Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Ben lupprian

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Addressing the discussion at the bottom of the page about non-admin closures etc. the consensus in the past seems to have been that administrators close requests for deletion, and I'm not sure we've ever had other users who have "powers to close RfD discussions". Maybe that's something worth discussion on simple talk? --Ferien (talk) 20:55, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ben lupprian

[change source]
Ben lupprian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

SHB2000 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not an encyclopedic article and makes no sense, and only source is Wikipedia which is not a reliable source. Probably a borderline for QD. SHB2000 (talk) 11:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

[change source]

 Pinging administrator:@Ferien Please start Deleting it, according to Consensus Thank you --🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: I'm happy for Sakura emad to be given the power to close RfD discussions. They seem to know what they are doing. Blissyu2 (talk) 04:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm happy for Sakura emad to receive "non-flattering flatter" from myself. Sakura emad is doing a good job. 89.8.157.11 (talk) 06:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I just note that Sakura emad seems to have a balanced view in RfD discussions, and doesn't automatically vote keep nor delete, and instead gives well-reasoned discussions, and I think that we would benefit from having them able to close discussions. I am not sure where to nominate this formally, so put it in here. Blissyu2 (talk) 06:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    You might want to contact any administrator's talk page, in the future. That way you don't have to waste the time of those who have come to the RfD about Ben lupprian. 89.8.163.6 (talk) 07:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It's already been done (above). I am not sakura. I am not going to reinvent the wheel. Blissyu2 (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello @Blissyu2 Thank you, it's very kind of you, i have more to learn ... However for Closing RFDs, yeah i even closed one of them ^_^; but they told me it's more preferable for administrators to Do the work, so in this case i will learn More 😊. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes I think I saw that. Also, apologies for calling you "they". I just didn't want to tread on any toes for getting the wrong gender pronouns. I know that Sakura is a Japanese female name but I wasn't sure if that meant that you were female. But anyway, for what it's worth, I am happy to recommend you to do closings. I note that some of these fall a bit behind and it looks like a lot of work, so they can probably do with some help and I can't think of anyone more suitable than you. Blissyu2 (talk) 00:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    89.8.157.11 🍀Thank you🍀, i have a lot more to learn, Your praises encouraged me, also helped my stress levels to cool down. Thank you 🌻 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 10:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    @Blissyu2 Closing RFDs Requires Deleting or Keeping, Deletion Action is a Part of Administrators right; it can't be done by other users i think, as for keep i am ok with it if i am allowed to, and about my gender; Don't worry i go with Female Pronounce. Thank you 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh sorry. I thought that I remembered there being non-administrator closures. I would probably support you being an administrator too, for what it's worth, though I don't know if I am allowed to participate in those discussions at this stage. Anyway, hopefully the backlog will be cleared up soon. I note there are a dozen or so that are overdue for closure. It probably doesn't matter too much though. There's only a couple where we aren't sure which way they will go. Most are pretty obvious. Blissyu2 (talk) 08:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    It can be done by non admins, but only in very few circumstances (such as if the deletion request is pure vandalism) SHB2000 (talk) 09:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.