skip to main content
10.1145/1882362.1882393acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Advancing software architecture modeling for large scale heterogeneous systems

Published: 07 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we describe how incorporating technology-specific modeling at the architecture level can help reduce risks and produce better designs for large, heterogeneous software applications. We draw an analogy with established modeling approaches in scientific domains, using groundwater modeling as an example, to help illustrate gaps in current software architecture modeling approaches. We then describe the advances in modeling, analysis and tooling that are required to bring sophisticated modeling and development methods within reach of software architects.

References

[1]
Gorton, I., Liu, A., and Brebner, P. 2003. Rigorous Evaluation of COTS Middleware Technology. Computer 36, 3 (Mar. 2003), 50--55.
[2]
Woodside, M., Franks, G., and Petriu, D. C. 2007. The Future of Software Performance Engineering. In 2007 Future of Software Engineering (May 23-25, 2007). International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 171--187.
[3]
Douglas C. Schmidt, "Guest Editor's Introduction: Model-Driven Engineering," Computer, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 25--31, Feb. 2006.
[4]
Zhang, J. and Cheng, B. H. 2006. Model-based development of dynamically adaptive software. In Proceedings of the 28th international Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE '06. ACM, New York, NY, 371--380.
[5]
Kramer, J. and Magee, J. 2007. Self-Managed Systems: an Architectural Challenge. In 2007 Future of Software Engineering (May 23-25, 2007). International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 259--268.
[6]
Wallnau, K. 2003. Volume III: A Technology for Predictable Assembly from Certifiable Components, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2003-TR-009, Software Engineering Institute.
[7]
Ommering,R., Linden, F., Kramer, J., Magee, J., "The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software," Computer, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 78--85, Mar. 2000.
[8]
Liu, Y., Fekete, A., and Gorton, I. 2005. Design-Level Performance Prediction of Component-Based Applications. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31, 11 (Nov. 2005), 928--941.
[9]
Dashofy, E. M., Hoek, A. V., and Taylor, R. N. 2001. A Highly-Extensible, XML-Based Architecture Description Language. In Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (August 28-31, 2001). WICSA. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 103.
[10]
Grundy, J., Cai, Y., and Liu, A. 2005. SoftArch/MTE: Generating Distributed System Test-Beds from High-Level Software Architecture Descriptions. Automated Software Engg. 12, 1 (Jan. 2005), 5--39.
[11]
Zhu, L., Bui, N.B., Liu, Y., Gorton, I., MDABench: Customized benchmark generation using MDA, Journal of Systems and Software, Volume 80, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 265--282, ISSN 0164-1212.
[12]
Becker, S., Koziolek, H., and Reussner, R. 2009. The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. J. Syst. Softw. 82, 1 (Jan. 2009), 3--22.
[13]
D. B. Petriu and M. Woodside, "A metamodel for generating performance models from uml designs," in 7th International Conference on Modelling Languages and Applications, Lisbon, Portugal, October 11-15, ser. LNCS, T. Baar, A. Strohmeier, A. Moreira, and S. J. Mellor, Eds. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2004, vol. 3273, pp. 41--53.
[14]
S. F. Wojtkiewicz, M. S. Eldred, R. V. Field, A. Urbina, J. R. Red-horse, Uncertainty Quantification In Large Computational Engineering Models, In Proceedings of the 42rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, number AIAA-2001-1455, 2001.
[15]
Taylor, R. N. and van der Hoek, A. 2007. Software Design and Architecture The once and future focus of software engineering. In 2007 Future of Software Engineering (May 23-25, 2007). International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 226--243.
[16]
Bošković, M. and Hasselbring, W. 2009. Model Driven Performance Measurement and Assessment with MoDePeMART. In Proceedings of the 12th international Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (Denver, CO, October 04-09, 2009). A. Schürr and B. Selic, Eds. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, vol. 5795. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 62--76.
[17]
Betty H. C. Cheng, Pete Sawyer, Nelly Bencomo and Jon Whittle, A Goal-Based Modeling Approach to Develop Requirements of an Adaptive System with Environmental Uncertainty, MODEL DRIVEN ENGINEERING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, Volume 5795/2009, 468--483.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research
November 2010
460 pages
ISBN:9781450304276
DOI:10.1145/1882362
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. dependability
  2. modeling
  3. software architecture

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGSOFT/FSE'10
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media