Spoken Injustice

https://lnkd.in/e3CPp3wJ Criminal responsibility requires control over your actions and the ability to change them until the last moment. In Joint Enterprise cases, those in a secondary role often lack this control, making it hard for them to alter the outcome. Check out our full-length video where we unpack the complexities of Joint Enterprise.

https://lnkd.in/eSRsmkDA The debate on Joint Enterprise highlights the challenge of balancing justice with fairness in the Criminal Justice System. This video explores the concept, its case-law evolution, and ongoing arguments despite the landmark Jogee ruling. The discussion highlights why the debate persists.

https://lnkd.in/dgbNhpYd Paragraph 113 of the Court of Appeal's judgement in Mr Moore’s case reflects the challenging situation that many potential appellants face. Even if they are innocent, they are often unable to pursue an appeal because the process typically requires showing that a legal error occurred during the trial, rather than just proving their innocence.

https://lnkd.in/ejwapxDB Join us for the second part of our two-part series, where we delve into the case of Jason Moore and examine whether the CCRC is truly the organisation that victims of miscarriages of justice need.

https://lnkd.in/esdGx999 Given our discussion, could we argue that the Jeremy Bamber case is another instance where the CCRC may have fallen short in fearlessly asking the right questions, thoroughly analysing new evidence and submissions, and, most crucially, correctly identifying cases that should be referred to the Court of Appeal? Share your thoughts in the comments below 👇🏻

https://lnkd.in/eMykmpy4 Join us for the first part of a two-part series as we delve into the Jeremy Bamber case and examine the role of the CCRC. Could the delay in referring this case be withholding justice from a deserving cause?

https://lnkd.in/eSeKQt-i In this first of a two-part series we explore whether the cases of Jeremy Bamber and Jason Moore might be further examples of the CCRC’s "superficial" and "insufficiently curious" approach, highlighted by Mr. Henley KC in the case of Mr. Malkinson.

https://lnkd.in/eWcMaqW7 This is an extract from our News Session for this month, in which we celebrated the Power of Open Justice and Public Debate. Though questioning the evidence presented at trial may seem insensitive from a victim's perspective, it is integral to the Open Justice principle because it promotes transparency, accountability, and fairness within the legal system. These discussions are necessary as they help protect individual rights, improve legal standards, and maintain public confidence in the administration of justice..

https://lnkd.in/euKuDwiH The MOJ has decided that the policy introduced by former Lord Chancellor Alex Chalk, which stops deducting saved living expenses from Miscarriage of Justice Compensation payments, will not be applied retroactively. Michael O'Brien and others who had these deductions from past compensation find this decision discriminatory and unfair.

https://lnkd.in/erArYEwm Our News Sessions out now: updates on Libor Tom Hayes' ongoing quest for justice, on Michael O'Brien, who has once again fallen victim to an injustice, and on Lucy Letby, highlighting an opportunity to celebrate Open Justice and public debate. Finally, we caught up with the Post Office IT Inquiry. Join us!