the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Brief communication: Rapid acceleration of the Brunt Ice Shelf after calving of iceberg A-81
Oliver J. Marsh
Adrian J. Luckman
Dominic A. Hodgson
The Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, accelerated rapidly from a velocity of 900 to 1500 m a−1 during 6 months, following calving of a 1500 km2 iceberg on 22 January 2023. The immediate response to calving was observed as a change to the rate of acceleration and not to velocity directly. Acceleration increased by a factor of 10, with a second, smaller calving at the end of June 2023, leading to further tripling of acceleration. The acceleration was caused by the reduction of buttressing at the McDonald Ice Rumples, leading to high localised strain rates, which reduce the strength of the remaining ice shelf.
- Article
(3895 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(7205 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
The Brunt Ice Shelf is the westernmost of the ice shelves which line the coast of East Antarctica. It has a 60-year record of glaciological observations, which show velocities ranging from 400 to 800 m a−1 (Gudmundsson et al., 2017). Historical variability in velocity is inferred to be primarily controlled by the coupling between the ice shelf and the sea floor at a pinning point known as the McDonald Ice Rumples (MIR) (Thomas, 1973; Hodgson et al., 2019) and to follow a cyclical pattern (De Rydt et al., 2019). Through the late 1990s and early 2000s, a strengthening of the contact between the bed and sea floor led to reduction in the ice velocity across the ice shelf and increased stress in the vicinity of the MIR. Since 2013, crevassing has increased around the MIR, weakening the ice shelf in this area, and several new rifts have formed or re-activated including Chasm-1, Halloween Crack, and North Rift (Fig. 1b). The growth of these cracks culminated in the recent calving of two large icebergs – A-74 in February 2021 and A-81 in January 2023 (Francis et al., 2022; Morris et al., 2023).
Tabular calving has been observed to play a strong role in the speed-up of ice shelves (Joughin et al., 2021) or to have no impact, depending on the buttressing stresses attributed to the ice which calves (Fürst et al., 2016). Understanding the effects of calving on buttressing is critical in regions such as Thwaites Glacier, where models disagree on the potential magnitude of the impact to grounded ice (Wild et al., 2022; Gudmundsson et al., 2023) and therefore the contribution to sea level rise. Here we present the most recent GPS and satellite observations of the Brunt Ice Shelf since the A-81 iceberg calving and discuss the mechanisms responsible for the recent acceleration.
2.1 GPS
GPS velocity data are presented for 10 consecutive years (2013–2023) from three sites on the Brunt Ice Shelf within the vicinity of the current Halley VI Research Station site (Fig. 2). The GPS at site LL20 recorded from 2013–2017. GPS at ZZ6A recorded from 2017 onwards and was originally located approximately 5 km east of the final position of LL20 (Fig. 1d). Velocity differences between sites are less than 3 %, and no adjustment is made to account for advection of the GPS receivers. Data from both sites were recorded for 2 h each day at 30 s intervals, using a dual-frequency Leica GS10, subsampled to 300 s intervals and processed into positions using Natural Resources Canada's Canadian Spatial Reference System Precise Point Positioning (CSRS–PPP) software. Velocities are then calculated from the gradient of a linear fit through polar stereographic x and y positions using a running fitting window of 14 d. The GPS at site ZMET was located approximately 500 m west of ZZ6A and recorded from 2022 onwards for 24 h each day at 1 s intervals. Data were subsampled and processed in the same way as for ZZ6A and LL20, although with a fitting window of 1 d to highlight short-term variability.
2.2 Feature tracking
Two-dimensional surface velocities (Fig. 3a, b) were derived by feature tracking between pairs of Sentinel-1A images separated by 12 d, using standard methods (e.g., Luckman et al., 2015) and the Gamma software package. Velocity maps were projected to the polar stereographic coordinate system (EPSG:3031) at a resolution of 100 m. Image pairs were chosen to maximise the spatial coverage of valid velocity measurements and to span the maximum duration since the calving of A-81. Magnitudes of first-principal strain rates (Fig. 3d, e) were computed on a 3 × 3 grid.
