skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2819951acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RichReview++: Deployment of a Collaborative Multi-modal Annotation System for Instructor Feedback and Peer Discussion

Published: 27 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

New multi-modal annotation tools hold the promise of bringing the benefits of face-to-face contact to remote, asynchronous interactions. One such system, RichReview++, incorporates new techniques to improve access to the embedded multimedia commentary and allows users to annotate with new modalities, like deictic gestures. We conducted a series of field deployments of RichReview++ to characterize how these features benefit students using them for activities in the university classroom. Our first deployment investigated the use of multi-modal annotations as a way for instructors to provide feedback on student term papers. Our second deployment used annotations to support peer discussion about assigned readings in a graduate-level course. We found that presenting voice comments as interactive waveforms seems to facilitate students' consumption of the instructor's voice comments. We also found that gestural annotations clarify voice and give annotators a quick and lightweight way to alter the scope of their voice comments. Based on these results, we suggest ways to best leverage multi-modal annotation tools in education environments.

References

[1]
Timothy Bickmore, Laura Pfeifer, and Langxuan Yin. 2008. the Role of Gesture in Document Explanation By Embodied Conversational Agents. International Journal of Semantic Computing 02, 01: 47–70.
[2]
AJ Brush, David Bargeron, and Jonathan Grudin. 2002. Supporting interaction outside of class: anchored discussions vs. discussion boards. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundation for a CSCL Communiy: 425-434.
[3]
Barbara L. Chalfonte, Robert S. Fish, and Robert E. Kraut. 1991. Expressive richness: A COMPARISON OF SPEECH AND TEXT AS MEDIA FOR REVISION. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology - CHI '91, ACM Press, 21–26.
[4]
Elizabeth F. Churchill, Jonathan Trevor, Sara Bly, Les Nelson, and Davor Cubranic. 2000. Anchored conversations: Chatting In The Context Of A Document. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '00, ACM Press, 454–461.
[5]
Anne Crook, Alice Mauchline, Stephen Maw, et al. 2012. The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers and Education 58, 1: 386–396.
[6]
Susan F Ehrlich. 1987. Strategies for Encouraging Successful Adoption of Office Communication Systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 5, 4: 340–357.
[7]
Susan R Fussell, Leslie D Setlock, Jie Yang, Jiazhi Ou, Elizabeth Mauer, and Adam D I Kramer. 2004. Gestures over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 3: 273–309.
[8]
Jonathan Grudin. 1988. Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, ACM Press, 85–93.
[9]
Carl Gutwin, Gwen Stark, and Saul Greenberg. 1995. Support for Workspace Awareness in Educational Groupware. Proc Conference on Computer Spported Collaborative Learning, Association for Computational Linguistics, 147–156.
[10]
Steve Harrison, Scott Minneman, and Joshua Marinacci. 1999. The DrawStream Station or the AVCs of Video Cocktail Napkins. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems - Volume 2, IEEE Computer Society, 543– 549.
[11]
Khe Foon Hew and Wing Sum Cheung. 2012. Examining the use of asynchronous voice discussion in a blended-learning environment. Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government, ECEG 10, 4: 136–140.
[12]
Khe Foon Hew and Wing Sum Cheung. 2013. Audiobased versus text-based asynchronous online discussion: Two case studies. Instructional Science 41, 2: 365–380.
[13]
Debby Hindus and Chris Schmandt. 1992. Ubiquitous audio: Capturing Spontaneous Collaboration. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92, ACM Press, 210–217.
[14]
Jim Hollan and Scott Stornetta. 1992. Beyond Being There. Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 119– 125.
[15]
Juho Kim, Elena L. Glassman, Andrés MonroyHernández, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2015. RIMES: Embedding Interactive Multimedia Exercises in Lecture Videos. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM, 1535–1544.
[16]
Robert Kraut, Jolene Galegher, Robert Fish, and Barbara Chalfonte. 1992. Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing. HumanComputer Interaction 7, 4: 375–407.
[17]
Chinmay Kulkarni, Julia Cambre, Yasmine Kotturi, Michael S. Bernstein, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2015. Talkabout: Making Distance Matter with Small Groups in Massive Classes. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15, ACM Press, 1116– 1128.
[18]
Chinmay E. Kulkarni, Michael S. Bernstein, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2015. PeerStudio. Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale - L@S '15, ACM, 75–84.
[19]
Joon-Suk Lee and Deborah Tatar. 2012. 'Good enough' pointing in pervasive computing. Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2012 International Conference on, 330–337.
