poster

Are you embarrassed?: the impact of robot types on emotional engagement with a robot

Authors:

Jung Ju Choi,

Yunkyung Kim,

Sonya S. KwakAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction

Pages 138 - 139

https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2559798

Published: 03 March 2014 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the effect of robot types on emotional communication between a person and a robot. We executed a 2 (robot types: an autonomous robot vs. a tele-operated robot) within-participants experiment (N=36). Participants were interviewed with either autonomous robot interviewers or tele-operated robot interviewers, and asked how much they felt social presence of robot interviewers and embarrassment toward robot interviewers. Participants felt more social presence to tele-operated robots than autonomous robots. Moreover, participants felt more embarrassment when they were interviewed with tele-operated robots than autonomous robots.

References

[1]

Ogata, T. and Sugano, S. 1999. Emotional communication between humans and the autonomous robot which has the emotion model. In Proc. of ICRA'99, 3177--3182.

Google Scholar

[2]

Breazeal, C. 2003. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. 2003. Int'l Journal of Human Computer Studies. 59, 119--155.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Yanco, H. A. and Drury, J. L. 2004. Classifying human-robot interaction: An updated taxonomy. In Proc. of Int'l Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 2841--2846.

Google Scholar

[4]

Kahn, P., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., and Kanda, T. 2006. What is a human? - Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. In Proc. of RO-MAN'06, 364--371.

Google Scholar

[5]

Moravec, H. 2003. Robots, after all. Communications of the ACM. 46, 10, 90--97.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Dole, L. D., Sirkin, D. M., Currano, R. M., Murphy, R. R., and Nass, C. I. 2013. Where to look and who to be: Designing attention and identity for search-and-rescue robots. In Proc. of HRI'13, 119--120.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

Kwak, S. S., Kim, Y., Kim, E., Shin, C., and Cho, K. 2013. What makes people empathize with an emotional robot? The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot. In Proc. of RO-MAN'13, 180--185.

Google Scholar

[8]

Heeter, C. 1992. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 1, 2, 262--271.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Costa, M., Dinsbach, W., Manstead, A. S. R., and Bitti, P. E. R. 2001. Social presence, embarrassment, and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. 25, 4, 225--240.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[10]

Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., and Wielinga, B. 2008. The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. Journal of Physical Agents. 2, 2, 33--40.

Google Scholar

[11]

Bartneck, C., Bleeker, T., Bun, J., Fens, P., and Riet, L. 2010. The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 1, 2, 109--115.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Liang CRicci AKress-Gazit HJung MCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)Lessons From a Robot Asking for Directions In-the-wildCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580159(617-620)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568294.3580159
Schepers JBelanche DCasaló LFlavián C(2022)How Smart Should a Service Robot Be?Journal of Service Research10.1177/1094670522110770425:4(565-582)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221107704
Mahdi HAkgun SSaleh SDautenhahn K(2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Are you embarrassed?: the impact of robot types on emotional engagement with a robot
1. Applied computing
  1. Operations research
    1. Industry and manufacturing
      1. Command and control
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. User centered design

Recommendations

Will you follow the robot's advice?: the impact of robot types and task types on people's perception of a robot
HAI '14: Proceedings of the second international conference on Human-agent interaction

Robots could be classified into an autonomous robot and a tele-operated robot according to the levels of autonomy. As a match between robot types and task types is important, we explored the impact of robot types and task types on social presence, ...
Costume vs. Wizard of Oz vs. Telepresence: How Social Presence Forms of Tele-operated Robots Influence Customer Behavior
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

In this study, we explore the effective form of social presence for a tele-operated robot to provide customer service. Particularly, we address the question on if and how a tele-operated robot displays the presence of an operator, and what effects it ...
Teleoperated or Autonomous?: How to Produce a Robot Operator's Pseudo Presence in HRI
HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction

Previous research has made various efforts to produce human-like presence of autonomous social robots. However, such efforts often require costly equipment and complicated mechanisms. In this paper, we propose a new method that makes a user feel as if ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction

March 2014

538 pages

ISBN:9781450326582

DOI:10.1145/2559636

General Chairs:
Gerhard Sagerer
Bielefeld University, Germany
,
Michita Imai
Keio University, Japan
,
Program Chairs:
Tony Belpaeme
Plymouth University, UK
,
Andrea Thomaz
Georgia Institute of Technology, USA

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 March 2014

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster

Conference

HRI'14

Sponsor:

HRI'14: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

March 3 - 6, 2014

Bielefeld, Germany

Acceptance Rates

HRI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 32 of 132 submissions, 24%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
883
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)85
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 04 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Liang CRicci AKress-Gazit HJung MCastellano GRiek LCakmak MLeite I(2023)Lessons From a Robot Asking for Directions In-the-wildCompanion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/3568294.3580159(617-620)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568294.3580159
Schepers JBelanche DCasaló LFlavián C(2022)How Smart Should a Service Robot Be?Journal of Service Research10.1177/1094670522110770425:4(565-582)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221107704
Mahdi HAkgun SSaleh SDautenhahn K(2022)A survey on the design and evolution of social robots — Past, present and futureRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193156:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.robot.2022.104193
Park SHealey PKaniadakis AKitamura YQuigley AIsbister KIgarashi TBjørn PDrucker S(2021)Should Robots Blush?Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445561(1-14)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3411764.3445561
Horstmann AGratch JKrämer N(2021)I just wanna blame somebody, not something! Reactions to a computer agent giving negative feedback based on the instructions of a personInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102683154:COnline publication date: 1-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102683
Oertel CCastellano GChetouani MNasir JObaid MPelachaud CPeters C(2020)Engagement in Human-Agent Interaction: An OverviewFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2020.000927Online publication date: 4-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00092
Lambert ANorouzi NBruder GWelch G(2020)A Systematic Review of Ten Years of Research on Human Interaction with Social RobotsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.180117236:19(1804-1817)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801172
Liu YZhang WPan SLi YChen Y(2019)Analyzing the robotic behaviour in a smart city with deep enforcement and imitation learning using IoRTComputer Communications10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.031Online publication date: Nov-2019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.031
Doherty KDoherty G(2018)Engagement in HCIACM Computing Surveys10.1145/323414951:5(1-39)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3234149
Zheng YRau PYueh HChen PHuang D(2018)An Exploratory Study on Design and Implement an Emotional Karaoke Robot (EKR)Cross-Cultural Design. Methods, Tools, and Users10.1007/978-3-319-92141-9_21(269-282)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92141-9_21
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Will you follow the robot's advice?: the impact of robot types and task types on people's perception of a robot

Costume vs. Wizard of Oz vs. Telepresence: How Social Presence Forms of Tele-operated Robots Influence Customer Behavior

Teleoperated or Autonomous?: How to Produce a Robot Operator's Pseudo Presence in HRI

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

Login options

Full Access

PDF

eReader

Abstract

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Will you follow the robot's advice?: the impact of robot types and task types on people's perception of a robot

Costume vs. Wizard of Oz vs. Telepresence: How Social Presence Forms of Tele-operated Robots Influence Customer Behavior

Teleoperated or Autonomous?: How to Produce a Robot Operator's Pseudo Presence in HRI

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations