skip to main content
10.1145/2535708.2535709acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cost-effectiveness of workplace closure and travel restriction for mitigating influenza outbreaks: a network-based simulation

Published: 05 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Background: Social distancing strategies, such as workplace closure and travel restriction, have been widely considered as alternative measures to contain influenza viruses, particularly when vaccines and antiviral drugs are under development. However, their cost-effectiveness in large urbanized populations is poorly understood.
Method: To fill this knowledge gap, this research builds a spatially-explicit network-based model to simulate influenza transmission, mitigation strategies, and their associated costs. This model represents a spatio-temporal network of individuals' daily contacts, which enables the simulation of local infection and long-distance dispersion of influenza. The workplace closure and travel restriction strategies, as well as their combinations with antiviral prophylaxis, are incorporated into this model to estimate their cost-effectiveness in mitigating seasonal flu and pandemic flu. The metropolitan area of Buffalo, NY, USA, with a population about 1 million, is selected as the study area.
Results: Without any intervention, the seasonal flu and pandemic flu cost $234.1 million and $331.1 million, respectively. The closure of 30% affected workplace is the most cost-effective single strategy with $12.9K per case averted for seasonal flu and $34.9K for pandemic flu. The travel restriction is not cost-effective if applied alone, but a 50% travel restriction in combination with antiviral prophylaxis and workplace closure forms the best strategy, which only costs $10.6K per cases averted for seasonal flu and $13.5K for pandemic flu.
Conclusions: For a large urbanized area, the closure of affected workplaces could be an effective and cost-saving strategy to mitigate influenza outbreaks, while the highest cost-effectiveness can be achieved by combining the travel restriction with antiviral prophylaxis and workplace closure.