3.1 Velocity increase
From 2013 to 2023, ice velocity measured by GPS at the current site of Halley VI Research Station (ZZ6A) gradually increased from around 450 to 900 m a−1 at a uniform acceleration of 50 m a−2 over 10 years (Fig. 2a). Repositioning of the site during this period confirms that the increase is not due to advection of the site in a spatially varying reference (Gudmundsson et al., 2017). During this period, there was a shift from radial crevassing (resulting from buttressing) to chaotic shear damage around the McDonald Ice Rumples (Fig. 1e–f). Chasm-1 (Fig. 1b) propagated towards the MIR (De Rydt et al., 2018); Halloween Crack (Fig. 1b) formed and then rapidly widened (Morris et al., 2023). GPS data throughout this period show a tidal variation in velocity of the ice shelf of around ±10 % over a fortnightly period, synchronous with the MSf tide (with velocity peaks during spring tide). Large semi-diurnal variations in flow have previously been observed on the Brunt Ice Shelf (Doake et al., 2002), and the tidally driven mechanism that results in non-linear fortnightly behaviour has been observed elsewhere in the Weddell Sea (Gudmundsson, 2006; Rosier and Gudmundsson, 2020).
The calving of A-74 in February 2021 did not lead to a substantial change in velocity at ZZ6A (Fig. 2a), as the North Rift (Fig. 1b) did not interact with the grounded parts of the ice shelf to the south of the MIR. In contrast, there was a distinct change in dynamics following the calving of A-81, with the rate of acceleration increasing by an order of magnitude (Fig. 2). The immediate direct velocity change is only a few percent, but after accounting for the periodic tidal behaviour, there is an apparent immediate shift from a constant rate of acceleration of 50 m a−2 before calving to a higher constant rate of acceleration of 500 m a−2 after calving, rather than a gradual increase in rate. A second step change in acceleration occurred at the end of June 2023, following the loss of a smaller 0.25 km2 iceberg from the south side of the McDonald Ice Rumples (Figs. 2b; 1h–i). Since this latest calving, GPS data from Halley VI Research Station (ZMET) show velocities at spring tide reaching 1500 m a−1 in August 2023, almost double the maximum velocities observed over the previous 60 years (Gudmundsson et al., 2017). Velocities derived from feature tracking between pairs of Sentinel-1 SAR (synthetic-aperture radar) images (Fig. 3) confirm the large increases in velocity within a short period following these calving events and show a particularly large increase in the south and southwest close to the grounding line.
3.2 High strain rate in the south
Following the calving of A-81 in January, a new area of high strain rate has developed in the south of the ice shelf near the grounding line (Fig. 3d–e). The Brunt Ice Shelf is composed of icebergs which calve off the continent via a series of small outlet glaciers and are then cemented together with sea ice and snow to form the ice shelf (King et al., 2018). The overall thickness of the incorporated icebergs is between 150 and 200 m, while the interstitial areas are metres to tens of metres thick. High velocities create large spaces between the icebergs, increasing the proportion of sea ice in the shelf and reducing the overall thickness. These thin regions have a lower resistance to tensile stress and are likely to make the ice shelf more vulnerable to the external forcings that can trigger multi-year sea ice break-up, such as swell, waves, and seasonal warming (Ochwat et al., 2023). Regions of elevated strain rates have previously been observed close to the continental grounding line (De Rydt et al., 2018), with evidence of gradual consolidation over time due to snow accumulation (King et al., 2018). Since the calving of A-81, the extent and rate of opening of these areas have increased substantially, and a new rift-type feature has begun propagating to the east (Fig. 3d–e)
3.3 Buttressing at the McDonald Bank
The long-term viability of the Brunt Ice Shelf is linked to the presence of topographic highs on the McDonald Bank, which form pinning points that buttress the ice shelf and restrict its velocity. Studies of the submarine geomorphology of the McDonald Bank show that a series of former pinning points have been progressively abandoned as the ice shelf has thinned and retreated towards the continent (Hodgson et al., 2019). Ice flow diversion around these pinning points has displaced high volumes of deformable sediment downstream, forming wedge-shaped ramps at different depths and reflecting historical changes in ice shelf draft (Arndt et al., 2020). The calving of A-81 has reduced the total area of contact between incorporated iceberg keels at the base of the Brunt Ice Shelf, the topographic high at the McDonald Ice Rumples, and the deformable sediment wedges downstream (the location of which can be inferred from observations of grounded icebergs, such as the three seen in Fig. 1g–i). If the ice shelf maintains its August 2023 velocity, then it will reach the location of these grounded icebergs around the end of 2024 and may also re-ground.
