Talk:Theresa May

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Eptalon in topic styles of address

Split out Cabinet

change

@TDKR Chicago 101: Hi. You've been doing a good job on this. Thanks.

I'm thinking the cabinet table needs to be split into its own article, not unlike en:Cabinet of the United Kingdom. What do you think? StevenJ81 (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

At the moment, this is the page people would look at. I would keep the Cabinet list for a week or two, then set it up as a stand-alone page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

styles of address

change

Not "Mrs Philip May", please. We don't use that archaic style in this country any more, and have not done so for at least forty years. In any event, we should only list formal changes unless the individual person has signalled a desire to be different. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since then the phrase "nasty party" has crept back in. What she meant at the time was perhaps that the Conservative party was seen as hostile towards people with disabilities, as well as other people who are vulnerable. Of course it is not, and no political party could afford to be. Address all political parties with respect. You cannot have a neutral encyclopaedia if you keep violating neutrality. Address all parties with respect, especially when an election is near. I could say the same about presidential elections in the U.S.A. We are not here to make personal remarks and take positions. Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
in what way can we refuse what we have, while keeping the basic info? Eptalon (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Theresa May" page.