skip to main content
10.1145/1276958.1277096acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Particle swarm guided evolution strategy

Published: 07 July 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Evolution strategy (ES) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) are two of the most popular research topics for tackling real-parameter optimization problems in evolutionary computation. Both of them have strengths and weaknesses for their different search behaviors and methodologies. In ES, mutation, as the main operator, tries to find good solutions around each individual. While in PSO, particles are moving toward directions determined by certain global information, such as the global best particle. In order to leverage the specialties offered by both sides to our advantage, this paper combines the essential mechanism of ES and the key concept of PSO to develop a new hybrid optimization methodology, called particle swarm guided evolution strategy. We introduce swarm intelligence to the ES mutation framework to create a new mutation operator, called guided mutation, and integrate the guided mutation operator into ES. Numerical experiments are conducted on a set of benchmark functions, and the experimental results indicate that PSGES is a promising optimization methodology as well as an interesting research direction.

References

[1]
A. Auger and N. Hansen. Performance evaluation of an advanced local search evolutionary algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 1777--1784, 2005.
[2]
A. Auger and N. Hansen. A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 1769--1776, 2005.
[3]
P. J. Ballester, J. Stephenson, J. N. Carter, and K. Gallagher. Real-parameter optimization performance study on the CEC-2005 benchmark with SPC-PNX. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 498--505, 2005.
[4]
H. G. Beyer and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution strategies: A comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1(1):3--52, March 2002.
[5]
L. Costa. A Parameter-less Evolution Strategy for Global Optimization. PhD thesis, Escola de Engenharia, Universidade do Minho, 2005.
[6]
N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: The covariance matrix adaptation. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pages 312--317, 1996.
[7]
L. Hidebrand, B. Reusch, and M. Fathi. Directed mutation---a new self-adaptation for evolution strategies. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-99), pages 1550--1557, 1999.
[8]
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, pages 1942--1948, 1995.
[9]
J. Kennedy and R. C. Eberhart. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceeding of the Sixth International Symposium on Micromachine and Human Science, pages 39--43, 1995.
[10]
J. J. Liang and P. N. Suganthan. Dynamic multi-swarm particle swarm optimizer with local search. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 522--528, 2005.
[11]
V. Miranda and N. Fonseca. EPSO---best-of-two-worlds meta-heuristic applied to power systemproblems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2002), pages 1080--1085, 2002.
[12]
V. Miranda and N. Fonseca. New evolutionary particle swarm algorithm (EPSO) applied to voltage/var control. In Proceedings of the 14th Power Systems Computation Conference, 2002.
[13]
D. Molina, F. Herrera, and M. Lozano. Adaptive local search parameters for real-coded memetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 888--895, 2005.
[14]
K. Parsopoulos and M. Vrahatis. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization. Natural Computing, 1(2-3):235--306, June 2002.
[15]
P. Posik. Real parameter optimization using mutation step co-evolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 872--879, 2005.
[16]
J. Ronkkonen, S. Kukkonen, and K. V. Price. Real-parameter optimization with differential evolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 506--513, 2005.
[17]
G. Rudolph. On correlated mutations in evolution strategies. In R. Männer and B. Manderick, editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2 (Proceedings of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature), pages 105--114, Amsterdam, 1992. Elsevier.
[18]
H.-P. Schwefel. Numerische Optimierung von Computer-Modellen mittels der Evolutionsstrategie, volume 26 of Interdisciplinary Systems Research. Birkhaeuser, Basle/Switzerland, 1977. ISBN: 3-764-30876-1.
[19]
A. Sinha, S. Tiwari, and K. Deb. A population-based, steady-state procedure for real-parameter optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 514--521, 2005.
[20]
P. N. Suganthan, N. Hansen, J. J. Liang, K. Deb, Y.-p. Chen, A. Auger, and S. Tiwari. Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC-2005: Special session on real-parameter optimization. KanGAL Report #2005005, IIT Kanpur, India, 2005.
[21]
B. Yuan and M. Gallagher. Experimental results for the special session on real-parameter optimization at CEC 2005: A simple, continuous EDA. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2005), pages 1792--1799, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '07: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
July 2007
2313 pages
ISBN:9781595936974
DOI:10.1145/1276958
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 July 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. PSGES
  2. evolution strategy
  3. global search
  4. local search
  5. particle swarm optimization
  6. swarm intelligence

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

GECCO07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '07 Paper Acceptance Rate 266 of 577 submissions, 46%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media