skip to main content
10.1145/1088622.1088641acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Collaborative knowledge capture in ontologies

Published: 02 October 2005 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes a new environment, COE, for capturing and formally representing expert knowledge for use in the Semantic Web. COE exploits the ease of use and rapid knowledge construction capabilities of the CmapTools concept mapping system and extends them to support the import and export of formal, machine-interpretable knowledge representations, such as OWL, across multiple ontologies. Pragati's ExpozT tool suite complements COE's ontology construction, browsing and navigation features by providing cluster-based search capabilities that expose existing reusable concepts relevant to the user's focus of attention.

References

[1]
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5):34--43.
[2]
Briggs, G., Shamma, D., Cañas, A. J., Carff, R., Scargle, J., and Novak, J. D. 2004. Concept maps applied to Mars exploration public outreach. In Proc. First Intl. Conf. on Concept Mapping, Volume 1, pp. 109--116, U. of Navarra.
[3]
Cañas, A. J.; Hill, G.; Carff, R.; Suri, N.; Lott, J.; Eskridge, T.; G=mez, G.; Arroyo, M.; and Carvajal, R. 2004. CmapTools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In Proc. First Intl. Conf. on Concept Mapping, Volume 1, pp. 125--133, U. of Navarra.
[4]
Clark, P., Thompson, J., Barker, K., Porter, B., Chaudhri, V., Rodriguez, A., Thomere, J., Mishra, S., Gil, Y., Hayes, P., and Reichherzer, T. Knowledge entry as the graphical assembly of components. 2001. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Capture, pp. 22--29. ACM Press.
[5]
Coffey, J. W. 1999. Institutional memory preservation at NASA Glenn Research Center. Unpublished technical report, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
[6]
Coffey, J.W., Eskridge, T.C., Sanchez, D.P. (2004). A case study in knowledge elicitation for institutional memory preservation using concept maps. In Proc. First Intl. Conf. on Concept Mapping, Volume 1, pp. 151--157, U. of Navarra.
[7]
Davies, J., Duke, A., and Sure, Y. 2003. OntoShare: a knowledge management environment for virtual communities of practice. In Proc. Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Capture, pages 20--27. ACM Press.
[8]
Ernst, N. A., Storey, M.-A. 2003. A Preliminary Analysis of Visualization Requirements in Knowledge Engineering Tools, Unpublished Technical Report, University of Victoria, Canada. http://www.neilernst.net/docs/pubs/ernst-survey.pdf
[9]
ezOWL: Visual OWL Editor Plugin for Protégé. Web page http://iweb.etri.re.kr/ezowl/.
[10]
Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., and Rice, J. 1997. The Ontolingua server: A tool for collaborative ontology construction. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies, 46(6):707--727.
[11]
Ford, K.M. & Adams-Webber, J.R. 1991. Knowledge acquisition and constructivist epistemology. In R.R. Hoffman (Ed.), The Psychology of Expertise: Cognitive Research and Empirical AI. pp. 121--136. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[12]
Gennari, J., Musen, M. A., Fergerson, R. W., Grosso, W. E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N. F., Tu, S. W. 2002. The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development. International J. of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 1, 89--123.
[13]
Hoffman, R. R., Coffey, J. W., Ford, K. M., and Carnot, M. J. (2001). Storm-LK: A human-centered knowledge model for weather forecasting. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
[14]
Hoffman, R. R., Shadbolt, N, Burton, A. M., & Klein, G. A. 1995. Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2) 129--158.
[15]
Hoffman, R. R., & Woods, D. D. 2000. Studying cognitive systems in context. Human Factors, 42, 1--7.
[16]
McGuinness, D., and Harmelen, F. 2004 OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
[17]
Mehrotra, M. and Wild, C. 1994. Analyzing Knowledge-based Systems Using Multi-ViewPoint Clustering Analysis. J. of Systems and Software, 29, 235--249.
[18]
Mehrotra, M. 2002. Ontology Analysis for the Semantic Web. In AAAI-02 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web. AAAI Press.
[19]
Mehrotra, M. and Bobrovnikoff, D. 2002. Multi-ViewPoint Clustering Analysis Tool. In Proc. Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp 1006--1007. AAAI Press.
[20]
Novak, J. and Gowin, D. B. 1984. Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Noy, N. F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubezy, M., Fergerson, R. W., and Musen, M. A. 2001. Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protege-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2):60--71.
[22]
Patel-Schneider, P. F., Hayes, P, Horrocks, I. 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantic/.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
K-CAP '05: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture
October 2005
234 pages
ISBN:1595931635
DOI:10.1145/1088622
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 October 2005

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. concept maps/diagrams
  2. information retrieval
  3. knowledge management
  4. ontologies

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

K-Cap05
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 198 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media