[20]
Stephen R Levine and Susan F Ehrlich. 1991. The Freestyle System. In Human-Machine Interactive Systems. Springer, 3–21.
[21]
Philip Marriott. 2002. Voice vs text-based discussion forums: An implementation of Wimba Voice Boards. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 640– 646.
[22]
C.C. Marshall and a.J.B. Brush. 2004. Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries, 2004., 349–357.
[23]
Toni-Jan Keith Palma Monserrat, Shengdong Zhao, Kevin McGee, and Anshul Vikram Pandey. 2013. NoteVideo: Facilitating Navigation of Blackboardstyle Lecture Videos. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '13, ACM Press, 1139.
[24]
Christine M. Neuwirth, Ravinder Chandhok, David Charney, Patricia Wojahn, and Loel Kim. 1994. Distributed collaborative writing. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence - CHI '94, ACM Press, 51–57.
[25]
Jody Oomen-Early, Mary Bold, Kristin L Wiginton, Tara L Gallien, and Nancy Anderson. 2008. Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 4, 3: 267–276.
[26]
Bernie Randles, Dongwook Yoon, Amy Cheatle, Malte Jung, and Francois Guimbretiere. 2015. Supporting Face-to-Face Like Communication Modalities for Asynchronous Assignment Feedback in Math Education. Learning @ Scale, ACM, 321–326.
[27]
Jonathan Grudin Scott LeeTiernan. Fostering Engagement in Asynchronous Learning Through Collaborative Multimedia Annotation.
[28]
Mary Lourdes Silva. 2012. Camtasia in the Classroom: Student Attitudes and Preferences for Video Commentary or Microsoft Word Comments During the Revision Process. Computers and Composition 29, 1: 1–22.
[29]
Lisa Stifelman, Barry Arons, and Chris Schmandt. 2001. The Audio Notebook: Paper and Pen Interaction with Structured Speech. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 182–189.
[30]
Michael Tsang, George W Fitzmaurice, Gordon Kurtenbach, Azam Khan, and Bill Buxton. 2002. Boom Chameleon: Simultaneous Capture of 3D Viewpoint, Voice and Gesture Annotations on a Spatially-aware Display. Proceedings of the 15th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 111–120.
[31]
Sarah Weir, Juho Kim, Robert C Miller, Krzysztof Z Gajos, and Robert C Miller. 2015. Learnersourcing Subgoal Labels for How-to Videos. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, 405– 416.
[32]
Steve Whittaker, Julia Hirschberg, Brian Amento, et al. 2002. SCANMail: a voicemail interface that makes speech browsable, readable and searchable. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Changing our world, changing ourselves - CHI '02, ACM Press, 275.
[33]
Steve Whittaker, Patrick Hyland, and Myrtle Wiley. 1994. Filochat: handwritten notes provide access to recorded conversations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems celebrating interdependence - CHI '94, ACM Press, 271–277.
[34]
Lynn D. Wilcox, Bill N. Schilit, and Nitin Sawhney. 1997. Dynomite: a dynamically organized ink and audio notebook. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '97, ACM Press, 186–193.
[35]
Thomas Wolsey. 2008. Efficacy of Instructor Feedback on Written Work in an Online Program. International Journal on E-Learning 7, 2: 311–329.
[36]
Elisabeth Yaneske and Briony Oates. 2010. Using voice boards: Pedagogical design, technological implementation, evaluation and reflections. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26, 8: 233–250.
[37]
Dongwook Yoon, Nicholas Chen, François Guimbretière, and Abigail Sellen. 2014. RichReview: Blending Ink, Speech, and Gesture to Support Collaborative Document Review. Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 481–490.
[38]
Dongwook Yoon, Nicholas Chen, and François Guimbretière. 2013. TextTearing: Opening White Space for Digital Ink Annotation. Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM, 107–112.
[39]
Qixing Zheng, Kellogg Booth, and Joanna McGrenere. 2006. Co-authoring with structured annotations. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems - CHI '06, ACM Press, 131.
[40]
Sacha Zyto, D Karger, M Ackerman, and S Mahajan. 2012. Successful classroom deployment of a social document annotation system. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 1883–1892.

Cited By

View all
  1. RichReview++: Deployment of a Collaborative Multi-modal Annotation System for Instructor Feedback and Peer Discussion

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2016
    1866 pages
    ISBN:9781450335928
    DOI:10.1145/2818048
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 February 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Multi-modal annotation
    2. anchored comment
    3. collaborative annotation
    4. instructor feedback
    5. online peer-discussion.

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '16
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '16: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 27 - March 2, 2016
    California, San Francisco, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 142 of 571 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media