The rapid acceleration of the Brunt Ice Shelf following calving represents a departure from the typical behaviour observed for this ice shelf over the last 60 years. Velocities of this magnitude are usually only measured on the ice shelves fed by exceptionally fast-flowing outlet glaciers such as Thwaites, Pine Island, and Denman glaciers (Miles et al., 2021; Thompson et al., 2023). The Brunt Ice Shelf does not have a fast-flowing outlet glacier feeding it, and under high velocities, it is not fully replenished by ice from the continental interior. Acceleration therefore results in the thinning of the ice shelf immediately downstream of the grounding line, and we observe new areas of concentrated high strain rates in this area, making the remaining ice shelf more vulnerable to external forcing. The magnitude and pattern of the observed acceleration does not match behaviour previously modelled for Chasm-1 growth or the removal of buttressing (De Rydt et al., 2019; Gudmundsson et al., 2017), where models currently fail to capture the heterogenous ice properties at small length scales that can account for high spatial variability in strain rates. The future stability of the ice shelf now depends on when, and if, the iceberg keels incorporated within the ice shelf are able to re-establish contact with the bed at the McDonald Bank.
Here we present the latest data on the flow and dynamics of the Brunt Ice Shelf, showing a substantial response in acceleration to a large tabular iceberg calving event. The Brunt Ice Shelf is unusual in its composition, but the observations presented show that large calving events which disrupt buttressing at key pinning points can substantially and immediately impact ice flow. The speed of response to calving shown here, and the sharp transition to a higher rate of acceleration, rather than just a new higher velocity, highlights a potential for discrete events such as the sudden removal of buttressing to initiate a self-reinforcing response in the ice shelf flow. This behaviour is important for understanding the vulnerability of other ice shelves, where fractures interact with grounded margins or pinning points (e.g., Benn et al., 2022).
GPS data used in the article are available through the UK Polar Data Centre (https://doi.org/10.5285/76dec018-3ea8-4ecc-9b53-5dd915daf214, Marsh, 2023). Sentinel-1 data are available through the ESA Science Hub.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-705-2024-supplement.
OJM and AJL performed the analysis of GPS and Sentinel-1 data, respectively. DAH conceived the study. OJM prepared the paper, with contributions from all authors.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
We thank Dana Floricioiu and DLR for providing TerraSAR-X imagery under project HYD2997. Sentinel-1 data were provided by the Copernicus Programme of the European Commission. We thank British Antarctic Survey engineers, field guides, and glaciologists for maintaining GPS instruments on the Brunt Ice Shelf. We thank two reviewers and the editor for comments that improved the paper.
This research has been supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant nos. NE/T008016/1 and NE/X014991/1).
This paper was edited by Reinhard Drews and reviewed by Jan De Rydt and Chad Greene.
Arndt, J. E., Larter, R. D., Hillenbrand, C.-D., Sørli, S. H., Forwick, M., Smith, J. A., and Wacker, L.: Past ice sheet–seabed interactions in the northeastern Weddell Sea embayment, Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 14, 2115–2135, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-2115-2020, 2020.
Benn, D. I., Luckman, A., Åström, J. A., Crawford, A. J., Cornford, S. L., Bevan, S. L., Zwinger, T., Gladstone, R., Alley, K., Pettit, E., and Bassis, J.: Rapid fragmentation of Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf, The Cryosphere, 16, 2545–2564, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2545-2022, 2022.
De Rydt, J., Gudmundsson, G. H., Nagler, T., Wuite, J., and King, E. C.: Recent rift formation and impact on the structural integrity of the Brunt Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 12, 505–520, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-505-2018, 2018.
De Rydt, J., Gudmundsson, G. H., Nagler, T., and Wuite, J.: Calving cycle of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, driven by changes in ice shelf geometry, The Cryosphere, 13, 2771–2787, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2771-2019, 2019.
Doake, C. S. M., Corr, H. F. J., Nicholls, K. W., Gaffikin, A., Jenkins, A., Bertiger, W. I., and King, M. A., Tide-induced lateral movement of Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 67-1–67-4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014606, 2002.
Francis, D., Fonseca, R., Mattingly, K. S., Marsh, O. J., Lhermitte, S., and Cherif, C., Atmospheric triggers of the Brunt Ice Shelf calving in February 2021, J. Geophys, Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD036424, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD036424, 2022.
