skip to main content
10.1145/2020408.2020563acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Classification of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using informative pattern features

Published: 21 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

The canonical technique for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, statistical parametric mapping, produces maps of brain locations that are more active during performance of a task than during a control condition. In recent years, there has been increasing awareness of the fact that there is information in the entire pattern of brain activation and not just in saliently active locations. Classifiers have been the tool of choice for capturing this information and used to make predictions ranging from what kind of object a subject is thinking about to what decision they will make. Such classifiers are usually trained on a selection of voxels from the 3D grid that makes up the activation pattern; often this means the best accuracy is obtained using few voxels, from all across the brain, and that different voxels will be chosen in different cross-validation folds, making the classifiers hard to interpret. The increasing commonality of datasets with tens to hundreds of classes makes this problem even more acute. In this paper we introduce a method for identifying informative subsets of adjacent voxels, corresponding to brain patches that distinguish subsets of classes. These patches can then be used to train classifiers for the distinctions they support and used as "pattern features" for a meta-classifier. We show that this method permits classification at a higher accuracy than that obtained with traditional voxel selection, and that the sets of voxels used are more reproducible across cross-validation folds than those identified with voxel selection, and lie in plausible brain locations.

References

[1]
C. Chang and C. Lin. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001.
[2]
K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, S. J. Kiebel, T. E. Nichols, and W. D. Penny. Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images. Academic Press, 2006.
[3]
S. J. Hanson, T. Matsuka, and J. V. Haxby. Combinatorial codes in ventral temporal lobe for object recognition: Haxby (2001) revisited: is there a "face" area? NeuroImage, 23(1):156--66, 2004.
[4]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
[5]
J. Haxby, M. Gobbini, M. Furey, A. Ishai, J. Schouten, and P. Pietrini. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293(5539):2425, 2001.
[6]
J. Haynes and G. Rees. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 7(7):523--34, 2006.
[7]
M. A. Just, V. L. Cherkassky, S. Aryal, and T. M. Mitchell. A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes. PloS one, 5(1):e8622, 2010.
[8]
K. N. Kay, T. Naselaris, R. J. Prenger, and J. L. Gallant. Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature, 452(7185):352--5, 2008.
[9]
N. Kriegeskorte, R. Goebel, and P. Bandettini. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(10):3863, 2006.
[10]
T. M. Mitchell, R. Hutchinson, R. S. Niculescu, F. Pereira, X. Wang, M. Just, and S. Newman. Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images. Machine Learning, 57(1/2):145--175, Oct. 2004.
[11]
T. M. Mitchell, S. V. Shinkareva, A. Carlson, K. Chang, V. L. Malave, R. A. Mason, and M. A. Just. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science (New York, N.Y.), 320(5880):1191--5, 2008.
[12]
K. A. Norman, S. M. Polyn, G. J. Detre, and J. V. Haxby. Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(9):424--30, 2006.
[13]
F. Pereira and M. Botvinick. Information mapping with pattern classifiers: a comparative study. NeuroImage (to appear), 2010.
[14]
F. Pereira, T. M. Mitchell, and M. Botvinick. Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview. NeuroImage, 45(1 Suppl):S199--209, Mar. 2009.
[15]
J. Schafer and K. Strimmer. A shrinkage approach to large-scale covariance matrix estimation and implications for functional genomics. Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology, 4:Article32, Jan. 2005.
[16]
N. Tzourio-Mazoyer, B. Landeau, D. Papathanassiou, F. Crivello, O. Etard, N. Delcroix, B. Mazoyer, and M. Joliot. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage, 15(1):273--89, 2002.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Classification of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using informative pattern features

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2011
      1446 pages
      ISBN:9781450308137
      DOI:10.1145/2020408
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 21 August 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. classification
      2. clustering
      3. feature synthesis
      4. functional MRI
      5. neuroscience

      Qualifiers

      • Poster

      Conference

      KDD '11
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media