skip to main content
10.1145/2908131.2908167acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Talking climate change via social media: communication, engagement and behaviour

Published: 22 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

While individual behaviour change is considered a central strategy to mitigate climate change, public engagement is still limited. Aiming to raise awareness, and to promote behaviour change, governments and organisations are conducting multiple pro-environmental campaigns, particularly via social media. However, to the best of our knowledge, these campaigns are neither based on, nor do they take advantage of, the existing theories and studies of behaviour change, to better target and inform users. In this paper we propose an approach for analysing user behaviour towards climate change based on the 5 Doors Theory of behaviour change [19]. Our approach automatically identifies five behavioural stages in which users are based on their social media contributions. This approach has been applied to analyse the online behaviour of participants of the Earth Hour 2015 and COP21 Twitter movements. Results of our analysis are used to provide guidelines on how to improve communication via these campaigns.

References

[1]
W. Abrahamse, L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter. A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3):273--291, 2005.
[2]
D. Ariely. Defining Key Behaviours. 2014.
[3]
D. Ariely, J. Hreha, and K. Berman. Hacking Human Nature for Good: A Practical Guide to Changing Human Behavior. 2014.
[4]
J. Berger. Defining Key Behaviours. 2013.
[5]
H. Blunck. Computational environmental ethnography: combining collective sensing and ethnographic inquiries to advance means for reducing environmental footprints. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Future energy systems, pages 87--98. ACM, 2013.
[6]
A. Campbell. How cavemen did social media. A comparative case study of social movement organisations using Twitter to mobilise on climate change. PhD thesis, The University of Sydney, 2010.
[7]
M. Cheong and V. Lee. Twittering for earth: A study on the impact of microblogging activism on earth hour 2009 in australia. In Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pages 114--123. Springer, 2010.
[8]
A. Corner, E. Markowitz, and N. Pidgeon. Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3):411--422, 2014.
[9]
H. Cunningham. GATE, a General Architecture for Text Engineering. Computers and the Humanities, 36:223--254, 2002.
[10]
A. Darnton. Behaviour change knowledge review--reference report. Andrew Darnton for the Government Social Research Unit, 2008.
[11]
N. Eyal. Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Penguin Canada, 2014.
[12]
M. Fernandez, G. Burel, H. Alani, L. S. G. Piccolo, C. Meili, and R. Hess. Analysing engagement towards the 2014 earth hour campaign in twitter. 2015.
[13]
B. J. Fogg, 2003. http://www.behaviormodel.org/.
[14]
J. Froehlich, L. Findlater, and J. Landay. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1999--2008. ACM, 2010.
[15]
E. Kazakova. Environmental campaign construction and symbolism. 2009.
[16]
C. Kormos and R. Gifford. The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40:359--371, 2014.
[17]
D. Maynard and K. Bontcheva. Understanding climate change tweets: an open source toolkit for social media. In Proceedings of EnviroInfo, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2015.
[18]
L. S. Piccolo and H. Alani. Perceptions and behaviour towards climate change and energy savings. Copenhagen, Denmark, 2015. EnviroInfo and ICT4S 2015: Building the Knowledge Base for Environmental Action and Sustainability.
[19]
L. Robinson. Doors. an integrated theory of behaviour change. 5.
[20]
E. M. Rogers. Elements of diffusion. Diffusion of innovations, 5:1--38, 2003.
[21]
Science and T. Committee. Communicating climate change. Technical report, House of Commons, 2014. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/254/254.pdf.
[22]
C. Shaw, A. Corner, J. Clarke, and O. Roberts. Are we engaged? un climate talks and the uk public. Technical report, Climate Outreach, 2015.
[23]
G. Vaynerchuk. Jab, Jab, Jab, Right Hook. Harper Collins, 2013.
[24]
L. Whitmarsh, I. Lorenzoni, and S. O'Neill. Engaging the public with climate change: Behaviour change and communication. Routledge, 2012.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Talking climate change via social media: communication, engagement and behaviour

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WebSci '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science
    May 2016
    392 pages
    ISBN:9781450342087
    DOI:10.1145/2908131
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 May 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. behaviour analysis
    2. climate change
    3. social media

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • European Union

    Conference

    WebSci '16
    Sponsor:
    WebSci '16: ACM Web Science Conference
    May 22 - 25, 2016
    Hannover, Germany

    Acceptance Rates

    WebSci '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 70 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)317
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)44
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media