References

[1]
Coburn, B. J., Wagner, B. G. and Blower, S. Modeling influenza epidemics and pandemics: insights into the future of swine flu (H1N1). BMC Medicine, 7 (2009), 1--8.
[2]
Dutta, A. The Effectiveness of Policies to Control a Human Influenza Pandemic: A Literature Review. Social Science Research Network, City, 2008.
[3]
Ferguson, N. M., Cummings, D. A., Fraser, C., Cajka, J. C., Cooley, P. C. and Burke, D. S. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature, 442 (2006), 448--452.
[4]
Longini, I. M., Nizam, A., Xu, S., Ungchusak, K., Hanshaoworakul, W., Cummings, D. A. T. and Halloran, M. E. Containing pandemic influenza at the source. Science, 309 (2005), 1083--1087.
[5]
Bridges, C. B., Thompson, W. W., Meltzer, M. I., Reeve, G. R., Talamonti, W. J., Cox, N. J., Lilac, H. A., Hall, H., Klimov, A. and Fukuda, K. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 284 (2000), 1655--1663.
[6]
Yassi, A., Kettner, J., Hammond, G., Cheang, M. and McGill, M. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of an influenza vaccination program for health care workers. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2 (1991), 101.
[7]
Gasparini, R., Lucioni, C., Lai, P., Maggioni, P., Sticchi, L., Durando, P., Morelli, P., Comino, I., Calderisi, S. and Crovari, P. Cost-benefit evaluation of influenza vaccination in the elderly in the Italian region of Liguria. Vaccine, 2 (2002), B50--B54.
[8]
Luce, B. R., Zangwill, K. M., Palmer, C. S., Mendelman, P. M., Yan, L., Wolff, M. C., Cho, I., Marcy, S. M., Iacuzio, D. and Belshe, R. B. Cost-effectiveness analysis of an intranasal influenza vaccine for the prevention of influenza in healthy children. Pediatrics, 108 (2001), e24--e24.
[9]
Scuffham, P. A. and West, P. Economic evaluation of strategies for the control and management of influenza in Europe. Vaccine, 20 (2002), 2562--2578.
[10]
Edmunds, W., Medley, G. and Nokes, D. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of vaccination programmes: a dynamic perspective. Statistics in medicine, 18 (1999), 3263--3282.
[11]
Sander, B., Nizam, A., Garrison Jr, L. P., Postma, M. J., Halloran, M. E. and Longini Jr, I. M. Economic evaluation of influenza pandemic mitigation strategies in the United States using a stochastic microsimulation transmission model. Value in Health, 12 (2009), 226--233.
[12]
Perlroth, D. J., Glass, R. J., Davey, V. J., Cannon, D., Garber, A. M. and Owens, D. K. Health outcomes and costs of community mitigation strategies for an influenza pandemic in the United States. Clinical infectious diseases, 50 (2010), 165--174.
[13]
Milne, G. J., Halder, N. and Kelso, J. K. The Cost Effectiveness of Pandemic Influenza Interventions: A Pandemic Severity Based Analysis. PloS one, 8 (2013), e61504.
[14]
Mao, L. and Bian, L. Spatial-temporal transmission of influenza and its health risks in an urbanized area. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (2010), 204--215.
[15]
Kermack, W. O. and McKendrick, A. G. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings Royal Statistics Society, 115 (1927), 700--721.
[16]
Mills, C. E., Robins, J. M. and Lipsitch, M. Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenza. Nature, 432 (2004), 904--906.
[17]
Chowell, G., Miller, M. A. and Viboud, C. Seasonal influenza in the United States, France, and Australia: transmission and prospects for control. Epidemiology and Infection, 136 (2007), 852--864.
[18]
Ferguson, N., Cummings, D. A. T., Cauchemez, S., Fraser, C., Riley, S., Meeyai, A., Iamsirithaworn, S. and Burke, D. S. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia. Nature, 437 (2005), 209--214.
[19]
Heymann, D. L. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 2004.
[20]
Halloran, M. E., Ferguson, N. M., Eubank, S., Ira M. Longini, J., Cummings, D. A. T., Lewis, B., Xu, S., Fraser, C., Vullikanti, A., Germann, T. C., Wagener, D., Beckman, R., Kadau, K., Barrett, C., Macken, C. A., Burke, D. S. and Cooley, P. Modeling targeted layered containment of an influenza pandemic in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (2008), 4639--4644.
[21]
CDC Key Facts About Seasonal Influenza (Flu). Center for Disease Control and Prevention, City, 2008.
[22]
Molinari, N. A. M., Ortega-Sanchez, I. R., Messonnier, M. L., Thompson, W. W., Wortley, P. M., Weintraub, E. and Bridges, C. B. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine, 25 (2007), 5086--5096.
[23]
Meltzer, M. I., Cox, N. J. and Fukuda, K. The economic impact of pandemic influenza in the United States: priorities for intervention. Emerging infectious diseases, 5 (1999), 659--671.
[24]
Fiore, A. E., Shay, D. K., Haber, P., Iskander, J., Uyeki, T., Mootrey, G., Bresee, J. S. and Cox, N. J. Prevention and control of influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56 (2007), 1--54.
[25]
Camitz, M. and Liljeros, F. The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of a moderately contagious disease. BMC medicine, 4 (2006), 32.
[26]
Germann, T. C., Kadau, K., Longini Jr, I. M. and Macken, C. A. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (2006), 5935--5940.
[27]
Longini, I., Halloran, M. E., Nizam, A. and Yang, Y. Containing pandemic influenza with antiviral agents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159 (2004), 623--633.
[28]
Hayden, F. G. Perspectives on antiviral use during pandemic influenza. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 356 (2001), 1877--1884.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Cost-effectiveness of workplace closure and travel restriction for mitigating influenza outbreaks: a network-based simulation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HealthGIS '13: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on the Use of GIS in Public Health
      November 2013
      91 pages
      ISBN:9781450325295
      DOI:10.1145/2535708
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. GIS
      2. agent-based simulation
      3. cost-effectiveness
      4. influenza
      5. mitigation strategies
      6. social network

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SIGSPATIAL'13
      Sponsor:

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media