Cited By
View all- Hai-Jew S(2023)What to Keep, What to DiscardHandbook of Research on Revisioning and Reconstructing Higher Education After Global Crises10.4018/978-1-6684-5934-8.ch015(305-318)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
Designing with templates in instructional design
Pages 17 - 22
Abstract
Instructional design lies at the interface of systems theory, theories of teaching and learning, technology, and design. These fields together pose epistemological challenges to instructional designers. In this report I examine one element widely used by instructional designers, specifically the template designed and widely distributed by the Commonwealth of Learning (COL). In analyzing how the template serves intended users (who are instructional designers), I find that efficiency and effectiveness rooted in scientific models of objectivity to effectively corral massive information into manageable yet accessible knowledge for specific needs while expedient can have its drawbacks. I argue that a key emphasis on thinking as an active transaction between an individual and the data to which that individual is exposed permeates not just information, but also Instructional Design. Formalized within that role is a system of reasoning used to generate solutions to problems and in fostering skills in acquiring concepts. And it is missing in a template application such as COL's.
References
[1]
R. Gagne. The Conditions of Learning and the Theory of Instruction. 4th ed. New York: CBS College Publishing, 1985.
[2]
P.L. Smith. and T. J. Ragan. Instructional Design. New York: Wiley, 1999.
[3]
W. Dick. and L. Cary. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Third Edition, Harper Collins, 1990.
[4]
R.A. Reiser. Instructional technology: A history. In R.M. Gagné. Instructional Technology: Foundations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987.
[5]
S. Dijkstra. Instructional design: international perspective. Theory, Research, and Models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
[6]
G. Rowland. What do instructional designers actually do? an initial investigation of expert practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 5, 2 65--86, 1992.
[7]
Molenda, M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement. 42,5 June 2003.
[8]
B. Persky and L.H. Golubchick. Early childhood education. Doctorate Association of New York Educators. American Federation of Teachers. Lanham, MD, University Press of America, 1991.
[9]
R. F. Mager. Preparing Instructional Objectives. California, David S. Lake Publishers, 1984.
[10]
V. Elliot. Developing Prescriptive Taxonomies for Distance Learning Instructional Design. Instructional Design: Concepts, Methodologies, tools and Applications. IGI Global. 270--287, 2011.
[11]
J.E. Kemp. Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Development. Belmont, CA, Fearon, 1971.
[12]
J.E. Kemp. Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Development. Belmont, CA, Fearon, 1971.
[13]
A. Brown and T.D. Green. The Essentials of Instructional Design: Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice. Pearson, Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2006.
[14]
A. Brown and T.D. Green. The Essentials of Instructional Design: Connecting Fundamental Principles with Process and Practice. Pearson, Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2006.
[15]
PL. Smith and T.J. Ragan. Instructional Design. New York: Wiley, 1999.
[16]
S. Thiagarajan. Rapid instructional design. http://www.thiagi.com/article-rid.htm, 2012.
[17]
N. M. Seel and S. Dijkstra. Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Mahwah, N.J. L. Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
[18]
N. M. Seel and S. Dijkstra. Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design: International Perspectives. Mahwah, N.J. L. Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
[19]
R. Gagne, J. Leslie, L. Briggs, and W. W. Wager Principles of Instructional Design. Fort Worth, TX, HBJ College Publishers, 1992.
[20]
R.E. Clark. Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development. 42, 2 21--29, 1994.
[21]
R. S. Perez and C. D. Emery. Designer thinking: how novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 8, 3 80--94, 1995.
[22]
V. Goel and P. Pirolli. The structure of design problem space. Cognitive Science. 16, 395--429, 1992.
[23]
D. S. Kaufer, and B.S. Butler. Rhetoric and the Arts of Design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.
[24]
G. L. Fröhlich. Experiences of working with the COL electronic Template: paper presented at the 5th Pan-Commonwealth conference on Open Learning. London: Commonwealth of Learning. 13--17 July, 2008.
[25]
P. L., Hardre X. Ge, and Thomas, M. K. 2006. An investigation of development toward instructional design expertise. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 19, 4 63--90.
[26]
S. Katz and V. Rhodes. Beyond ethical frames of technical relations: digital being in the workplace. In Digital Literacy for Technical Communication: 21st Century Theory and Practice, Rachel Spilka. London: Routledge, 230--256, 2010.
[27]
E. Tufte. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press, 1990.
[28]
L. Nakamura. Prospects for a materialist informatics: an interview with Donna Haraway. Electronic Book Review, 2003.
[29]
S. P. Consigny. Gorgias, Sophist and Artist. Columbia, S.C: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.
[30]
F. D. Walters. Gorgias as philosopher of being: epistemic foundationalism in sophistic thought. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 27.2, 143--55, 1994.
[31]
US Geological Survey. Instructional systems design process usgs.gov/humancapital/ecd/ecd_telisd.html
[32]
A. G. Hill. Wordsworth, Comenius, and the Meaning of Education. The Review of English Studies. New Series. 26, 103 301--312, 1975.
[33]
H. Dreyfus. How far is distance learning from education? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 21, 3 165--174, 2001.
[34]
B. Latour. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
[35]
G.W.F. Hegel. Hegel's aesthetics lectures on fine art. Trans. T.M. Knox. I. Oxford, Clarendon Press,1988.
[36]
R. D. Winfield.The challenge of architecture to Hegel's aesthetics. Ed. William Maker. Hegel and Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[37]
D. Buchanan. Design research and the new learning. In Researching Design: Designing Research. Ed. Jonathan M. Woodham. London: London Design Council, 2000.
[38]
R.Gagne, J. Leslie, L. Briggs, and W.W. Wager. Principles of Instructional Design (4th Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College Publishers, 1992.
[39]
R. S. Perez and C. D Emery. Designer thinking: how novices and experts think about instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 8, 3 80--95, 1995.
[40]
H.W. Levie and K. Dickie. The analysis and application of media. Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Ed. R. M. W. Travers. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
Index Terms
- Designing with templates in instructional design
Recommendations
Application of the SPOC Instructional Model Supported by E-Schoolbag Teaching System
ICDEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Distance Education and LearningThe innovation of teaching mode based on information technology specially embodies deep integration of information technology and education. The emergence of massive open online courses (MOOCs) not only changes the ecology of education, but also ...
Integrating gamification and instructional design to enhance usability of online learning
AbstractThe current study investigates the interaction of Gamification, and Instructional Design to enhance the Usability of e-Learning in higher education programs. The study also examines the mediating role of Instructional design. Data were collected ...
Personalizing the Interaction in a Web-based Educational Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE
In this paper we present an Adaptive Educational Hypermedia prototype, named INSPIRE. The approach employed in INSPIRE emphasizes the fact that learners perceive and process information in very different ways, and integrates ideas from theories of ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2012
386 pages
Copyright © 2012 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 03 October 2012
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
SIGDOC 2012
Sponsor:
SIGDOC 2012: The 30th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
October 3 - 5, 2012
Washington, Seattle, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 294Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)7
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Hai-Jew S(2023)What to Keep, What to DiscardHandbook of Research on Revisioning and Reconstructing Higher Education After Global Crises10.4018/978-1-6684-5934-8.ch015(305-318)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in