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Learning optimal ranking with tensor factorization for tag recommendation. In Proc. of KDD'09, pages 727--736. ACM, 2009.
[33]
S. Rendle and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Pairwise interaction tensor factorization for personalized tag recommendation. In Proc. of WSDM'10, pages 81--90. ACM, 2010.
[34]
D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: Idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In Proc. of WWW '11, pages 695--704, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[35]
S. Sedhai and A. Sun. Hashtag recommendation for hyperlinked tweets. In Proc. of SIGIR'14. ACM, 2014.
[36]
P. Seitlinger, T. Ley, and D. Albert. Verbatim and semantic imitation in indexing resources on the web: A fuzzy-trace account of social tagging. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(1):32--48, 2015.
[37]
J. She and L. Chen. Tomoha: Topic model-based hashtag recommendation on twitter. In Proc. of WWW '14 companion, pages 371--372. ACM, 2014.
[38]
T. A. Small. What the hashtag? a content analysis of canadian politics on twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6):872--895, 2011.
[39]
O. Tsur and A. Rappoport. What's in a hashtag?: Content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. In Proc. of WSDM'12, pages 643--652, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[40]
Y. Wang, J. Qu, J. Liu, J. Chen, and Y. Huang. What to tag your microblog: Hashtag recommendation based on topic analysis and collaborative filtering. In Web Technologies and Applications, pages 610--618. Springer, 2014.
[41]
J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In Proc. of WSDM'11, pages 177--186. ACM, 2011.
[42]
E. Zangerle, W. Gassler, and G. Specht. Recommending #-tags in twitter. In Proc. of SASWeb'11, pages 67--78. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2011.
[43]
L. Zhang, J. Tang, and M. Zhang. Integrating temporal usage pattern into personalized tag prediction. In Web Technologies and Applications. Springer, 2012.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Temporal Effects on Hashtag Reuse in Twitter: A Cognitive-Inspired Hashtag Recommendation Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '17: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web
    April 2017
    1678 pages
    ISBN:9781450349130

    Sponsors

    • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

    Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

    Publication History

    Published: 03 April 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. act-r
    2. bll equation
    3. hashtag recommendation
    4. hashtag reuse prediction
    5. hashtag usage recency
    6. hashtags
    7. recommender systems
    8. temporal dynamics
    9. tf-idf
    10. twitter

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '17
    Sponsor:
    • IW3C2

    Acceptance Rates

    WWW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 164 of 966 submissions, 17%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media