Fürst, J., Durand, G., Gillet-Chaulet, F., Tavard, L., Rankl, M., Braun, M., and Gagliardini, O.: The safety band of Antarctic ice shelves, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 479–482, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2912, 2016.
Gudmundsson, G. H.: Fortnightly variations in the flow velocity of Rutford Ice Stream, West Antarctica, Nature, 444, 1063–1064, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05430, 2006.
Gudmundsson, G. H., De Rydt, J., and Nagler, T.: Five decades of strong temporal variability in the flow of Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 63, 164–175, 2017.
Gudmundsson, G. H., Barnes, J. M., Goldberg, D. N., and Morlighem, M.: Limited impact of Thwaites Ice Shelf on future ice loss from Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL102880, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL102880, 2023.
Hodgson, D. A., Jordan, T. A., De Rydt, J., Fretwell, P. T., Seddon, S. A., Becker, D., Hogan, K. A., Smith, A. M., and Vaughan, D. G.: Past and future dynamics of the Brunt Ice Shelf from seabed bathymetry and ice shelf geometry, The Cryosphere, 13, 545–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-545-2019, 2019.
Joughin, I., Shapero, D., Smith, B., Dutrieux, P., and Barham, M.: Ice-shelf retreat drives recent Pine Island Glacier speedup, Sci. Advances, 7, eabg3080, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg3080, 2021.
King, E. C., De Rydt, J., and Gudmundsson, G. H.: The internal structure of the Brunt Ice Shelf from ice-penetrating radar analysis and implications for ice shelf fracture, The Cryosphere, 12, 3361–3372, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3361-2018, 2018.
Luckman, A., Benn, D. I., Cottier, F., Bevan, S., Nilsen, F., and Inall, M.: Calving rates at tidewater glaciers vary strongly with ocean temperature, Nat. Commun. 6, 8566, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9566, 2015.
Marsh, O.: GPS data from Brunt Ice Shelf close to the site of Halley VI Research Station from 2013 to August 2023 (Version 1.0), NERC EDS UK Polar Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/76dec018-3ea8-4ecc-9b53-5dd915daf214, 2023.
Miles, B. W. J., Jordan, J. R., Stokes, C. R., Jamieson, S. S. R., Gudmundsson, G. H., and Jenkins, A.: Recent acceleration of Denman Glacier (1972–2017), East Antarctica, driven by grounding line retreat and changes in ice tongue configuration, The Cryosphere, 15, 663–676, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-663-2021, 2021.
Morris, A., Lipovsky, B. P., Walker, C. C., and Marsh, O. J.: Measurement of Ice Shelf Rift Width with ICESat-2 Laser Altimetry: Automation, Validation, and the behavior of Halloween Crack, Brunt Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-63, in review, 2023.
Ochwat, N. E., Scambos, T. A., Banwell, A. F., Anderson, R. S., Maclennan, M. L., Picard, G., Shates, J. A., Marinsek, S., Margonari, L., Truffer, M., and Pettit, E. C.: Triggers of the 2022 Larsen B multi-year landfast sea ice break-out and initial glacier response, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-88, in review, 2023.
Rosier, S. H. R. and Gudmundsson, G. H.: Exploring mechanisms responsible for tidal modulation in flow of the Filchner–Ronne Ice Shelf, The Cryosphere, 14, 17–37, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-17-2020, 2020.
Thomas, R. H.: The dynamics of the Brunt Ice Shelf, Coats Land, Antarctica, Technical Report, The British Antarctic Survey, Scientific Report no. 79, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509207/ (last access: 6 February 2024), 1973.
Thompson, S. S., Kulessa, B., Luckman, A., Halpin, J. A., Greenbaum, J. S., Pelle, T., Habbal, F., Guo, J., Jong, L. M., Roberts, J. L., Sun, B., and Blankenship, D. D.: Glaciological history and structural evolution of the Shackleton Ice Shelf system, East Antarctica, over the past 60 years, The Cryosphere, 17, 157–174, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-157-2023, 2023.
Wild, C. T., Alley, K. E., Muto, A., Truffer, M., Scambos, T. A., and Pettit, E. C.: Weakening of the pinning point buttressing Thwaites Glacier, West Antarctica, The Cryosphere, 16, 397–417, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-397-2022, 2022.